Clinical Reasoning in Medicine: A Concept Analysis

Author(s):
Shahram YazdaniShahram Yazdani1, Maryam Hoseini AbardehMaryam Hoseini Abardeh2,*
1Associated Professor, Dean of School of Medical Education Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2PhD Candidate at School of Medical Education Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
*Corresponding Author: Maryam Hoseini Abardeh, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, School of Medical Education, Near the Intersection of Valiasr and Parkway Bridge , Valiasr Street, Tehran, Iran Phone: +98 (21) 26210092; Fax: +98 (21) 26210093 Email: [email protected]

Journal of Medical Education for Future Demands:Vol. 16, issue 3; e105581
Published online:Jan 21, 2018
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jul 05, 2017
Accepted:Oct 04, 2017
How to Cite:Yazdani S, Hoseini Abardeh M. Clinical Reasoning in Medicine: A Concept Analysis . J Med Edu. 2017;16(3):e105581. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v16i3.17755

Abstract

Background: Clinical reasoning plays an important role in the ability of physicians to make diagnoses and decisions. It is considered the physician’s most critical competence, but it is an ambiguous conceptin medicine that needs a clear analysis and definition. Our aim was to clarify the concept of clinical reasoning in medicine by identifying its components and to differentiate it from other similar concepts.It is necessary to have an operational definition of clinical reasoning, and its components must be precisely defined in order to design successful interventions and use it easily in future research.Methods: McKenna’s nine-step model was applied to facilitate the clarification of the concept of clinical reasoning. The literature for this concept analysis was retrieved from several databases, including Scopus, Elsevier, PubMed, ISI, ISC, Medline, and Google Scholar, for the years 1995– 2016 (until September 2016). An extensive search of the literature was conducted using the electronic database. Accordingly, 17 articles and one book were selected for the review. We applied McKenna’s method of concept analysis in studying clinical reasoning, so that definitional attributes, antecedents, and consequences of this concept were extracted.Results: Clinical reasoning has nine major attributes in medicine. These attributes include: (1) clinical reasoning as a cognitive process; (2) knowledge acquisition and application of different types of knowledge; (3) thinking as a part of the clinical reasoning process; (4) patient inputs; (5) contextdependent and domain-specific processes; (6) iterative and complex processes; (7) multi-modal cognitive processes; (8) professional principles; and (9) health system mandates. These attributes are influenced by the antecedents of workplace context, practice frames of reference, practice models of the practitioner, and clinical skills. The consequences of clinical reasoning are the metacognitive improvement of reasoning and tacit knowledge production.Conclusion: The present concept analysis tries to clarify the concept of clinical reasoning in medicine and reduces the ambiguity of this concept to design successful interventions and use it easily in future research.

Fulltext

The body of the article can be found in the PDF file.

References

  • 1.
    References are available in the PDF file.

Copyright

© 2017, Author(s). This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.

Similar Articles

23
Nov
2014

Clinical Reasoning and Improvement in the Quality of Medical Education

Mohamad Matinpour,
Iraj Sedighi,
Alireza Monajemi,
Farshad Jafari,
Hossein Emad Momtaz,
Mohamad Ali Seif Rabiei

Matinpour M, Sedighi I, Monajemi A, Jafari F, Momtaz HE, et al. Clinical Reasoning and Improvement in the Quality of Medical Education. Shiraz E-Med J. 2014;15(4):e18667. doi: https://doi.org/10.17795/semj18667

11
Mar
2009

Multistage Problem-Based Case Discussion For Medical Students

M Dadgostarnia,
V Gholami Renani,
V Ashoorion,
A Esmaeili,
B Shams,
H Taban
,et al.

Dadgostarnia M, Gholami Renani V, Ashoorion V, Esmaeili A, Shams B, et al. Multistage Problem-Based Case Discussion For Medical Students. J Med Edu. 2003;4(1):e105044. doi: https://doi.org/10.22037/jme.v4i1.853

9
Aug
2023

Clinical Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence

Ali Ghasemi,
Mahdi Naeimaeyi aali

Ghasemi A, Naeimaeyi aali M. Clinical Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Mil Health Sci Res. 2023;21(1):e134440. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/amh-134440

17
Dec
2012

Critical Thinking Disposition among Medical Students of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences

Shirin Iranfar,
Vida Sepahi,
Ahmad Khoshay,
Mansour Rezaei,
Behzad Karami Matin,
Farahnaz Keshavarzi
,et al.

Iranfar S, Sepahi V, Khoshay A, Rezaei M, Karami Matin B, et al. Critical Thinking Disposition among Medical Students of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences. Educ Res Med Sci. 2012;1(2):e77189. doi:

10
May
2023
J Med Edu

The Critical Thinking Process: A Holistic View to Promote Critical Problem-solving in Health Profession Education

Nasim Gheshlaghi Azar,
Shahram Yazdani,
Zohreh Khoshgoftar

Gheshlaghi Azar N, Yazdani S, Khoshgoftar Z. The Critical Thinking Process: A Holistic View to Promote Critical Problem-solving in Health Profession Education. J Med Edu. 2023;22(1):e135024. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jme-135024

Download PDF327.70 KB

Crossmark

Crossmark

Checking

Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles