AKI is a common and challenging complication in children admitted to PICUs and has important clinical consequences. Early diagnosis can substantially affect treatment and prognosis. Diagnostic criteria for AKI in children are generally based on changes in urine output, serum creatinine, and GFR. However, these criteria may manifest differently across patient populations. A better understanding of this variability may improve the diagnosis and clinical management of AKI.
The exceptionally high prevalence of AKI (90%) in our cohort of critically ill children contrasts markedly with the rates reported in most major PICU studies, in which prevalence typically ranged from 10% to 27% (
10,
16-
18). This discrepancy may reflect several methodological and population-specific factors.
The high prevalence may reflect the study's stringent inclusion criteria, which selected a uniquely severe subpopulation. By including only children who required a PICU stay of ≥ 24 hours and had complete hemodynamic monitoring data, the study may have preferentially captured patients with severe illness requiring intensive surveillance. This interpretation is supported by the finding that 90.3% of patients with AKI had an elevated SI, a marker of substantial hemodynamic compromise. The primary diagnoses in the cohort—septic shock (32.5%), diabetic ketoacidosis (17.5%), and major trauma (15%)—also indicate a high-acuity case mix with an increased risk of kidney injury. Therefore, these findings are most generalizable to this specific high-risk subset of PICU patients rather than to all PICU admissions.
Another factor is that the study was conducted at a single tertiary care center in Iran. Local patient demographics, admission thresholds, underlying disease patterns, and resource availability may influence the case mix and observed AKI prevalence compared with multicenter studies (
4,
10) or studies conducted in different health care systems.
Despite the unusually high AKI prevalence, the core finding of a strong, statistically significant association between elevated SI and AKI (OR = 9.28) remained evident within this high-severity cohort of critically ill children. Taken together, the high AKI prevalence and its discrepancy with broader PICU studies highlight the vulnerability of this subgroup of hemodynamically unstable patients to kidney injury and underscore the importance of considering patient acuity, the precise AKI definition (including the role of GFR estimates and fluid overload), and the clinical setting when interpreting AKI epidemiology. Future research should prospectively validate SI in diverse PICU populations using standardized AKI criteria such as KDIGO while accounting for fluid balance, to better define its prognostic utility for AKI risk.
The present study showed that mean urine output and GFR after 24 hours were significantly lower in the high-SI group than in the normal-SI group. In contrast, age, weight, creatinine, baseline GFR, and length of hospitalization did not differ significantly between groups. The odds-ratio results were consistent with these findings: patients with higher SI were more likely to have AKI and reduced GFR.
A comprehensive review of the available literature suggests that the strong association between high SI and AKI can be explained by several interconnected mechanisms. At the macroscopic level, an increase in SI reflects a decrease in effective circulating blood volume, which can impair kidney perfusion (
19). This condition is accompanied by activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which causes renal vasoconstriction and further decreases blood flow (
20). At the microscopic and cellular level, ischemia-induced hypoperfusion can lead to tubular epithelial cell injury accompanied by cellular debris in the tubular lumen (
21). At the same time, the release of proinflammatory cytokines, such as TNF-α and IL-6, and reactive oxygen species during the systemic inflammatory response to shock can exacerbate glomerular endothelial injury (
20). These processes can ultimately impair renal blood flow autoregulation and increase renal vascular resistance, thereby reducing glomerular filtration (
19).
From a clinical perspective, these mechanisms help explain why patients with high SI in the present study were more likely to develop AKI. The present findings support SI as a simple hemodynamic marker that may help identify patients at increased risk of AKI; however, its role in guiding treatment decisions requires further validation.
5.1. Study Limitations
This study has several limitations. First, the exceptionally high baseline AKI prevalence, although informative for a high-severity subgroup, limits the generalizability of the findings to broader, less critically ill PICU populations. The results are most applicable to children requiring prolonged PICU stays and intensive hemodynamic monitoring.
Second, the use of admission creatinine or estimation formulas to determine baseline creatinine, rather than documented premorbid values, may have influenced the accuracy of AKI classification. Using admission creatinine as baseline may underestimate true baseline values in patients with preexisting renal impairment or overestimate AKI severity in patients with low baseline values. This limitation is inherent in studies of critically ill populations in which premorbid laboratory values are frequently unavailable.
Third, the small number of patients without AKI (n = 8) resulted in insufficient statistical power for robust multivariable adjustment and precise estimation of effect sizes, as reflected by the wide confidence intervals. This limitation reduces the certainty of the reported odds ratios and precludes adjustment for potential confounders such as sepsis, illness severity, or nephrotoxic medication exposure. Future studies with larger sample sizes and adequate numbers of patients without AKI are needed to confirm these findings and enable adjusted analyses.
5.2. Conclusions
Shock index may be a useful marker of acute kidney injury in children admitted to the intensive care unit. An increased SI was associated with the development of AKI and decreased kidney function. These findings support the clinical value of regular SI monitoring as a simple and accessible marker for identifying children at increased risk of kidney injury.