EktaspeedThe effect of alterations in processing solution and exposure times on Dentus M2 and Ektaspeed intra-oral films

Author(s):
A MaramiA Marami,*, F GhotbiF Ghotbi
*Corresponding Author: Email: [email protected]

Journal of Inflammatory Diseases:Vol. 10, issue 2; 5-8
Published online:Sep 30, 2006
Article type:Research Article
How to Cite:Marami A, Ghotbi F. EktaspeedThe effect of alterations in processing solution and exposure times on Dentus M2 and Ektaspeed intra-oral films. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;10(2):e155224. doi:

Abstract

Background: The processing procedure influences the degree of density and contrast of the resulting radiograph. Objective: To determine the effect of changes in processing solution and exposure times on Dentus M2 and Ektaspeed intra-oral films. Methods: This was an analytical study in which 44 samples of each type of the films were used. The distance between the source and the film surface was 28 inches. The exposure was performed using 11 different times, vertically, with maximum voltage of 70 and 8 mA. Processing was carried out at days 1, 5, 10 and 15 using an automatic machine. Later, the density of each film was measured by Digital Density Meter. Data were analyzed by T-Test and paired T-Test. Finding: Longer exposure time caused an increase in density of both types of the films. The mean density of either type decreased through days 1 to 15. The mean density was 0.92±0.09 for Dentus M2 and 0.75±0.09 for Ektaspeed in all processing time. However, a significant difference was found between two groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: The Dentus M2 is recommended asboth result in a intra-oral film showed to have higher density with lower variability than the Ektaspeed film

Copyright

© 2024, Journal of Inflammatory Diseases. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which allows for the copying and redistribution of the material only for noncommercial purposes, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

31
Dec
2006

Compairing accuracy of Kodak Ektaspeed and Agfa Dentus M2 dental X-ray films in detection of caries

A Marami,
N Taghavi,
A Zareyosefi

Marami A, Taghavi N, Zareyosefi A. Compairing accuracy of Kodak Ektaspeed and Agfa Dentus M2 dental X-ray films in detection of caries. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;10(3):e155245. doi:

31
Mar
2014

Accuracy of linear tomography in comparison with computed tomography to assess bone quantity for dental implant treatment

M Tofangchiha,
mahdis Mohammadpour,
B Shojaei fard,
A Marami,
S Rahrotaban

Tofangchiha M, Mohammadpour M, Shojaei fard B, Marami A, Rahrotaban S. Accuracy of linear tomography in comparison with computed tomography to assess bone quantity for dental implant treatment. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;17(6):e155805. doi:

25
Mar
2012

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Radiography in the Detection of Non-Cavitated Approximal Dental Caries

Farida Abesi,
Alireza Mirshekar,
Ehsan Moudi,
Maryam Seyedmajidi,
Sina Haghanifar,
Nima Haghighat
,et al.

Abesi F, Mirshekar A, Moudi E, Seyedmajidi M, Haghanifar S, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Radiography in the Detection of Non-Cavitated Approximal Dental Caries. I J Radiol. 2012;9(1):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.6747

28
Dec
2015

Dosimetry of organ at risks in Orthopantomography

Mehravar Rafati,
Amir Eftekhari-Moghadam,
Ghazal Mehri-Kakavand,
Hadi Hasanzadeh,
Afsaneh Maftoon

Rafati M, Eftekhari-Moghadam A, Mehri-Kakavand G, Hasanzadeh H, Maftoon A. Dosimetry of organ at risks in Orthopantomography. koomesh. 2015;17(1):e150800. doi:

27
Dec
2016

Evaluating the Affect of Tube Current’s on Different Dental Material Artifacts in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Using Signal Difference to Noise Ratio Index

Yaser Safi,
Mahkameh Moshfeghi,
Zahra Vasegh,
Mohamad Mehdi Aghdasi,
Jahangir Haghani,
Mahmoud Afsahi

Safi Y, Moshfeghi M, Vasegh Z, Aghdasi MM, Haghani J, et al. Evaluating the Affect of Tube Current’s on Different Dental Material Artifacts in Cone Beam Computed Tomography Using Signal Difference to Noise Ratio Index. I J Radiol. 2017;14(2):e38620. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.38620

Download PDF116.82 KB
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC