1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Phytochemical Identification and Screening
3.2. Target Identification
3.3. Protein-Protein Interaction Network Generation
3.4. Ontology and Pathway Analysis
3.5. Docking Analysis
3.6. Molecular Dynamics Simulation
3.7. Chemicals and Reagents
3.8. Cell Culture
3.9. Phytochemical Profile Using LC-MS
3.10. MTT Analysis
3.11. Clonogenic Analysis
3.12. Annexin V/PI Staining Analysis
3.13. Transwell Assay
3.14. Western Blotting
4. Results
4.1. Screening of Phytochemicals, Targets, and the Compound-Target Network
| Molecule Name | PubChem ID | Mol ID | MW | Hdon | AlogP | Hacc | Caco-2 | OB (%) | DL | BBB | FASA- | HL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta-sitosterol | 222284 | MOL000358 | 414.79 | 1 | 8.08 | 1 | 1.32 | 36.91 | 0.75 | 0.99 | 0.23 | 5.36 |
| L-beta,gamma-dimyristoyl-alpha-cephalin | 114944 | MOL008247 | 635.97 | 3 | 9.49 | 9 | -0.43 | 20.69 | 0.47 | -1.8 | 0.21 | - |
| Sitogluside | 5742590 | MOL000357 | 576.95 | 4 | 6.34 | 6 | -0.14 | 20.63 | 0.62 | -0.93 | 0.23 | - |
| Stigmasterol | 5280794 | MOL000449 | 412.77 | 1 | 7.64 | 1 | 1.44 | 43.83 | 0.76 | 1 | 0.22 | 5.57 |
4.2. Protein-Protein Interaction Network Construction and Analysis
(A) Venn diagram illustrating the intersection between 139 compound-related targets and 3866 HCC-associated targets, resulting in 123 common targets. This figure visually represents the rigorous filtering and integration process that underpins subsequent network analyses. (B) Protein-protein interaction networks generated via STRING and (C) visualized in Cytoscape. These panels display a network of 119 nodes interconnected by 520 edges, reflecting the complex interactions among common targets and setting the stage for hub gene identification. (D) Degree centrality analysis of the protein-protein interaction network, highlighting the top 10 hub genes, including STAT3, NFKB1, and TLR4. This figure emphasizes the pivotal roles of these nodes within the network, suggesting their critical involvement in the pharmacological mechanisms of the extract.
4.3. Functional Annotations
(A) Gene Ontology enrichment analysis depicting significantly enriched biological processes (eg, peptidyl phosphorylation and cellular response to peptide), cellular components, and molecular functions among the 123 common targets. This figure provides insight into the functional roles of these genes. (B) Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway enrichment analysis showing key signaling pathways, such as sphingolipid signaling, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance, and apoptosis, that are significantly associated with the common targets. This highlights potential molecular mechanisms by which A. sinensis exerts its effects.
4.4. Docking Validation for Hub Genes
4.5. Molecular Dynamics Simulation-Based Validation of Molecular Docking
Molecular dynamics stability and interaction analysis of the STAT3-stigmasterol complex. (A) Time evolution of Cα root mean square deviation and ligand-fit root mean square deviation over 100 ns, demonstrating system equilibration and stable ligand binding after approximately 20 ns. (B) Residue-wise root mean square fluctuation profile showing minimal fluctuations in binding-site residues, with higher flexibility restricted to distal loop regions. (C) Secondary structural element analysis indicating consistent α-helix and β-strand content throughout the simulation. (D) Protein-ligand interaction timeline highlighting dominant contacts, including water bridges, hydrophobic interactions, and hydrogen bonds with key residues.
Conformational and physicochemical stability of stigmasterol during molecular dynamics simulation. (A) Ligand torsion angle analysis depicting stable dihedral behavior with minor conformational adjustments. (B) Ligand property evaluation, including root mean square deviation, radius of gyration, solvent-accessible surface area, and polar surface area, confirming a compact and equilibrated ligand conformation within the STAT3 binding pocket.
4.6. Validation of Phytochemical Presence Using LC-MS
(A) Total ion chromatogram showing the separation and retention of key compounds, including sitoglucoside, α-cephalin, stigmasterol, and β-sitosterol, with stigmasterol eluting before β-sitosterol. The chromatogram also reveals multiple minor peaks corresponding to polar constituents, confirming the phytochemical diversity and analytical reliability of the extract. (B) MTT assay results showing a dose-dependent reduction in Hep-G2 cell viability, as reflected by decreasing viability with increasing concentrations of A. sinensis extract. (C) Representative culture plates from the clonogenic assay demonstrating dose-dependent inhibition of colony formation in Hep-G2 cells after treatment with the extract. (D) Quantitative analysis of colony formation, confirming significant reductions in colony numbers at higher extract concentrations, thereby indicating its antiproliferative effects.
4.7. Cytotoxic and Cell Colony-Inhibiting Effects of Angelica sinensis
4.8. Apoptotic Cytotoxicity Induced by Angelica sinensis
(A) Flow cytometry dot plots from Annexin V/PI staining revealing a dose-dependent increase in apoptotic cell populations in Hep-G2 cells treated with A. sinensis extract. (B) Bar graph quantifying apoptotic cell percentages, highlighting significant increases in both early and late apoptosis with higher extract doses. (C) Representative images from the Transwell migration assay showing diminished cell migration in Hep-G2 cells treated with escalating concentrations of the extract. (D) Quantitative analysis of the migration assay data, illustrating a significant dose-dependent decrease in the number of migrating cells, underscoring the antimetastatic potential of the extract.
4.9. Anti-Migration Effects of Angelica sinensis
4.10. Hub Gene Expression
(A) Western blots displaying the expression levels of STAT3, NFKB1, and TLR4 in Hep-G2 cells treated with various concentrations of A. sinensis extract. (B) Densitometric analysis of Western blot bands showing dose-dependent downregulation of STAT3, NFKB1, and TLR4, corroborating the modulatory effects of the extract on key signaling proteins.










