Inflammation, particularly when chronic and accompanied by pain, can substantially impair quality of life. Persistent inflammation may also delay tissue repair and prolong disease. Although pharmacological therapies have long been used to manage pain and inflammation, they may cause adverse effects, particularly with prolonged treatment. Complementary and alternative medicine has therefore attracted considerable interest in the search for effective and relatively safe therapeutic agents.
Prosopis cineraria belongs to the Fabaceae family and is widely distributed along the southern coast of Iran (
7). The plant has been described as a valuable source of bioactive compounds (
35). Previous studies have reported analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities in different parts of
P. cineraria, suggesting its potential as an inexpensive and readily available source of therapeutic agents for pain and inflammation (
36,
37). However, to the best of our knowledge, limited information is available about the anti-inflammatory and anti-nociceptive effects of
P. cineraria seed extracts. Therefore, this study investigated these effects using established experimental models of pain and inflammation.
PCSE was evaluated at 100, 200, and 300 mg/kg in male NMRI mice using two nociception models (the hot plate and acetic acid-induced writhing tests) and in male Wistar rats using two inflammation models (carrageenan-induced paw edema and cotton pellet-induced granuloma). Morphine (5 mg/kg), indomethacin (5 mg/kg), and mefenamic acid (30 mg/kg) were used as reference drugs in the respective models, based on previously reported protocols. All treatment groups were compared with their corresponding controls. In the hot plate test, the extract produced transient anti-nociceptive effects at 15 and 30 min after administration, but these effects were no longer evident at 1 or 2 h. In contrast, morphine (5 mg/kg) produced a sustained anti-nociceptive effect throughout the 2-h observation period. At the doses investigated, PCSE may therefore exert a relatively short-lasting effect against acute thermal nociception without providing sustained analgesia. In the writhing test, all three extract doses significantly reduced writhing responses. These different responses may reflect the distinct nociceptive pathways and mechanisms assessed by the two models.
The hot plate and acetic acid-induced writhing tests are widely used preclinical models to evaluate analgesic or anti-nociceptive activity, but they differ substantially in the types and mechanisms of nociception assessed. The hot plate test primarily evaluates acute thermal nociception and involves supraspinal processing of nociceptive stimuli (
38). The writhing test is particularly sensitive to peripherally mediated visceral nociception and chemically induced inflammatory pain. Intraperitoneal acetic acid causes tissue injury and irritation, promoting the release of inflammatory mediators, including prostaglandins, which increase vascular permeability and sensitize peripheral nociceptors. These events lead to the characteristic abdominal constrictions and stretching behavior termed writhing (
39). The model is sensitive to both opioid and nonopioid analgesics; compounds that reduce writhing episodes are therefore considered to have anti-nociceptive activity (
40). The extract's marked activity in the writhing test, together with its relatively limited effect in the hot plate test, may suggest that its anti-nociceptive action has a predominantly peripheral component. One possible explanation is modulation of inflammatory mediators involved in peripheral nociceptor sensitization, such as prostaglandins and leukotrienes. However, this interpretation remains hypothetical because these mediators and molecular pathways were not directly assessed. Further mechanistic studies are needed to determine whether the observed effect involves prostaglandin synthesis, leukotriene pathways, or other peripheral nociceptive mechanisms.
Consistent with the present findings, previous studies have reported anti-nociceptive activity in
P. cineraria stem bark, roots, and leaves. Manikandar et al. reported that an ethanolic stem bark extract produced a significant analgesic effect in rats in the Eddy hot plate model at 300 mg/kg. A petroleum ether extract also showed significant antipyretic activity at the same dose in a Brewer's yeast-induced hyperpyrexia model (
20). Kumar et al. (
21) investigated an ethanolic root extract at oral doses of 200 and 300 mg/kg using tail immersion and hot plate tests. The extract showed significant analgesic activity at 200 mg/kg, with this dose appearing more effective than the higher dose in both models (
21). Joseph et al. reported that an aqueous leaf extract produced significant analgesic activity at 200 mg/kg in Swiss albino mice in the acetic acid-induced writhing test. The extract also showed significant antipyretic activity at the same dose in a Brewer's yeast-induced hyperpyrexia model.
Differences between these findings and the present results may partly reflect the plant material investigated. Earlier studies primarily examined roots, leaves, and stem bark, whereas this study focused on seeds. The concentration and composition of bioactive constituents may vary considerably among plant organs and consequently affect pharmacological activity. Differences in extraction solvents and procedures, experimental species, doses, and nociceptive models may also contribute to discrepancies among studies. As noted in the Background, anti-convulsant, antioxidant, antimalarial, antimicrobial, and anticancer effects have been reported for P. cineraria, in addition to its analgesic and antipyretic properties. These findings support further investigation of its bioactive constituents and mechanisms of action.
In the carrageenan-induced paw edema test, PCSE showed significant anti-inflammatory activity at the investigated doses and time points, except that 100 mg/kg was not effective at 30 min. These findings indicate that the extract can attenuate acute inflammatory edema induced by carrageenan. In contrast, the cotton pellet model, which assesses the proliferative component of chronic inflammation, showed no significant differences in transudate or granuloma weight between the extract-treated and control groups. Under the experimental conditions used, PCSE therefore did not significantly inhibit the chronic inflammatory response assessed by this model. Indomethacin (5 mg/kg), however, produced a significant anti-inflammatory effect, supporting the model’s responsiveness to a standard anti-inflammatory agent.
The distinct findings in these models may reflect the different phases and mechanisms of inflammation they represent. Carrageenan-induced paw edema is an established model of acute inflammation characterized by edema formation and the sequential release of mediators, including histamine, serotonin, bradykinin, and prostaglandins (
41). The later phase is particularly associated with increased prostaglandin production, which contributes to edema and nociceptor sensitization. This model is therefore widely used to screen compounds with acute anti-inflammatory activity, particularly those affecting prostaglandin-mediated pathways. Cotton pellet implantation, by contrast, induces a foreign-body inflammatory response that develops over several days and produces vascularized granulomatous tissue. It thus assesses the proliferative component of chronic inflammation and can be used to evaluate agents that inhibit granuloma formation (
42).
The lack of a significant effect in the cotton pellet model, despite marked activity in the carrageenan assay, suggests that PCSE may have greater activity during the acute phase than during the proliferative phase of chronic inflammation. Together with the writhing test results, these findings suggest that PCSE may preferentially affect acute inflammatory and peripheral nociceptive processes. Its activity may involve the modulation of inflammatory mediators or pathways associated with prostaglandin production. However, the experimental design does not support definitive conclusions about a specific molecular target, such as cyclooxygenase inhibition or prostaglandin receptor modulation. Direct assessment of cyclooxygenase activity, prostaglandin levels, cytokines, and other inflammatory biomarkers would help clarify the mechanisms involved.
The present findings are consistent with earlier reports of anti-inflammatory activity in
P. cineraria. Yadav et al. reported significant anti-inflammatory activity of a phenol-rich
P. cineraria ointment (
22). Sharma et al. also reported significant activity against an LPS-induced inflammatory response (
43). Although these findings support the plant’s anti-inflammatory potential, differences in plant part, extraction method, formulation, experimental model, and administration route should be considered when comparing studies. Pharmacological activities have also been reported for other
Prosopis species. Extracts of
P. juliflora leaves and seeds have shown anti-inflammatory, antifungal, and antibacterial effects in vitro (
12).
Previous phytochemical investigations of
Prosopis species and related plant materials have reported steroids such as stigmasterol, β-sitosterol, and campesterol; alkaloids such as prosophylline and spicigerine; and flavonoid derivatives, including prosogerins A-E. Flavonoid derivatives and phenolic compounds reported in
Prosopis materials include prosogerins C, D, and E (
44,
45), as well as gallic acid, luteolin, patuletin, patulitrin, and rutin (
46,
47).
P. cineraria seed lipids have also been reported to contain substantial amounts of unsaturated fatty acids, particularly oleic and linoleic acids (
48). These literature-derived findings are indirect evidence and should not be interpreted as confirming the constituents of the extract used in this study, because the original batch is no longer available for chemical characterization. Establishing a direct relationship between individual phytochemicals and the observed antinociceptive or anti-inflammatory effects requires further pharmacological and phytochemical investigation.
5.1. Study Limitations
Several limitations should be considered when interpreting these findings. The specific extract batch used in the animal experiments is no longer available, preventing retrospective chemical characterization or chromatographic fingerprinting. The study did not include direct biochemical or mechanistic investigations, a comprehensive toxicological evaluation, or observer blinding. The number of animals was relatively limited, and no formal a priori power calculation was performed. Finally, findings from these animal models should not be directly extrapolated to human therapeutic applications. The reported pharmacological effects should therefore be regarded as preliminary evidence requiring confirmation through chemical characterization, mechanistic studies, and further safety evaluation.
5.2. Conclusions
PCSE significantly reduced acetic acid-induced writhing and carrageenan-induced paw edema, indicating visceral anti-nociceptive and acute anti-inflammatory activities in the specific animal models investigated. However, it did not significantly inhibit the response in the cotton pellet-induced granuloma model, suggesting greater activity during the acute phase than during the proliferative phase of inflammation. The relatively short duration of activity in the hot plate test and the pronounced effect in the writhing model may indicate a predominantly peripheral component of anti-nociceptive activity, although the mechanism was not directly investigated. Further studies are needed to characterize the extract chemically, identify its bioactive constituents, and determine the relevant pharmacological mechanisms and safety profile. The potential therapeutic relevance of these findings remains preliminary and requires confirmation in further preclinical studies.