Association Between Pain with Disability in the Elderly with Dementia

authors:

avatar Masoud Hatefi ORCID 1 , 2 , avatar Lida Nouri ORCID 3 , *

Neurology School of Medicine Non-communicable Diseases Research Center, Emam Khomeini Hospital Ilam University of Medical sciences, Ilam, Iran
Clinical Research Development, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Allied Medical Sciences , Ilam University of Medical sciences, Ilam, Iran

how to cite: Hatefi M , Nouri L. Association Between Pain with Disability in the Elderly with Dementia. Arch Neurosci. 2021;8(4):e119913. https://doi.org/10.5812/ans.119913.

Abstract

Background:

Elderly is one of the most important and critical periods of life, and paying attention to the issues and problems of this period is very important.

Objectives:

The present study was performed to investigate the relationship between pain and disability in the elderly with dementia in 2021.

Methods:

In the present cross-sectional descriptive study, 120 elderly people with dementia were included. The instruments used in the four sections were the demographic profile form, the P-APS pain observation tool, and Stanford Disability Questionnaire questions. the researcher identified the elderly with dementia by available sampling method and if the elderly with dementia were eligible and written informed consent was obtained from the elderly and their primary caregivers, the questionnaires were completed. Conditions of pain and disability were described by descriptive tests, and then the relationship between pain and the degree of disability in patients was analyzed by statistical analysis using SPSS16 software.

Results:

The results showed mean (SD) pain score was 14.45 (4.23), disability score was 12.75 (3.09), and fall score was 37 (30.8%). According to pain score status classification, 4 (3.3%) of the elderly had no pain, 8 (6.7%) had mild pain, 27 (22.5%) had moderate pain, and 81 (67.5%) had severe pain. There is a significant relationship between pain status and disability in the elderly with dementia. By increase in pain, the patients had more disability (P = 0.000, F = 79.971).

Conclusions:

As the pain increased, the disability of the elderly with dementia decreased. For this reason, preventive interventions are explained in this field.

1. Background

Elderly is one of the most important and critical periods of life, and paying attention to the issues and problems of this period is very important (1, 2). In Iran, significant changes occur in the elderly population so that, based on the forecasts, the elderly population will increase about 21% by 2050 (3). In old age, patients may expose to various disorders, one of which is cognitive disorders. One of the existing cognitive disorders is dementia, which is called neurodegenerative disorder, and has psychological effects and leads to a decrease in daily activities of life and functions of the individual. In these patients, memory, visual ability, judgment, calculation, and problem-solving are impaired, and the patient suffers from restlessness, insomnia, delirium, and hallucinations (4-6).

Over 50 million cases all over the world and more than trillion-dollar costs in 2018, this is a well-known health issue and has created challenges for the individual, family, and community at various levels (7-9), which creates many difficulties in patients’ families (10). In addition to the pressure of care, family caregivers of these patients, face with social isolation, psychological disorders (such as anxiety, depression), financial problems, social problems (eg, maltreatment, disruption of patient and family relationships), disorders in physical activity as well as decreased physical health (10-12).

The needs of the elderly as one of the vulnerable groups in all dimensions and areas have not been specially studied, and it is necessary to pay more attention to this group of people (13). Elderly people with dementia experience many difficulties, including pain (14), disability (15), and falls (16). Pain is one of the problems of the elderly, which has many negative effects on the living conditions of this age group, and the prevalence of pain in the elderly with dementia has been significant. Pain in these patients may also reduce social interactions and increase stress, depression, irritability, and the need for health care in patients (17). Therefore, pain assessment is effective in reducing the risk of mortality and increasing the quality of life of these patients (18). Despite the different side effects of pain and its high prevalence in patients, the pain in this group may be well considered for reasons such as fear of drug dependence, misunderstandings about the inevitable pain in the elderly, and side effects of painkillers (19).

Other problems of the elderly include disability and falls, especially in dementia patients. In fact, the decrease in the abilities of the elderly has increased their dependence on others, and these disabilities can affect various dimensions, including hearing and vision loss (20, 21). On the other hand, when these disabilities are associated with dementia, this function becomes weaker and may even lead to the patient falling (16). Falls are one of the most important causes of fatal and non-fatal injuries in people over 64 years of age, which has high prevalence and many consequent injuries, and this shows the importance of the issue (22).

The study by Lin et al. showed that 49.07% of elderly people with dementia had experienced pain at least once and that the three most common types of pain reported in these patients’ included osteoarthritis, headache, and osteoporosis (23). In the study of Takenoshita et al., the prevalence of dementia in patients with a disability was 13.9% for old group (24). Pain and disability in all the elderly, especially in the elderly with dementia, are very important issues that need to be prevented (23, 24).

2. Objectives

Based on the need for paying attention to the issues and problems of the elderly, especially vulnerable elderly, and the lack of knowledge gap in this regard, the present study aimed to investigate the relationship between pain and disability and falls in the elderly with dementia in Ilam in 2021.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design

In the present cross-sectional descriptive study, the elderly with dementia living in Ilam were included.

3.2. Study Population

The patients included in this study were patients with a history of dementia, and 120 patients were included in the study.

3.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

3.3.1. Inclusion Criteria

The patients included in this study had a history of dementia. Inclusion criteria were dementia based on a neurologist diagnosis using interview and CT scan, Iranian nationality, auditory ability, being in the age range of over 65 years old, lack of valid pain expression by the patient by self-report method, having a primary caregiver, and willingness of primary caregiver to cooperate.

3.3.2. Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion criteria were incomplete completion of information and also the existence of any conditions other than dementia in the patient that may have affected the pain status and disability of patients.

3.4. Data Gathering

The instruments used in the four sections were the demographic form, the Persian-Abbey Pain Scale (P-APS) pain observation tool, and the Stanford Disability Questionnaire.

3.4.1. Demographic Characteristic Form

The used form had questions about age, gender (male, female), education (illiterate, diploma, bachelor's degree or higher), place of residence (Outside the nursing home, In a nursing home), and History of chronic disease (yes, no).

3.4.2. Persian-Abbey Pain Scale

The used tool had questions about pain assessment and pain intensity based on behavioral indicators, including patient speech, facial expression, changes in body movements, behavioral changes, physiological changes, and physical changes. This instrument with six items in the 4-point Likert scale was rated as non-existent with a score of zero, mild with a score of one, moderate with a score of two, and severe with a score of three, and the overall score ranged from 0 to18. If patients scored 2 - 0, they had no pain, a score of 3 - 7 had mild pain, a score of 8 - 13 had moderate pain, and a score of 14 or higher indicated severe pain (19, 25, 26).

3.4.3. Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Scale

This tool (HAQ-DI) had eight questions, which assigned a score between 3 - 0 based on the person’s ability, and if the patient did not have any problems, was given a score of 0, with a little difficulty, was given a score of 1, with a high difficulty was given a score of 2, and if the person was unable to do it or could do it with the help of mobility aids, a score of 3 was considered. Finally, in this questionnaire, the person’s score was between 0 - 24 and if the patient's score was higher, it indicated a higher degree of disability (27, 28).

3.5. Method of Research

With the permission of the Ethics Committee of the Ilam University of Medical Sciences, the researcher identified the elderly with dementia by available sampling method and if the elderly with dementia were eligible and written informed consent was obtained from the elderly and their primary caregiver, the questionnaires were completed. Demographic profile form tools, P-APS pain instrument, Stanford Disability Questionnaire were completed by observing the patient and interviewing the patient’s primary caregiver.

3.6. Data Analysis

Conditions of pain and disability were described by descriptive tests, and then the relationship between pain and the degree of disability in patients was analyzed by statistical analysis using SPSS 16 software.

4. Results

Based on the results in Table 1, Mean (SD) pain score was 14.45 (4.23), disability score was 12.75 (3.09), and fall score was 37 (30.8%) (Table 1). According to pain score status classification, 4 (3.3%) of the elderly had no pain, 8 (6.7%) had mild pain, 27 (22.5%) had moderate pain and 81 (67.5%) had severe pain.

Table 1.

Demographic Characteristics of Patients in the Elderly with Dementia

VariableNo. (%)PainDisability
Sex--
Male 73 (60.8)16 (2.93)14.34 (2.57)
Female47 (39.2)12.06 (4.82)10.27 (2.01)
P-value-0.0000.000
Job status---
Retired and disabled64 (53.3)14.12 (5.0)12.64 (3.26)
No job56 (46.7)14.83 (3.13)12.87 (2.89)
P-value-0.350.68
Education---
Illiterate30 (25)14.63 (3.56)12.36 (2.25)
Reading and writing47 (39.2)15.46 (4.12)14.27 (2.76)
Diploma and undergraduate43 (35.8)13.23 (4.54)11.34 (3.23)
P-value-0.040.01
Living area---
Outside the nursing home79 (65.8)12.75 (4.31)11.35 (2.40)
In a nursing home41 (34.2)17.73 (0.54)15.43 (2.41)
P-value-0.0000.000
Marital status---
No spouse82 (68.3)14.25 (4.23)12.46 (3.10)
Has a spouse38 (31.7)14.89 (4.24)13.36 (2.99)
P-value-0.440.13
History of chronic disease---
Yes70 (58.3)16.01 (3.23)13.94 (2.81)
No50 (41.7)12.28 (4.53)11.08 (2.67)
P-value-0.0000.000
Family support---
Low41 (34.2)15.21 (3.53)13.09 (3.12)
Medium57 (47.5)13.66 (4.81)12.52 (3.17)
Much22 (18.3)15.09 (3.55)12.68 (2.86)
P-value-0.140.66
Income---
Weak69 (57.5)15.68 (3.07)13.62 (2.99)
Medium41 (34.2)13.90 (3.90)12.00 (2.80)
Good10 (8.3)8.3 (6.54)9.80 (4.15)
P-value-0.0000.000
Age (mean [SD])R = 0.570, P = 0.000R = 0.69, P = 0.000

Tables 2 and 3 indicate the relationship between pain status and disability. Based on the results of Tables 2 and 3, there is a significant relationship between pain status and disability in the elderly with dementia (P = 0.000, F = 79.971).

Table 2.

Investigating the Relationship Between Pain and Disability in the Elderly with Dementia

ModelSum of SquaresdfMean SquareFP-Value
DisabilityRegression861.9491861.94979.9710.000
Residual1271.84311810.778
Total2133.792119
Table 3.

The Relationship Between Pain and Disability in the Elderly with Dementia

ModelUnstandardized CoefficientsStandardized CoefficientsTP-Value
BStd. ErrorBeta
Disability (constant)3.3551.2772.6260.010
0.8710.0970.6368.9430.000

5. Discussion

The present study was conducted for investigating the relationship between pain and disability and falls in the elderly with dementia in Ilam in 2021. In this study, most of the subjects were male, had low education, without a spouse, without a job, with a history of other chronic diseases, moderate family support status, and poor economic status. Zare et al. in Iran demonstrated that most of the participants in the study were female, unmarried, illiterate, and unemployed, which is consistent with the results of this study (19). While in the study of Lin et al. in the elderly with dementia in Taiwan, most of the elderly were women, had low education, and were married (23). In the cohort study of Meuleners et al., most of the patients were female and unmarried (29). It seems that the difference in demographic variables is related to diversity in the study countries.

Based on the results, the Mean (SD) pain score in the elderly with dementia was 14.45 (4.23) out of 18, and the reported number (percentage) of severe pain was 81 (67.5%). In the study of Lin et al., it was demonstrated that 49.07% of the elderly had experienced pain during the last year (23). Also, in the study of Atee et al., on 479 elderly people with dementia, it was shown that the prevalence of pain was 65.6% in this group (30), which is consistent with the results of prevalence of high pain in elderly with dementia.

In this study, mean (SD) disability score was 12.75 (3.09) out of 24, according to the results of Sathya and Premkumar’s study in the elderly group in India, where the prevalence of disability was 12.6% (31) in India, the prevalence of disability was 92 (25.6%) (32); in the study of Saha et al., with the amount of 28.9% (33), in another study it was equal to 32.4% (34), in the study of Gupta et al., it was 37.4% (35), which are consistent with the results of this study on the existence of disability in the elderly.

According to fall prevalence, its rate was 37 (30.8%), which in the study of Dev et al. showed that this rate in the group of Alzheimer’s patients 32 (22.8%) for a minimum of one fall, prevalence 8 (5.7%) multiple falls and a prevalence of 18 (12.8%) have been reported for non-vertebral fractures (22). In the paper of Kato-Narita and Radanovic, the prevalence of falls in AD patients was 55% (36), in the study of Soysal et al. on dementia patients, the prevalence of fear of falling was 86.9% in patients with dementia and 36.0% in patients with AD (37). A cohort study by Meuleners et al., from 2001 to 2013, included 32,519 elderly people with dementia and found that 8,970 (27%) of the elderly had experienced a fall at least once (29). Based on the results of similar studies, the rate of falls in the elderly was consistent with the results of this study.

5.1. Conclusions

According to the results of this study, disability and a history of falls were higher in the elderly who experienced more pain. Hence, it is recommended to take the necessary interventions to reduce the pain of the elderly with dementia to prevent disability and reduce the risk of falls.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Sadeghmoghadam L, Foroughan M, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi F, Ahmadi F, Nazari S, Farhadi A, et al. The lived experiences of aging in older adults: A phenomenological study. Iran J Ageing. 2020;14(4):478-93.

  • 2.

    Abdi A, Soufinia A, Borji M, Tarjoman A. The Effect of Religion Intervention on Life Satisfaction and Depression in Elderly with Heart Failure. J Relig Health. 2019;58(3):823-32. [PubMed ID: 30421268]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-0727-7.

  • 3.

    Peyman N, Olyani S. Assessment of the Subjective Wellbeing of the Elderly During the COVID-19 Disease Epidemic in Mashhad. Iran J Ageing. 2021;16(1):62-73. https://doi.org/10.32598/sija.16.1.3109.1.

  • 4.

    Mehraban AH, Soltanmohamadi Y, Akbarfahimi M, Taghizadeh G. Validity and reliability of the persian version of lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale in patients with dementia. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2014;28:25.

  • 5.

    Wiegelmann H, Speller S, Verhaert LM, Schirra-Weirich L, Wolf-Ostermann K. Psychosocial interventions to support the mental health of informal caregivers of persons living with dementia - a systematic literature review. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):1-17. [PubMed ID: 33526012]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7849618]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02020-4.

  • 6.

    Kazeminezhad B, Tarjoman A, Borji M. Relationship Between Praying and Self-Care in Elderly with Heart Failure: A Cross-Sectional Study in West of Iran. J Relig Health. 2020;59(1):19-28. [PubMed ID: 30644042]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-018-00757-8.

  • 7.

    Shah H, Albanese E, Duggan C, Rudan I, Langa KM, Carrillo MC, et al. Research priorities to reduce the global burden of dementia by 2025. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1285-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30235-6.

  • 8.

    Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, Costafreda SG, Huntley J, Ames D, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2673-734. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31363-6.

  • 9.

    Prince MJ, Wimo A, Guerchet MM, Ali GC, Wu Y-T, Prina M. World Alzheimer Report 2015-The Global Impact of Dementia: An analysis of prevalence, incidence, cost and trends. World Alzheimer Rep. 2015.

  • 10.

    Kim B, Noh GO, Kim K. Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in patients with Alzheimer's disease and family caregiver burden: a path analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):1-12. [PubMed ID: 33663416]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7934246]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-021-02109-w.

  • 11.

    Brodaty H, Donkin M. Family caregivers of people with dementia. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(2):217. [PubMed ID: 19585957]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3181916].

  • 12.

    Kim H, Chang M, Rose K, Kim S. Predictors of caregiver burden in caregivers of individuals with dementia. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(4):846-55. [PubMed ID: 21793872]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05787.x.

  • 13.

    Abdi A, Tarjoman A, Borji M. Prevalence of elder abuse in Iran: a Systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019;39:120-7. [PubMed ID: 30616159]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2018.12.005.

  • 14.

    Lundin E, Godskesen TE. End-of-life care for people with advanced dementia and pain: a qualitative study in Swedish nursing homes. BMC Nurs. 2021;20(1):1-11. [PubMed ID: 33743691]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7981921]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00566-7.

  • 15.

    Lisko I, Kulmala J, Annetorp M, Ngandu T, Mangialasche F, Kivipelto M. How can dementia and disability be prevented in older adults: where are we today and where are we going? J Intern Med. 2021;289(6):807-30. [PubMed ID: 33314384]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8248434]. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.13227.

  • 16.

    Gettel CJ, Chen K, Goldberg EM. Dementia Care, Fall Detection, and Ambient-Assisted Living Technologies Help Older Adults Age in Place: A Scoping Review. J Appl Gerontol. 2021;40(12):1893-902. [PubMed ID: 33853428]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8514579]. https://doi.org/10.1177/07334648211005868.

  • 17.

    Haasum Y, Fastbom J, Fratiglioni L, Kareholt I, Johnell K. Pain treatment in elderly persons with and without dementia: A population-based study of institutionalized and home-dwelling elderly. Drugs Aging. 2011;28(4):283-93. [PubMed ID: 21428463]. https://doi.org/10.2165/11587040-000000000-00000.

  • 18.

    Scuteri D, Matamala-Gomez M, Bottiroli S, Corasaniti MT, De Icco R, Bagetta G, et al. Pain Assessment and Treatment in Dementia at the Time of Coronavirus Disease COVID-19. Front Neurol. 2020;11:890. [PubMed ID: 32982921]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7479308]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2020.00890.

  • 19.

    Zare M, Tagharrobi Z, Sharifi K, Sooki Z, Abolhasani J. Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian-Abbey Pain Scale (P-APS) in a Sample of Iranian Elderly with Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci. 2020;19(1):3-22. https://doi.org/10.29252/jrums.19.1.3.

  • 20.

    Feyzi V, Hasheminejad N, Jafari Roodbandi AS. Relationship Between Visual, Hearing and Memory Disabilities and Hand Grip Strength and the Systems Usability Available to the Elderly Living in Nursing Homes in Kerman, Iran. Iran J Ageing. 2017;11(4):484-93. https://doi.org/10.21859/sija-1104484.

  • 21.

    Wissing MBG, Ulgiati AM, Hobbelen JSM, De Deyn PP, Waninge A, Dekker AD. The neglected puzzle of dementia in people with severe/profound intellectual disabilities: A systematic literature review of observable symptoms. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021. [PubMed ID: 34219327]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12920.

  • 22.

    Dev K, Javed A, Bai P, Memon S, Alam O; Murlidhar, et al. Prevalence of Falls and Fractures in Alzheimer’s Patients Compared to General Population. Cureus. 2021. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12923.

  • 23.

    Lin PC, Li CH, Chou PL, Chen YM, Lin LC. Prevalence of pain-related diagnoses in patients with dementia: a nationwide study. J Pain Res. 2018;11:1589-98. [PubMed ID: 30214270]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6126483]. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S172875.

  • 24.

    Takenoshita S, Terada S, Kuwano R, Inoue T, Cyoju A, Suemitsu S, et al. Prevalence of dementia in people with intellectual disabilities: Cross-sectional study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2020;35(4):414-22. [PubMed ID: 31894597]. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5258.

  • 25.

    Takai Y, Yamamoto-Mitani N, Chiba Y, Nishikawa Y, Hayashi K, Sugai Y. Abbey Pain Scale: Development and validation of the Japanese version. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2010;10(2):145-53. [PubMed ID: 20446928]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2009.00568.x.

  • 26.

    Gregersen M, Melin AS, Nygaard IS, Nielsen CH, Beedholm-Ebsen M. Reliability of the Danish Abbey Pain Scale in severely demented and non-communicative older patients. Int J Palliat Nurs. 2016;22(10):482-8. [PubMed ID: 27802089]. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2016.22.10.482.

  • 27.

    ten Klooster PM, Taal E, van de Laar MA. Rasch analysis of the Dutch Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index and the Health Assessment Questionnaire II in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(12):1721-8. [PubMed ID: 19035413]. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24065.

  • 28.

    Allanore Y, Bozzi S, Terlinden A, Huscher D, Amand C, Soubrane C, et al. Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) use in modelling disease progression in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: an analysis from the EUSTAR database. Arthritis Res Ther. 2020;22(1):257. [PubMed ID: 33115544]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7592571]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-020-02329-2.

  • 29.

    Meuleners LB, Fraser ML, Bulsara MK, Chow K, Ng JQ. Risk factors for recurrent injurious falls that require hospitalization for older adults with dementia: a population based study. BMC Neurol. 2016;16(1):188. [PubMed ID: 27687085]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5041288]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-016-0711-3.

  • 30.

    Atee M, Morris T, Macfarlane S, Cunningham C. Pain in Dementia: Prevalence and Association With Neuropsychiatric Behaviors. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021;61(6):1215-26. [PubMed ID: 33068708]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.011.

  • 31.

    Sathya T, Premkumar R. Association of functional limitations and disability with elder abuse in India: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr. 2020;20(1):220. [PubMed ID: 32576146]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7310468]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01619-3.

  • 32.

    Vaish K, Patra S, Chhabra P. Functional disability among elderly: A community-based cross-sectional study. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020;9(1):253-8. [PubMed ID: 32110600]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7014891]. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_728_19.

  • 33.

    Saha C, Thakur RP, Das S, Das DK. Prevalence and correlates of physical disability among elderly rural population in a community development block of Purba Bardhaman District, West Bengal. J Indian Acad Geriatr. 2021;17(1):22.

  • 34.

    R D, Kasthuri A. Visual and hearing impairment among rural elderly of south India: a community-based study. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2012;12(1):116-22. [PubMed ID: 21702873]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0594.2011.00720.x.

  • 35.

    Gupta P, Mani K, Rai SK, Nongkynrih B, Gupta SK. Functional disability among elderly persons in a rural area of Haryana. Indian J Public Health. 2014;58(1):11. [PubMed ID: 24748351]. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-557X.128155.

  • 36.

    Kato-Narita EM, Radanovic M. Characteristics of falls in mild and moderate Alzheimer's disease. Dement Neuropsychol. 2009;3(4):337-43. [PubMed ID: 29213650]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5619422]. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642009DN30400013.

  • 37.

    Soysal P, Tan SG, Smith L. A comparison of the prevalence of Fear of Falling between older patients with Lewy body dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and without dementia. Exp Gerontol. 2021;146:111248. [PubMed ID: 33486068]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2021.111248.