Abstract
Introduction:
Electrical storms and ventricular tachycardia are two life-threatening arrhythmias that are becoming more common. In developing ventricular arrhythmias, the sympathetic nervous system plays a vital role. Stellate ganglion (SG) block can be used in many situations as an important therapeutic target, like treating tachyarryhthmias and ventricular tachyarrhythmias.Case Presentation:
The patient was a 53 years old woman with a history of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) insertion due to ventricular tachycardia. The patient complained of an awkward and unpleasant sensation when the ICD sensed the tachyarrhythmia and shocked her. Regarding the positive response to the previous SG block, with the goal of a longer duration of this effect, stellate ganglion radiofrequency was performed.Conclusions:
Stellate ganglion radiofrequency shows a safe and long-term effect for patients with tachyarrhythmias and ICD who cannot tolerate episodes of ICD activation.Keywords
Stellate Ganglion Block Ventricular Tachycardia Radiofrequency Ultrasound-Guided ICD
1. Introduction
The superior, middle, and inferior cervical sympathetic ganglia make the cervical sympathetic ganglia. Anterolateral to the longus capitis muscle are these ganglia. This muscle separates the ganglia from the transverse processes of the cervical spine. Because of its star-shaped appearance resulting from the junction of the two inferior cervical ganglions with the first two thoracic ganglions, the cervicothoracic or inferior ganglion is called the SG (1). This ganglion is significantly larger than the middle cervical ganglion (MCG) (2). The inferior cervical ganglion merges with the first thoracic ganglion to generate the SG in about 80% of people.
SG is a three-dimensional structure bordered on the medial side by the longus colli muscle, the scalene muscles on the lateral side, and the common carotid artery on the anterior side. Sympathetic blocks may be used to treat the following conditions: Complex regional pain syndrome types I and II, Raynaud's syndrome, frostbite, unintentional intravascular injection of medicines (a vasospastic mechanism), Sudeck's atrophy, pain from CNS lesions, scleroderma, Schizophrenia, hyperhidrosis, shoulder-hand syndrome, herpes zoster, stroke, vascular headaches, and cardiac dysrhythmias (3-5).
The stellate ganglion block (SGB) can be performed under fluoroscopy or sonography.
If performing SGB leads to successful results, a chemical neurolytic block or RF lesioning may be appropriate (4-7).
2. Case Presentation
The patient was a 53 years old woman with a history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus type II who was referred to a heart center for inserting an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) after a few attacks of sudden ventricular tachycardia and loss of consciousness that had not responded to medical therapy. The ICD was successfully inserted.
After six months, the patient returned to the heart center complaining of an awkward and unpleasant sensation from the moments the ICD sensed the tachyarrhythmia and shocked her. Following is the patient's drug history: Mexiletine, diabezide, aspirin, amlodipine, metohexital, metformin, atorvastatin, valsartan, and empagliflozin. Stellate ganglion block was done twice in the center, aiming to modulate the pulse rate and ICD shock number. Aspirin was discontinued four days before each block.
The first session of SGB was done six months after the insertion of the ICD. The block was performed unilaterally under fluoroscopy guidance with 40 mg triamcinolone and 6cc ropivacaine 0.25%, first on the right side and the next day on the left side in two successive days with the same method and the same drugs. Generation of horner's syndrome and unilateral block side change in the temperature of the upper limb was determined as block success (2, 5-9).
After these successful blocks, the patient was symptom-free for about two months. Symptom-free means there was no activity or shocking ICD due to tachyarrythmias. After this time, another event of ICD's shock happened. The patient was admitted, and another session of unilateral SGB was done with the same method and drugs. At this time, such as the previous time, the symptom-free period was also about two months.
Finally, it was decided to perform radiofrequency SGB to increase the duration of the effect. Before initiating the procedure, we consulted with a cardiologist. He visited the patient a few days earlier and came to the operating room at the beginning of the procedure initiation. Monitoring vital signs, including heart rate, blood pressure, and electrocardiogram (six leads) was performed in the operation room, and the cardiologist deactivated the ICD with a magnet before initiating the block. Furthermore, the cardiologist stayed in the operating room all over the time of block until the end and then reactivated the ICD again.
Patient preparation with neck extension and slight head rotation to the opposite side was done in the supine position. The skin was sterilized with betadine and alcohol. By linear ultrasound transducer, 5 - 12 MHz (Sonosite, EDGE2, USA), the anterior tubercle of the transverse process of C6 and, after moving caudally, the C7 transverse was confirmed. Then under the guidance of sonography with a short axial view, the internal jugular vein, the longus colli muscle, and the carotid artery were identified (Figure 1). For better screening of the vessels through the needle course, color Doppler mode was used. After skin infiltration, with a real-time ultrasound guide, an RF sharp needle 22-gauge with a 5 cm length and 5 mm active tip (Cosman, USA) from the lateral side of the probe was introduced in-plane (from the left direction for doing unilateral RF neurolysis). As we first performed PRF, which had no significant pain and irritation, we did not inject any local anesthetic before doing PRF. The needle tip was placed on the longus Colli muscle and under the prevertebral fascia. Aspiration for cerebrospinal fluid, air, or blood was negative, and 1 mL of saline was injected. A neuro-term RF electrode with a 50 mm length was inserted and connected to the generator. The RF needle was positioned perpendicular to the ganglion for performing PRF, and for thermal RF, the needle was placed alongside the SG. In the next step, sensory stimulation was performed with 50 Hz, 0.1 - 0.5 V, with no neural numbness to the upper limbs or other areas. We checked the proximity to recurrent laryngeal nerves, phrenic or the segmental nerve, which are crucial.
Ultrasound view of stellate ganglion (SCM, sternocleidomastoid; LCo, lungoscolli; PVF, prevertebral fascia; T, C6 tubercle; CA, carotid artery).
For motor stimulation, at 2 Hz, 0.4 - 1.0 V exercise test, no corresponding segmental muscle tremors, and the jumping sensation was observed. Motor stimulation was performed by asking the patient to say "ee" to check for preservation of the motor function and exclude needle malposition. After the negative sensory and motor test, high voltage (60 V) PRF at 42°C for 360 s, 20 ms pulse width, and 2 Hz frequency started. Then before starting RF at 80ºC, we injected 1cc lidocaine 2% to prevent irritation and pain that may result from neurolysis at high temperatures. At 80ºC for 60 seconds, thermal left unilateral RF neurolysis was performed and repeated four times after needle-tip rotation and directed to the most medial site and most ventral aspect of the C6 and C7 transverse process under US guidance, with repeated sensory and motor stimulation before RF lesioning. Thirty minutes after the procedure's termination, a follow-up ultrasound screening was done to exclude any hematoma formation.
From pre- to post-block, there was an increase in the forehead and hands temperature, as recorded by a skin thermometer, which was used as a surrogate for a successful block.
After doing RF neurolysis in multiple time intervals, we visited the patient 1, 3, 6, 12, and 14 months later, and observed no signs of ventricular tachycardia. The patient did not complain about the unpleasant sensation of ICD activity and shock. At this time, she did not have the problem up to 14 months after the procedure and showed no sign of recurrence of the cardiac tachyarrhythmia.
3. Discussion
In recent years, interventional therapies that target the cardiac nervous system to control ventricular arrhythmias are gaining popularity. It is planned that in most cases, electrical storm or ventricular arrhythmia are associated with a heightened sympathetic tone that could be refractory to beta-blockade, antiarrhythmic therapy, and other hemodynamic supports. Most spinal sensory afferents pass through SG on their way to the dorsal horn of the spinal cord, where they have been linked to the development of arrhythmogenesis. Anesthetic drugs infused into SG also target these fibers, reducing both afferent and efferent neurotransmission at SG. Although SGB does not affect vagal afferents, lowering spinal afferents likely reduces overall cardiac afferent neurotransmissions (3, 10-21).
Zhou et al. (19) evaluated the effect of SG on atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial electrophysiological properties in a canine model. They concluded that unilateral SG electrical stimulation in combination with six h rapid atrial pacing could successfully establish a canine model of acute sympathetic-induced AF. They mentioned that SG stimulation facilitated AF induction. In addition, unilateral SGB and inhibition of sympathetic nerve activation can reduce AF initiation.
Ganesh et al. (20) used SGB as an intervention to treat ventricular arrhythmias.
They discovered that in patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias, performing unilateral or bilateral SGB can reduce arrhythmia occurrences for 24 - 72 hours, allowing time for additional interventions such as catheter ablation. SGB appears to be effective regardless of different kinds of ventricular arrhythmia. Otherwise, even when performed on patients with anticoagulation therapy, ultrasound-guided SGB is safe and has a low risk of sequelae.
Yang et al. (21) described a patient with a refractory VT to medication and catheter ablation history. Under ultrasound guidance, a left SGB injection using the mixture of 0.4% Lidocaine and 0.5% bupivacaine was performed immediately after the block sinus rhythm was retained. They found that left SGB may provide effective VT control and can be considered a necessary rescue treatment or bridge therapy with catheter ablation.
Abbas and Reyad (22) compared thermal RF versus super voltage PRF application on SG in neuropathic post-mastectomy pain syndrome control. The percentage of patients who had successful responses was significantly higher in the thermal RF group than in the PRF group, with significant differences in post-mastectomy pain intensity, less rescue analgesia needed, and better improvement in function. They mentioned that for post-mastectomy pain syndrome, the thermal RF of SG is a safe and successful treatment and more effective than PRF.
The current findings support the use of RF unilateral SGB as an effective complement to modern medicines in treating cardiac arrhythmia and electrical storms. However, additional research is needed to understand the safety and efficacy of SGB radiofrequency and compare different RF modalities in randomized clinical trials.
3.1. Conclusions
SGB radiofrequency is a good method in patients with refractory tachyarrhythmias. It is a minimally invasive method with the least side effects and can perform under the guidance of sonography. With the goal of a longer block duration, we did SG radiofrequency. The block duration in our patient, according to the last visit, was 14 months.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically Oriented Anatomy. Haryana, India: Wolters kluwer india Pvt Ltd; 2018.
-
2.
Abdi S, Zhou Y, Doshi R, Patel N. Stellate ganglion block: Emphasis on the new oblique fluoroscopic approach. Tech Reg Anesth Pain Manag. 2005;9(2):73-80. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.trap.2005.05.005.
-
3.
Imani F, Rahimzadeh P. Interventional pain management according to evidence-based medicine. Anesth Pain Med. 2012;1(4):235-6. [PubMed ID: 24904805]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4018708]. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.4514.
-
4.
Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Falco FJ, Hirsch JA. Essentials of Interventional Techniques in Managing Chronic Pain. New York, USA: Springer Cham; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60361-2.
-
5.
Hansen H, Trescot A, Manchikanti L. Stellate ganglion block. In: Manchikanti L, Singh V, editors. Interventional Techniques in Chronic Non-Spinal Pain. Kentucky, USA: ASIPP Publishing; 2009.
-
6.
Rockett M. Diagnosis, mechanisms and treatment of complex regional pain syndrome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2014;27(5):494-500. [PubMed ID: 25111604]. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000114.
-
7.
Meng L, Tseng CH, Shivkumar K, Ajijola O. Efficacy of Stellate Ganglion Blockade in Managing Electrical Storm: A Systematic Review. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(9):942-9. [PubMed ID: 29270467]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5734652]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.06.006.
-
8.
Borchers AT, Gershwin ME. Complex regional pain syndrome: a comprehensive and critical review. Autoimmun Rev. 2014;13(3):242-65. [PubMed ID: 24161450]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2013.10.006.
-
9.
Abdi S, Zhou Y, Patel N, Saini B, Nelson J. A new and easy technique to block the stellate ganglion. Pain Physician. 2004;7(3):327-31. [PubMed ID: 16858470].
-
10.
Meijer J, de Lange JJ, Ros HH. Skin pulse wave monitoring during lumbar epidural and spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1988;67(4):356-9. [PubMed ID: 3354870].
-
11.
Hogan QH, Erickson SJ, Haddox JD, Abram SE. The spread of solutions during stellate ganglion block. Reg Anesth. 1992;17(2):78-83. [PubMed ID: 1581263].
-
12.
Feigl GC, Rosmarin W, Stelzl A, Weninger B, Likar R. Comparison of different injectate volumes for stellate ganglion block: an anatomic and radiologic study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32(3):203-8. [PubMed ID: 17543814]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rapm.2006.11.013.
-
13.
Boas RA. Sympathetic blocks in clinical practice. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1978;16(4):149-82. [PubMed ID: 84795]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004311-197801640-00008.
-
14.
Ackerman WE, Racz GB. Comparison of the Efficacy of a Low-Volume Stellate Ganglion Block with a. Pain Digest. 1998;8(2):80-4.
-
15.
Rahimzadeh P, Imani F, Nafissi N, Ebrahimi B, Faiz SHR. Comparison of the effects of stellate ganglion block and paroxetine on hot flashes and sleep disturbance in breast cancer survivors. Cancer Manag Res. 2018;10:4831-7. [PubMed ID: 30464591]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6208490]. https://doi.org/10.2147/CMAR.S173511.
-
16.
Forouzanfar T, van Kleef M, Weber WE. Radiofrequency lesions of the stellate ganglion in chronic pain syndromes: retrospective analysis of clinical efficacy in 86 patients. Clin J Pain. 2000;16(2):164-8. [PubMed ID: 10870729]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200006000-00010.
-
17.
Reinertsen E, Sabayon M, Riso M, Lloyd M, Spektor B. Stellate ganglion blockade for treating refractory electrical storm: a historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth. 2021;68(11):1683-9. [PubMed ID: 34312821]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-021-02068-1.
-
18.
Racz GB, Holubec JT. Stellate Ganglion Phenol Neurolysis. In: Racz GB, editor. Techniques of Neurolysis. 4. New York, USA: Springer; 1989. p. 133-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6721-3_12.
-
19.
Zhou Q, Hu J, Guo Y, Zhang F, Yang X, Zhang L, et al. Effect of the stellate ganglion on atrial fibrillation and atrial electrophysiological properties and its left-right asymmetry in a canine model. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013;18(1):38-42. [PubMed ID: 24294036]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3716487].
-
20.
Ganesh A, Qadri YJ, Boortz-Marx RL, Al-Khatib SM, Harpole DJ, Katz JN, et al. Stellate Ganglion Blockade: an Intervention for the Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2020;22(12):100. [PubMed ID: 33097982]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7646199]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-020-01111-8.
-
21.
Yang SC, Wu CC, Hsieh YJ. Left stellate ganglion block, a rescue treatment for ventricular arrhythmia refractory to radiofrequency catheter ablation: A care-compliant case report. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(44). e17790. [PubMed ID: 31689853]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6946516]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017790.
-
22.
Abbas DN, Reyad RM. Thermal Versus Super Voltage Pulsed Radiofrequency of Stellate Ganglion in Post-Mastectomy Neuropathic Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Randomized Trial. Pain Physician. 2018;21(4):351-62. [PubMed ID: 30045592].