The Association Between Borna Disease Virus and Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

authors:

avatar Milad Azami 1 , avatar Farid Azizi Jalilian 2 , avatar Mohammad Reza Adhami Mojarad 3 , avatar Younes Mohammadi 4 , avatar Zeinab Tardeh 1 , *

Student Research Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran
Department of Virology, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran
Department of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, IR Iran
Department of Epidemiology, Modeling of Noncommunicable Disease Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, IR Iran

how to cite: Azami M, Azizi Jalilian F, Adhami Mojarad M R, Mohammadi Y, Tardeh Z. The Association Between Borna Disease Virus and Mood Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Neurosci. 2018;5(2):e57779. https://doi.org/10.5812/archneurosci.57779.

Abstract

Context:

Recent studies on patients with psychiatric disorders suggest a possible association between borna disease virus (BDV) and mood disorders. However, a clear association remains controversial. The current systematic review and meta-analysis study aimed at investigating the association between BDV infection and mood disorders.

Methods:

The current study was conducted based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. To obtain the evidence, several databases were searched including PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar search engine without time limit until 2017. Heterogeneity of the studies was assessed using Q test and I2 index. A random effect model was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Results:

Meta-analysis of 23 studies comprising 3628 cases and 5,810 controls showed that BDV infection was associated with a significantly increased risk of mood disorders (OR = 1.61; 95%CI: 1.21 - 2.15, P = 0.001, I2 = 44%). Subgroup analysis was used according to diagnostic method indicating OR was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.37 - 2.8) for immunofluorescence antibody (IFA), 1.26 (95%CI: 0.5 - 3.18) for western blot (WB) assay, 1.58 (95%CI: 1.06 - 2.38) for real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), 1.16 (95%CI: 0.24 - 5.70) for radioligand assay (RLA), 2.55 (95%CI: 1.67 - 3.88) for enzyme immunoassay (EIA), 2.15 (95%CI: 0.68-6.80) for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 3.29 (95%CI: 1.35 - 7.98) for electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), 4.00 (95%CI: 0.89 - 17.87) for peptide array, and 1.00 (95%CI: 0.23 - 4.27) for proliferation assay method. In subgroup analysis of bipolar and unipolar disorder, OR was 1.99 (95%CI: 1.29 - 3.08, P = 0.002) and 1.16 (95%CI: 0.76 - 1.76, P = 0.481), respectively.

Conclusions:

These results can confirm the significant role of BDV infection in mood disorders. Therefore, it might be necessary to consider BDV infection to manage psychiatric disorders.

1. Context

A significant proportion of global burden of disease is caused by mental, neurological, and substance use disorders (1). A study conducted in 2015 reported the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders as 13.4%, which is high (2). In some studies, low prevalence of psychiatric disorders was reported in the elderly, high prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders was reported in females, and substance use and several personality disorders were reported in males (3, 4).

Studies showed that mental disorders are a risk factor for blood borne infections (5-7). Borna disease virus (BDV) is one of the infections considered by some studies as a risk factor that might play a role in the development of neurological and psychiatric disorders. However, there is no consensus on whether BDV can infect human and cause neuropsychiatric disorders (8). BDV is a negative strand and negative polarity, non-segmented RNA virus belonging to order Mononegavirales that replicates in the cell nucleus (9, 10). BDV mainly infects the cortex and hippocampus neurons of limbic system and thus, may affect cognition and behavior (11).

Bechterand et al., detected BDV immunoglobulin G (IgG) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimen of patients with mood disorder and confirmed the role of BDV infection in the etiology of psychiatric disorders (12). In a study using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) to detect BDV p24RNA in patients with mood disorder, the association between BDV infection and mood and other psychiatric disorders was reported (13). In another study by Li et al., using western blot (WB) assay and RT-PCR, BDV was detected in 6 patients with encephalitis, but not in the ones with other neurological disorders (14). No association was observed between BDV infection and psychiatric disorders including depressive, bipolar, and schizophrenia in a study using RRT-PCR and indirect immunofluorescence antibody (IFA) methods (15). Tsuji et al. compared patients with psychiatric disorders with a control group using RT-PCR and WB assay, but did not confirm the association between BDV infection and mood and other psychiatric disorders (16). In another study conducted in Iran, high prevalence of subclinical BDV infections and the association between BDV infection and mood disorders such as bipolar and major depressive disorders (MDD) was approved (17). The study by Horing et al. rejected the role of BDV infection in pathogenesis of psychiatric disorders such as bipolar, major depressive, and schizophrenia (18).

Moreover, the evidence indicated a possible association between BDV infection and mood disorders, but the exact association was not clear and many questions about this association remained unanswered.

2. Objectives

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were the investigation methods to combine results of different studies into a single conclusion (19-21) and the current study aimed at finding the association between mood disorders and BDV infection.

3. Methods:

3.1. Study Protocol

The current study was conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (20). To avoid bias, all steps of the study were performed by 2 researchers independently. A third author reviewed any disagreement between the 2 researchers.

3.2. Data Sources

To obtain the corresponding evidence, the following databases were searched: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar search engine as well as the reference list of the articles without time limit until 15 January 2017. The search was developed using the following keywords: “Borna Disease Virus”[MeSH], “Mood Disorders”[MeSH], “Mood Disorders”[MeSH], “Depression”[MeSH], “Depressive Disorder"[MeSH], “Bipolar Disorder”[MeSH], “Depressive Disorder, Major”[MeSH], “Infection”[MeSH], and “Mental Disorders”[MeSH].

3.3. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criteria were observational epidemiological studies (i e, case-control, cohort, and cross sectional) in English on human populations. Studies with insufficient data, irrelevant to the topic, without the outcome of mood disorders based on exposure to BDV along with a control group of healthy people for comparison, letter to editors, presentations, review articles, and case reports were excluded.

3.4. Study Selection and Quality Assessment

The primary screening was conducted to select relevant articles by screening title and abstract of the articles, and then the full text of the remaining articles were reviewed for eligibility. Finally, articles were assessed using the modified Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for non randomized studies and articles that got a minimum score of 7 were selected (22).

3.5. Data Extraction

The data of the selected articles including the name of the first author, country, year and design of study, name of journal, characteristics of samples (e g, sample size, gender, and mean age), diagnostic method, diagnostic criteria, odds ratio (OR), 95% confidence interval (CI), and number of BDV positive subjects in the case and control groups were extracted and recorded in an Excel file.

3.6. Data Analysis

The data were analyzed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis ver. 2 software. OR was used with 95% CIs as a selective association index and forest plot was used to present combined result and individual studies separately. To assess the heterogeneity of the studies, Cochran’s Q test and I2 statistic were used (I2 index lower than 25%, 25% - 75%, and higher than 75% was considered as low, moderate, and high heterogeneity, respectively) (23). Due to the heterogeneity of the studies, the random effect model was used to combine the study data. Subgroup analysis was performed according to diagnostic method and bipolar and unipolar disorders. The sensitivity analysis was employed to investigate the stability and reliability of data by deleting every single study from meta-analysis. To assess publication bias, the Egger and Begg's tests were used. The significance level was considered < 0.05.

4. Results

4.1. Search Results

In the initial systematic search, 460 publications were found; 210 duplicates were excluded. After screening titles and abstracts of the 250 retained studies, 200 irrelevant ones were excluded. Then, the full texts of the remaining articles were studied and 27 articles were excluded (Figure 1).

4.2. Characteristics of the included studies

Finally, 23 eligible studies consisting of 3628 cases and 5810 controls entered the final analysis (Tables 1 and 2).

Table 2.

Data Obtained From Studies on the Association Between BDV Infection and Unipolar and Bipolar Disorders

SubtypeStudy (N)OR (95%CI)P ValueHeterogeneity
I2P Value
Unipolar disorder101.162 (0.765 - 1.765)0.48136.20.119
Bipolar disorder71.996 (1.293 - 3.080)0.00200.856

4.3. The Association Between BDV and Mood Disorders

The heterogeneity rate in the current study was moderate (I2 = 44.43%, P = 0.005). Meta-analysis of 23 studies showed that BDV infection was associated with a significantly increased risk of mood disorders (OR = 1.615; 95%CI: 1.215 - 2.15, P = 0.001) (Figure 2).

Meta-analysis of studies on association between BDV infection and mood disorders
Meta-analysis of studies on association between BDV infection and mood disorders

4.4. Subgroup Analysis Based on Diagnostic Methods

Subgroup analysis used according to diagnostic method indicated that OR was 1.01 (95%CI: 0.37 - 2.8) for IFA, 1.26 (95%CI: 0.5 - 3.18) for WB, 1.58 (95%CI: 1.06 - 2.38) for RT-PCR, 1.16 (95%CI: 0.24 - 5.70) for radioligand assay (RLA), 2.55 (95%CI: 1.67 - 3.88) for enzyme immunoassay (EIA), 2.15 (95%CI: 0.68 - 6.80) for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), 3.29 (95%CI: 1.35 - 7.98) for electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA), 4.00 (95%CI: 0.89 - 17.87) for peptide array, and 1.00 (95%CI: 0.23 - 4.27) for proliferation assay (Figure 3).

Meta-analysis of studies on the association between BDV infection and mood disorders according to diagnostic method; (1 = IFA, 2 = WB, 3 = RT-PCR, 4 = RLA, 5 = peptide array, 6 = ECLIA, 7 = proliferation assay, 8 = EIA, 9 = ELISA).
Meta-analysis of studies on the association between BDV infection and mood disorders according to diagnostic method; (1 = IFA, 2 = WB, 3 = RT-PCR, 4 = RLA, 5 = peptide array, 6 = ECLIA, 7 = proliferation assay, 8 = EIA, 9 = ELISA).

4.5. Subgroup Analysis Based on Patients with Bipolar/Unipolar Depressive Disorder

In subgroup analysis of patients with bipolar/ unipolar depressive disorder, OR was 1.99 (95%CI: 1.29 - 3.08, P = 0.002) and 1.16 (95%CI: 0.76 - 1.76, P = 0.481), respectively (Table 2).

4.6. Publication Bias and Sensitivity Analysis

P values estimated for the publication bias in the Egger and Begg tests were 0.31 and 0.96 respectively, and the difference between them was not significant (Figure 4). In the sensitivity analysis, the impact of each study on the combined OR was determined by repeating the meta-analysis after removing 1 study, and the relationship was significant (Figure 5).

Publication bias in meta-analysis of studies on the association between BDV infection and mood disorders
Publication bias in meta-analysis of studies on the association between BDV infection and mood disorders
Sensitivity analysis in meta-analysis of studies on the association between BDV infection and mood disorders
Sensitivity analysis in meta-analysis of studies on the association between BDV infection and mood disorders

5. Discussion

In the current study, a significant association was noted between BDV infection and mood disorders by combining the results of 23 studies. After performing heterogeneity testing, the rate of heterogeneity in the current study was 44.43%, which tended to moderate heterogeneity. Therefore, the random effect model was used. Subgroup analysis based on diagnostic methods and bipolar and unipolar disorders was used to detect the source of heterogeneity. Another possible source of heterogeneity was sample size and different types of mood disorders, which was not assessed in the current study. Subgroup analysis was conducted in patients with bipolar or unipolar depressive disorders, which was not significant in unipolar disorders and was significant in bipolar disorders. However, this result may be affected by the limited number of studies and small sample size.

Studies showed that humans are exposed to BDV (24). Evidence of the association between BDV infection and psychiatric disorders was observed in the study by Azami et al. By analyzing 35 studies, significant association was confirmed between BDV infection and schizophrenia, and the estimated OR was 2.72 (95%CI: 1.75 - 4.20) (25). In another meta-analysis conducted in 2017 on 9 studies, a significant association was observed between BDV infection and chronic fatigue syndrome, and the estimated OR was 10.41 (95%CI: 4.24 - 25.55, P < 0.0001) (26). In addition, significant association was noted between BDV infection and depression in a meta-analysis by Wang et al. (27). However, no evidence of BDV infection was observed in patients with mental illnesses in a meta-analysis by Durrwald, suggesting the possible role of sample contamination in the result of previous studies (28).

One of limitations of the current study was lack of access to full texts of several articles. In addition, studies included in the analysis did not use the same methods, samples, and diagnostic indices, which may affect the results. Moreover, studies conducted on this issue were restricted to specific geographical regions. However, it was tried to use all studies conducted on the association between BDV and mood disorders and also the role of different methods in the final results using subgroup analysis. These variables may influence the result of the current and other studies, and their sensitivity and specificity were not similar to those of the study by Billich. According to the findings of the current study, the results of IFA and peptide array were different, which indicated lower sensitivity, but higher specificity of peptide array (29). However, according to the study by Fukuda using different methods such as ECLIA, RT-PCR, and WB in different samples of plasma and PBMC (peripheral blood mononuclear cell), the differences were not statistically significant (30). According to the study by Na, BDV was not detected in any of the subjects in the case or control groups using IFA and RT-PCR methods (15).

6. Conclusions

The current study confirmed the association between BDV infection and mood disorders and suggested the role of viral infections in the etiology of neuropsychiatric disorders. However, more studies in different regions of the world should be conducted to find the exact association and other etiologic agents should be determined. However, reliable diagnostic methods should be introduced. Understanding the underlying factors may help in prevention, diagnosis, and management of patients with psychiatric disorders and may help to reduce the rate of such disorders and their socio-economical burdens.

Table 1.

Data Obtained From Studies on the Association Between BDV Infection and Mood Disorders

Authors NameYearPlaceCaseControlAssayTechnique/Sample
BDV PositiveBDV NegativeMale/FemaleMean Age (SD)BDV PositiveBDV NegativeMale/FemaleMean Age (SD)
Yamaguchi et al. (31)1999Japan924298/15355.6 (14)10907632/28535.1 (13.1)Anti p24 and p40 AbECLIA/Serum
Amesterdam et al. (32)1985USA122530105Anti BDV AbIFA/Serum
Fu et al. (33)1993USA912941/9740 (13)111677/4034 (10)Anti 38/40 and 24kDa protein AbWB/Serum
Terayama et al. (34)2003Japan9 (8MDD,1 BD)24 (12MDD,12 BD)17/16124Anti p10 AbWB/Serum
Tsuji et al. (16)2000Japan051/458.6 (17.6)1172110/63p24, p40RNART-PCR/PBMCS
Tsuji et al. (16)2000Japan0196/1350.7 (14.2)0210129/81Anti p24, p40 or gp18 AbWB/Plasma
Matsunaga et al. (35)2008Japan2510438/9149.5(16.4)67209Anti p40, p24AbRLA/Serum
Billich et al. (29)2002Germany8114/15531450IFA/Serum
Billich (29)2002Germany4154/1553757N,P proteinsPeptide array/Serum
de la Torre et al. (36)1996Germany3005p24RNART-PCR/PBMCS
Fukuda et al. (30)2001Japan14423/224704522/2348Anti p24, p40 AbWB/ Plasma
Fukuda et al. (30)2001Japan14423/224704522/2348P24 RNANestedRT-PCR/PBMCS
Fukuda et al. (30)2001Japan14423/224714422/2348Anti p24, p40 AbECLIA/Plasma
Fukuda et al. (30)2001Japan44123/224714422/2348p24, p40 proteinsProliferation assay/Plasma
Na et al. (15)2009Korea0138 (98MDD,40BD)060Anti BDV AbIFA/Serum
Na et al. (15)2009Korea0138 (98MDD,40BD)060p24, p40RNART-PCR/PBMCS
Sauder et al. (37)1996Germany6463200antiP24, p40,p16AbWB/Serum
Planz et al. (38)1999Germany2003P40RNART-PCR/Granulocytes
Salvator et al. (39)1997USA2 (BD)9 (6MDD, 3BD)010P24RNART-PCR/Brain
Iwata et al. (40)1998Kubo24725/2447.5 (12.6)28249/3545.2 (10.2)P24RNART-PCR/PBMCS
Czygon et al. (41)1999Germany0114/752 (15)05232/2854 (24)p24, p40RNART-PCR/Brain
Nunes et al. (42)2008Brazil9158/1638.4 (10)42314/1338.8 (10.3)P24RNART-PCR/PBMCS
Kubo (43)1997Japan112242/8152.95 (13.24)07037/3345.43 (11.04)Anti BDV AbIFA/plasma
Matsunaga et al. (44)2005Japan67422/5846 (16.9)14019/2245.5 (13.9)Anti BDV-P and N AbRLA/Serum
Tehrani (17)2014Iran5 (BD)76 (12MDD, 59BD)37/448192111/89Anti BDV AbEIA/Plasma
Tehrani et al. (17)2014Iran37 (6MDD, 29BD)44 (6MDD, 36BD)37/4459141111/89CICEIA/Plasma
Tehrani et al. (17)2014Iran08137/442198111/89N,P proteinsEIA/Plasma
Horing et al. (18)2012USA2 (BD)144 (80MDD,64BD)1145Anti BDV AbIFA/ Serum
Horing et al. (18)2012USA01460146Anti BDV-P and N AbELISA/Serum
Horing et al. (18)2012USA01460146P23,P40 RNART-PCR/WBC
Shankar et al. (45)1992USA05020BDV RNART-PCR/Brain
Zhao et al. (46)2007China3570120P24 RNART-PCR/PBMCS
Wang et al. (47)2006China647032P24 RNART-PCR/PBMCS
Flower et al. (48)2008Australia5995214Anti p24 and p40AbELISA/Serum
Flower et al. (48)2008Australia11032217P24 and p40 pAgELISA/Serum
Bode et al. (49)1992Germany12 (5MDD,7BD)538 (358MDD,180BD)45 (13)11472Anti38/80KDAbIFA/Serum
Bode et al. (13)1995Germany2 (MDD)1 (MDD)`010P24, P40RNANested RT-PCR/PBMCS
Liu et al. (50)2015China97 (MDD)437 (MDD)187/34735.99 (12.33)176819342/653CICEIA/Plasma
Liu et al. (50)2015China5 (MDD)95 (MDD)9171Anti BDV abEIA/Plasma
Liu et al. (50)2015China27 (MDD)507 (MDD)187/34735.99 (12.33)58937342/653BDVp24RNART-PCR/PBMCs

References

  • 1.

    Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, Degenhardt L, Feigin V, Vos T. The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One. 2015;10(2). e0116820. [PubMed ID: 25658103]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0116820.

  • 2.

    Polanczyk GV, Salum GA, Sugaya LS, Caye A, Rohde LA. Annual research review: A meta-analysis of the worldwide prevalence of mental disorders in children and adolescents. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2015;56(3):345-65. [PubMed ID: 25649325]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12381.

  • 3.

    Karel MJ, Gatz M, Smyer MA. Aging and mental health in the decade ahead: what psychologists need to know. Am Psychol. 2012;67(3):184-98. [PubMed ID: 21942364]. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025393.

  • 4.

    Reynolds K, Pietrzak RH, El-Gabalawy R, Mackenzie CS, Sareen J. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in U.S. older adults: findings from a nationally representative survey. World Psychiatry. 2015;14(1):74-81. [PubMed ID: 25655161]. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20193.

  • 5.

    Hughes E, Bassi S, Gilbody S, Bland M, Martin F. Prevalence of HIV, hepatitis B, and hepatitis C in people with severe mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(1):40-8. [PubMed ID: 26620388]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00357-0.

  • 6.

    Lagios K, Deane FP. Severe mental illness is a new risk marker for blood-borne viruses and sexually transmitted infections. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007;31(6):562-6. [PubMed ID: 18081578]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00144.x.

  • 7.

    Campos LN, Guimaraes MD, Carmo RA, Melo AP, Oliveira HN, Elkington K, et al. HIV, syphilis, and hepatitis B and C prevalence among patients with mental illness: a review of the literature. Cad Saude Publica. 2008;24 Suppl 4:s607-20. [PubMed ID: 18797734].

  • 8.

    Lipkin WI, Briese T, Hornig M. Borna disease virus - fact and fantasy. Virus Res. 2011;162(1-2):162-72. [PubMed ID: 21968299]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2011.09.036.

  • 9.

    Tomonaga K, Kobayashi T, Ikuta K. Molecular and cellular biology of Borna disease virus infection. Microbes Infect. 2002;4(4):491-500. [PubMed ID: 11932200].

  • 10.

    Lipkin WI, Briese T. Bornaviridae. In: Knipe D, Howley P, Griffin D, Lamb R, Martin M, Roizman B, et al., editors. Fields Virology. Philadelphia PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 1829-51.

  • 11.

    Gonzalez-Dunia D, Volmer R, Mayer D, Schwemmle M. Borna disease virus interference with neuronal plasticity. Virus Res. 2005;111(2):224-34. [PubMed ID: 15885838]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2005.04.011.

  • 12.

    Bechter K, Herzog S, Behr W, Schuttler R. Investigations of cerebrospinal fluid in Borna disease virus seropositive psychiatric patients. Eur Psychiatry. 1995;10(5):250-8. [PubMed ID: 19698348]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-9338(96)80302-6.

  • 13.

    Bode L, Zimmermann W, Ferszt R, Steinbach F, Ludwig H. Borna disease virus genome transcribed and expressed in psychiatric patients. Nat Med. 1995;1(3):232-6. [PubMed ID: 7585039].

  • 14.

    Li Q, Wang Z, Zhu D, Xu M, Chen X, Peng D, et al. Detection and analysis of Borna disease virus in Chinese patients with neurological disorders. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16(3):399-403. [PubMed ID: 19364367]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02516.x.

  • 15.

    Na KS, Tae SH, Song JW, Kim YK. Failure to detect borna disease virus antibody and RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of psychiatric patients. Psychiatry Investig. 2009;6(4):306-12. [PubMed ID: 20140130]. https://doi.org/10.4306/pi.2009.6.4.306.

  • 16.

    Tsuji K, Toyomasu K, Imamura Y, Maeda H, Toyoda T. No association of borna disease virus with psychiatric disorders among patients in northern Kyushu, Japan. J Med Virol. 2000;61(3):336-40. [PubMed ID: 10861642].

  • 17.

    Mazaheri-Tehrani E, Maghsoudi N, Shams J, Soori H, Atashi H, Motamedi F, et al. Borna disease virus (BDV) infection in psychiatric patients and healthy controls in Iran. Virol J. 2014;11:161. [PubMed ID: 25186971]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-11-161.

  • 18.

    Hornig M, Briese T, Licinio J, Khabbaz RF, Altshuler LL, Potkin SG, et al. Absence of evidence for bornavirus infection in schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2012;17(5):486-93. [PubMed ID: 22290118]. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2011.179.

  • 19.

    Sayehmiri K, Tavan H, Sayehmiri F, Mohammadi I, V. Carson K. Prevalence of epilepsy in iran: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Iran J Child Neurol. 2014;8(4):9-17. [PubMed ID: 25657765].

  • 20.

    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Prisma Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7). e1000097. [PubMed ID: 19621072]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097.

  • 21.

    Sayehmiri K, Tavan H, Sayehmiri F, Mohammadi I. Prevalence of epilepsy in iran: a meta-analysis and systematic review. ZUMSJ. 2015;23(97):112-21.

  • 22.

    Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. 2011, [cited 2012 Nov 25]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.

  • 23.

    Ades AE, Lu G, Higgins JP. The interpretation of random-effects meta-analysis in decision models. Med Decis Making. 2005;25(6):646-54. [PubMed ID: 16282215]. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X05282643.

  • 24.

    Chalmers RM, Thomas DR, Salmon RL. Borna disease virus and the evidence for human pathogenicity: a systematic review. QJM. 2005;98(4):255-74. [PubMed ID: 15760926]. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hci039.

  • 25.

    Azami M, Azizi Jalilian F, Khorshidi A, Mohammadi Y, Tardeh Z. The Association between Borna Disease Virus and Schizophrenia:A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Psychiatr. 2017;34:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2017.11.026.

  • 26.

    Azami M, Adhami Mojarad MR, Mansouri A, Tardeh Z. The Association Between Borna Disease Virus and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Iran J Psychiatr Behav Sci. 2017;11(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.9074.

  • 27.

    Wang X, Zhang L, Lei Y, Liu X, Zhou X, Liu Y, et al. Meta-analysis of infectious agents and depression. Sci Rep. 2014;4:4530. [PubMed ID: 24681753]. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04530.

  • 28.

    Durrwald R, Kolodziejek J, Herzog S, Nowotny N. Meta-analysis of putative human bornavirus sequences fails to provide evidence implicating Borna disease virus in mental illness. Rev Med Virol. 2007;17(3):181-203. [PubMed ID: 17342788]. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmv.530.

  • 29.

    Billich C, Sauder C, Frank R, Herzog S, Bechter K, Takahashi K, et al. High-avidity human serum antibodies recognizing linear epitopes of Borna disease virus proteins. Biol Psychiatry. 2002;51(12):979-87. [PubMed ID: 12062882].

  • 30.

    Fukuda K, Takahashi K, Iwata Y, Mori N, Gonda K, Ogawa T, et al. Immunological and PCR analyses for Borna disease virus in psychiatric patients and blood donors in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(2):419-29. [PubMed ID: 11158085]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.39.2.419-429.2001.

  • 31.

    Yamaguchi K, Sawada T, Naraki T, Igata-Yi R, Shiraki H, Horii Y, et al. Detection of borna disease virus-reactive antibodies from patients with psychiatric disorders and from horses by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1999;6(5):696-700. [PubMed ID: 10473520].

  • 32.

    Amsterdam JD, Winokur A, Dyson W, Herzog S, Gonzalez F, Rott R, et al. Borna disease virus. A possible etiologic factor in human affective disorders? Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(11):1093-6. [PubMed ID: 3931604].

  • 33.

    Fu ZF, Amsterdam JD, Kao M, Shankar V, Koprowski H, Dietzschold B. Detection of Borna disease virus-reactive antibodies from patients with affective disorders by western immunoblot technique. J Affect Disord. 1993;27(1):61-8. [PubMed ID: 8432962].

  • 34.

    Terayama H, Nishino Y, Kishi M, Ikuta K, Itoh M, Iwahashi K. Detection of anti-Borna Disease Virus (BDV) antibodies from patients with schizophrenia and mood disorders in Japan. Psychiatry Res. 2003;120(2):201-6. [PubMed ID: 14527651].

  • 35.

    Matsunaga H, Tanaka S, Fukumori A, Tomonaga K, Ikuta K, Amino N, et al. Isotype analysis of human anti-Borna disease virus antibodies in Japanese psychiatric and general population. J Clin Virol. 2008;43(3):317-22. [PubMed ID: 18786855]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2008.07.011.

  • 36.

    de la Torre JC, Bode L, Durrwald R, Cubitt B, Ludwig H. Sequence characterization of human Borna disease virus. Virus Res. 1996;44(1):33-44. [PubMed ID: 8873411].

  • 37.

    Sauder C, Muller A, Cubitt B, Mayer J, Steinmetz J, Trabert W, et al. Detection of Borna disease virus (BDV) antibodies and BDV RNA in psychiatric patients: evidence for high sequence conservation of human blood-derived BDV RNA. J Virol. 1996;70(11):7713-24. [PubMed ID: 8892892].

  • 38.

    Planz O, Rentzsch C, Batra A, Winkler T, Buttner M, Rziha HJ, et al. Pathogenesis of borna disease virus: granulocyte fractions of psychiatric patients harbor infectious virus in the absence of antiviral antibodies. J Virol. 1999;73(8):6251-6. [PubMed ID: 10400715].

  • 39.

    Salvatore M, Morzunov S, Schwemmle M, Lipkin WI. Borna disease virus in brains of North American and European people with schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Bornavirus Study Group. Lancet. 1997;349(9068):1813-4. [PubMed ID: 9269221].

  • 40.

    Iwata Y, Takahashi K, Peng X, Fukuda K, Ohno K, Ogawa T, et al. Detection and sequence analysis of borna disease virus p24 RNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients with mood disorders or schizophrenia and of blood donors. J Virol. 1998;72(12):10044-9. [PubMed ID: 9811743].

  • 41.

    Czygan M, Hallensleben W, Hofer M, Pollak S, Sauder C, Bilzer T, et al. Borna disease virus in human brains with a rare form of hippocampal degeneration but not in brains of patients with common neuropsychiatric disorders. J Infect Dis. 1999;180(5):1695-9. [PubMed ID: 10515835]. https://doi.org/10.1086/315068.

  • 42.

    Nunes SO, Itano EN, Amarante MK, Reiche EM, Miranda HC, de Oliveira CE, et al. RNA from Borna disease virus in patients with schizophrenia, schizoaffective patients, and in their biological relatives. J Clin Lab Anal. 2008;22(4):314-20. [PubMed ID: 18623121]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.20261.

  • 43.

    Kubo K, Fujiyoshi T, Yokoyama MM, Kamei K, Richt JA, Kitze B, et al. Lack of association of Borna disease virus and human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 infections with psychiatric disorders among Japanese patients. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1997;4(2):189-94. [PubMed ID: 9067654].

  • 44.

    Matsunaga H, Tanaka S, Sasao F, Nishino Y, Takeda M, Tomonaga K, et al. Detection by radioligand assay of antibodies against Borna disease virus in patients with various psychiatric disorders. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12(5):671-6. [PubMed ID: 15879032]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CDLI.12.5.671-676.2005.

  • 45.

    Shankar V, Dietzschold B, Fu ZF, Amsterdam J. A search for borna virus-specific genome in human nerve tissue by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Biol Psychiatr. 1992;31(5):103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3223(92)90449-a.

  • 46.

    Zhao LB, Xie P, Mu J, Li YJ, Zou DZ, Liu QJ, et al. Molecular biological research on borna disease virus infection in depressive patients of chongqing. Airiti Lib. 2007;33(1):18-22.

  • 47.

    Wang ZH, Xie P, Han YX, Zhan J. [Study on molecular epidemiology of Borna disease virus in Ningxia and vicinal regions]. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2006;27(6):479-82. [PubMed ID: 17152506].

  • 48.

    Flower RL, Kamhieh S, McLean L, Bode L, Ludwig H, Ward CM. Human Borna disease virus infection in Australia: serological markers of infection in multi-transfused patients. APMIS Suppl. 2008;(124):89-93. [PubMed ID: 18771108].

  • 49.

    Bode L, Riegel S, Lange W, Ludwig H. Human infections with Borna disease virus: seroprevalence in patients with chronic diseases and healthy individuals. J Med Virol. 1992;36(4):309-15. [PubMed ID: 1578223].

  • 50.

    Liu X, Bode L, Zhang L, Wang X, Liu S, Zhang L, et al. Health care professionals at risk of infection with Borna disease virus - evidence from a large hospital in China (Chongqing). Virol J. 2015;12:39. [PubMed ID: 25888756]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-015-0239-y.