Cover image of the article: Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Radiography in the Detection of Non-Cavitated Approximal Dental Caries

Image Credit:I J Radiol

Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Radiography in the Detection of Non-Cavitated Approximal Dental Caries

Authors

Farida Abesi1, Alireza Mirshekar1,*, Ehsan Moudi1, Maryam Seyedmajidi1, Sina Haghanifar1, Nima Haghighat2, Ali Bijani3
1Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Mirshekaralireza@ymail.com, Iran
2Student Research Committee of Babol University, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Mazandaran
3Non-Communicable Pediatric Disease Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Dental Materials Research Center, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Dental Faculty, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Mirshekaralireza@ymail.com, Iran. Tel: +98- 1112291408-9,. Fax: +98-1112291093. Email: Mirshekaralireza@ymail.com

Iranian Journal of Radiology:Vol. 9, issue 1; 17-21
Published online:Mar 25, 2012
Article type:Research Article
Received:May 21, 2011
Accepted:Feb 23, 2012
How to Cite:Abesi F, Mirshekar A, Moudi E, Seyedmajidi M, Haghanifar S, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Radiography in the Detection of Non-Cavitated Approximal Dental Caries. I J Radiol. 2012;9(1):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.6747

Abstract

Background:

Radiography plays an important role in the detection of interproximal caries.

Objectives:

The aim of the present study was to determine diagnostic accuracy of chargecoupled devices (CCD), Photo Stimulable Phosphor (PSP) and film radiography in detecting non-cavitated caries.

Patients and Methods:

Seventy-two non-cavitated approximal surfaces of extracted human posterior teeth were radiographed under standardized conditions using three intraoral modalities: CCD Dixi3 (Planmeca, Finland), PSP Digora PCT (Soredex, Finland), and E-speed film (Kodak, USA). Radiographs were interpreted by four observers and caries lesions were classified as sound (R0), restricted to enamel (R1), reaching the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ) and the outer half of the dentin (R2) and the inner half of the dentin (R3). The teeth were subsequently sectioned for histological analysis which served as the gold standard for radiographic examination.

Results:

Microscopic examinations showed that the distribution of caries were 63.9% sound, 18.1% enamel, 9.7% DEJ and outer half of the dentin and 8.3% into the inner half of the dentin. The sensitivity and specificity of film, CCD and PSP for the detection of enamel caries were 38% and 98%; 15% and 96 %; and 23% and 98%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of film, CCD and PSP for the detection of both dentin and enamel caries were 55% and 100%; 45% and 100% ; and 55% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusions:

The results demonstrated that the diagnostic accuracy of digital images is similar to that of conventional film radiography in the detection of non-cavitated approximal caries.

Highlights

Full Text

Full text is available in PDF

Copyright

© 2012, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

31
Dec
2006
Compairing accuracy of Kodak Ektaspeed and Agfa Dentus M2 dental X-ray films in detection of caries

Compairing accuracy of Kodak Ektaspeed and Agfa Dentus M2 dental X-ray films in detection of caries

A Marami,
N Taghavi,
A Zareyosefi

Marami A, Taghavi N, Zareyosefi A. Compairing accuracy of Kodak Ektaspeed and Agfa Dentus M2 dental X-ray films in detection of caries. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;10(3):e155245. doi:

5
Aug
2015
Designing of a Computer Software for Detection of Approximal Caries in Posterior Teeth

Designing of a Computer Software for Detection of Approximal Caries in Posterior Teeth

Solmaz Valizadeh,
Mostafa Goodini,
Sara Ehsani,
Hadis Mohseni,
Fateme Azimi,
Hooman Bakhshandeh

Valizadeh S, Goodini M, Ehsani S, Mohseni H, Azimi F, et al. Designing of a Computer Software for Detection of Approximal Caries in Posterior Teeth. I J Radiol. 2015;12(4):e16242. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.12(2)2015.16242

28
Jul
2009
Comparison of Digital and Conventional Radiography In Evaluating Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss

Comparison of Digital and Conventional Radiography In Evaluating Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss

Nafise ShamlouMahmoudi,
Yaser Safi,
Hossein Ansari,
Safoora Afshari

ShamlouMahmoudi N, Safi Y, Ansari H, Afshari S. Comparison of Digital and Conventional Radiography In Evaluating Horizontal Alveolar Bone Loss. Zahedan J Res Med Sci. 2009;11(2):e94407. doi:

29
Jan
2014
In Vitro Detection of Dental Root Fractures with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

In Vitro Detection of Dental Root Fractures with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

Erdogan Fisekcioglu,
Semanur Dolekoglu,
Mehmet Ilguy,
Nilufer Ersan,
Dilhan Ilguy

Fisekcioglu E, Dolekoglu S, Ilguy M, Ersan N, Ilguy D. In Vitro Detection of Dental Root Fractures with Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT). I J Radiol. 2014;11(1):11485. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.11485

30
Jun
2012
Determination of Vertical Interproximal Bone Loss Topography: Correlation Between Indirect Digital Radiographic Measurement and Clinical Measurement

Determination of Vertical Interproximal Bone Loss Topography: Correlation Between Indirect Digital Radiographic Measurement and Clinical Measurement

Farzad Esmaeli,
Adileh Shirmohammadi,
Masoumeh Faramarzie,
Nader Abolfazli,
Hossein Rasouli,
Saied Fallahi

Esmaeli F, Shirmohammadi A, Faramarzie M, Abolfazli N, Rasouli H, et al. Determination of Vertical Interproximal Bone Loss Topography: Correlation Between Indirect Digital Radiographic Measurement and Clinical Measurement. I J Radiol. 2012;9(2):. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.7732

More by these authors

Farida AbesiPubMedScholar
Alireza MirshekarPubMedScholar
Ehsan MoudiPubMedScholar
Maryam SeyedmajidiPubMedScholar
Sina HaghanifarPubMedScholar
Nima HaghighatPubMedScholar
Ali BijaniPubMedScholar
Share
Cited by
Metrics