Sign in

Iranian Journal of Radiology

An Innovative Journal in the Field of Radiology

e-ISSN 2008-2711
p-ISSN 1735-1065
Authors GuideSubmit manuscript

Outline

https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48194

The Importance of Shimming in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Authors

Reza Jalli1, Mahdi Haghighatafshar2, Banafsheh Zeinali-Rafsanjani3,*
1Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
2Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran
3Medical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Medical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran, b.zeinali.r@gmail.com. Email: b.zeinali.r@gmail.com
Iranian Journal of Radiology:Vol. 14, issue Special Issue; e48194
Published online:Apr 12, 2017
Article type:Abstract
Received:Dec 20, 2016
Accepted:Feb 07, 2017
How to Cite:Jalli R, Haghighatafshar M, Zeinali-Rafsanjani B. The Importance of Shimming in Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. I J Radiol. 2017;14(Special Issue):e48194. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.48194

Abstract

Background:

Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is a well-known device for analyzing the biological fluids metabolically. Obtaining accurate and reliable information via MRS needs a homogeneous magnetic field in order to provide well-defined peaks and uniform water suppression. There are lots of reasons which can disturb the magnetic field homogeneity which can be corrected by a process known as shimming. This study is intended to recall the importance of shimming and also the significant role of quality control (QC) in achieving an accurate quantification.

Methods:

An acrylic cylindrical quality control phantom was designed as an analog of brain MRS test phantoms in order to control the accuracy of the obtained signal of a 1.5 T Siemens MRI system which belonged to one of Shiraz hospitals. The signal of NAA, Cho, Cr, the combination of these metabolites and also the distilled water, which was used in this study, was evaluated using separate phantoms. A QC test was performed using Siemens QC phantom and a standard test phantom.

Results:

The spectrum of our home- made phantom had a significant difference with the expected spectrum. The results of checking the spectrum of metabolites separately also confirmed that there was a systemic problem that affects all the signals originated from all metabolites and even the pure distilled water. The MRS system could not pass QC tests, and peak broadening was common in all spectra. The complex spectrum of standard test phantom was not produced successfully by the MRS system.

Conclusions:

By a simple check of the water peak characteristics, lots of information can be obtained, one of which is the status of shimming that has a considerable effect on the accuracy of the spectrum. Thus, performing an automatic or manual shimming is not a criterion of the spectrum accuracy, and performing a periodic quality control using a test phantom by a specialist is necessary. Briefly, the quality control of MRS and all the other clinical device must be taken seriously. Sometimes QC can be the boundary of a right or a wrong decision for the patient.

Highlights

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

Copyright

© 2017, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

28
Feb
2014

Development of a Low-Cost Phantom to Assess Absolute Quantification in Multi-Voxel MR Spectroscopy

Mohammad Ali Parto Dezfouli,
Mohsen Shojaie Moghadam,
Rasoul IrajiRad,
Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
PDF

Parto Dezfouli MA, Shojaie Moghadam M, IrajiRad R, Saligheh Rad H. Development of a Low-Cost Phantom to Assess Absolute Quantification in Multi-Voxel MR Spectroscopy. I J Radiol. 2014;11(30th Iranian Congress of Radiology):e21319. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21319

28
Feb
2014

Sparse Quantification of 1H-MRS Based on Metabolites Profiles in Time- Frequency Employing Pursuit Algorithm; A Phantom Study

Mohammad Ali Parto Dezfouli,
Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
PDF

Parto Dezfouli MA, Saligheh Rad H. Sparse Quantification of 1H-MRS Based on Metabolites Profiles in Time- Frequency Employing Pursuit Algorithm; A Phantom Study. I J Radiol. 2014;11(30th Iranian Congress of Radiology):e21320. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21320

28
Feb
2014

Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Neurological Disorders

Hajar Taheri,
Mohammad Ali Elahifar,
Amin Bighamian
PDF

Taheri H, Elahifar MA, Bighamian A. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Neurological Disorders. I J Radiol. 2014;11(30th Iranian Congress of Radiology):e21326. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21326

28
Feb
2014

Accurate Quantification of Metabolite Ratio in Osteosarcoma Employing Clinical Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3T; A Comparative Study With Normal Tissue

Shaghayegh Karimi Alavijeh,
Mohammadali Oghabian,
Hamidreza Saligheh Rad
PDF

Karimi Alavijeh S, Oghabian M, Saligheh Rad H. Accurate Quantification of Metabolite Ratio in Osteosarcoma Employing Clinical Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy at 3T; A Comparative Study With Normal Tissue. I J Radiol. 2014;11(30th Iranian Congress of Radiology):e21289. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.21289

20
Nov
2012
The Effects of Voxel Localization and Time of Echo on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cystic Brain Tumors in 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

The Effects of Voxel Localization and Time of Echo on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cystic Brain Tumors in 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

Alireza Rezvanizadeh,
Kavous Firouznia,
Mohammad Salehi-Sadaghiani,
Meisam Mohseni,
Dona Gharaei,
Hossein Ghanaati
,et al.
PDF

Rezvanizadeh A, Firouznia K, Salehi-Sadaghiani M, Mohseni M, Gharaei D, et al. The Effects of Voxel Localization and Time of Echo on the Diagnostic Accuracy of Cystic Brain Tumors in 3 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. I J Radiol. 2012;9(4):195-201. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.7510

More by these authors

Reza JalliPubMedScholar
Mahdi HaghighatafsharPubMedScholar
Banafsheh Zeinali-RafsanjaniPubMedScholar

Find related work

PubMed
Google Scholar
Create citation alert
Download PDF57.42 KB
Share
Cited by
Metrics
Comments
Number of Comments:0