Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Outlines
Expression of Concern for "Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial" [Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(2):e112592]
Author(s):
1Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Published online:Jan 20, 2024
Article type:Expressions of Concern
Received:Dec 27, 2023
Accepted:Jan 20, 2024
This is an expression of concern about the following article: Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial
How to Cite:Alebouyeh M. Expression of Concern for "Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial" [Anesth Pain Med. 2021;11(2):e112592]. Anesth Pain Med. 2024;13(6):e144495. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm-144495
The Editor-in-Chief of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine is issuing this Expression of Concern regarding the article titled "Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial" by Taheri et al., published in Anesthesia and Pain Medicine in 2021 (1).
This Expression of Concern has been prompted by the receipt of an anonymous communication raising concerns about the description of the shock wave therapy device used in the study. Specifically, the concern points to a discrepancy between the mentioned device in the article, the Dornier AR2, and the device name, the Duolith SD1, both of which are associated with focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy (fESWT). The anonymous correspondent has noted that these are two distinct devices, and the lack of clarity on which device was actually used in the study raises questions about the reproducibility of the research.
The accuracy and transparency of device descriptions in scientific research are essential for ensuring the replicability of studies by other researchers. Given the identified discrepancy and the importance of specifying the exact device used in fESWT research, we are taking this Expression of Concern seriously.
Until this matter is resolved, this Expression of Concern will remain attached to the article, ensuring that readers are aware of the concern raised and that the issue is being investigated with diligence and transparency.
References
- 1.Taheri P, Naderi M, Khosravi S. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Phonophoresis Therapy for Neck Myofascial Pain Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. 2021;11(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.112592.
Copyright
Copyright © 2024, Alebouyeh. This open-access article is available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which allows for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
Crossmark
Checking
Comments
Number of Comments:0Cited by
- Scopus by DOI: 0
Last Update: 1 day ago
- Scopus by Title: 0
Last Update: 1 day ago
- Scopus by Title (Ref): 0
Last Update: 1 day ago
- CrossRef: 0
Last Update: 4 days ago
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCCÂ
Search Relations
Related Articles