https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.57568

Anesthetic Considerations in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Review Article

authors:

avatar Hassan Soleimanpour ORCID 1 , avatar Saeid Safari ORCID 2 , * , avatar Sarvin Sanaie ORCID 3 , avatar Mehdi Nazari 4 , avatar Seyed Moayed Alavian 5 , 6

Road Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Pain Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Tuberculosis and Lung Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Anesthesiology Research Team, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Baqiyatallah Research Center for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Tehran Hepatitis Center, Tehran, Iran
Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine: Vol.7, issue 4; e57568
published online: July 11, 2017
article type: Review Article
received: August 20, 2016
revised: October 3, 2016
accepted: June 12, 2017

how to cite: Soleimanpour H, Safari S, Sanaie S, Nazari M, Alavian S M. Anesthetic Considerations in Patients Undergoing Bariatric Surgery: A Review Article. Anesth Pain Med. 2017;7(4):e57568. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.57568.

Abstract

Context:

This article discusses the anesthetic considerations in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of surgery.

Evidence Acquisition:

This review includes studies involving obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Searches have been conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Review using the terms obese, obesity, bariatric, anesthesia, perioperative, preoperative, perioperative, postoperative, and their combinations.

Results:

Obesity is a major worldwide health problem associated with many comorbidities. Bariatric surgery has been proposed as the best alternative treatment for extreme obese patients when all other therapeutic options have failed.

Conclusions:

Anesthetists must completely assess the patients before the surgery to identify anesthesia- related potential risk factors and prepare for management during the surgery.

1. Context

Obesity is a major health problem affecting every organ system and is associated with many health consequences including an increased risk for coronary artery disease, dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, degenerative joint disease, gallbladder disease, obstructive sleep apnea, and socioeconomic and psychosocial impairment (1). Obese patients have more annual admissions to the hospital, more outpatient visits, and higher prescription drug costs than nonobese adults. Obesity is generally classified based on body mass index (BMI). BMI is calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms (kg) by the square of height in meters (m2). A person with a BMI of 20 - 25 kg/m2 has normal weight, whereas an individual with a BMI of 26 - 29.9 kg/m2 is defined as overweight. A patient with a BMI of 30 - 39.9 kg/m2 is called obese, and is called extreme/morbid obese with a BMI > 40 kg/m2. A patient with a BMI > 50 kg/m2 is superobese, and with a BMI > 60 kg/m2 is supersuperobese (2). The risk of developing one or more of the obesity- related conditions is based on BMI, as being low risk for overweight patients and being very high risk for morbid or super obese patients (3). Obesity has become a global epidemic problem, with more than 1 billion adults being overweight and at least 300 million of them being obese (4). It is estimated that more than 40% of the adult population in the United States will be obese by the year 2025 (5).

2. Pharmacological Management of Obesity

BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 or ≥ 27 kg/m2 in combination with obesity-related disease or risk factors is the indication for pharmacotherapy. These drugs decrease appetite, reduce fat absorption, or increase metabolic rate energy expenditure. Although the prescribed weight loss drugs will not do magic, they may be effective, especially when combined with proper diet programs and physical activity (6). The drugs used for obesity management are classified into 2 groups of CNS-acting and non-CNS-acting agents. CNS-acting drugs include catecholaminergics, serotninergics, and a combination of catecholaminergic and serotninergic agents. Catecholaminergic drugs exert their effect by increasing the availability of norepinephrine amphetamine, a catecholaminergic and anorexic agent, which has a high potential for abuse and is not recommended anymore for obesity treatment. Serotoninergic drugs act by increasing serotonin levels in the brain. Fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine are 2 of the serotoninergic drugs. Fenfluramine was commonly used in combination with phentermine (fen-phen) and used to be one of the most popular treatments for obesity. However, they were removed from the market and were no longer approved by the food and drug administration (FDA) in 1997 after observing their cardiopulmonary side effects. Sibutramine (Meridia) is a combination of catecholaminergic and serotoninergic drugs that was approved in 1997 for weight loss. It acts by inhibiting the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine in the brain, decreasing hunger and increasing satiety and metabolic rate. However, some clinical trials indicated an increased risk of cardiovascular adverse events including heart attack and stroke in patients using sibutramine. Thus, it was withdrawn from the market in 2010 by FDA (7). Orlistat is another weight loss drug with a unique and unusual mode of action. It prevents the absorption of one third of fat from the diet by inhibiting gastrointestinal lipase. This reduced fat absorption can represent 150 - 200 kcal/day, depending on the fat content of the diet (8). Side effects are gastrointestinal complaints induced by fat malabsorption. Absorption of fat-soluble vitamins (A, D, E, and K) decreases, which necessitates supplementation with these vitamins (9, 10). Since April, 2015, 5 weight loss drugs have been approved by the FDA for long-term use. They are Orlistat (Xenical), lorcaserin (Belviq), phentermine-topiramate (Qsymia), naltrexone-bupropion (Contrave), and liraglutide (Saxenda) (11).

3. Surgical Management of Obesity

The national institutes of health consensus development conference panel has recommended weight reduction surgery as the best alternative treatment for extreme obese patients who cannot lose weight by diet, exercise, and weight loss medications. Bariatric surgery is considered as the only effective long-term treatment for patients with BMI ≥ 40 or ≥ 35 with comorbidities (1). In addition to significant and consistent weight loss, bariatric surgery has additional advantages for the patients. Recent studies have shown that it can help improve cardiovascular disease, hypertension, glucose intolerance, and Type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and mortality (12-15). Bariatric surgery rate is increasing day by day, especially because of failure of nonsurgical methods of weight loss (life style modification, diet, exercise, and drug therapy). Weight reduction surgery can be categorized as malabsorptive, restrictive, or a combination of both (16). Jejuno-ileal bypass and biliopancreatic bypass are malabsorptive methods and are rarely used now (17). Restrictive procedures include the vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), and sleeve gastrectomy (GS) (18, 19). Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a combination of gastric restriction and a small degree of malabsorption (20, 21). AGB and RYGB are currently the most common performed operations among bariatric surgeries. VBG, AGB, GS, and RYGB can be performed by laparoscopy. Laparoscopic procedures are now more preferred. They have more advantages compared with open bariatric operations including earlier recovery, lesser risk of postoperative pulmonary complications, and reduced postoperative pain. RYGB is one of the most common, most effective, and the gold standard of weight reduction surgeries. It is performed by anastomosingthe proximal gastric pouch to a segment of theproximal jejunum, bypassing most of the stomach, duodenum, and proximal jejunum (22). AGB is a restrictive procedure and usually performed by a minimally invasive laparoscopic method. It consists of an adjustable silicone elastomer band with an inflatable inner shell. The band is placed laparoscopically around the proximal stomach to limit oral intake (23). Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages. Effort is made to minimize the side effects and achieve better results.

As the risk of anesthesia and surgery is higher in obese patients than the normal population, anesthesiologists should be familiar with the clinical management of obese patients for all types of surgery, especially for weight reduction procedures. They must completely assess the patients before the surgery to identify anesthesia- related potential risk factors and prepare for management during the surgery. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia and oxygenation, intubation, and pain management can be challenging in these patients. Moreover, obese patients are at a higher risk for postoperative complications.

4. Evidence Acquisition

This review includes studies involving obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery. Searches have been conducted in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Scopus, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Review using the terms obese, obesity, bariatric, anesthesia, perioperative, preoperative, perioperative, postoperative, and their combinations. Literature, in English language, published up to 2016 including randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional studies, case reports, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, and expert opinions have been assessed. We identified more than 70 papers; the 48 most relevant were reviewed in detail. This article discusses the anesthetic considerations in patients undergoing bariatric surgery in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases of surgery.

5. Results

5.1. Preoperative Considerations

As obesity is associated with many chronic medical conditions, preoperative history and physical examination are very important. Comorbidities include disorders in respiratory, cardiovascular, endocrine, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal systems and various types of malignancy as well as metabolic changes such as protein, vitamin, iron, and calcium deficiencies. Drug history including diet drugs and appetite suppressors should be assessed and be listed preoperatively because they may have important implications for anesthetic management such as cardiopulmonary and gastrointestinal problems. Other usual medications, except insulin and oral hypoglycemics, are better to be continued until the time of operation. As postoperative wound infection is high due to the longer incisions and operative times, inability of adipose tissue to resist infection and tissue trauma from excessive traction, antibiotic prophylaxis should be considered in such patients (24).

Although the incidence of wound infection is higher in open bariatric surgery than thelaparoscopic approach, antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for both operation methods.

Special attention and care is needed in obese patients regarding airway and cardiorespiratory status. Patients should be evaluated for ischemic heart disease, systemic and pulmonary hypertension, right or left ventricular failure signs, and sleep-disordered breathing. Nitrous oxide and other drugs, which may worsen pulmonary vasoconstriction, should be avoided in patients with pulmonary hypertension. As inhaled anesthetics cause bronchodilation and decrease hypoxic pulmonary, vasoconstriction may be beneficial (25). Airway management in bariatric surgery is a challenge for anesthesiologists. Difficult or failed intubation is more common in obese patients than the nonobese (26). Obesity is associated with a 30% greater chance of difficult or failed intubation (27); however, it is not a risk factor for difficult laryngoscopy (28). Preoperative identification of patients at a high risk for airway management problems is highly important. Anesthesiologists should evaluate the risk for intubation to avoid life-threatening complications by preoperative assessment of some airway parameters. The Mallampati score and the neck circumference are some of the most important parameters of the preoperative assessment. The Mallamati score uses the visibility of the base of uvula, faucial pillars, and soft palate to assess how difficult an intubation will be. Based on Mallamati score, patients are classified into 4 classes. In class 1, these structures are best visible, and in class 4 the structures are least visible. Mallampati classes 1 and 2 are associated with relatively easy intubation, and classes 3 and 4 are associated with higher probability of a difficult intubation (29, 30). A neck circumference ≥ 43 cm and Mallampati class ≥ 3 are related to increased risk of difficult intubation in patients with morbid obesity (31-33).

The anesthesiologist must also assess the thyromental distance and the range of movements of the neck and larynx.

6. Intraoperative Considerations

6.1. Patient Positioning

Two conventional operating room tables placed together or specially designed tables may be required to accommodate a particularly large patient. Conventional operating room tables are capable of holding maximum 205 kg of weight, but there are specially designed tables with a little extra width and strong enough to support a patient weighing up to 455 kg.

Attention should be paid to protect pressure areas because pressure sores and neural injuries are common in these patients, especially in the super obese and patients with diabetes. It is essential to carefully pad all the pressure points to avoid pressure sores and neurologic injury. Brachial plexus and sciatic nerve palsies have also been reported in these patients, which can be due to the excessive stretch or prolonged ischemic pressure (34, 35). Proper patient positioning is crucial for a safe and efficient surgery. Respiration is difficult in the supine position; functional residual capacity (FRC) is markedly reduced causing further ventilation/perfusion mismatch. So, significant increases in O2 consumption and cardiac output can occur in this position. Abdominal weight can compress the inferior vena cava and the aorta, impeding normal blood flow. The Trendelenburg position exacerbates this condition and decreases lung volume; thus, it may cause fatality due to the cardiorespiratory decompensation. Overweight patients do not tolerate the prone position well. The diaphragm is compressed and consequently the ventilation will be difficult and restricted. Moreover, compression on the abdomen constricts the inferior vena cava and the aorta (as in the supine and Trendelenburg position). The reverse Trendelenburg position is better tolerated and is a simple and safe intraoperative posture for obese patients. In this position, the diaphragm is unloaded and has some cardiorespiratory advantages including improved respiratory compliance, alveolar unit recruitment, and increasing FRC (36). The lateral decubitus position is usually well- tolerated if the panniculus is displaced off the abdomen. Proper size and placement of the axillary support is essential in this position (37, 38).

7. Monitoring

Standard monitors including blood pressure and temperature measurements pulse oximetry, ECG, and end-tidal capnography should be applied. Blood pressure measurements may be inaccurate if the used cuff has a wrong size. It can be falsely increased, if the cuff is too small for the arm. If there is difficulty with the upper arm blood pressure cuff, blood pressure can be obtained from the wrist or ankle with cuffs having an appropriate size (39, 40). For more accurate pressure monitoring, a radial artery is often cannulated. Central venous catheters can be used for major abdominal and thoracic procedures when peripheral IV access cannot be obtained. A central line can also be helpful for postoperative needs because postoperative IV access can be problematic in obese patients and is more easily performed in anesthetized patients (38).

8. Pharmacologic Considerations

Distribution, binding, and elimination of the anesthetic drugs are affected by the physiological changes of obesity. Anesthetic drugs are administered based on the body weight in routine surgeries, but this may not be valid in the bariatric surgery of obese patients.

Most of the anesthetic medications are highly lipophilic. Volume of distribution (Vd) is significantly increased for highly lipophilic drugs such as barbiturates, benzodiazepines in obese patients compared to the nonobese. To achieve adequateserum concentrations, larger initial doses are needed and their doses are calculated based on total body weight (TBW). However, their maintenance dosing should be decreased and calculated based on the ideal body weight (IBW) because their elimination half-lives are longer (41, 42). Digoxin (43), procainamide (44), and remifentanil (45) are some exceptions to this rule, as they are highly lipophilic medications but there is no change in their Vd in obese patients. Therefore, their doses should be calculated based on IBW. Vd of non- or weakly- lipophilic medications does not change in obese patients. Their doses are calculated based on LBW. Because 20% to 40% of increase in TBW can be attributed to an increase in LBM in an obese patient, LBW is calculated by adding 20% to 40% to IBW (38). Proper doses of nondepolarizing musclerelaxants can be calculated this way. There is no evidence to show the preferably of any nondepolarizing muscle relaxants in bariatric surgery. Neuromuscular recovery time is not different between obese and nonobese patients with atracurium, rocuronium, or vecuronium (46). Succinylcholine dosages are increased and calculated based on TBW, because plasma cholinesterase levels and activity increases in obesity. Halogenated inhalational anesthetic agents are more metabolized in obese patients than the nonobese. Desflurane and sevoflurane have more rapid and consistent recovery, prompt regaining of psychological and physical functioning, infrequent incidence of nausea and vomiting, good hemodynamic control, and early discharge from hospital. So, inhaled anesthetic medications are preferred in bariatric surgery (47-49). As fat content, cardiac output, and blood volume increase in obese individuals, larger doses of induction agents such as propofol may be needed in these patients. On the other hand, obese patients are more sensitive to these medications. Consequently, induction agents should be given based on LBW. Opioids are highly lipophilic medications and their loading doses should be calculated based on TBW. However, using high doses of long-acting opioids such as morphine needs caution because it can lead to respiratory depression (38). Obesity does not significantly affect systemic absorption of oral medications.

9. General Anesthesia

9.1. Tracheal Intubation

Possibility of a difficult intubation and potential airway management problems must be considered and preparation should be made for it. Large neck circumference and high Mallampati score are some of the most important parameters of the preoperative assessment and reliable predictors of problematic intubation in morbidly obese patients (33).

The supine position is not well-tolerated by a morbidly obese patient. Posterior cervical fat can exaggerate the flexed position of the head and neck, and head elevation with a conventional 8-cm cushion is not sufficient to optimize conditions for direct laryngoscopy. Proper positioning can be obtained by the elevation of the head, neck, and shoulders with a towel or folded blankets under the shoulders and head. In this position, known as “stacked” or “ramped” position, the tip of the chin is placed at a higher level than the chest and the patient’s ear is placed at the same level with his sternum to facilitate laryngoscopy and intubation (50). It is necessary to preoxygenate the patients in the reverse Trendelenburg position until their SPO2 reaches to100% and remains for several minutes (51). As FRC is reduced and O2 reserves are limited in the obese patients with apnea, hemoglobin will quickly desaturate. A rapid IV induction with propofol and succinylcholine in addition to cricoid pressure is the best way to establish airway for most of the patients.

10. Ventilation

Several ventilatory strategies have been proposed to improve gas exchange patients with morbid obesity. Visick et al. suggested using large tidal volumes (Vt) to increase PaO2 (52); however, other studiers did not confirm the efficacy of this strategy. It has been found that large Vt not only does not improve oxygenation in patients with morbid obesity, but also produces severe hypocapnia and increases the risk of lung injury (53, 54). Atelectasis is common after induction of anesthesia of morbidly obese patients and use of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may theoretically be beneficial for its improvement. However, PEEP combined with a large Vt can decrease cardiac output and O2 delivery to the tissues, and therefore worsen hypoxemia (55). Alveolar recruitment maneuver is a strategy to reopen atelectatic lung areas, which is present during anesthesia. It is performed by the use of high, sustained, positive airway pressure to increase end-expiratory lung volume and reexpand atelectatic lung areas (56). It is the most effective method to improve intraoperative PaO2 in patients with obesity. Sustained inspiratory pressure of at least 40 cm H2O is needed to open collapsed alveoli in nonobese patients (57-60). To maintain open alveoli, recruitment needs to be followed by adequate levels of PEEP (61, 62). Whalen et al. assessed the effect of recruitment maneuver on arterial oxygenation in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery. They demonstrated that this strategy may be effective in improving intraoperative PaO2 in patients with morbid obesity (63).

11. Postoperative Considerations

Patients can be safely managed after the surgery in general surgical wards, the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU)/recovery, or high dependency unit (HDU)/ITU. It should be noted that as experience with anesthesia and surgical techniques increases in specialist centers performing these procedures, the number of patients requiring HDU/ITU reduces over time (64). The most important anesthetic considerations during this phase are as follow: pain control, wound care, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, and fluid management. The reverse Trendelenburg or semirecumbent position maximizes oxygenation because it increases FRC. When the patients are hemodynamically stable, their airway can be extubated with an elevation of 30° to 45° in the upper body. They can be then transferred in the same position from the operating room. Thereafter, all patients should be placed in that semirecumbent position with continuous pulse oximetry and should receive supplemental oxygen therapy (38). Supplemental humidified oxygen should be administered at an appropriate fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2). There are some evidences that postoperative incentive spirometry or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) started in early postoperative phase may accelerate the return to preoperative pulmonary function, especially in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (65). Concerns that CPAP may cause gastric insufflations and distention resulting in anastomotic failure have largely been discredited (66). Optimal analgesia ensures adequate ventilation and pulmonary mechanics and reduces the risk of postoperative chest infections. Pain severity during laparoscopic procedures is less than open surgeries, so pain control is much easier if the patient undergoes laparascopic bariatric surgery (67). As pain severity is less and toleration is easy, the patients don’t usually need epidural analgesia. Pain control is better with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) technique. Intravenous opioids may induce respiratory depression, especially with continous infusion method, but the risk is decreased if opioids are used judiciously with PCA (68-70). Thromboembolism is an important cause of postoperative mortality in these patients. Phlebothrombosis can develop as a result of prolonged immobilization. Other risk factors of thrombosis include diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, greater blood volume and polycythemia, and accelerated fibrin formation of obese patients. One of the most important interventions for deep vein thrombosis prevention is early postoperation ambulation. Other interventions such as anticoagulant therapy or inferior vena cava filter should also be considered (71, 72). Multimodal pain control regimen could be ideal for pain control and may include acetaminophen, NSAIDs, intravenous opioids, local anesthetics injected to wound or port site, and tramadol. There are some studies with good results with dexmedetomidine use for decreasing opioid requirements (73-75). Fluid management should be considered according to personalized requirements and careful recording of fluid input and output. To ensure reduction in complications, all these factors should be considered in addition to high quality nursing care.

12. Conclusions

As the risk of anesthesia and surgery is higher in obese patients than the normal population, anesthesiologists should be familiar with the clinical management of obese patients for all types of surgeries, especially for weight reduction procedures. In this field, there is variety of recommendations, but there is a lack of a general consensus about the perioperative care of these patients. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia and oxygenation, intubation, and pain management can be challenging in these patients. Moreover, obese patients are at higher risk for postoperative complications.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    NIH conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115(12):956-61. [PubMed ID: 1952493].

  • 2.

    Renquist K. Obesity classification. Obes Surg. 1997;7(6):523. [PubMed ID: 9730514]. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089297765555331.

  • 3.

    Bray GA. Pathophysiology of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;55(2 Suppl):488S-94S. [PubMed ID: 1733117].

  • 4.

    Obesity and overweight: World Health Organization global strategy on diet, physical activity and health. Geneva: WHO; 2008.

  • 5.

    Kopelman PG. Obesity as a medical problem. Nature. 2000;404(6778):635-43. [PubMed ID: 10766250]. https://doi.org/10.1038/35007508.

  • 6.

    Apovian CM, Aronne LJ, Bessesen DH, McDonnell ME, Murad MH, Pagotto U, et al. Pharmacological management of obesity: an endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(2):342-62. [PubMed ID: 25590212]. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-3415.

  • 7.

    FDA drug safety communication: FDA recommends against the continued use of Meridia (sibutramine). 2014. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm228747.htm.

  • 8.

    Sjostrom L, Rissanen A, Andersen T, Boldrin M, Golay A, Koppeschaar HP, et al. Randomised placebo-controlled trial of orlistat for weight loss and prevention of weight regain in obese patients. European Multicentre Orlistat Study Group. Lancet. 1998;352(9123):167-72. [PubMed ID: 9683204].

  • 9.

    Davidson MH, Hauptman J, DiGirolamo M, Foreyt JP, Halsted CH, Heber D, et al. Weight control and risk factor reduction in obese subjects treated for 2 years with orlistat: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1999;281(3):235-42. [PubMed ID: 9918478].

  • 10.

    Hauptman J, Lucas C, Boldrin MN, Collins H, Segal KR. Orlistat in the long-term treatment of obesity in primary care settings. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(2):160-7. [PubMed ID: 10693734].

  • 11.

    Mahan LK, Raymond JL. Krause's Food & the Nutrition Care Process-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

  • 12.

    Dixon JB, O'Brien PE, Playfair J, Chapman L, Schachter LM, Skinner S, et al. Adjustable gastric banding and conventional therapy for type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008;299(3):316-23. [PubMed ID: 18212316]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.3.316.

  • 13.

    Sjostrom L, Lindroos AK, Peltonen M, Torgerson J, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, et al. Lifestyle, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk factors 10 years after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(26):2683-93. [PubMed ID: 15616203]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa035622.

  • 14.

    Sjostrom L, Narbro K, Sjostrom CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):741-52. [PubMed ID: 17715408]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa066254.

  • 15.

    Adams TD, Gress RE, Smith SC, Halverson RC, Simper SC, Rosamond WD, et al. Long-term mortality after gastric bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(8):753-61. [PubMed ID: 17715409]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa066603.

  • 16.

    Balsiger BM, Murr MM, Poggio JL, Sarr MG. Bariatric surgery. Surgery for weight control in patients with morbid obesity. Med Clin North Am. 2000;84(2):477-89. [PubMed ID: 10793653].

  • 17.

    Griffen WJ, Bivins BA, Bell RM. The decline and fall of the jejunoileal bypass. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1983;157(4):301-8. [PubMed ID: 6623319].

  • 18.

    Elder KA, Wolfe BM. Bariatric surgery: a review of procedures and outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(6):2253-71. [PubMed ID: 17498516]. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.057.

  • 19.

    Trelles N, Gagner M. Updated Review of Sleeve Gastrectomy. Open Gastroenterol J. 2008;2(1):41-9. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874259900802010041.

  • 20.

    Buchwald H, Williams SE. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2003. Obes Surg. 2004;14(9):1157-64. [PubMed ID: 15527627]. https://doi.org/10.1381/0960892042387057.

  • 21.

    Scott DJ, Provost DA, Jones DB. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: transoral or transgastric anvil placement? Obes Surg. 2000;10(4):361-5. [PubMed ID: 11007630]. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089200321629139.

  • 22.

    Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, Ramanathan R, Luketich J. Outcomes after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232(4):515-29. [PubMed ID: 10998650].

  • 23.

    O'Brien PE, Dixon JB, Brown W, Schachter LM, Chapman L, Burn AJ, et al. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (Lap-Band): a prospective study of medium-term effects on weight, health and quality of life. Obes Surg. 2002;12(5):652-60. [PubMed ID: 12448387].

  • 24.

    Fisher A, Waterhouse TD, Adams AP. Obesity: its relation to anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1975;30(5):633-47. [PubMed ID: 1103646].

  • 25.

    Konduri GG, Garcia DC, Kazzi NJ, Shankaran S. Adenosine infusion improves oxygenation in term infants with respiratory failure. Pediatrics. 1996;97(3):295-300. [PubMed ID: 8604260].

  • 26.

    Juvin P, Lavaut E, Dupont H, Lefevre P, Demetriou M, Dumoulin JL, et al. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(2):595-600. table of contents. [PubMed ID: 12873960].

  • 27.

    Lundstrom LH, Moller AM, Rosenstock C, Astrup G, Wetterslev J. High body mass index is a weak predictor for difficult and failed tracheal intubation: a cohort study of 91,332 consecutive patients scheduled for direct laryngoscopy registered in the Danish Anesthesia Database. Anesthesiology. 2009;110(2):266-74. [PubMed ID: 19194154]. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e318194cac8.

  • 28.

    Ezri T, Medalion B, Weisenberg M, Szmuk P, Warters RD, Charuzi I. Increased body mass index per se is not a predictor of difficult laryngoscopy. Can J Anaesth. 2003;50(2):179-83. [PubMed ID: 12560311]. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03017853.

  • 29.

    Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, et al. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985;32(4):429-34. [PubMed ID: 4027773].

  • 30.

    Samsoon GL, Young JR. Difficult tracheal intubation: a retrospective study. Anaesthesia. 1987;42(5):487-90. [PubMed ID: 3592174].

  • 31.

    Combes X, Jabre P, Jbeili C, Leroux B, Bastuji-Garin S, Margenet A, et al. Prehospital standardization of medical airway management: incidence and risk factors of difficult airway. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;13(8):828-34. [PubMed ID: 16807397]. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2006.02.016.

  • 32.

    Kristensen MS. Airway management and morbid obesity. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27(11):923-7. [PubMed ID: 20689440]. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833d91aa.

  • 33.

    Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Brock-Utne JG, Vierra M, Saidman LJ. Morbid obesity and tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(3):732-6. table of contents. [PubMed ID: 11867407].

  • 34.

    Jupiter JB, Ring D, Rosen H. The complications and difficulties of management of nonunion in the severely obese. J Orthop Trauma. 1995;9(5):363-70. [PubMed ID: 8537837].

  • 35.

    Sawyer RJ, Richmond MN, Hickey JD, Jarrratt JA. Peripheral nerve injuries associated with anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(10):980-91. [PubMed ID: 11012494].

  • 36.

    Perilli V, Sollazzi L, Bozza P, Modesti C, Chierichini A, Tacchino RM, et al. The effects of the reverse trendelenburg position on respiratory mechanics and blood gases in morbidly obese patients during bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(6):1520-5. [PubMed ID: 11094011].

  • 37.

    Dybec RB. Intraoperative positioning and care of the obese patient. Plast Surg Nurs. 2004;24(3):118-22. [PubMed ID: 15550814].

  • 38.

    Ogunnaike BO, Jones SB, Jones DB, Provost D, Whitten CW. Anesthetic considerations for bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(6):1793-805. [PubMed ID: 12456461].

  • 39.

    Emerick DR. An evaluation of non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) monitoring on the wrist: comparison with upper arm NIBP measurement. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2002;30(1):43-7. [PubMed ID: 11939439].

  • 40.

    Block FE, Schulte GT. Ankle blood pressure measurement, an acceptable alternative to arm measurements. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1996;13(3):167-71. [PubMed ID: 8912031].

  • 41.

    Adams JP, Murphy PG. Obesity in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaesth. 2000;85(1):91-108. [PubMed ID: 10927998].

  • 42.

    Greenblatt DJ, Abernethy DR, Locniskar A, Harmatz JS, Limjuco RA, Shader RI. Effect of age, gender, and obesity on midazolam kinetics. Anesthesiology. 1984;61(1):27-35. [PubMed ID: 6742481].

  • 43.

    Abernethy DR, Greenblatt DJ, Smith TW. Digoxin disposition in obesity: clinical pharmacokinetic investigation. Am Heart J. 1981;102(4):740-4. [PubMed ID: 7282520].

  • 44.

    Christoff PB, Conti DR, Naylor C, Jusko WJ. Procainamide disposition in obesity. Drug Intell Clin Pharm. 1983;17(7-8):516-22. [PubMed ID: 6191939].

  • 45.

    Egan TD, Huizinga B, Gupta SK, Jaarsma RL, Sperry RJ, Yee JB, et al. Remifentanil pharmacokinetics in obese versus lean patients. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(3):562-73. [PubMed ID: 9743391].

  • 46.

    Varin F, Ducharme J, Theoret Y, Besner JG, Bevan DR, Donati F. Influence of extreme obesity on the body disposition and neuromuscular blocking effect of atracurium. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990;48(1):18-25. [PubMed ID: 2369806].

  • 47.

    Juvin P, Vadam C, Malek L, Dupont H, Marmuse JP, Desmonts JM. Postoperative recovery after desflurane, propofol, or isoflurane anesthesia among morbidly obese patients: a prospective, randomized study. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(3):714-9. [PubMed ID: 10960406].

  • 48.

    Sollazzi L, Perilli V, Modesti C, Annetta MG, Ranieri R, Tacchino RM, et al. Volatile anesthesia in bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2001;11(5):623-6. [PubMed ID: 11594107].

  • 49.

    Torri G, Casati A, Albertin A, Comotti L, Bignami E, Scarioni M, et al. Randomized comparison of isoflurane and sevoflurane for laparoscopic gastric banding in morbidly obese patients. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13(8):565-70. [PubMed ID: 11755325].

  • 50.

    Collins JS, Lemmens HJ, Brodsky JB, Brock-Utne JG, Levitan RM. Laryngoscopy and morbid obesity: a comparison of the "sniff" and "ramped" positions. Obes Surg. 2004;14(9):1171-5. [PubMed ID: 15527629]. https://doi.org/10.1381/0960892042386869.

  • 51.

    Jense HG, Dubin SA, Silverstein PI, O'Leary-Escolas U. Effect of obesity on safe duration of apnea in anesthetized humans. Anesth Analg. 1991;72(1):89-93. [PubMed ID: 1984382].

  • 52.

    Visick WD, Fairley HB, Hickey RF. The effects of tidal volume and end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary gas exchange during anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1973;39(3):285-90. [PubMed ID: 4580631].

  • 53.

    Bardoczky GI, Yernault JC, Houben JJ, d'Hollander AA. Large tidal volume ventilation does not improve oxygenation in morbidly obese patients during anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1995;81(2):385-8. [PubMed ID: 7618732].

  • 54.

    Sprung J, Whalley DG, Falcone T, Wilks W, Navratil JE, Bourke DL. The effects of tidal volume and respiratory rate on oxygenation and respiratory mechanics during laparoscopy in morbidly obese patients. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(1):268-74. table of contents. [PubMed ID: 12818980].

  • 55.

    Perilli V, Sollazzi L, Modesti C, Annetta MG, Sacco T, Bocci MG, et al. Comparison of positive end-expiratory pressure with reverse Trendelenburg position in morbidly obese patients undergoing bariatric surgery: effects on hemodynamics and pulmonary gas exchange. Obes Surg. 2003;13(4):605-9. [PubMed ID: 12935363]. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089203322190826.

  • 56.

    Tusman G, Bohm SH, Vazquez de Anda GF, do Campo JL, Lachmann B. 'Alveolar recruitment strategy' improves arterial oxygenation during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1999;82(1):8-13. [PubMed ID: 10325828].

  • 57.

    Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Hedenstierna G. Re-expansion of atelectasis during general anaesthesia: a computed tomography study. Br J Anaesth. 1993;71(6):788-95. [PubMed ID: 8280539].

  • 58.

    Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Hedenstierna G. Reexpansion of atelectasis during general anaesthesia may have a prolonged effect. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39(1):118-25. [PubMed ID: 7725873].

  • 59.

    Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Reber A, Hedenstierna G. Prevention of atelectasis during general anaesthesia. Lancet. 1995;345(8962):1387-91. [PubMed ID: 7760608].

  • 60.

    Rothen HU, Sporre B, Engberg G, Wegenius G, Reber A, Hedenstierna G. Atelectasis and pulmonary shunting during induction of general anaesthesia--can they be avoided? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1996;40(5):524-9. [PubMed ID: 8792880].

  • 61.

    Lachmann B. Open up the lung and keep the lung open. Intensive Care Med. 1992;18(6):319-21. [PubMed ID: 1469157].

  • 62.

    Sprung J, Whalen FX, Comfere T, Bosnjak ZJ, Bajzer Z, Gajic O, et al. Alveolar recruitment and arterial desflurane concentration during bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(1):120-7. [PubMed ID: 19095839]. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e31818db6c7.

  • 63.

    Whalen FX, Gajic O, Thompson GB, Kendrick ML, Que FL, Williams BA, et al. The effects of the alveolar recruitment maneuver and positive end-expiratory pressure on arterial oxygenation during laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Anesth Analg. 2006;102(1):298-305. [PubMed ID: 16368847]. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000183655.57275.7a.

  • 64.

    Jayaraman L, Sethi N, Sharma S, Sood J. Anaesthesia for bariatric surgery-Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding case series. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2006;22(4):403.

  • 65.

    Sabharwal A, Christelis N. Anaesthesia for bariatric surgery. Continu Educ Anaesthes Crit Care Pain. 2010;10(4):99-103. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkq020.

  • 66.

    Jones SB, Schumann R, Jones DB. Post-anesthesia care unit: management of anesthetic and surgical complications. In: Alvarez A, Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Morton JM, editors. Morbid Obesity Peri-operative Management. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

  • 67.

    Tank Y, Gohil P. Anesthetic considerations for bariatric surgery. Gujart Med J. 2011;66:46-50.

  • 68.

    Hassani V, Pazouki A, Nikoubakht N, Chaichian S, Sayarifard A, Shakib Khankandi A. The effect of gabapentin on reducing pain after laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery in patients with morbid obesity: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Pain Med. 2015;5(1). e22372. [PubMed ID: 25789237]. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.22372.

  • 69.

    Alimian M, Imani F, Faiz SH, Pournajafian A, Navadegi SF, Safari S. Effect of oral pregabalin premedication on post-operative pain in laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery. Anesth Pain Med. 2012;2(1):12-6. [PubMed ID: 24223327]. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.4300.

  • 70.

    Imani F. Postoperative pain management. Anesth Pain Med. 2011;1(1):6-7. [PubMed ID: 25729647]. https://doi.org/10.5812/kowsar.22287523.1810.

  • 71.

    Choi YK, Brolin RE, Wagner BK, Chou S, Etesham S, Pollak P. Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled analgesia for morbidly obese patients following gastric bypass surgery. Obes Surg. 2000;10(2):154-9. [PubMed ID: 10782177]. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089200321668703.

  • 72.

    Eriksson S, Backman L, Ljungstrom KG. The incidence of clinical postoperative thrombosis after gastric surgery for obesity during 16 years. Obes Surg. 1997;7(4):332-5. discussion 336. [PubMed ID: 9730520]. https://doi.org/10.1381/096089297765555575.

  • 73.

    Schumann R, Jones SB, Cooper B, Kelley SD, Bosch MV, Ortiz VE, et al. Update on best practice recommendations for anesthetic perioperative care and pain management in weight loss surgery, 2004-2007. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009;17(5):889-94. [PubMed ID: 19396068]. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.569.

  • 74.

    Alvarez A, Perez-Protto SE, Carey K, Sinha A. Post-operative analgesia. In: Alvarez A, Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ, Morton JM, editors. Morbid Obesity Peri-operative Management. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2010.

  • 75.

    Tufanogullari B, White PF, Peixoto MP, Kianpour D, Lacour T, Griffin J, et al. Dexmedetomidine infusion during laparoscopic bariatric surgery: the effect on recovery outcome variables. Anesth Analg. 2008;106(6):1741-8. [PubMed ID: 18499604]. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318172c47c.