The study has several limitations that warrant consideration. Health conditions were assessed primarily through self-report, which may be subject to recall bias or underdiagnosis, particularly in rural settings with limited access to medical services (
3,
14). Pesticide exposure was characterized based on reported use rather than quantitative exposure measurements, such as biomonitoring or environmental sampling, and many farmers reported using multiple herbicides over time, which complicates attribution to specific formulations (
13,
15,
16). In addition, the relatively small sample size and cross-sectional design limit the ability to assess temporal relationships or dose-response patterns. The secondary analysis nature of this study means that inflammatory and ECG data were collected for the companion manuscripts and were not specifically powered for herbicide-stratified comparisons; therefore, the descriptive patterns by herbicide should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than confirmatory. Finally, the companion manuscripts by Chukwu et al. (
15,
16) have not yet completed the peer-review process, and their data should be considered preliminary until published. Despite these limitations, the study provides important descriptive data from an underrepresented population and offers a foundation for future longitudinal and biomonitoring research (
3,
13).
Overall, the findings highlight the intersection of occupational exposure, lifestyle factors, and cardiovascular health in smallholder rice farming systems. By situating exposure patterns and self-reported disease prevalence alongside subclinical cardiovascular indicators, this study reinforces the need for early risk identification and preventive strategies in agricultural communities (
1,
15,
16).