IGM is a rare and benign chronic inflammatory breast disease (
12). Its etiology is not clear; however, local inflammatory response in the connective tissue due to the transition of the luminal secretions to the lobular breast stroma has been suggested as an etiological mechanism (
13). The clinical and radiological findings of IGM usually mimic those of breast carcinoma, and the initial diagnosis is often breast carcinoma (
14). Tissue sampling is still a commonly used method to differentiate these lesions (
5). As the severity of the inflammation and the lesion size increase in patients with IGM, so does the frequency of ulceration and erosion in the breast tissue (
9). Moreover, IGM manifests itself as different clinical and radiological findings in each patient (
12,
15-
17). In this study, we presented for the first time whether there are differences between radiological and clinical findings in fistular and non-fistular granulomatous mastitis.
Symptoms of IGM usually include a palpable mass and breast pain (
18). Other symptoms such as erythema, ulceration, and nipple involvement are more infrequently detected (
19). IGM more frequently presents as a unilateral breast mass; the involvement of both breasts is less common (
20). The majority of patients with IGM are found in the premenopausal period and have a breastfeeding history (
21). In our study, the most frequent symptom in IGM patients was a palpable mass and the second most common symptom was breast pain. Erythema, ulceration, and nipple changes were observed more often in IGM patients with fistulas, and most of the patients were in the premenopausal period.
Ultrasonography is the preferred imaging method for the evaluation of breast lesions. However, the ultrasound findings of IGM vary (
16,
22). In their study, Yildiz et al. and Aghajanzadeh et al. detected multiple irregular hypoechoic masses and collections with tubular connections and with fingerlike aspects as the most common ultrasound finding (
16,
17). Additionally, ultrasonography is useful for detecting fluid collections or abscess cavities, sinus tracts extending to the skin surface, and enlarged axiliary lymph nodes (
2,
5). In our study, the most common finding in all IGM patients was multiple irregularly shaped hypoechoic masses (44.2%). Collection areas with complicated cysts consistent with abscess, were the most common ultrasound finding in fistular IGM, and a statistically significant difference was noted between fistular and non-fistular IGM regarding ultrasound findings. However, similar results were noted in both groups in terms of enlarged axillary lymph nodes.
The mammography findings of IGM are nonspecific (
23). Because most of the patients were of reproductive age, mammography could not be applied to most of these patients, and the breast density of the patients who underwent mammography had decreased mammography sensitivity. In a study, Aghajanzadeh et al. identified an irregular focal mass as the most common mammography finding in 186 IGM patients (
16). In another study by Yilmaz et al. the most common mammography finding was focal asymmetry (
24). In our study, we performed mammography for only 20 patients, and the most common finding was focal asymmetry. However, there were no significant differences between the mammography findings in fistular and non-fistular IGM.
IGM has a wide range of MRI enhancement patterns such as intensively and strongly enhanced irregular masses, ring enhancement, regional or diffuse enhancement, and the formation of multiple abscesses with peripheral enhancement (
5,
24,
25). In previous studies, the most common enhancement patterns on MRI were a regional area of non-mass enhancement and abscess with regional enhancement (
15,
25,
26). In our study, the most common MRI enhancement pattern was non-mass lesions with regional heterogeneous enhancement. However, the most common MRI enhancement pattern in fistular IGM was non-mass lesions with regional clustering ring enhancement. Yet, statistically, the thickness of the skin and the volumes of lesions were significantly higher in fistular IGM than in non-fistular IGM.
This study had some limitations. The study design was retrospective and the sample size was relatively small. Moreover, inter- and intra-observer variability were not assessed in this study.
In conclusion, there were statistically significant differences between fistular and non-fistular IGM with respect to clinical and radiological findings. Imaging methods such as ultrasonography and MRI could be useful in identifying patients with a high risk of developing fistulas.