The current study evaluated the growth and nutritional status among 99 children with CP within the age range of 3 to 12 years, living in the Northwest Iran, and found inadequate calorie intake in 64.6% below the 5th percentile and over the 95th percentile of weight-for-age and height-for-age in 45.4%, 2%, 34.3%, and 8.1%, respectively. In the current study, most patients had low body-weight.
The results were inconsistent with those of the studies showed that lower weight was more frequent among children with CP, although obesity and overweight showed increase in such children (
19-
22). These differences could be due to poor or inadequate nutrition. The current study also observed that most children with CP had inadequate calorie intake. Similarly, it was reported that the calorie intake of children with CP was lower than that of the age-matched controls (
23,
24).
When a child cannot take essential nutrients due to difficulty in feeding, the scarcity of foodstuff, or when the needs of the child exceeds food intake due to an increase in the metabolic rate, the malnutrition occurs. It was suggested that feeding difficulties can interfere with the calorie intake required for the energy needs of children; thereby, it probably results in a decrease of the linear growth and a serious risk of malnutrition (
9,
19). Multiple etiologies such as motor disability, inadequate nutritional intake, and motor dysfunction were suggested as the factors causing malnutrition in children with CP (
6-
8). Inadequate nutrition may increase healthcare costs and limit functional mobility, particularly in children with severe motor impairments (
21,
25,
26). Nutrition is an important factor to manage children with CP; therefore, appropriate and early nutritional support and follow-up are necessary to ensure adequate growth, improved quality of life, and optimized functional status.
Previous results indicated that children with CP were at risk of malnutrition. Studies also reported that the severity of malnutrition and growth problems differed regarding the CP type (
27). Stallings et al., (
28) reported that children with hemiplegia or diplegia experienced a reduced linear growth and 30% of such children were also undernourished. In another study on children with spastic quadriplegia, the researchers also noted a reduction in linear growth and body weight (
29,
30). In addition, the calorie requirements were different for the various types of CP. For example, children with hypotonic and non-ambulatory CP did not require calories more than that to sustain the resting energy expenditure (
31); while children with athetoid CP had an increased demand for calories (
32,
33). Similarly, children with diplegic or hemiplegic CP required more calories to sustain their daily activities than the normal children (
33,
34).
The current study showed that the rate of inadequate calorie intake was higher in patients with quadriplegic and spastic CP, but the difference was not significant. The need for energy showed increase in the patients with spastic CP, compared with the ones with hypotonic type; since they had a significantly higher rate of inadequate calorie intake. Patients with the quadriplegic CP, compared with diplegic and hemiplegic types, had significantly lower normal weight percentiles, but no significant difference was observed between spastic and hypotonic CP types regarding weight or height percentiles.
According to the results of the current study, with increase in the plegic limbs, the lower weight and height increases; In an another study, (
34) also reported low values of height-to-age percentile in the individuals with tetraplegia. Other reports were also inconsistent with these findings (
19,
35,
36).
Studies also showed that decreased nutritional status in children with CP was related to decreased mobility (GMFCS) (
26). Brooks et al., (
16) reported that children in GMFCS levels I and II had significantly better weight than the ones in GMFCS levels III, IV, and V. Similarly, with the increased GMFCS levels, the rate of normal weight percentile significantly reduced. Although not significant, patients with GMFCS levels III, IV, and V more frequently take inadequate calories than the children with GMFCS levels I and II.
The study had some limitations; first, the large sample of patients for GMFCS II and II, which may affect the interpretation of the results regarding the GMFCS levels. The sample size was rather small; as the patients were just recruited from a tertiary care hospital. Evaluation of children with CP from different centers could increase the sample size and allow the generalization of results. It is also possible that family income affected the nutritional status of children; however, the study did not evaluate this variable in the population.
In conclusion, inadequate calorie intake and growth problems are common in children with CP and nutritional management should be arranged for undernourished children to improve their nutritional status, growth, and functional capacity.