1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Density Functional Theory Analysis of Baicalein and Reference Molecules
3.2. Pharmacokinetic and Toxicity Profiles
3.3. Prediction of Biological Targets for Baicalein
3.4. Gastric Cancer-Associated Targets
3.5. Protein-Protein Interaction Network Generation and Visualization
3.6. Gene Ontology and Pathway Enrichment Analysis for Baicalein Targets in Gastric Cancer
3.7. Differential Gene Expression Analysis Using GEPIA2
3.8. TIMER Analysis
3.9. Molecular Docking
3.10. Chemicals, Reagents, and Equipment
3.11. Cell Culture and Conditions
3.12. Standardized Baicalein Treatment and Exposure Conditions
3.13. Evaluation of Cell Viability
3.14. Colony Formation Assay
3.15. Morphological Analysis
3.16. Apoptosis Analysis
3.17. Cell Cycle Analysis
3.18. Western Blot Analysis
3.19. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
| Categories and Descriptors | Values |
|---|---|
| General properties | |
| Molecular formula | C15H10O5 |
| MW | 270.24 g/mol |
| Heavy atoms | 20 |
| Aromatic heavy atoms | 16 |
| Rotatable bonds | 1 |
| Polarity and surface | |
| HBA | 5 |
| HBD | 3 |
| TPSA | 90.9 Å2 |
| Lipophilicity | |
| Consensus Log P | 2.24 |
| Solubility | |
| ESOL Log S | -4.03 |
| ESOL class | Moderately soluble |
| Pharmacokinetics | |
| GI absorption | High |
| BBB permeability | No |
| P-gp substrate | No |
| Skin permeability (log Kp) | -5.7 cm/s |
| CYP interaction | |
| CYP1A2 inhibition | Yes |
| CYP2D6 inhibition | Yes |
| CYP3A4 inhibition | Yes |
| Drug-likeness | |
| Lipinski | 0 violations |
| Veber | 0 violations |
| Ghose | 0 violations |
| Egan | 0 violations |
| Muegge | 0 violations |
| Bioavailability score | 0.55 |
| Medicinal chemistry | |
| PAINS alerts | 1 |
| Brenk alerts | 1 |
| Synthetic accessibility | 3.02 |
| Toxicity predictions | |
| Hepatotoxicity | Inactive |
| Neurotoxicity | Inactive |
| Cardiotoxicity | Inactive |
| Immunotoxicity | Inactive |
| Cytotoxicity | Inactive |
| Clinical toxicity | Inactive |
a Abbreviations: MW, Molecular weight; BBB, blood-brain barrier; CYP, cytochrome P450; ESOL, estimated solubility; GI, gastrointestinal; HBA, hydrogen bond acceptors; HBD, hydrogen bond donors; PAINS, pan-assay interference compounds; P-gp, P-glycoprotein; TPSA, topological polar surface area.
4.1. Electronic Structure of Baicalein Using Density Functional Theory
A, Frontier molecular orbital (HOMO–LUMO) distribution of baicalein computed at the B3LYP/6 - 311G level showing HOMO and LUMO energies and energy gap. B, Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) surface showing electron-rich and electron-deficient regions. C, Optimized molecular geometry illustrating the structural conformation of baicalein.
| Parameter (Symbol) | Baicalein | COTI-2 | MK-2206 | Napabucasin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EHOMO | -5.736 eV | -5.39058 eV | -5.58759 eV | -9.54140 eV |
| ELUMO | -1.949 eV | -1.35594 eV | -1.66479 eV | -0.41008 eV |
| Energy gap (ΔE) | 3.787 eV | 4.03463 eV | 3.92279 eV | 9.13132 eV |
| Ionization potential (IE) | 5.736 eV | 5.39058 eV | 5.58759 eV | 9.54140 eV |
| Electron affinity (EA) | 1.949 eV | 1.35594 eV | 1.66479 eV | 0.41008 eV |
| Absolute electronegativity (χ) | 3.843 eV | 3.37326 eV | 3.62619 eV | 4.97574 eV |
| Global hardness (η) | 1.894 eV | 2.01732 eV | 1.96140 eV | 4.56566 eV |
| Global softness (S) | 0.528 eV-1 | 0.24785 eV-1 | 0.25492 eV-1 | 0.10951 eV-1 |
| Electrophilicity index (ω) | 3.898 eV | 2.82030 eV | 3.35190 eV | 2.71132 eV |
| Dipole moment (μ), Debye | 2.770 | 4.1830 | 2.7935 | 3.9406 |
| Quadrupole moment (Qxx), Debye·Å | -83.741 | -146.9609 | -198.9903 | -88.3317 |
| Quadrupole moment (Qyy), Debye·Å | -115.864 | -151.9740 | -168.4742 | -118.6259 |
| Quadrupole moment (Qzz), Debye·Å | -115.962 | -151.8943 | -173.2419 | -106.7533 |
| Quadrupole moment (Qxy), Debye·Å | -1.614 | 18.7538 | 9.4641 | -6.3744 |
| Quadrupole moment (Qxz), Debye·Å | -0.0004 | 12.9660 | 4.2915 | 9.3158 |
| Quadrupole moment (t/↓), Debye·Å | -0.0002 | -14.2534 | 2.2165 | 2.4187 |
a Abbreviations: HOMO, highest occupied molecular orbital; LUMO, lowest unoccupied molecular orbital.
HOMO–LUMO distribution and energy gap analysis of the studied baicalein-based systems. A–C, Frontier molecular orbital maps illustrating the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) distributions for three optimized molecular systems. The corresponding HOMO–LUMO energy gaps were calculated as 4.03463 eV, 3.92279 eV, and 9.3132 eV, respectively. The observed orbital localization and variation in energy gaps provide insight into the electronic stability, charge-transfer behavior, and relative chemical reactivity of the investigated structures.
A, Total density of states (TDOS) profile showing electronic energy distribution. B, BOILED-Egg plot predicting gastrointestinal absorption and blood–brain barrier permeability. C, Bioavailability radar illustrating key physicochemical properties. D, Venn diagram showing overlap between baicalein targets and gastric cancer-associated genes.
4.3. Predicted Pharmacokinetics and Toxicity of Baicalein
4.4. Target Screening for Baicalein and Gastric Cancer
4.5. Construction of the Protein-Protein Interaction Network Using STRING and Cytoscape
| Degree Rank | Degree Gene | Degree Score | MCC Rank | MCC Gene | MCC Score | MNC Rank | MNC Gene | MNC Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | TP53 | 50 | 1 | JUN | 10420 | 1 | TP53 | 48 |
| 2 | AKT1 | 35 | 2 | TP53 | 9578 | 2 | AKT1 | 33 |
| 3 | STAT3 | 33 | 3 | AKT1 | 8920 | 3 | STAT3 | 32 |
| 4 | SRC | 31 | 4 | MAPK1 | 7888 | 4 | SRC | 31 |
| 5 | CTNNB1 | 30 | 5 | STAT3 | 6715 | 5 | CTNNB1 | 30 |
| 6 | JUN | 27 | 6 | ESR1 | 5639 | 6 | JUN | 27 |
| 7 | ESR1 | 25 | 7 | SRC | 5588 | 7 | MAPK1 | 25 |
| 7 | MAPK1 | 25 | 8 | HIF1A | 4763 | 8 | ESR1 | 24 |
| 7 | GRB2 | 25 | 9 | MAPK3 | 4240 | 8 | MAPK3 | 24 |
| 10 | MAPK3 | 24 | 10 | EGFR | 3945 | 8 | GRB2 | 24 |
a Abbreviations: MCC, maximal clique centrality; MNC, maximum neighborhood component.
A, Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of 181 common targets generated using STRING, exhibiting significant connectivity (641 edges; P < 1.0 × 10-16) and strong biological interdependence. B, Hub gene identification using cytoHubba algorithms highlighting TP53, AKT1, and STAT3 among the top ranked nodes. C, Subnetwork visualization of key hub genes emphasizing their central regulatory roles in gastric cancerassociated networks.
4.6. Gene Ontology and Pathway Enrichment for Baicalein Targets in Gastric Cancer
4.7. Baicalein-Target Protein-Signaling Pathway Network Construction
4.8. Differential Gene Expression of Mutant TP53, AKT1, and STAT3 in Gastric Cancer
A–C, Differential gene expression analysis (left panels) showing significant upregulation of TP53, AKT1, and STAT3 in gastric cancer tissues compared to normal controls, and corresponding Kaplan–Meier survival curves (right panels) indicating trends toward poorer prognosis with elevated expression, supporting their clinical relevance.
4.9. Influence of Mutant TP53, AKT1, and STAT3 on the Gastric Cancer Tumor Microenvironment
Correlation analysis between hub gene expression and immune cell infiltration demonstrating distinct immunomodulatory roles, with mutant-TP53 showing mixed associations, AKT1 exhibiting modest negative correlations, and STAT3 displaying strong positive correlations with multiple immune cell populations, indicating its prominent involvement in tumor microenvironment regulation.
4.10. Molecular Docking-Based Prediction and Relationship with Quantum Chemical Parameters
| CurPocket | Docking score | Volume (Å3) | Center (x, y, z) | Docking size (x, y, z) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baicalein-mutantTP53 | ||||
| C4 | -6.6 | 116 | -28, -4, -1 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C2 | -6.3 | 151 | -20, 9, 7 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C5 | -6.2 | 104 | -17, -19, 8 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C3 | -5.4 | 121 | -15, 1, 21 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C1 | -5.2 | 170 | -33, -8, 9 | 20, 20, 20 |
| Baicalein-AKT1 | ||||
| C1 | -9.7 | 6836 | 9, -13, -12 | 30, 35, 35 |
| C2 | -7.6 | 1777 | 25, -22, -24 | 20, 30, 28 |
| C4 | -6.6 | 297 | 12, 4, -31 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C5 | -6.5 | 191 | 2, 2, -4 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C3 | -5.9 | 501 | 5, -12, -33 | 20, 20, 20 |
| Baicalein-STAT3 | ||||
| C3 | -7.3 | 479 | 16, 11, 18 | 20, 20, 26 |
| C1 | -7.1 | 830 | 0, 25, 31 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C2 | -7.0 | 730 | 5, 32, 20 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C4 | -6.8 | 451 | -1, 9, 26 | 20, 20, 20 |
| C5 | -5.6 | 403 | -29, -28, 59 | 20, 20, 20 |
| Protein | Interaction Type | Residues |
|---|---|---|
| mutant TP53 | Conventional hydrogen bond/Pi-donor | TYR A:229 |
| mutant TP53 | Pi-anion/attractive charge | GLU A:224 |
| mutant TP53 | Unfavorable acceptor-acceptor | GLU A:198 |
| mutant TP53 | van der Waals | ASN A:200, GLU A:221, GLY A:199, THR A:230, THR A:231, TYR A:233 |
| AKT1 | Attractive charge/Pi-cation | TRP A:80 |
| AKT1 | Conventional hydrogen bond | SER A:205, THR A:211, THR A:291 |
| AKT1 | Pi-alkyl/Pi-stacked | LEU A:210 |
| AKT1 | Pi-anion | ASP A:292 |
| AKT1 | Pi-sigma | LEU A:264, LYS A:268, VAL A:270 |
| AKT1 | van der Waals | ALA A:212, ASN A:53, ILE A:290, LEU A:213, TYR A:272 |
| STAT3 | Conventional hydrogen bond | ASP A:369, GLU A:455, THR A:440 |
| STAT3 | Pi-sigma | ASP A:371, LEU A:438, VAL A:490 |
| STAT3 | van der Waals | HIS A:437, HIS A:457, LEU A:436, LYS A:370, LYS A:488 |
A, Molecular docking of baicalein with mutant-TP53 showing stable binding (−6.6 kcal/mol) via hydrogen bonding, π-interactions, and van der Waals contacts within functional pockets. B, Docking with AKT1 demonstrating the strongest binding affinity (−9.7 kcal/mol), supported by multiple hydrogen bonds and π-based interactions within the kinase domain. C, STAT3 interaction profile (−7.3 kcal/mol) indicating stable binding within the SH2 domain through hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions, collectively supporting a multitarget inhibitory mechanism.
4.11. Correlation Between Quantum Chemical Parameters and Baicalein Docking Affinity Against Critical Hub Genes
4.12. Cytotoxic Effects of Baicalein in SGC-7901 Cells
A, MTT assay demonstrating dose-dependent cytotoxicity of baicalein in SGC7901 cells with higher IC50 in normal GES-1 cells, indicating selective anticancer activity. B, Representative colony formation images showing progressive suppression of clonogenic potential. C, Quantitative analysis confirming dose-dependent inhibition of colony formation.
4.13. Morphological Changes in SGC-7901 Cells After Baicalein Treatment
A, Phase-contrast microscopy revealing dose-dependent apoptotic morphological changes, including cell shrinkage, detachment, and membrane blebbing. B, Flow cytometric FSC/SSC analysis indicating progressive reduction in cell size and complexity consistent with apoptosis. C, AO/EB staining confirming increased apoptotic populations with chromatin condensation, fragmentation, and late-stage apoptotic features.
4.14. Baicalein-Induced Apoptosis in SGC-7901 Cells
4.15. Baicalein-Induced G2/M Phase Arrest
A, Representative DNA-content histograms illustrating cell cycle distribution following baicalein treatment. B, Quantitative analysis demonstrating dose-dependent accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase with reduction in S-phase population, indicating cell cycle arrest and inhibition of proliferation.
4.16. Expression of Hub Genes in SGC-7901 Cells After Baicalein Treatment
A, Western blot analysis showing dose-dependent downregulation of mutantTP53, AKT1, and STAT3 protein expression in SGC-7901 cells following baicalein treatment. B, Densitometric quantification normalized to β-actin confirming suppression of key oncogenic signaling pathways, supporting the proposed molecular mechanism of anticancer activity.














