Review and performance comparison of lead-free shields and lead shields, in terms of biological effects in nuclear medicine by the comet method

Author(s):
Mohsen BakhshandeMohsen BakhshandeMohsen Bakhshande ORCID,*, Mohsen BakhshandehMohsen Bakhshandeh, Mehdiollah bakhshian-FarsaniMehdiollah bakhshian-Farsani, Ehsan BakhshandehEhsan Bakhshandeh, Nozhat ShakeriNozhat Shakeri

Koomesh:Vol. 20, issue 4; 792-799
Published online:Apr 01, 2018
Article type:Review Article
Received:Jun 01, 2017
Accepted:Feb 01, 2018
How to Cite:Bakhshande M, Bakhshandeh M, bakhshian-Farsani M, Bakhshandeh E, Shakeri N. Review and performance comparison of lead-free shields and lead shields, in terms of biological effects in nuclear medicine by the comet method. koomesh. 2018;20(4):e153028. doi:

Abstract

References

  • 1.
    Bogen K. Reassessment of human peripheral T-lymphocyte lifespan deduced from cytogenetic and cytotoxic effects of radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 1993; 64: 195-204.
  • 2.
    Shabestani Monfared A AM, John K. How can the use of radiation in nuclear medicine community's concerns to a reasonable level lowered? Iran Nucl Med J 2002; 19.(Persian).
  • 3.
    Hejazi P SM. Measuring radiation, radiographers and nuclear medicine and radiopharmaceutical enters the two major positions of radiation exposure and the effect of reduction dose syringe shield. Koomesh 2000; 2: 117-123. (Persian).
  • 4.
    Ghazi KM, Zokori R, Sabzevari S. Lead aprons effect of reducing the dose in nuclear medicine department staff. Babol Med Sinsce Univ J 2008; 10: 30-34. (Persian).##.
  • 5.
    Kaewkhao J Pokaipisit A Limsuwan P. Study on borate glass system containing with Bi2O3 and BaO for gamma-rays shielding materials Comparison with PbO. J of Nuc. Mat 2010; 399: 38-40.
  • 6.
    Cournoyer M. Lead substitution and elimination study. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2001; 249: 397-402.
  • 7.
    McCaffreyJ, Shen H, Downton B, MainegraHing E. Radiation attenuation by lead and nonlead materials used in radiation shielding garments. Med Phys 2007; 34: 530-537.
  • 8.
    Steyn PF, Uhrig J. The role of protective lead clothing in reducing radiation exposurerates to personnel during equine bone scintigraphy.Vet Radiol Ultrasound2005; 46: 529-532.
  • 9.
    Christodoulou EG, Goodsitt MM, Larson SC, Darner KL, Satti J, Chan HP. Evaluation of the transmitted exposure through lead equivalent aprons usedin a radiology department, including the contribution from backscatter. Med Phys 2003; 30: 1033-1038.
  • 10.
    Takano Y, Okazaki K, Ono K, Kai M. Experimental and theoretical studies on radiation protective effect of a lighter non-lead protective apron. NihonHoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2005; 61: 1027-1032.
  • 11.
    khalil TM, Abdel_Moty EM, Rosomoff HL. Back pain, Guide to prevention and Rehablititation Ergonomics New York van Nostrand.1993;100-101.
  • 12.
    Aghamiri M, Mortazavi S, Tayebi M, Mosleh-Shirazi M, Baharvand H, Tavakkoli-Golpayegani A, Zeinali-Rafsanjani B. A novel design for production of efficient flexible lead-free shields against X-ray Photons in Diagnostic Energy Range. J Biomed Phys Eng 2011; 1. (Persian).
  • 13.
    Mozdarani Hosein, Hejazi Ashkan , Hejazi Peyman. Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of individuals with chronic exposure to gamma radiation.Archives Of Iranian Medicine 2002; 5: 32-36.
  • 14.
    McKelvey V, Doran K, Higgins F, Butler M, McKenna P. Decreased DNA repair capacity in APRT deficient Friend erythroleukaemia cells following H2O2 treatment. Mutagenesis 1991; 6: 441-442.
  • 15.
    Ostling O, Johanson K. Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1984; 123: 291-298.
  • 16.
    Olive PL, Banth JP, Durand RE. Heterogeneity in radiation-induced DNA damage and repair in tumor and normal cells measured using the" comet" assay. Radiat Res 1990; 122: 86-94.
  • 17.
    Olive PL, Banth JP, Durand RE. Detection of etoposide resistance by measuring DNA damage in individual Chinese hamster cells.J Natl Cancer Inst 1990; 82: 779-783.
  • 18.
    Bayram T, Yilmaz AH, Demir M, Sonmez B. Radiation dose to technologists per nuclear medicine examination and estimation of annual dose. J Nucl Med Technol 2011; 39: 55-59.
  • 19.
    Zuguchi M, Chida K, Taura M, Inaba Y, Ebata A, Yamada S. Usefulness of non-lead aprons in radiation protection for physicians performing interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008; 131: 531-534.
  • 20.
    Aminian M, Bakhshandeh M, Allahbakhshian-Farsani M, Bakhshandeh E, Shakeri N. Comparison of the protection performance in a composite shield and a lead standard shield in terms of biological effects in nuclear medicine. Iran J Nucl Med 2017; 25: 129-135. (Persian).

Similar Articles

5
Feb
2020
Iranian Journal of Radiology

Assessment of the Effect of Nano-Composite Shield on Radiation Risk Prevention to Breast During Computed Tomography

Parinaz Mehnati,
Reza Malekzadeh,
Baharak Divband,
Mohammad Yousefi Sooteh

Mehnati P, Malekzadeh R, Divband B, Yousefi Sooteh M. Assessment of the Effect of Nano-Composite Shield on Radiation Risk Prevention to Breast During Computed Tomography. I J Radiol. 2020;17(1):e96002. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.96002

30
Mar
2011

Comparison of Lead and Cerrobend Blocks for Incident Photon Flux of 6 and 15 MV X‐rays

Ahmad Iftikhar,
M Wazir,
MB Kakakhail,
A Sbilal,
H Amjad,
A Khwaja
,et al.

Iftikhar A, Wazir M, Kakakhail M, Sbilal A, Amjad H, et al. Comparison of Lead and Cerrobend Blocks for Incident Photon Flux of 6 and 15 MV X‐rays. Int J Cancer Manag. 2011;4(1):e80721. doi:

30
Jul
2019
Iranian Journal of Radiology

New Bismuth Composite Shield for Radiation Protection of Breast During Coronary CT Angiography

Parinaz Mehnati,
Reza Malekzadeh,
Mohammad Yousefi Sooteh

Mehnati P, Malekzadeh R, Yousefi Sooteh M. New Bismuth Composite Shield for Radiation Protection of Breast During Coronary CT Angiography. I J Radiol. 2019;16(3):e84763. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/iranjradiol.84763

9
Jan
2019
Evaluation of Putty Metal for Internal Shielding for Patient Protection in Electron Therapy by Monte Carlo Study

Evaluation of Putty Metal for Internal Shielding for Patient Protection in Electron Therapy by Monte Carlo Study

Mohammad Javad Tahmasebi Birgani,
Mansour Zabihzadeh,
Saeideh Aliakbari,
Mohammad Ali Behrouz,
Seyyed Mohammad Hosseini

Tahmasebi Birgani MJ, Zabihzadeh M, Aliakbari S, Behrouz MA, Hosseini SM. Evaluation of Putty Metal for Internal Shielding for Patient Protection in Electron Therapy by Monte Carlo Study. Jundishapur J Nat Pharm Prod. 2019;14(2):e12589. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jjnpp.12589

3
Oct
2020
Journal of Archives in Military Medicine

Reduction of Ovarian Radiation Dose and Image Quality Disruptive Effects: New Constructed Shields for CT Scanning of Abdomen and Pelvis

Mehran Bagheri,
Mohammad Reza Azimi Aval

Bagheri M, Azimi Aval MR. Reduction of Ovarian Radiation Dose and Image Quality Disruptive Effects: New Constructed Shields for CT Scanning of Abdomen and Pelvis. J Arch Mil Med. 2020;8(1):e109023. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/jamm.109023

Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Ordering Reprints

Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC 

Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles