Liver cancer, a highly malignant tumor with a global prevalence, presents challenges in effective treatment due to its high metastasis, recurrence, and chemical resistance rate (
12). As a comprehensive approach to treating malignant tumors, TCMs offer advantages such as enhancing immunity, improving patient quality of life, and extending survival (
13). Although TCMs play a dynamic role in the clinical management of liver cancer, uncertainties persist in the medication patterns and mechanisms through which high-frequency drug combinations counteract liver cancer occurrence and development.
In this study, we systematically summarized prescription compositions and medication rules from prior research on the treatment of liver cancer using TCMs. After analyzing 107 prescriptions, 50 high-frequency TCMs were obtained, which were dominated by qi-invigorating herbs (such as
A. macrocephala koidz,
A. membranaceus,
L. lucidum) and heat-clearing herbs (such as
H. diffusa,
S. barbata,
C. appendiculata). These findings align with the Chinese medicine treatment of liver cancer, which focuses on strengthening the spleen, invigorating qi, and detoxifying and dispersing nodules (
14-
16). Both
A. macrocephala koidz and A
. membranaceus are vital for invigorating qi. The former tonifies spleen and stomach meridians (
17), while the latter nourishes spleen and lung meridians, invigorates qi, promotes fluid production, and nourishes blood (
18). These two herbs complement each other effectively. Furthermore,
S. barbata and
C. appendiculata are crucial heat-clearing drugs.
S. barbata has the effects of clearing heat and detoxifying, resolving blood stasis, and diuresis (
19).
Cremastra appendiculata belongs to the liver and spleen meridians, which has the effects of clearing heat, detoxifying, softening, and dispersing nodules (
20). The four drugs of
A. macrocephala koidz,
A. membranaceus,
S. barbata, and
C. appendiculata are not only a combination of invigorating qi and heat-clearing drugs but also the core components of many formulas, which are widely used in clinical practice for tumor treatment.
According to network pharmacology analysis, the construction of a "traditional Chinese medicine-active components-target-disease" network diagram identified five core active components. These components, primarily flavonoids and phytosterols, include quercetin, beta-sitosterol, kaempferol, stigmasterol, and luteolin. Flavonoids are known to be potential anticancer agents with an excellent safety profile (
21). Quercetin, a plant-derived polyphenol, exhibits diverse biological actions, such as anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antiviral effects (
22). It mainly inhibits liver cancer progression by regulating apoptosis, migration, invasion, cell cycle arrest, and autophagy (
23-
25). Therefore, a growing body of research demonstrating quercetin’s antitumor properties places it as a prospective anti-cancer agent, not only as a stand-alone therapy but also as a means of enhancing currently available therapeutic choices for advanced HCC. Abdu et al. (
26) confirmed that quercetin alone or in combination with sorafenib (the first approved drug for the treatment of advanced HCC and continuing to be the gold standard therapy for HCC) significantly inhibited HCC growth, induced cell cycle arrest, and induced apoptosis and necrosis. Similarly, luteolin exhibits various biological effects like anti-inflammatory, anti-allergic, and anti-cancer, capable of preventing and treating numerous cancer types (
27). Published reports indicate that kaempferol promoted cell apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner, inhibited HepG2 cell proliferation, and the inhibition rate increased with the increase in drug concentration and incubation time (
28). In recent years, mounting evidence supports the broad anti-carcinogenic effects of phytosterols. They’ve been linked to the mitigation of breast, prostate, lung, liver, stomach, and ovarian cancers. Kim et al. (
29) revealed that stigmasterol could induce apoptosis in HepG2 cells by up-regulating the expression of pro-apoptotic genes (Bax, p53) and down-regulating the anti-apoptotic genes (Bcl-2). These findings suggest quercetin, beta-sitosterol, kaempferol, stigmasterol, and luteolin may be good anti-carcinogenic components.
To further explore the binding activity between core components and core targets, and verify network pharmacology findings, molecular docking was performed. The results showed that quercetin had strong binding energy with JUN and FOS. As reported by Chen et al., quercetin could suppress TNF-α induced apoptosis and inflammation by blocking NF-κB and AP-1 signaling pathways (
30). Besides, Hsieh et al. (
31) revealed that quercetin inhibits TNF-α-induced cell migration by reducing MMP-9 expression via c-Fos and NF-κB pathways. To further verify the relationship between quercetin and the transcription factors c-Fos and c-Jun, in vitro experiments were performed. These results were consistent with network pharmacology prediction, indicating that quercetin induced apoptosis and inhibited migration of HepG2 cells by affecting c-Jun and c-Fos protein expressions. Moreover, docking results showed that quercetin exhibited comparable or even stronger binding affinities than sorafenib and lenvatinib across multiple targets, further supporting its potential as a promising anticancer compound.
Taken together, this study fully demonstrated the multi-component, multi-pathway, and multi-target characteristics of A. macrocephala koidz, A. membranaceus, S. barbata, and C. appendiculata in liver cancer treatment, providing a foundational basis for future clinical applications. Nonetheless, there are still some limitations. Firstly, the public online databases used are imperfect and constantly updated, so some active components of drugs and their target genes may not be included in the analysis. Secondly, although certain trends (such as changes in migration capacity and apoptosis rate) were observed in the in vitro experiments, some of the results did not reach statistical significance. Therefore, future studies should further validate these findings through in vivo experiments and optimize the experimental design to better evaluate the therapeutic effects of quercetin in liver cancer. Despite these limitations, this study provides powerful tools and preliminary data for further research on TCMs in liver cancer.