Abstract
Background:
A defasciculating dose of non-depolarizing muscle relaxant administered prior succinylcholine decrease its side effects including fasciculations and postoperative myalgias; however it is believed that the dosage of succinylcholine should be increased when such a pre-treatment is used.Objectives:
We hypothesized that a defasciculating dose of pancuronium as a pre-treatment could prolong its duration of effect.Patients and Methods:
Forty patients scheduled for elective orthopaedic surgery were consecutively assigned into 5 groups, a first group without pre-treatment (succinylcholine 1 mg/kg) and 4 subsequent groups of pretreatment with atracurium 0.05 mg/kg + succinylcholine 1 or 1.5 mg/kg and pancuronium 7.5 µg /kg + succinylcholine 1 and 1.5 mg/kg. The muscle relaxant effect of succinylcholine was assessed with a force transducer using train of four stimulations every 12 seconds. Kruskall Wallis Anova test was used to compare results.Results:
The duration of succinylcholine induced paralysis (1 and 1.5 mg/kg) was significantly prolonged with pre-treatment with pancuronium but succinylcholine 1mg/kg did not reached maximum blockade after pre-treatment with atracurium. After pancuronium, full recovery after succinylcholine 1.5 and 1 mg/kg occurred respectively after 18 and 15 minutes. P < 0.05 vs. 12 minutes for succinylcholine 1mg/kg alone.Conclusions:
This study highlights potentiation effect of a defasciculating dose of pancuronium on succinylcholine paralysis suggesting the lack of justification to increase succinylcholine dosage.Keywords
1. Background
Succinylcholine is used mainly used to facilitate tracheal intubation in emergency procedures but also in elective surgery, however because of multiple side effects including fasciculations muscle damage and late postoperative myalgia, a small dose of non-depolarising muscle relaxants (NDMR) may be used to decrease these side effects (1-6). Nearly all of NMDR might be used (7, 8), however magnesium sulphate is also reported to be efficient for this purpose (9). In addition, it’s generally believed that the dose of Succinylcholine should be enhanced because of receptor competition with the NMDR (10-13).
2. Objectives
A defasciculating dose of Pancuronium might have different pharmacokinetic profile, because of serum anticholinesterase activity (14, 15). In previous works we investigated different effect of low dose of pancuronium on mivacurium pharmacodynamics, suggesting that the potentiation of mivacurium effect would mostly be the result of the anti-cholinesterase activity of a low dose of pancuronium although a receptors competitive action cannot be totally excluded (16-18). Succinylcholine, like mivacurium is eliminated by plasma cholinesterase (BChe) (19, 20), therefore we hypothesized the same pharmacokinetic effect of low dose of pancuronium (18) could enhance the duration of neuromuscular blockade of succinylcholine.
4. Results
The mean age of patients was of 59 ± 12 year with a mean weight of 75 ± 23 kg and the mean height 167 ± 11 cm, no statistical difference was found between groups in demographic characteristics. No side effects occurred after the injection of pancuronium or atracurium.
Maximum blockade reached 100% except in Atra sux 1 group (95%).
The mean duration of Succinylcholine neuromuscular blockade (1mg/kg and 1,5 mg/kg) was significantly prolonged when it was preceded by administration of low dose pancuronium and shortened when preceded by low dose atracurium in comparison with Succinylcholine 1mg/kg alone (P < 0.05) (Table 1).
Neuromuscular Characteristics of Different Combinations
E Max a, % | T 70 b, Min | T 90 b, Min | T 100 b, Min | Significance | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Atra sux 1 | 95 | 4.8 (3.3-7.4) | 6.0 (4-8.5) | 7.1 (4.8-9) | P < 0.05 vs sux 1 |
Panc sux 1 | 100 | 12.2 (7-21.5) | 14.3 (8.8-23.7) | 15.8 (11.3-26) | P < 0.05 vs sux1 |
Sux 1 | 100 | 9.1 (5.8-13.2) | 11.5 (6.8-15.7) | 12.4 (9.1-16.9) | - |
Panc sux 1.5 | 100 | 13.3 (8.2-20.8) | 15.8 (10.7-24.1) | 18.2 (12.5-28.7) | P < 0.05 vs sux 1 |
Atra sux 1.5 | 100 | 8.6 (4.7-12.3) | 10.4 (5.8-10.5) | 12.6 (7.2-16) | P < 0.05 vs panc sux 1.5 |
5. Discussion
This study shows that low dose of pancuronium prolongs the duration of action of Succinylcholine induced paralysis whereas atracurium reduces it, therefore increasing the dose of succinylcholine is not necessary in case of pancuronium pre-treatment. Traditionally the administration of a very low dose of NDMR is used to prevent succinylcholine induced side effects (mostly fasciculations and post-operative myalgias) (21), however the dose of sucinylcholine should be increased to obtain satisfactory neuromuscular paralysis and or intubation conditions described in several investigations (10, 12, 22) this was demonstrated also in the present study with atracurium followed by succinylcholine 1mg/kg since the maximum neuromuscular effect was of 95% in comparison to other combinations or alone. Nevertheless, despite multiple studies considering side effects of pre-treatment very few investigated the duration of induced paralysis after such combinations.
As previously described with mivacurium, the potentiation of succinylcholine by pancuronium might be explained by the reduced hydrolysis of succinylcholine due to Bche inhibition (18). Although clear relationship between a decrease in Bche and a prolongation of effect of mivacurium could not be demonstrated (18).
We used the higher dose of pancuronium suggested for pre-treatment (21) to fulfill the purpose of the study in order to yield a decrease in cholinesterase activity, however our timing of the propofol injection (2 minutes after injection of low dose of pancuronium or atracurium), avoided the occurrence of side effects including blurred vision, diplopia, heavy eyelids, weakness, difficulty in breathing and swallowing or desaturation.
This investigation was open labelled, and not randomized since our primary endpoint was objective assessment of dose-effect relationship in clinical practice, we also did not measured the Bche after administration of pancuronium but in accordance to our previous dose-response investigations with intubating and maintenance doses we assumed Bche would significantly decrease despite remaining within clinical range (18). In addition the sample size was not chosen to evaluate the side effect of succinylcholine but only to prove an increase in the duration of paralysis. This study confirms the result of a previous investigation using higher dose of NDMR for pre-treatment (17).
Low dose of NDMR before succinylcholine is considered to be safe provided accurate dosing and timing however we suggest to consider also the type of NDMR as pancuronium enhances the effect of succinylcholine and atracurium reduces it, therefore increasing the dose of succinylcholine is not justified when pancuronium is used as a pre-treatment.
References
-
1.
Fagiano G, Vignotto F, Galliano D, Salamino A, Fogliati MT, Zaffiri O. [Prevention of myalgias caused by succinylcholine with a small dose of a non-depolarizing muscle relaxant]. Minerva Anestesiol. 1981;47(3):73-8. [PubMed ID: 7242958].
-
2.
Oxom DC, Whatley GS, Knox JW, Hooper JG. Atracurium and D-tubocurarine pretreatment in the prevention of succinylcholine myalgias: a study in vaginal hysterectomies. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37(4 Pt 2):S140. [PubMed ID: 2193736].
-
3.
Abbas N, Tariq S, Khan AW, Murtaza G, Naqvi N, Khanzada A. To asses the effects of rocuronium pretreatment on succinylcholine induced fasciculations and postoperative myalgias. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(12):847-50. [PubMed ID: 20201179].
-
4.
Hernandez-Palazon J, Noguera-Velasco J, Falcon-Arana LF, Domenech-Asensi P, Burguillos-Lopez S, Nuno de la Rosa-Carrillo V. [Precurarization with rocuronium prevents fasciculations and biochemical changes after succinylcholine administration]. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2004;51(4):184-9. [PubMed ID: 15168925].
-
5.
Fukano N, Suzuki T, Ishikawa K, Mizutani H, Saeki S, Ogawa S. A randomized trial to identify optimal precurarizing dose of rocuronium to avoid precurarization-induced neuromuscular block. J Anesth. 2011;25(2):200-4. [PubMed ID: 21225293]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-010-1086-z.
-
6.
Farhat K, Waheed A, Pasha AK, Tariq M. Effects of rocuronium pretreatment on muscle enzyme levels following succinylcholine. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2013;26(5):939-42. [PubMed ID: 24035949].
-
7.
Blitt CD, Carlson GL, Rolling GD, Hameroff SR, Otto CW. A comparative evaluation of pretreatment with nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers prior to the administration of succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 1981;55(6):687-9. [PubMed ID: 6458224].
-
8.
Pace NL. Prevention of succinylcholine myalgias: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 1990;70(5):477-83. [PubMed ID: 2139549].
-
9.
Sakuraba S, Serita R, Kosugi S, Eriksson LI, Lindahl SG, Takeda J. Pretreatment with magnesium sulphate is associated with less succinylcholine-induced fasciculation and subsequent tracheal intubation-induced hemodynamic changes than precurarization with vecuronium during rapid sequence induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2006;57(3):253-7. [PubMed ID: 17067136].
-
10.
Eisenkraft JB, Mingus ML, Herlich A, Book WJ, Kopman AF. A defasciculating dose of d-tubocurarine causes resistance to succinylcholine. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37(5):538-42. [PubMed ID: 2372857].
-
11.
Fisher DM. Clinical pharmacology of neuromuscular blocking agents. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1999;56(11 Suppl 1):S4-9. [PubMed ID: 10437710].
-
12.
Motamed C, Choquette R, Donati F. Rocuronium prevents succinylcholine-induced fasciculations. Can J Anaesth. 1997;44(12):1262-8. [PubMed ID: 9429043].
-
13.
Donati F. Dose inflation when using precurarization. Anesthesiology. 2006;105(1):222-3. author reply 223. [PubMed ID: 16810017].
-
14.
Stoelting RK. Serum cholinesterase activity following pancuronium and antagonism with neostigmine or pyridostigmine. Anesthesiology. 1976;45(6):674-8. [PubMed ID: 984487].
-
15.
Stovner J, Oftedal N, Holmboe J. The inhibition of cholinesterases by pancuronium. Br J Anaesth. 1975;47(9):949-54. [PubMed ID: 1191483].
-
16.
Motamed C, Kirov K, Combes X, Feiss P, Duvaldestin P. Interaction between mivacurium and pancuronium: impact of the order of administration. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;61(3):175-7. [PubMed ID: 15824913].
-
17.
Motamed C, Kirov K, Lieutaud T, Duvaldestin P. The mechanism of pancuronium potentiation of mivacurium block: use of the isolated-arm technique. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(3):732-5. [PubMed ID: 10960409].
-
18.
Motamed C, Menad R, Farinotti R, Kirov K, Combes X, Bouleau D, et al. Potentiation of mivacurium blockade by low dose of pancuronium: a pharmacokinetic study. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(5):1057-62. [PubMed ID: 12717125].
-
19.
Baraka A, Wakid N, Noueihed R, Karam H, Bolotova N. Pseudocholinesterase activity and atracurium v. suxamethonium block. Br J Anaesth. 1986;58 Suppl 1:91S-5S. [PubMed ID: 3011044].
-
20.
Bissinger U, Lenz G. [Prolonged neuromuscular blockade. Different antagonistic effects following successive exposure to vecuronium and succinylcholine in a patient with atypical plasma cholinesterase]. Der Anaesthesist. 1994;43(2):82-6. [PubMed ID: 7908176].
-
21.
Schreiber JU, Lysakowski C, Fuchs-Buder T, Tramer MR. Prevention of succinylcholine-induced fasciculation and myalgia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Anesthesiology. 2005;103(4):877-84. [PubMed ID: 16192781].
-
22.
Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Samuels SI. Pancuronium pretreatment and post-succinylcholine myalgias. Anesthesiology. 1979;51(3):259-61. [PubMed ID: 475029].