Older adults experiences of online social interactions: A phenomenological study

References

• 1.
  Lin KY, Lu HP. Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Comput Hum Behav 2011; 27: 1152-1161.
• 2.
  Ellison N, Heino R, Gibbs J. Managing impressions online: Self presentation processes in the online dating environment. J Comput Mediat Commun 2006; 11: 415-441.
• 3.
  About Skype. 2017; Available from: https://www.skype.com/en/about/.
• 4.
  Katz JE, Rice RE. Social consequences of Internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction: MIT press; 2002.
• 5.
  Mirzaei M, Shams-Ghahfarkhi M. Demographic characteristics of the elderly population in Iran according to the census 1976-2006. Iran J Ageing 2007; 2: 326-331. (Persian).
• 6.
  Mellor D, Firth L, Moore K. Can the internet improve the well-being of the elderly? Ageing Int 2008; 32: 25-42.
• 7.
  Marcelino I, Barroso J, Cruz JB, Pereira A. Elder Care Architecturea physical and social approach. Int J Adv Life Sci 2010; 29: 9.0.
• 8.
  Joinson AN. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Florence, Italy. 1357213: ACM; 2008. 1027-36.
• 9.
  Golden J, Conroy RM, Bruce I, Denihan A, Greene E, Kirby M, Lawlor BA. Loneliness, social support networks, mood and wellbeing in communitydwelling elderly. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24: 694-700.
• 10.
  Mulvaney-Day NE, Alegra M, Sribney W. Social cohesion, social support, and health among Latinos in the United States. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64: 477-495.
• 11.
  Quan-Haase A, Mo GY, Wellman B. Connected seniors: how older adults in East York exchange social support online and offline. Inf Commun Soc 2017; 20: 967-983.
• 12.
  Chakraborty R, Vishik C, Rao HR. Privacy preserving actions of older adults on social media: Exploring the behavior of opting out of information sharing. Decis Support Syst 2013; 55: 948-956.
• 13.
  Cotten SR, Ford G, Ford S, Hale TM. Internet use and depression among older adults. Comput Hum Behav 2012; 28: 496-499.
• 14.
  Selwyn N. The information aged: A qualitative study of older adults' use of information and communications technology. J Aging Stud 2004; 18: 369-384.
• 15.
  Cornejo R, Tentori M, Favela J. Enriching in-person encounters through social media: A study on family connectedness for the elderly. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2013; 71: 889-899.
• 16.
  Harley D, Fitzpatrick G. Appropriation of social networking by older people: two case studies. ECSCW 2011 Workshop on Fostering Social Interactions in the Ageing Society: Artefacts Methodologies Research Paradigms: Springer International Publishing; 2012.
• 17.
  Jung EH, Sundar SS. Senior citizens on Facebook: How do they interact and why? Comput Hum Behav 2016; 61: 27-35.
• 18.
  Sundar SS, Oeldorf-Hirsch A, Nussbaum J, Behr R. Retirees on Facebook: can online social networking enhance their health and wellness? CHI '11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Vancouver, BC, Canada. 1979931: ACM; 2011. 2287-92.
• 19.
  Czaja SJ, Charness N, Fisk AD, Hertzog C, Nair SN, Rogers WA, Sharit J. Factors predicting the use of technology: findings from the Center for Research and Education on Aging and Technology Enhancement (CREATE). Psychol Aging 2006; 21: 333.
• 20.
  De Belvis AG, Avolio M, Sicuro L, Rosano A, Latini E, Damiani G, Ricciardi W. Social relationships and HRQL: A cross-sectional survey among older Italian adults. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 348.
• 21.
  Chopik WJ. The benefits of social technology use among older adults are mediated by reduced loneliness. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2016; 19: 551-556.
• 22.
  Pittman M, Reich B. Social media and loneliness: Why an Instagram picture may be worth more than a thousand Twitter words. Comput Hum Behav 2016; 62: 155-167.
• 23.
  Fochtman D. Phenomenology in pediatric cancer nursing research. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2008; 25: 185-192.
• 24.
  Streubert Speziale H, Carpenter D. Qualitative research in nursing. Third Editionth edition Philadelphia: Williams & Wilkings Co 2003.
• 25.
  VanderStoep SW, Johnson DD. Research methods for everyday life: Blending qualitative and quantitative approaches: John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
• 26.
  Padilla-Daz M. Phenomenology in Educational Qualitative Research: Philosophy as Science or Philosophical Science? Educational Excellence 2015; 1: 101-110.
• 27.
  Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. 1978.
• 28.
  Shosha GA. Employment of Colaizzi's strategy in descriptive phenomenology: A reflection of a researcher. Eur Sci J 2012; 8.
• 29.
  Gharibpoor M, Allameh S, Abrishamkar M. New concept of social network citizenship behavior: Definition and elements. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2012; 6: 154-163.
• 30.
  Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry: Sage; 1985.
• 31.
  Gabriel Z, Bowling ANN. Quality of life from the perspectives of older people. Ageing Soc 2004; 24: 675-691.
• 32.
  Lehtinen V, Nsnen J, Sarvas R, editors. A little silly and empty-headed: older adults' understandings of social networking sites. Proceedings of the 23rd British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: Celebrating People and Technology; 2009: British Computer Society.
• 33.
  Tsai TH, Chang HT, Ho YL. Perceptions of a specific family communication application among grandparents and grandchildren: an extension of the technology acceptance model. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0156680.
• 34.
  Stevens NAN. Combating loneliness: a friendship enrichment programme for older women. Ageing Soc 2001; 21: 183-202.
• 35.
  Nef T, Ganea RL, Mri RM, Mosimann UP. Social networking sites and older usersa systematic review. Int Psychogeriatr 2013; 25: 1041-1053.
• 36.
  MacCallum J, Palmer D, Wright P, Cumming-Potvin W, Northcote J, Brooker M, Tero C. Community building through intergenerational exchange programs: Report to the National Youth Affairs Research Scheme (NYARS). 2006.
• 37.
  Boyd D. Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. MacArthur foundation series on digital learningYouth, identity, and digital media volume 2007 Dec: 119-42.
• 38.
  Meneses Fernndez MD, Santana Hernndez JD, Martn Gutirrez J, Henrquez Escuela MR, Rodrguez Fino E. Using communication and visualization technologies with senior citizens to facilitate cultural access and self-improvement. Comput Hum Behav 2017; 66: 329-344.
• 39.
  Jung EH, Walden J, Johnson AC, Sundar SS. Social networking in the aging context: Why older adults use or avoid Facebook. Telematics and Informatics 2017.
• 40.
  Gilbert E, Karahalios K. Predicting tie strength with social media. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Boston, MA, USA. ACM; 2009. 211-20.
• 41.
  Ciboh R. Adult users engagement and utilisation of social networks sites in nigeria. Stud Media Commun 2015; 3: 129-136.
• 42.
  Yuan S, Hussain SA, Hales KD, Cotten SR. What do they like? Communication preferences and patterns of older adults in the United States: The role of technology. Educ Gerontol 2016; 42: 163-174.
• 43.
  Chayko M. Superconnected: The Internet, Digital Media, and Techno-Social Life: SAGE Publications; 2016.
• 44.
  Coelho J, Duarte C. A literature survey on older adults' use of social network services and social applications. Comput Hum Behav 2016; 58: 187-205.
• 45.
  Erickson LB, editor. Social media, social capital, and seniors: The impact of Facebook on bonding and bridging social capital of individuals over 65. AMCIS; 2011.
• 46.
  Lampe C, Ellison N, Steinfield C. A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing. Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative work; Banff, Alberta, Canada. ACM; 2006; 167-170.
• 47.
  Karahasanovi A, Brandtzg PB, Heim J, Lders M, Vermeir L, Pierson J, et al. Co-creation and user-generated contentelderly peoples user requirements. Comput Hum Behav 2009; 25: 655-678.
• 48.
  Bruggeman J. The strength of varying tie strength: comment on aral and van alstyne. AJS 2016; 121: 1919-1930.
• 49.
  Hampton K, Rainie L, Lu W, Shin I, Purcell K. Social media and the cost of caring. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center 2015.
• 50.
  Rains SA, Brunner SR, Oman K. Self-disclosure and new communication technologies. J Soc Pers Relat 2014; 33: 42-61.
• 51.
  Wenger GC, Burholt V. Changes in levels of social isolation and loneliness among older people in a rural area: A twentyyear longitudinal study. Can J Aging 2004; 23: 115-127.
• 52.
  Stek ML, Vinkers DJ, Gussekloo J, Beekman AT, van der Mast RC, Westendorp RG. Is depression in old age fatal only when people feel lonely? Am J Psychiatry 2005; 162: 178-180.
• 53.
  Voner HB, Bobek S, Kokol P, Krei MJ. Attitudes of active older Internet users towards online social networking. Comput Hum Behav 2016; 55: 230-241.
• 54.
  Aarts S, Peek STM, Wouters EJM. The relation between social network site usage and loneliness and mental health in community-dwelling older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2015; 30: 942-949.
• 55.
  Farkas PA, Schrenk M, Hlauschek W. Senior Social PlatformAn application aimed to reduce the social and digital isolation of seniors: na; 2010.
• 56.
  Ballantyne A, Trenwith L, Zubrinich S, Corlis M. I feel less lonely: what older people say about participating in a social networking website. Qual Ageing Older Adults 2010; 11: 25-35##.