A Survey of the Zahedan Medical School Students’ View of the Research Workshop and its Effects on their Final Thesis

Author(s):
Masood RoudbariMasood Roudbari1,*
1Assistant Professor. Department of Public Health, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
*Corresponding Author: Assistant professor in Department of Public Health, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. Zahedan. I. R. Tel: 0541-2419409. Mobile: 09123887600 Fax: 0541 2438487 PO Box: 98165-485. Zahedan, I. R. Iran Email: [email protected]

Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands:Vol. 9, issue 2; e105292
Published online:Jul 01, 2006
Article type:Research Article
Received:Apr 01, 2006
Accepted:Jul 01, 2006
How to Cite:Roudbari M. A Survey of the Zahedan Medical School Students’ View of the Research Workshop and its Effects on their Final Thesis. J Med Edu. 2006;9(2):e105292. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v9i2.720

Abstract

Background and purpose: The research workshops (RW) for the medical students have been performed at Zahedan University of Medical Sciences (ZUMS) since about ten years ago. The aim of the RW is teaching the research rules to the medical students to be used in their future researches, especially in their final thesis project.This study is planned to investigate the effect of the research RWs on the students’ final project.Methods: This descriptive research was performed in 2005 to 2006 at ZUMS. The target population was the medical students who passed the research RW and registered their final thesis project. The research sample was 155 and the data were collected using a questionnaire. For data analyzing, the descriptive statistics and nonparametric methods were applied in SPSS software.Results:The results show that 24.8% of the students believed that the effect of the RW on their projects was poor or very poor. Over 28% believed that the effect was moderate and 46.4% believed that theeffect is high or very high. Also, 86.5% of the students believed that the RW is essential for them.On the other hand, the students stated that the effects of the different sections of the RW were not the same. The section of introduction, aim and hypothesis are the most effective sections which are more applicable in their research project, while the sections of the sample size, sampling techniques and the research timetable are the least effective sections of the research RW. Also, 50.3% of the students believed that the best time for the RW is in externship period and 39.4% said that the best time is in internship period. Furthermore, 45.2% believed that the full time 3 or 4 day RW is not suitable and they suggested a minimum of a 7 day part time RW to learn better. The students also believed that thepractical parts of the RW are the most effective parts. The most important problem during the projects as stated by the students are determining the sample size, sampling techniques, writing the references and plotting the tables and graphs.Conclusion: It seems that the RW programs need to be revised and the part time RWs should be replaced. The period of the different parts of the RWs should be changed according to their importance and effects on the students’ final projects. If the RWs are less effective due to its time, periods, lecturers or syllabus, it needs to be reformed; otherwise the RWs will need to be stopped.

Fulltext

The body of the article can be found in the PDF file.

References

  • 1.
    References are available in the PDF file.

Copyright

© 2006, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

13
Apr
2009

What do medical graduates think of their earlier research projects?

S Asefzadeh,
A Mahmoodinia

Asefzadeh S, Mahmoodinia A. What do medical graduates think of their earlier research projects?. J Med Edu. 2003;3(2):e105025. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v3i2.862

31
Dec
2007

Assessment of students' research proposals and reports in Qazvin UMS

M Javaheri,
M Mashatan,
M Rafati

Javaheri M, Mashatan M, Rafati M. Assessment of students' research proposals and reports in Qazvin UMS. J Inflamm Dis. 2024;11(3):e155349. doi:

1
May
2022
Trends in Med Sci

How Can Faculty Members Produce More Articles?

Shahzad Mehranfard,
Ferdos Pelarak,
Raana Kousari,
Leila Kalani

Mehranfard S, Pelarak F, Kousari R, Kalani L. How Can Faculty Members Produce More Articles?. J Adv Immunopharmacol. 2022;2(1):e123315. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/tms-123315

24
Feb
2019

The Roles of Students and Supervisors in Medical Research Projects: Expectations and Evaluations

Salman AlSabah,
Eliana Al Haddad,
Fahd AlSaleh

AlSabah S, Haddad EA, AlSaleh F. The Roles of Students and Supervisors in Medical Research Projects: Expectations and Evaluations. J Med Edu. 2018;17(4):e105652. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v17i4.23298

6
Jul
2017

The approach and function of university students to research process: A cross sectional study

Hassan Babamohamadi,
Faezeh Deihim Far,
Hajar Chaharpashlo,
Masoumeh Hamidi,
Mehdi Kahouei

Babamohamadi H, Deihim Far F, Chaharpashlo H, Hamidi M, Kahouei M. The approach and function of university students to research process: A cross sectional study. koomesh. 2017;19(2):e151094. doi:

Download PDF89.56 KB

Crossmark

Crossmark

Checking

Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC