Abstract
Background:
Glioblastoma is the most common brain cancer in adults. It is caused by the abnormal proliferation of central nervous system cells called astrocytes, with an incidence rate of 4.32 per 100,000 in the United States. The median survival for glioblastoma is about 1 to 2 years. In Morocco, the survival of patients with glioblastoma is relatively little explored.Objectives:
This research aims to study overall survival and these prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma.Methods:
This is a retrospective study; the data were extracted from the files of patients with glioblastoma in the public reference oncology center in the southern region of Morocco; it is a prognostic study including all patients with glioblastoma cancer between 2014 and October 2021.Results:
The present study ultimately focused on 71 files of cases diagnosed with glioblastoma. The median age at diagnosis was 57, with a sex ratio of 1.44. The median survival time for all glioblastoma patients in this study was 11 months (95% CI: 9.96 to 12.03 months). Univariate analysis revealed that age, sex, geographical origin, type of treatment, and type of surgery were significant at P = 0.20 and then included in the multivariate model. After adjusting for all factors, the results revealed that only gender, age, and geographical origin were statistically significant predictors of overall survival.Conclusions:
The survival rate in patients with glioblastoma is improved with surgery, followed by concomitant radio-chemotherapy. We also confirmed that age and sex are important prognostic factors for the survival of patients with glioblastoma. Moreover, the data suggest the effect of the geographical origin of the patients on the overall survival of the patients as the only modifiable prognostic factor.Keywords
Glioblastoma Brain Overall Survival Prognostic Factors Morocco
1. Background
Glioblastoma (GB) is the most common and most aggressive primary central nervous system (CNS) tumor in adults (1), with an incidence of 4.32 /100,000 in the United States (2, 3), from 2.0 in Finland to 3.3 in North America, Austria, and Israel, and 4.96 per 100,000 in Gironde (1, 4). This incidence varies by age, sex, race, and region (5).
According to recent studies, the epidemiology and quality of life of patients with glioblastomas in the North African region are still little explored (6, 7). The incidence of glioblastoma can vary according to the socioeconomic level of the countries, with a higher rate in the western world than in low-income countries (8); this could be due to the very limited access to health services, the underreporting of glioma cases, and differences in diagnostic techniques and practices (9, 10). The current standard of care includes surgical resection at maximum, followed by concurrent and adjuvant radio-chemotherapy (11). The median survival from glioblastoma is approximately 1 to 2 years (8, 12), and the 5-year survival rate is approximately 5 to 9% (1, 13, 14). Prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) are patient age, patient functional capacity, grade of surgical resection, MGMT gene promoter methylation status, and type of treatment used (15-20).
2. Objectives
In Morocco, the survival of patients with glioblastoma is relatively little explored. In this sense, the present research aims to study the overall survival and these prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma in the southern region of Morocco.
3. Methods
This is a retrospective cross-sectional study, and the data were extracted from the files of patients with glioblastoma in the public reference oncology center in the southern region of Morocco; it is a prognostic study including all patients living with glioblastoma cancer between January 2014 and October 2021.
3.1. Data Collection
A data collection sheet was used to collect the following variables from patient records: Age, sex, date of diagnosis, type of surgery (biopsy, partial surgery, complete surgery), and type of treatment (radiotherapy, concomitant radio-chemotherapy).
The (a) eloquent zone refers to the parietal, temporal, hypothalamus, thalamus, parieto-occipital, temporo-parietal, fronto-temporal, fronto-parietal, basal ganglion; (b) the non-eloquent area refers to the frontal and occipital lobes.
The vital status of patients was researched at the level of patient care structures via their attending physician (from medical records or by telephone contact) and from data from the city's death register, which records all cases of the deceased. Overall survival was calculated from the date of surgery to the date of patient death.
3.2. Statistical Analysis
Kaplan Meier's method was used to estimate patient survival, and the Log Rank test was used to compare results between different classes. The Cox model was used to study the factors associated with survival. Variables significantly associated with survival in univariate analysis with a P-value < 0.25 were introduced into the multivariate model. Relative risks (RR) were calculated with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The significance level was set at 0.05. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using SPSS 13.
4. Results
4.1. Patients and Treatment Characteristics
The total number of patient records was 82; the present study ultimately included 71 cases diagnosed with glioblastoma. 11 patients were excluded from the study; two patients with spinal involvement, four patients with incomplete data, and five patients were lost to follow-up. The median age at diagnosis was 57 (range 17.0 - 80.0 years), with a sex ratio of 1.44. The most common tumor region was the eloquent area (83.1%). Regarding the types of surgery, 29 patients underwent partial tumor removal, 26 cases had tissue biopsy, and 16 patients with total tumor removal. For the other treatment modalities, 42 cases were treated only with radiotherapy; on the other hand, 29 other patients received concomitant radiotherapy. Most patients received standard Radiotherapy treatment of 60 Gy for the dose administered during radiotherapy, while 29.6% of cases received hypofractionated treatment; these patients are all over 60 years of age (Table 1). Regarding the time between the surgical act and the start of radiotherapy, almost all patients (91.5%) started the first radiotherapy sessions only after six weeks of the operative act (Table 1).
Patients and Treatment Characteristics a
| Characteristics | Values |
|---|---|
| Age group | |
| < 60 years | 42 (59.2) |
| ≥ 60 years | 29 (40.8) |
| Median age (range); y | 57 (17 - 80) |
| Gender | |
| Male | 42 (59.2) |
| Female | 29 (40.8) |
| Geographic origin | |
| Urban | 32 (45.1) |
| Rural | 39 (54.9) |
| Tumor location | |
| Confined to a single lobe | 38 (53.5) |
| Involved more than one lobe | 33 (46.5) |
| Tumor location | |
| Eloquent area | 59 (83.1) |
| Non-eloquent area | 12 (16.9) |
| Type of surgery | |
| Biopsy | 26 (36.6) |
| Partial tumor removal | 29 (40.8) |
| Total tumor removal | 16 (22.5) |
| Modalities of treatment | |
| RT | 42 (59.2) |
| CRCT | 29 (40.8) |
| Total dose (radiotherapy) | |
| Hypofractionated RT | 21 (29.6) |
| Hyperfractionated RT | 50 (70.4) |
| Days from surgery to initiation of RT | |
| ≤ 42 days | 6 (8.5) |
| ≥ 42 days | 65(91.5) |
| Overall survival | |
| < 9 months | 28 (39.4) |
| ≥ 9 months | 43 (60.6) |
4.2. Survival Outcomes
The median survival time (MST) of all GB patients in this study was 11 months (95% CI: 9.96 to 12.03 months) (Figure 1). Overall survival at two years is estimated at 4.2%.
Survival curve of GBM (months)
Using Kaplan-Meier, the results demonstrated a median overall survival of 12 months in patients with an age of fewer than 60 years, compared to only seven months in patients aged ≥ 60, with a significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.007) (Figure 2). Regarding gender, men showed a median overall survival of 12 months; on the other hand, in women was only ten months, with a non-significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.097).
Overall survival stratified by age. Kaplan-Meier curves are shown for overall survival stratified by age group.
However, geographical origin demonstrated a significant difference between patients with a higher median overall survival in rural patients (median survival 12 vs. seven months, P = 0.001) (Figure 3). On the other hand, according to the eloquent localization of the tumors, the results of the present study did not reveal a statistically significant difference in survival between the groups (P = 0.373).
Overall survival is stratified by the geographical origin of the patients. Kaplan-Meier curves are shown for overall survival separated by geographic origin.
Compared to surgery, patients who underwent complete or partial tumor resection demonstrated a higher median survival of 12 months compared to 7 months for patients with biopsy, with a significant difference between the 3 three groups (P = 0.011) (Figure 4).
Overall survival stratified by type of surgery.
For the type of treatment used for each patient, the group treated only with radiotherapy demonstrated significantly reduced survival compared to patients treated with standard RCC treatment (median survival of nine versus 13 months, P = 0.002) (Figure 5).
Overall survival stratified by modalities of treatment. Kaplan-Meier curves are shown for overall survival from diagnosis stratified by modalities of treatment.
4.3. Prognostic Factors
The COX regression model has been used to study the impact of prognostic factors on overall survival. Initially, the univariate analysis examined the sex, age, geographical origin of the patient, and type of surgery.
The results showed that gender, age, geographical origin, type of treatment, and type of surgery were significant at a level of P = 0.20 (Table 2). They are then included in the multivariate model.
Univariate Analysis of Overall Survival
| Variables | HR | P-Value |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.814 | 0.014 |
| Gender | 1.456 | 0.126 |
| Tumor location | 0.770 | 0.415 |
| Origin geographic | 0.327 | 0.001 |
| Type of surgery | 0.688 | 0.017 |
| Type of treatment | 0.499 | 0.005 |
Hazard ratios (HR) of multivariate results are shown in Table 3. After adjusting for all factors, the results revealed that only gender, age, and geographical origin were statistically significant predictors of overall survival. There is a tendency towards significance for the type of treatment.
Multivariate Analysis of Overall Survival
| Variables | HR | 95% CI | P-Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.912 | 1.150 - 3.181 | 0.012 |
| Gender | 1.847 | 1.105 - 3.087 | 0.019 |
| Origin geographic | 0.371 | 0.212 - 0.650 | 0.001 |
| Type of surgery | 0.895 | 0.633 - 1.264 | 0.528 |
| Type of treatment | 0.619 | 0.366 - 1.048 | 0.074 |
5. Discussion
Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary tumor of the central nervous system. Despite recent therapeutic advances, patients with glioblastoma have a poor prognosis, with a median survival that does not exceed 15 months after diagnosis (15, 21).
The results of our study revealed a male predominance, which agrees with several previous studies (22-24). The median Overall Survival in our series was 11 months (95% CI: 9.96 to 12.03 months) which is consistent with other studies by Lacroix et al. (10.6 months) (17), Laws et al. (10.2 months) (18). The overall survival at two years was 4.2% which is lower than the rates found in some studies in developed countries (21.3% to 27.2%) (14, 25); this could be explained by the presence in these countries of more developed screening programs and diagnostic and treatment infrastructure.
For elderly patients with glioblastoma, results showed poor overall survival compared to patients younger than 60, consistent with several previous studies that have shown the effect of age as a factor influencing the survival of patients with glioblastoma (17, 18, 26, 27).
According to a recent meta-analysis, the effect of radiotherapy wait time on survival in patients with glioblastoma is still controversial (28); this is difficult to verify in the present study, as the majority of patients started radiotherapy only after six weeks of surgery, which can be explained by the long waiting time due to the lack of treatment facilities. The results of our study indicated that geographical origin is a predictor of overall survival, with better overall survival observed in rural patients compared to urban patients, which might be explained by the environmental factors of patients from rural areas; future studies will be necessary to confirm and deepen these findings.
Regarding the type of surgery, significant results show that the extent of resection can improve the overall survival of patients; this result is supported by univariate regression, which shows that the extent of resection is a factor in overall survival, which is in line with several studies showing that a better maximum resection is a predictor of increased survival for patients with glioma (17, 29-31). In addition, the type of post-surgical treatment has an impact on the survival of the patients in our series; the standard treatment with radio-chemotherapy concomitantly with temozolomide offers favorable survival results compared to patients treated only with radiotherapy, which in turn results in agreeing with the results of the literature (15, 32).
The present study had several limitations, in particular its retrospective design, with missing data in the patient files such as the Karnofsky Index (KPS) and molecular biology data, namely, the IDH mutation and the methylation of the MGMT promoter, which are considered to be prognostic factors in patients with glioblastoma.
5.1. Conclusions
The survival rate in patients with GB is improved with surgery, followed by concomitant radio-chemotherapy with temozolomide. We also confirmed that age and gender are important prognostic factors for the survival of GB patients. Furthermore, the data suggest the effect of the geographical origin of the patients on the overall survival of the patients as the only modifiable prognostic factor; indeed, future prospective studies are recommended to prove this result.
References
-
1.
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Truitt G, Boscia A, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2011-2015. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(suppl_4):iv1-86. [PubMed ID: 30445539]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6129949]. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy131.
-
2.
Davis FG, Smith TR, Gittleman HR, Ostrom QT, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. Glioblastoma incidence rate trends in Canada and the United States compared with England, 1995-2015. Neuro Oncol. 2020;22(2):301-2. [PubMed ID: 31786602]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7032629]. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz203.
-
3.
Omuro A, DeAngelis LM. Glioblastoma and other malignant gliomas: a clinical review. JAMA. 2013;310(17):1842-50. [PubMed ID: 24193082]. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.280319.
-
4.
Baldi I, Huchet A, Bauchet L, Loiseau H. [Epidemiology of glioblastoma]. Neurochirurgie. 2010;56(6):433-40. French. [PubMed ID: 20869733]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuchi.2010.07.011.
-
5.
Reynoso-Noverón N, Mohar-Betancourt A, Ortiz-Rafael J. Epidemiology of Brain Tumors. In: Monroy-Sosa A, Chakravarthi SS, de la Garza-Salazar JG, Meneses Garcia A, Kassam AB, editors. Principles of Neuro-Oncology. Cham: Springer; 2021. p. 15-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54879-7_2.
-
6.
Baba MA, Adali N. Neurocognitive state and quality of life of patients with glioblastoma in Mediterranean countries: a systematic review. Ann Palliat Med. 2021;10(11):11980-93. [PubMed ID: 34775771]. https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-21-1900.
-
7.
French Panel; North Africa Panel. Guidelines, "minimal requirements" and standard of care in glioblastoma around the Mediterranean Area: A report from the AROME (Association of Radiotherapy and Oncology of the Mediterranean arEa) Neuro-Oncology working party. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;98:189-99. [PubMed ID: 26626226]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2015.10.014.
-
8.
Thakkar JP, Dolecek TA, Horbinski C, Ostrom QT, Lightner DD, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, et al. Epidemiologic and molecular prognostic review of glioblastoma. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014;23(10):1985-96. [PubMed ID: 25053711]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4185005]. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0275.
-
9.
Ohgaki H. Epidemiology of brain tumors. In: Verma M, editor. Cancer Epidemiology. Methods in Molecular Biology. 472. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2009. p. 323-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-492-0_14.
-
10.
Fisher JL, Schwartzbaum JA, Wrensch M, Wiemels JL. Epidemiology of brain tumors. Neurol Clin. 2007;25(4):867-90. [PubMed ID: 17964019]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ncl.2007.07.002.
-
11.
Delgado-Lopez PD, Corrales-Garcia EM. Survival in glioblastoma: a review on the impact of treatment modalities. Clin Transl Oncol. 2016;18(11):1062-71. [PubMed ID: 26960561]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-016-1497-x.
-
12.
Ronning PA, Helseth E, Meling TR, Johannesen TB. A population-based study on the effect of temozolomide in the treatment of glioblastoma multiforme. Neuro Oncol. 2012;14(9):1178-84. [PubMed ID: 22869622]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3424214]. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nos153.
-
13.
Gittleman H, Boscia A, Ostrom QT, Truitt G, Fritz Y, Kruchko C, et al. Survivorship in adults with malignant brain and other central nervous system tumor from 2000-2014. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(suppl_7):vii6-16. [PubMed ID: 29850889]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6225751]. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy090.
-
14.
Stupp R, Hegi ME, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Taphoorn MJ, Janzer RC, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):459-66. [PubMed ID: 19269895]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7.
-
15.
Stupp R, Mason WP, van den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ, et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(10):987-96. [PubMed ID: 15758009]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa043330.
-
16.
Walker MD, Green SB, Byar DP, Alexander Jr E, Batzdorf U, Brooks WH, et al. Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery. N Engl J Med. 1980;303(23):1323-9. [PubMed ID: 7001230]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198012043032303.
-
17.
Lacroix M, Abi-Said D, Fourney DR, Gokaslan ZL, Shi W, DeMonte F, et al. A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival. J Neurosurg. 2001;95(2):190-8. [PubMed ID: 11780887]. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2001.95.2.0190.
-
18.
Laws ER, Parney IF, Huang W, Anderson F, Morris AM, Asher A, et al. Survival following surgery and prognostic factors for recently diagnosed malignant glioma: data from the Glioma Outcomes Project. J Neurosurg. 2003;99(3):467-73. [PubMed ID: 12959431]. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.99.3.0467.
-
19.
Stummer W, Pichlmeier U, Meinel T, Wiestler OD, Zanella F, Reulen HJ, et al. Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomised controlled multicentre phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7(5):392-401. [PubMed ID: 16648043]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70665-9.
-
20.
Ryken TC, Frankel B, Julien T, Olson JJ. Surgical management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma in adults: role of cytoreductive surgery. J Neurooncol. 2008;89(3):271-86. [PubMed ID: 18712281]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-008-9614-5.
-
21.
Fine HA. The basis for current treatment recommendations for malignant gliomas. J Neurooncol. 1994;20(2):111-20. [PubMed ID: 7807189]. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01052722.
-
22.
Carrano A, Juarez JJ, Incontri D, Ibarra A, Guerrero Cazares H. Sex-Specific Differences in Glioblastoma. Cells. 2021;10(7):1783. [PubMed ID: 34359952]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8303471]. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10071783.
-
23.
Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Liao P, Vecchione-Koval T, Wolinsky Y, Kruchko C, et al. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary brain and other central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2010-2014. Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(suppl_5):v1-88. [PubMed ID: 29117289]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5693142]. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nox158.
-
24.
Ostrom QT, Rubin JB, Lathia JD, Berens ME, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. Females have the survival advantage in glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2018;20(4):576-7. [PubMed ID: 29474647]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5909625]. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noy002.
-
25.
Bloch O, Han SJ, Cha S, Sun MZ, Aghi MK, McDermott MW, et al. Impact of extent of resection for recurrent glioblastoma on overall survival: clinical article. J Neurosurg. 2012;117(6):1032-8. [PubMed ID: 23039151]. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.9.JNS12504.
-
26.
Rogne SG, Konglund A, Meling TR, Scheie D, Johannesen TB, Ronning P, et al. Intracranial tumor surgery in patients >70 years of age: is clinical practice worthwhile or futile? Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;120(5):288-94. [PubMed ID: 19737154]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01157.x.
-
27.
Mirimanoff RO, Gorlia T, Mason W, Van den Bent MJ, Kortmann RD, Fisher B, et al. Radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis of the EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(16):2563-9. [PubMed ID: 16735709]. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5963.
-
28.
Li GL, Lv S, Xu Y, Zhang HB, Yan Y. The relationship between the waiting time of postoperative radiotherapy and the prognosis of high grade glioma: A systemic review and meta-analysis. bioRxiv. 2020;January. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.01.10.901447.
-
29.
McGirt MJ, Chaichana KL, Gathinji M, Attenello FJ, Than K, Olivi A, et al. Independent association of extent of resection with survival in patients with malignant brain astrocytoma. J Neurosurg. 2009;110(1):156-62. [PubMed ID: 18847342]. https://doi.org/10.3171/2008.4.17536.
-
30.
Sanai N, Berger MS. Glioma extent of resection and its impact on patient outcome. Neurosurgery. 2008;62(4):753-64. [PubMed ID: 18496181]. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.neu.0000318159.21731.cf.
-
31.
Sanai N, Polley MY, McDermott MW, Parsa AT, Berger MS. An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas. J Neurosurg. 2011;115(1):3-8. [PubMed ID: 21417701]. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.jns10998.
-
32.
Roh TH, Park HH, Kang SG, Moon JH, Kim EH, Hong CK, et al. Long-term outcomes of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients: A single-center analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(27). e7422. [PubMed ID: 28682902]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5502175]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007422.