This retrospective chart analysis demonstrates that, in children undergoing primary hypospadias repair, the addition of S (+)-ketamine and clonidine to the levobupivacaine 0.25% used to effect caudal analgesia does not prolong the time to the first request for analgesia or reduce the total 24-hour postoperative analgesia requirement for acetaminophen or ibuprofen. There was no significant difference in the median time to discharge among the groups, indicating no cost benefit for any of the techniques. These results suggest that S (+)-ketamine and clonidine, or the two in combination, when administered with levobupivacaine 0.25% during hypospadias repair, offer no additional analgesic benefit. We offer two possible explanations for these findings.
First, S (+)-ketamine and clonidine as caudal additives do not work well in combination with the S-enantiomer levobupivacaine and work better with the racemic bupivacaine preparation. Although considerable evidence supports the use of caudal S (+)-ketamine and clonidine with racemic bupivacaine (
4,
5,
7-
10), only limited evidence supports their use with levobupivacaine (
13). That the S-enantiomer levobupivacaine is thought to have a superior safety profile, with a reduced local anesthetic toxicity, may explain the recent increase in its use in the UK (
14). Surveys of UK pediatric anesthetists have shown a decrease in the use of racemic bupivacaine, from 94% in 2002 to 43.4% in 2009, with 41.7% of UK pediatric anesthesiologists now using levobupivacaine for caudal analgesia (
15,
16). The efficacy of levobupivacaine in caudals has been proven by Frawley (
17). For subumbilical surgery, Locatelli compared identical concentrations of caudally administered levobupivacaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine. Analgesic efficacy was similar among all three groups but bupivacaine resulted in a greater incidence of residual motor blockade and a longer analgesic block than the other two agents (
18).
A second explanation for the results obtained in this study concerns the quality of postoperative analgesia provided by the caudally administered local anesthetic alone. Following hypospadias repair, levobupivacaine alone may be sufficient to render unnecessary further analgesia. Thus, the addition of S (+)-ketamine and clonidine, either alone or in combination, does not further enhance the already adequate analgesia. This idea is supported by a recent study of caudal analgesia for hypospadias repair that compared levobupivacaine 0.125% with levobupivacaine 0.375% (0.5 mL/kg body weight). Twelve of the 17 patients in this study were pain free at discharge on the morning following surgery when levobupivacaine 0.125% and no additional analgesic was used (
19).
In the present study, neither S (+)-ketamine nor clonidine alone as caudal additive increased nausea, vomiting, anti-emetic use, or time to first oral intake, but when used in combination they did significantly increase postoperative sedation. Benzodiazepine premedication was given to just seven of these patients, yet 40% of the non-premedicated patients in this group exhibited postoperative sedation.
The main limitation of our study is its retrospective nature and the lack of consistently documented pain scores at the time of analgesia administration. Although nurses are under instructions to provide pain relief according to the severity of pain, its absence makes it impossible to comment on the quality of analgesia provided in each group. Assessment of pain in the age group studied is difficult, as it is frequently confounded in the postoperative period and confused with emergence delirium (
20).
This study examined wide dose ranges for levobupivacaine, S(+)-ketamine, and clonidine, reflecting variations in the practice of individual anesthetists. Even so, the median doses of S (+)-ketamine and clonidine used were consistent with the recommended doses of caudally administered S (+)-ketamine (0.5–1 mg/kg) and clonidine (1–2 μg/kg).
In conclusion, the addition of S (+)-ketamine or clonidine to levobupivacaine used to induce caudal analgesia for primary hypospadias repair appears to offer no benefit. When used in combination, however, the two additives do significantly increase the percentage of patients with postoperative sedation.