https://doi.org/10.5812/ans-123462

Spinal Cord Injury Patient's Physical and Psychological Care Needs at Home from Patients’ and Caregivers’ Perspectives: A Qualitative Study

authors:

avatar Asra Nassehi 1 , avatar Nahid Dehghan Nayeri ORCID 2 , * , avatar Abbas Abbaszadeh ORCID 3 , avatar Seyed Hasan Emami-Razavi 4 , avatar Hooman Shahsavari 1 , avatar Laleh Ghadirian Marnani 5

Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Center for Academic and Health Policy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Archives of Neuroscience: Vol.9, issue 3; e123462
published online: July 20, 2022
article type: Research Article
received: February 19, 2022
revised: July 2, 2022
accepted: July 3, 2022

how to cite: Nassehi A, Dehghan Nayeri N, Abbaszadeh A, Emami-Razavi S H, Shahsavari H, et al. Spinal Cord Injury Patient's Physical and Psychological Care Needs at Home from Patients’ and Caregivers’ Perspectives: A Qualitative Study. Arch Neurosci. 2022;9(3):e123462. https://doi.org/10.5812/ans-123462.

Abstract

Background:

Limited studies have attempted to identify the care needs of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and their professional caregivers at home and after discharge from the hospital. However, little information about these needs has led to increased physical and psychological complications and thus a reduced quality of life in SCI patients.

Objectives:

This study aimed to explain the experiences of patients and their caregivers regarding physical and psychological care needs at home.

Method:

This qualitative descriptive study was conducted on 24 SCI patients and their professional caregivers using the conventional content analysis. Data were collected through unstructured and semi-structured interviews. Purposeful sampling was continued until data saturation was reached. The conventional content analysis approach proposed by Graneheim and Lundman (continuous comparison) was used to analyze the data.

Results:

The age range of the participants was 29 - 48 years, with an average age of 37.8 years. Seven of the participants had paraplegia, and three of them had tetraplegia. The results of data analysis led to the extraction of two main categories, including physical and psychological care needs.

Conclusions:

By identifying the real needs of patients after discharge from the hospital, we emphasize the need to remove barriers to home health care services and provide more financial support to meet patients' needs. Therefore, policymakers are encouraged to use the results of this study to plan at-home patient care services.

1. Background

The estimated annual global incidence of spinal cord injury (SCI) is about 23 cases per million populations (1), while this is about 72.4 per million in Iran (2). The high prevalence of this devastating injury, in addition to sensory and motor disorders, leads to several complications, including physical, psychological, and social issues. In addition to causing readmission and imposing high costs on the health system and patients, these complications affect patients' quality of life and lead to mortality. The results of many studies have emphasized the need to follow up and implement long-term care after discharge from the hospital and at home to prevent and treat secondary complications (3).

However, according to the evidence, despite the care to prevent and treat these problems, these complications are not well controlled and still have a high prevalence. One of the causes can be providing care without considering the deep knowledge of patients' real needs and concerns (4). A review of the literature in this field shows that limited studies have evaluated the actual perception and experience of SCI patients and their care needs. Madasa et al. reported that the most common physical complications of SCI patients were urinary tract infections, pain, and pressure injury (5). The results of a study in Washington also showed that patients suffered from urinary tract infections (62%), pressure injury (41%), and constipation (33%) (6).

In addition to physical problems, SCI patients are significantly more prone to psychological complications than healthy individuals. Moreno et al. showed that 17% - 25% of SCI patients had psychological disorders, of whom 18% - 37% suffered from depression (7). Other studies have pointed out the importance of paying attention to the care and treatment of psychological disorders in SCI patients (8).

Considering the high prevalence of physical and psychological complications in SCI patients, which has led to increased readmission rates and reduced quality of life, it is necessary that rehabilitation team members provide planned care based on the patient's actual needs (9). However, effective care requires deep awareness and insight into the challenges and needs of these patients and their professional caregivers in real life (10).

2. Objectives

A comprehensive understanding of people's experiences of problems and care needs requires deep and extensive investigation through qualitative research. Thus, this study was conducted to identify and effectively meet SCI patients’ and rehabilitation team members’ physical and psychological care needs.

3. Methods

3.1. Study Design

This study used a qualitative content analysis approach to explain SCI patients’ physical and psychological care needs.

The study population included all SCI patients selected from SCI associations in Tehran and Bam, Iran. Rehabilitation team members included a physiotherapist, a social worker, an occupational therapist, a rehabilitation specialist, a general physician, a nurse, a psychologist, and a sexologist. Purposeful sampling was continued with maximum diversity (age, sex, type of injury, and duration of SCI) until data saturation was reached.

3.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

3.2.1. Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion criteria were all traffic injured and earthquake victims with SC, paraplegia and tetraplegia SCI diagnosed by a specialist, communicating ability, 18 years of age or older, signed informed consent forms, at least one year of SCI care experience for caregivers.

3.2.2. Exclusion Criteria

The exclusion criteria included unwillingness to participate in the study and traumatic brain injury.

3.3. Data Collection

3.3.1. Demographic Characteristics

After prior telephone coordination, obtaining permission from the participants to interview and participate in the study, and setting an appointment, the researcher visited the mentioned centers at a specified time.

3.4. Method

In this study, semi-structured interviews were used to collect information. Each interview with the patient began with a general question: "Can you tell us about your experiences with this serious injury?" Then, they were asked to "share their experiences of challenges and care needs they had after SCI". The rehabilitation team members were asked to "describe their experience of caring for these patients" or "describe what care patients need at home". Data collection lasted 14 months. The duration of the interviews varied between 30 - 45 minutes. The first researcher performed the interviews and recorded them on a tape recorder. Then, verbatim transcription and continuous comparative analysis were done.

3.5. Data Analysis

The conventional content analysis was used for data analysis. Simultaneously with data collection, the analysis was performed according to the five-step Graneheim and Lundman method (11) as follows: First, the interviews were transcribed immediately after each interview, and then transcripts were read several times. The initial codes were extracted, and then the codes were merged and classified based on their similarities. Finally, the concept and content hidden in the data were extracted.

Goba and Lincoln's (1994) criteria were used for data trustworthiness, including credibility, dependability, confirmability, and transferability (12). The research team had a long-term relationship that helped gain the participants' trust and understand the study environment. The participants were asked to review and verify the data and codes. After coding, the interview transcripts were returned to the participants to ensure the accuracy of the codes and interpretations, and codes not reflecting the participants' views were corrected. Also, we included diverse participants in terms of age, type of injury, occupation, sex, level of education, and caregivers. Supervisors specialized in qualitative research reviewed the interview transcripts and the extracted codes and classes and reached a high agreement regarding the extracted results.

3.6. Ethical Considerations

The Tehran University of Medical Sciences Ethics Committee approved the study (IR.TUMS.FNM.REC.1398.141). Before the interviews, the participants were informed about the study's objectives and methods.

4. Results

The findings of this study were based on interviews with 24 participants to achieve data saturation. The participants' demographic characteristics are presented in Tables 1 and 2. The results of data analysis led to the identification of two main categories of physical and psychological care needs.

Table 1.

The Patients’ Demographic Characteristics

CodeSexAgeMarital StatusEmploymentType of Spinal Cord InjuryDuration of Spinal Cord Injury
1Male48MarriedTeacherParaplegia18
2Female47MarriedHouseworkerParaplegia18
3Male45MarriedUnemployedParaplegia18
4Female33MarriedHouseworkerParaplegia18
5Female43MarriedUnemployedTetraplegia18
6Male28MarriedUnemployedParaplegia6
7Female37WidowUnemployedParaplegia18
8Male30SingleUnemployedTetraplegia8
9Female38DivorcedUnemployedTetraplegia5
10Male29MarriedHouseworkerParaplegia3
Table 2.

The Professional Caregivers’ Demographic Characteristics

CodeSexEducationMajorEmployment Experience
11FemaleBachelorSocial worker10
12MaleBachelorPhysiotherapist12
13FemaleBachelorOccupational therapist9
14FemaleBachelorOccupational therapist13
15MaleMaster of scienceOccupational therapist8
16FemalePh. D.General physician6
17FemaleSpecialistRehabilitation specialist10
18FemalePh. D.Nurse10
19FemaleMaster of scienceNurse12
20MaleMaster of sciencePsychologist5
21FemaleMaster of sciencePsychologist10
22FemalePh. D.Sexologist20
23FemalePh. D.Sexologist7
24FemaleBachelorStaff of the welfare organization10

4.1. Physical Care Needs

One of the main aspects of this study was the need for physical care, which has several sub-categories, including care for skin, gastrointestinal, urinary, and musculoskeletal problems.

4.1.1. Skin Problems

The participants suffered from skin problems in the form of pressure injury and burns. Immobility is an influential factor in the incidence of pressure injury, which is a consequence of the caregiver's inability to change the patient's position and lack of patient knowledge. In this regard, a 45-year-old man with paraplegia caused by an earthquake said:

"... After I was discharged from Tehran hospital ... During this time, my wife took care of me. She was also injured in the earthquake, and couldn’t move me, we did not have anyone else, ... " I got a pressure injury." (Code 3)

In the present study, the participants stated that the inability to provide adequate equipment to prevent and treat pressure injury such as alternating pressure mattresses, dressings, standard wheelchairs, and the inability to pay for appropriate treatments, caused them serious problems. In this regard, a caseworker said:

"Because of the rising price of wheelchairs, patients cannot afford to buy high-quality wheelchairs, so they have to buy non-standard and second-hand wheelchairs, which cause pressure injury." (Code 11)

Burns were another skin problem, mostly caused by the patients' lack of knowledge about sensory dysfunction, especially in the early stages of the disease. A married man suffering from a paraplegic lesion for 18 years said:

"For the first time, after SCI, we went on a picnic. My friends had made a fire. We sat around the fire. When I got home, I realized that my legs were burned, but I did not notice.”

4.1.2. Gastrointestinal Problems

The patients experienced gastrointestinal problems in the form of fecal incontinence and constipation. According to the data, fecal incontinence caused skin disorders, social isolation, occupational difficulties, and depression in the patients and even affected their patients' sex lives. People with this problem avoided attending meetings and became isolated. In this regard, a 29-year-old married man stated:

"Before this disease, I was a very social person, but this disease has made me stay at home for fear of being disgraced because of my bowel incontinence ..." (Code 10)

According to the present study, non-compliance with a bowel-training program due to impatience and lack of knowledge were mentioned as causes of constipation and fecal incontinence. For example, a nurse with ten years of experience said:

"A bowel training program prevents constipation and accumulation of feces. I had patients who did not suffer from constipation because of following this program regularly and having a proper diet, but some do not compliance. They do not care at all." (Code 18)

4.1.3. Urinary Problems

Urinary problems in patients appeared in the form of urinary tract infection, urinary retention, and urinary incontinence. Urinary tract infection was the most common complaint that the patients attributed to frequent hospitalizations. According to the data, the causes of this complication were lack of caregivers, exhaustion of caregivers, and lack of catheterization knowledge. The results showed that other causes of urinary tract infection were lack of equipment and unsuitable environments for catheterization. According to the patients, unsanitary and small toilets made it impossible for them to follow the hygiene tips during catheterization. Financial problems also forced the patients to use catheters and bladders for extended periods, leading to urinary tract infections.

In this regard, a nurse with 12 years of experience stated:

"Once we visited one of the client's houses in a slum, the patient suffered from urinary tract infection, the house toilet was very small, and the health conditions were poor; Nelaton catheter was also kept in a contaminated environment, which was a factor for infection." (Code 19)

Another problem was urinary incontinence, which had a negative effect on psychological, social, and sexual aspects, leading to a decrease in the patients' quality of life. Some caregivers believed that patients' lack of intermittent catheterization was a cause of incontinence. A caseworker stated:

"Most patients often can adapt with disabilities; however, they cannot adapt with urinary incontinence, and this problem bothers them a lot because it affects many aspects of their lives, sexual, social, and occupational issues." (Code 11)

4.1.4. Musculoskeletal Problems

Shoulder pain and pain caused by muscle spasms were frequently experienced by the patients, affecting their quality of life and making life more difficult for them. These people depend on their shoulders to perform many daily activities, especially pushing a wheelchair. Therefore, pain in this area can significantly impact their ability to perform daily activities. For example, a 47-year-old paraplegic patient with an 18-year history of the disease stated:

"Some nights, I cannot sleep because of pain, it is very annoying, it is worse when I have shoulder pain and I can no longer push my wheelchair and do housework, so I have to be in bed all the time." (Code 2)

4.2. Psychological Care Needs

4.2.1. Isolation

According to the quotes, factors such as lack of proper urban facilities, a shortage of caregivers, pity, and addiction led to the isolation of the patients.

Lack of proper urban facilities was a concern for almost all the participants, making it difficult for them to move independently outside the house. In this regard, a single man with paraplegia stated:

"I cannot go out alone, even to the neighborhood park, there are too many stairs that I cannot go at all, someone must be with me. I only have an old mother and father who cannot come with me, so I do not leave the house anymore. " (Code 8)

Another reason for the isolation of the patients was addiction. After becoming addicted, patients lose their desire for social interactions and become dissociable.

4.2.2. Lack of Adaptation in Patients with Spinal Injuries

Most of the participants acknowledged their inadequate knowledge about SCI, coping strategies, and how to live after the injury. They considered this lack of knowledge an effective barrier to their adaptation. Another obstacle to achieving adjustment was giving the patient false hope about recovery. Caregivers noted that giving false hope by the rehabilitation team made the accepting process more difficult for the patients and emphasized that the rehabilitation team should consider this more seriously. Lack of adaptation to the living environment was another problem for the patients to adapt and return to daily activities. Data showed that the patients wanted to return to society after adjusting to their illness; although, the conditions and infrastructure in their living environment were an obstacle.

For example, a 48-year-old man suffering from paraplegia for 18 years said:

"At first I did not understand what had happened to me. Like a small child for whom something has happened, but the child does not understand, I did not know my illness. On the first days, something like this happened to me. I did not understand what I should do, how I should cope with this disability and live with it." (Code 1)

Another participant, a 33-year-old female patient suffering from paraplegia for 18 years, said:

"After a long time, when my mental health improved, I decided to go shopping like before my illness, but there was no suitable space for wheelchairs in the city and shops. I used to go shopping on foot. Now I accept this with a wheelchair, but when it is not possible to go with a wheelchair, many places are not suitable; what should we do?" (Code 4)

4.2.3. Addiction

Lack of counseling and insufficient knowledge about strategies to deal with mental (low self-esteem), physical (chronic pain), sexual (premature ejaculation), social (lack of jobs), and financial issues can be risk factors for addiction.

A 29-year-old man suffering from paraplegia for three years stated:

"I could not cope with my disability; I could not believe that I could not walk anymore, I was under a lot of pressure, so I became addicted to calm myself down." (Code 10)

Another cause of the patients' tendency to drug abuse was lack of proper employment, leading to financial problems. This prevented one from appearing as a successful and authoritative person in the family and society, causing them to face severe psychological issues. Consequently, they chose drug abuse as a relief.

For example, one of the patients, a 28-year-old man suffering from paraplegia for six years, said:

"Before I was disabled, I was a masonry, I could afford my living expenses, but after that I am always in the house. It is very difficult to be a man at home and cannot make money for his wife and children, I feel bad when my wife has to be the breadwinner. How can I work when I am paralyzed?"

Another factor mentioned by the participants was the use of opium to delay ejaculation. Premature ejaculation is a sexual disorder experienced by some of the patients. The patients were looking for a way to deal with this complication. However, due to lack of sexual counseling and training, they used wrong methods such as opium use to solve this problem and eventually become addicted.

5. Discussion

The patients' immobility due to lack of proper caregiving and inadequate knowledge led to a high prevalence of pressure injury in them. This problem may be due to the patients' limited access to home health care services to provide education and care after discharge from the hospital. As in Eslami et al.'s study, one of the important reasons for the high prevalence of pressure injury in these patients was lack of home health care services after hospital discharge (13). According to some studies, home health care services in Iran face challenges, one of the most important of which is lack of insurance coverage, limiting access to such services. Other problems in providing home health care services include flawed policy and lack of guidelines (14, 15). However, measures have already been taken, including defining such services and implementing them as pilot projects in several cities. However, there are still significant differences in home health care standards between Iran and other countries (16).

Other factors included limiting patients' access to protective equipment, as found by Sleight et al. (17). They reported that lack of institutional support and patients' financial inability were the causes of limited access to equipment. Although the Welfare Organization in Iran has taken steps to provide necessary equipment, an inadequate budget and high costs of standard equipment have remained among its main concerns. This is in line with the results of a 2012 study by Burns and O’Connell (18).

Another finding was the refusal of the patients to follow the healing process of pressure injury due to the high cost of treatment. According to the participants, they had to follow their treatment at private clinics since public hospitals provided limited services due to the long-term treatment of pressure injury and yet they could not afford private treatment. In this regard, Stroupe et al. reported that pressure injury was one of the costliest complications of the disease (19). Home health care services can prevent this costly complication, which is one of the main causes of patient mortality, and shorten the length of hospital stay, resulting in reduced costs for the health system and the patient (20).

Urinary and fecal incontinence were other physical challenges that led to social, sexual, and psychological disorders. Other studies have also indicated adverse effects of these complications on patients' quality of life (21-23). The participants mentioned a bowel and bladder training program as a way to prevent these problems. A review of studies examining bladder and bowel management methods showed the effect of this program on reducing these problems (24, 25). However, some of the participants pointed out that they could not comply with the bowel and bladder exercise program due to lack of knowledge and impatience. Thus, the rehabilitation team members needed to plan an exercise to manage this issue.

Another common physical problem was urinary tract infections due to poor hygiene during catheter insertion, non-standard toilets, and long-term use of catheters and urine bags, as mentioned in some other studies (26, 27). Inadequate bathroom surroundings were additionally stated by Burns and O’Connell (18). However, urinary catheters were used for more extended periods, which can be attributed to the limited access to catheters due to the patients’ poor economic status.

Research results described the experience of pain as a distressing problem that negatively affected daily functioning. In this regard, several studies have pointed out the negative relationship between pain intensity and patients' daily activity (28-30).

Isolation was one of the psychological challenges, and poor welfare facilities were identified as one of its contributing factors. Cimino et al. showed that urban structural barriers restricted patients' access to recreational facilities and services and forced them to be isolated at home (31). Therefore, city authorities should adapt urban space to prioritize people with disabilities so they can use urban facilities and enjoy their citizenship rights (32).

The present study's findings introduced the compassionate look at the patient as another factor of isolation. The unpleasant opinions of people and their unnecessary help, due to their bad attitude toward people with disabilities, were so annoying from the patients' point of view that caused their reluctance to participate in social life. This was in line with Hammel et al.'s findings (33). Increasing people's awareness of the abilities of people with disabilities can change society's attitude toward them so that they can take their rightful place in society without being stigmatized (34).

The analysis of the interviews revealed barriers to adaptation to the disease. Lack of knowledge about the disease and how to deal with it, expressed by almost the majority of the participants, was one of the most critical barriers. According to the findings, it was due to lack of appropriate counseling and training. Another obstacle was lack of structural adaptation to the living environment. This is because, without adapted environmental conditions, patients cannot lead a normal life.

Similar to our results, Babamohamadi et al. identified that lack of necessary information about the disease and adaptation methods and patients' lack of access to urban facilities and spaces were the factors of incompatibility (34). Inappropriate urban elements were considered a factor for not participating in social activities (35). Additionally, giving false hope by the rehabilitation team was another issue that led to patients' failure to achieve adaptation, according to Dorsett et al. (36).

Another important finding of this study was to explain the factors of the patients' tendency to addiction. Based on the participants' experiences, lack of knowledge about adaptation strategies and lack of counseling sessions led to drug addiction instead of using practical and scientific strategies. Our findings indicated the importance of counseling and education in the adaptation process. The results of previous studies also showed that patients tended to use drugs as an ineffective coping strategy to accept their disease (37, 38). Similarly, we observed that the patients considered drug abuse as a solution to relieve chronic pain, as confirmed by Smedema and Ebener (39).

The patients also considered drug abuse a defensive method to relieve psychological stress, which is in line with Tetrualt and Courtois findings (40). The present study showed that people used drugs to increase the time of sexual intercourse, as also mentioned by Khammarnia and Peyvand (41). Other factors included economic problems, especially unemployment, causing the patients to use drugs as a means of entertainment and a solution to forget their problems. These results are in line with those of Karimyar Jahromi and Eftekharzadeh (42). Therefore, we suggest psychological counseling and training to deal with these challenges.

5.1. Conclusions

This study identified patients' home health care needs, based on their actual experiences and caregivers, according to the community's economic, social, and cultural conditions. We also emphasize the need for home health care services and the financial support of caregiving organizations. Implementation of such services in the country requires health insurance coverage, guideline preparation, and care standardization. Therefore, it is suggested that health policymakers design effective home health care rehabilitation programs based on the real needs of patients and the conditions of society and eliminate obstacles to implementing such services in the country's health system. The consequence can be improving patients' quality of life and reducing the costs of the health system.

5.2. Limitations

The study's limitation was our inability to interview a sufficient number of family caregivers to achieve data saturation in this group. This limitation means the perspectives of families providing informal care to SCI patients after hospital discharge and at home may be underrepresented in the study findings.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Maharaj MM, Hogan JA, Phan K, Mobbs RJ. The role of specialist units to provide focused care and complication avoidance following traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(6):1813-20. [PubMed ID: 27037920]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4545-x.

  • 2.

    Jazayeri SB, Beygi S, Shokraneh F, Hagen EM, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Incidence of traumatic spinal cord injury worldwide: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2015;24(5):905-18. [PubMed ID: 24952008]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3424-6.

  • 3.

    Sedghi Goyaghaj N, Monjamed Z, Ghorbani S, Akbarnejhad N, Khosrozadeh M. [Prevalence and Intensity of Different Types of Pain in Spinal Cord Injury Patients]. Iranian Journal of War and Public Health. 2016;8(2):105-10. eng.

  • 4.

    Pilusa S, Myezwa H, Potterton J. Exploring prevention and management of secondary health conditions in people with spinal cord injury in South Africa. Int J Ther Rehabil. 2021;28(12):1-10. https://doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2021.0005.

  • 5.

    Madasa V, Boggenpoel B, Phillips J, Joseph C. Mortality and secondary complications four years after traumatic spinal cord injury in Cape Town, South Africa. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2020;6(1):84. [PubMed ID: 32887870]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7473856]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41394-020-00334-w.

  • 6.

    Stillman MD, Barber J, Burns S, Williams S, Hoffman JM. Complications of Spinal Cord Injury Over the First Year After Discharge From Inpatient Rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(9):1800-5. [PubMed ID: 28115072]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.011.

  • 7.

    Moreno A, Zidarov D, Raju C, Boruff J, Ahmed S. Integrating the perspectives of individuals with spinal cord injuries, their family caregivers and healthcare professionals from the time of rehabilitation admission to community reintegration: protocol for a scoping study on SCI needs. BMJ Open. 2017;7(8). e014331. [PubMed ID: 28780539]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5724190]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014331.

  • 8.

    Mahooti F, Raheb G, Alipour F, Hatamizadeh N. Psychosocial challenges of social reintegration for people with spinal cord injury: a qualitative study. Spinal Cord. 2020;58(10):1119-27. [PubMed ID: 32203067]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0449-z.

  • 9.

    Gourlan M, Pellechia A, Robineau S, Foulon B, Gault D, Lefort M, et al. "What pressure ulcers mean to me?" Representations of pressure ulcer in persons with spinal cord injury: A qualitative study. J Tissue Viability. 2020;29(4):324-30. [PubMed ID: 32830010]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2020.07.002.

  • 10.

    Kitson A, Conroy T, Kuluski K, Locock L, Lyons R. Reclaiming and redefining the Fundamentals of Care: Nursing's response to meeting patients' basic human needs. Adelaide, South Australia: School of Nursing, The University of Adelaide; 2013.

  • 11.

    Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105-12. [PubMed ID: 14769454]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.

  • 12.

    Polit DF, Beck CT. Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: myths and strategies. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(11):1451-8. [PubMed ID: 20598692]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004.

  • 13.

    Eslami V, Saadat S, Habibi Arejan R, Vaccaro AR, Ghodsi SM, Rahimi-Movaghar V. Factors associated with the development of pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2012;50(12):899-903. [PubMed ID: 22777490]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2012.75.

  • 14.

    Heydari H, Shahsavari H, Hazini A, Nasrabadi AN. Exploring the Barriers of Home Care Services in Iran: A Qualitative Study. Scientifica (Cairo). 2016;2016:2056470. [PubMed ID: 27127677]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4835654]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2056470.

  • 15.

    Heydari H, Rahnavard Z, Ghaffari F. Exploring the Position of Community-Based Nursing in Iran: A Qualitative Study. Int J Community Based Nurs Midwifery. 2017;5(4):386-96. [PubMed ID: 29043284]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5635558].

  • 16.

    Shahsavari H, Nasrabadi AN, Almasian M, Heydari H, Hazini A. Exploration of the administrative aspects of the delivery of home health care services: a qualitative study. Asia Pac Fam Med. 2018;17:1. [PubMed ID: 29410602]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5781270]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12930-018-0038-x.

  • 17.

    Sleight AG, Cogan AM, Hill VA, Pyatak EA, Diaz J, Florindez LI, et al. Factors Protecting Against Pressure Injuries in Medically Underserved Adults With Spinal Cord Injury: A Qualitative Study. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2019;25(1):31-40. [PubMed ID: 30774288]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6368109]. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2501-31.

  • 18.

    Burns AS, O'Connell C. The challenge of spinal cord injury care in the developing world. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35(1):3-8. [PubMed ID: 22330185]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3240914]. https://doi.org/10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000043.

  • 19.

    Stroupe K, Manheim L, Evans C, Guihan M, Ho C, Li K, et al. Cost of Treating Pressure Ulcers for Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2011;16(4):62-73. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci1604-62.

  • 20.

    Lee E. Effect of Home Health Care Program for Management of Pressure Ulcerin Community Dwelling Vulnerable Populations. 10th International Nursing Conference. Seoul, Korea. 2016. p. 43-6.

  • 21.

    Burns AS, St-Germain D, Connolly M, Delparte JJ, Guindon A, Hitzig SL, et al. Phenomenological study of neurogenic bowel from the perspective of individuals living with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(1):49-55. [PubMed ID: 25172370]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.417.

  • 22.

    Luo DY, Ding MF, He CQ, Zhang HC, Dai Y, Yang Y, et al. Bladder management of patients with spinal cord injuries sustained in the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012;28(11):613-8. [PubMed ID: 23140770]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjms.2012.04.028.

  • 23.

    Thrussell H, Coggrave M, Graham A, Gall A, Donald M, Kulshrestha R, et al. Women's experiences of sexuality after spinal cord injury: a UK perspective. Spinal Cord. 2018;56(11):1084-94. [PubMed ID: 30140048]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-018-0188-6.

  • 24.

    Cameron AP, Wallner LP, Tate DG, Sarma AV, Rodriguez GM, Clemens JQ. Bladder management after spinal cord injury in the United States 1972 to 2005. J Urol. 2010;184(1):213-7. [PubMed ID: 20478597]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.008.

  • 25.

    Inskip JA, Lucci VM, McGrath MS, Willms R, Claydon VE. A Community Perspective on Bowel Management and Quality of Life after Spinal Cord Injury: The Influence of Autonomic Dysreflexia. J Neurotrauma. 2018;35(9):1091-105. [PubMed ID: 29239268]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5908418]. https://doi.org/10.1089/neu.2017.5343.

  • 26.

    Nicolle LE. Urinary tract infections in special populations: diabetes, renal transplant, HIV infection, and spinal cord injury. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014;28(1):91-104. [PubMed ID: 24484577]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idc.2013.09.006.

  • 27.

    Wyndaele JJ. The management of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction after spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(12):705-14. [PubMed ID: 27779229]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2016.206.

  • 28.

    Bloemen-Vrencken JH, Post MW, Hendriks JM, De Reus EC, De Witte LP. Health problems of persons with spinal cord injury living in the Netherlands. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(22):1381-9. [PubMed ID: 16321920]. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280500164685.

  • 29.

    Tawashy AE, Eng JJ, Lin KH, Tang PF, Hung C. Physical activity is related to lower levels of pain, fatigue and depression in individuals with spinal-cord injury: a correlational study. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(4):301-6. [PubMed ID: 18936771]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3095632]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.120.

  • 30.

    Widerstrom-Noga EG, Felipe-Cuervo E, Yezierski RP. Chronic pain after spinal injury: interference with sleep and daily activities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(11):1571-7. [PubMed ID: 11689978]. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2001.26068.

  • 31.

    Cimino SR, Hitzig SL, Craven BC, Bassett-Gunter RL, Li J, Guilcher SJT. An exploration of perceived social isolation among persons with spinal cord injury in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2022;44(14):3400-9. [PubMed ID: 33356633]. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2020.1861485.

  • 32.

    Lofvenmark I, Norrbrink C, Nilsson Wikmar L, Lofgren M. 'The moment I leave my home - there will be massive challenges': experiences of living with a spinal cord injury in Botswana. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(15):1483-92. [PubMed ID: 26694314]. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1106596.

  • 33.

    Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, Gray DB, Stark S, Kisala P, et al. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: A qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(4):578-88. [PubMed ID: 25813890]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.12.008.

  • 34.

    Babamohamadi H, Negarandeh R, Dehghan-Nayeri N. Barriers to and facilitators of coping with spinal cord injury for Iranian patients: a qualitative study. Nurs Health Sci. 2011;13(2):207-15. [PubMed ID: 21595815]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00602.x.

  • 35.

    Newman SD, Li C, Krause JS. Social isolation after spinal cord injury: Indicators from the Longitudinal Aging Study. Rehabil Psychol. 2016;61(4):408-16. [PubMed ID: 27831732]. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000112.

  • 36.

    Dorsett P, Geraghty T, Sinnott A, Acland R. Hope, coping and psychosocial adjustment after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017;3:17046. [PubMed ID: 28944084]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5607448]. https://doi.org/10.1038/scsandc.2017.46.

  • 37.

    Anderson CJ, Vogel LC, Chlan KM, Betz RR. Coping with spinal cord injury: strategies used by adults who sustained their injuries as children or adolescents. J Spinal Cord Med. 2008;31(3):290-6. [PubMed ID: 18795479]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2565556]. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2008.11760725.

  • 38.

    Pollard C, Kennedy P. A longitudinal analysis of emotional impact, coping strategies and post-traumatic psychological growth following spinal cord injury: a 10-year review. Br J Health Psychol. 2007;12(Pt 3):347-62. [PubMed ID: 17640451]. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910707X197046.

  • 39.

    Smedema SM, Ebener D. Substance abuse and psychosocial adaptation to physical disability: analysis of the literature and future directions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(16):1311-9. [PubMed ID: 20156048]. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903514721.

  • 40.

    Tetrault M, Courtois F. Use of psychoactive substances in persons with spinal cord injury: a literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014;57(9-10):684-95. [PubMed ID: 25455026]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rehab.2014.10.002.

  • 41.

    Khammarnia M, Peyvand M. [The reasons of return to drug addiction and suggested solutions among the people referring to rehabilitation centers: A Qualitative Study]. Journal of Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences. 2018;17(6):523-38. Persian.

  • 42.

    Karimyar Jahromi M, Eftekharzadeh MH. [Assessment meter of various effective factors associated with substance abuse relapse in addict’s perspective]. Journal of Research in Behavioural Sciences. 2015;13(1):124-33.