1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
3.1. Animals
3.2. Design of the Study
3.3. Diet Composition
3.4. Preparation of VCO
3.5. Surgery and Injection of Aβ
3.6. Sample Collection
3.7. Total Antioxidant Capacity (TAC)
3.8. Total Oxidant Status (TOS)
3.9. Measurement of Hematological Factors
3.10. Measurement of the Amount of Serum Calcium (Ca) and Phosphate
3.11. Statistical Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Effect Aβ and HFD on TAC and TOS
Change of serum’s total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (A) and total oxidant status (TOS) (B) in the studied groups. Results are presented as the mean ± SD of mean (P < 0.05). *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05 compared with control group. ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0. 01 and # P < 0.05 compared with Alzheimer group. €€€ P < 0.001, €€ P < 0.01 and € P < 0.05 compared with HFD group, and ¥¥¥ P < 0.001, ¥¥ P < 0.01 and ¥ P < 0.05 compared with HFD+ Alzheimer group.
4.2. Effect of Aβ and HFD on White Blood Cells (WBC) and Lymphocyte (Lym) Count
Changes of white blood cells (WBC) count (A) and lymphocyte (Lym) percentage (B) in the studied groups. Results are presented as the mean ± SD of mean (P < 0.05). *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05 compared with control group. ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0.01 and # P < 0.05 compared with Alzheimer group. €€€ P < 0.001, €€ P < 0.01 and € P < 0.05 compared with HFD group, and ¥¥¥ P < 0.001, ¥¥ P < 0.01 and ¥ P < 0.05 compared with HFD+ Alzheimer group.
4.3. Effect of Aβ and HFD on Red Blood Cells (RBC), Hb, and HCT
Changes of red blood cell (RBC) count (A), hemoglobin (Hb) (B) and hematocrit (HCT) (C) in the studied groups. Results are presented as the mean ± SD of mean (P < 0.05). *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01 and * P < 0.05 compared with control group. ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0. 01 and # P < 0.05 compared with Alzheimer group. €€€ P < 0.001, €€ P < 0.01 and € P < 0.05 compared with HFD group, and ¥¥¥ P < 0.001, ¥¥ P < 0.01 and ¥ P < 0.05 compared with HFD+ Alzheimer group.
4.4. Effect of HFD and Aβ on Changes of MCV, Mean MCH, and MCHC
| Group | MCV, Fl | MCH, Pg | MCHC, g/dL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 59.77 ± 1.83 | 18.65 ± 0.53 | 31.92 ± 0.24 |
| Alzheimer | 56.17 ± 0.77 | 18.12 ± 0.36 | 29.82 ± 0.69 |
| Alzheimer + 8% VCO | 57.23 ± 1.25 | 18.56 ± 1.07 | 30.25 ± 0.48 |
| Alzheimer + 10% VCO | 59.32 ± 0.67 | 18.7 ± 2.28 | 30.97 ± 1.790 |
| High-fat diet | 57.19 ± 3.24 | 18.34 ± 0.28 | 31.79 ± 1.00 |
| High-fat diet + 8% VCO | 58.62 ± 2.02 | 18.62 ± 1.86 | 32.01 ± 1.07 |
| High-fat diet + 10% VCO | 59.6 ± 0.27 | 18.73 ± 1.52 | 32.91 ± 1.62 |
| Alzheimer + high-fat diet | 57.12 ± 1.39 | 18.17 ± 0.50 | 30.07 ± 0.09 |
| Alzheimer + high-fat diet +8% VCO | 57.93 ± 0.41 | 18.24 ± 0.17 | 30.85 ± 0.84 |
| Alzheimer + high-fat diet +10% VCO | 58.64 ± 1.29 | 18.2 ± 1.13 | 31.47 ± 1.40 |
Abbreviations: MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; MCV, mean corpuscular volume; VCO, virgin coconut oil.
aResults are presented as the mean ± SD of mean (P > 0.05).
4.5. Effect of Aβ and HFD on Platelet Count Change
Change of platelet count in the studied groups. Results are presented as the mean ± SD of mean (P < 0.05). *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05 compared with control group. ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0.01 and # P < 0.05 compared with Alzheimer group. €€€ P < 0.001, €€ P < 0.01 and € P < 0.05 compared with HFD group, and ¥¥¥ P < 0.001, ¥¥ P < 0.01 and ¥ P < 0.05 compared with HFD+ Alzheimer group.
4.6. Effect of HFD and Aβ on the Changing of Ca and Phosphate Levels
Changes of Calcium (Ca)(A), Phosphate (B) levels in the studied groups. Results are presented as the mean ± SD of mean (P < 0.05). *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0.01 and *P < 0.05 compared with control group. ### P < 0.001, ## P < 0. 01 and # P < 0.05 compared with Alzheimer group. €€€ P < 0.001, €€ P < 0.01 and € P < 0.05 compared with HFD group, and ¥¥¥ P < 0.001, ¥¥ P < 0.01 and ¥ P < 0.05 compared with HFD+ Alzheimer group.




