In this study, we investigated children with positive urine cultures admitted to the 17th Shahrivar Hospital of Rasht City, Iran. Among 259 children under 3 years of age hospitalized with a diagnosis of UTIs, 200 children were less than 60 days old. About 59% of the children were hospitalized for more than 7 days, and the average duration of hospitalization was 7.96 days.
The most common clinical symptoms in our children were fever and restlessness. Fever has been reported in several studies as a common symptom in children hospitalized due to UTIs (
14-
17). It should be noted that most of these studies have been performed on hospitalized patients, who generally show a higher prevalence of upper UTIs and fever. Neonatal jaundice can also be the first sign of UTIs in infants and neonates before the appearance of other symptoms, so urine analysis is recommended to check for jaundice in asymptomatic icterus infants (
14). According to our study, among 102 infants with jaundice in the first two weeks of life, UTIs were diagnosed in about 8%, highlighting the importance of urine analysis in all infants with unknown causes of jaundice for more than 3 days (
9). In other studies involving infants who experienced prolonged jaundice lasting more than two weeks, the reported prevalence of urinary tract infections (UTIs) ranged from 5.8% to 6%. (
9,
10,
14).
In the current study, ESR was assessed in 105 patients, and it was found to be elevated in 98.1% of the cases. This suggested that most of these patients had elevated ESR levels, indicating the presence of inflammation or an underlying condition. The mean ESR value in the studied population was 38.61 ± 36.79 mm/h, indicating elevated ESR levels. The wide standard deviation suggested that there was considerable variability in ESR values among these patients. C-reactive protein was tested in 211 of the patients and returned positive in 42.7% of the cases. A positive CRP result indicates the presence of acute inflammation or infections. The lower percentage of positive CRP compared to elevated ESR reflects the lower sensitivity of CRP in detecting inflammation compared to ESR in this study. Evidence indicates that elevated CRP and ESR can be associated with multidrug-resistant UTIs. As an acute-phase protein, CRP is produced by the liver in response to inflammation and is commonly used as a marker of systemic inflammation. Studies have shown that CRP levels are often elevated in patients with UTIs, and this elevation can be even more pronounced in patients with multidrug-resistant UTIs. Elevated CRP levels also predict a more severe and prolonged inflammatory response. Similarly, ESR is a non-specific marker of inflammation that measures the rate at which red blood cells settle in a tube containing anticoagulated blood. Similar to CRP, ESR can be elevated in patients with UTIs, particularly in those with multidrug-resistant infections. However, it is important to note that ESR can be influenced by various factors other than inflammation. Although simultaneously elevated CRP and ESR levels can be indicative of a more severe and resistant UTI, they are not definitive diagnostic markers for multidrug resistance. The gold standard for detecting multidrug-resistant UTIs is antimicrobial susceptibility testing. It is important to consult with a healthcare professional for proper evaluation and interpretation of CRP and ESR levels in the context of a suspected multidrug-resistant UTI.
In our study, 53.3% of the patients were boys. The incidence of UTIs is higher in male infants, especially uncircumcised boys (
11). In some studies, no significant difference was reported in the incidence of UTIs between the sexes, and other studies have reported a higher prevalence of UTIs in girls than in boys, especially at the age of one year and older (
12,
13,
18). Various factors, such as the structure and anatomy of the urinary tract (short urethra), can explain the higher prevalence of UTIs in girls. In addition, the close relationship between girls’ urinary systems and fecal microorganisms can be another reason for this observation (
15). Given that UTIs among infants are more common in males than in females, and considering that many older children are treated on an outpatient basis, the overall higher number of boys in this study can be justifiable because 200 out of 259 children studied here were less than 60 days old.
Regarding the frequency distribution of uropathogenic bacteria in children under three years of age presenting with UTIs in different age groups (i.e., < 60 days and > 60 days) or hospitalization periods (< 7 days and > 7 days), uropathogenic bacteria causing UTIs were significantly associated with age (P-value = 0.034) and duration of hospitalization (P-value = 0.046). We observed that the average hospitalization period was longer in children with UTIs caused by Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp. than children who suffered from E. coli infections. This can be due to the antibiotic resistance of Klebsiella spp. and Enterobacter spp., leading to unresponsiveness to standard antibiotic treatments.
In addition, the predominant pathogen causing UTIs in children less than or beyond 60 days old was
E. coli, which was also the predominant pathogen in both girls and boys. In the study of Aghamahdi et al.,
E. coli (59.7%) and then
Klebsiella spp. (10%) and Enterobacter spp. (14.3%) were the most common organisms isolated (
16). In another study by Karimpour and Mohamadi
E. coli was also identified as the cause of 71.1% of UTIs, and similar to our study, this bacterium was the most common causative organism in both sexes. In a recent study, the highest frequency after
E. coli was related to Enterobacter spp. (
17). According to Bay and Anacleto,
E. coli had the highest frequency among other microorganisms isolated from urine cultures of UTI patients (
11). In the study of Yousefimashouf and Molazadeh,
E. coli was the cause of 64.3% of UTIs, followed by
Klebsiella spp. as the second most common microorganism. As can be seen, in almost all studies,
E. coli was the most common pathogen causing UTIs in children. However, there is slight variability in the frequency of pathogens besides
E. coli, which may be related to differences in the distribution of pathogens in different geographical areas, even within a single country (
19).
A large number of isolates causing UTIs in this study were resistant to cephalothin, cephalexin, ampicillin, and amoxicillin, but most of them, such as
E. coli,
Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter spp., were sensitive to ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, amikacin, gentamicin, imipenem, and nalidixic acid. Given that
E. coli was the most common pathogen causing UTIs, the results of our study suggest that
E. coli can be reasonably sensitive to ciprofloxacin, amikacin, gentamicin, nitrofurantoin, imipenem, ceftriaxone (59.2%), and nalidixic acid. Therefore, it seems that aminoglycosides and ciprofloxacin are the best agents to be used for the empirical treatment of children admitted to our hospital due to UTIs. In a study by Prakasam et al.,
E. coli was most sensitive to ciprofloxacin, followed by amikacin, but this bacterium was not desirably sensitive to cotrimoxazole and cefotaxime (
20). Barzan et al. reported that
E. coli was sensitive to amikacin, tazobactam, and nitrofurantoin and had the highest resistance to cephalothin and cotrimoxazole (
12). Aghamahdi et al. showed that their isolated uropathogenic strains were resistant to ampicillin, amoxicillin, cephalexin, cotrimoxazole, and cefixime by the respective rates of 94.1%, 88.9%, 70%, 66.7%, and 75%; however, the rate of antibacterial resistance was lower against nalidixic acid, ceftriaxone, aminoglycosides, nitrofurantoin, and ciprofloxacin (
16). In comparison, the rate of resistance to cotrimoxazole was lower (66.7% vs. 53.6%), while resistance to ceftriaxone was higher (20% vs. 46%) in our study. This discrepancy seems to be due to the administration of ceftriaxone during this period (
16). In a study by Valavi et al. in Ahvaz,
E. coli had the highest resistance to cotrimoxazole and the lowest resistance to nitrofurantoin (
21).
The choice of antibiotics to eradicate multidrug-resistant uropathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacteriaceae spp., and
Staphylococcispp., depends on several factors, including local resistance patterns, patient-specific factors, and severity of the infection. It is important to note that antibiotic recommendations can vary across different regions and healthcare facilities, and it is crucial to consult local guidelines and infectious disease specialists to choose appropriate antibiotics. In general, combination therapy may be considered for multidrug-resistant uropathogens to improve treatment efficacy and reduce the risk of further resistance. The specific combination of antibiotics will depend on the bacteria isolated and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. For P. aeruginosa, which is known for its multidrug resistance, combination therapy with two or more antibiotics from different classes is often recommended. Commonly used antibiotics for P. aeruginosa include carbapenems (e.g., meropenem and imipenem), antipseudomonal penicillin (e.g., piperacillin-tazobactam), cephalosporins (e.g., ceftazidime and cefepime), and fluoroquinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) (
22). However, susceptibility testing guide better in the choice of antibiotics. For
Enterobacteriaceae spp., including
E. coli and
K. pneumoniae, the choice of antibiotics may depend on the specific resistance mechanisms detected. Carbapenems (e.g., meropenem and imipenem) are often considered the drugs of choice for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae spp. Other options may include combinations of newer beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (e.g., ceftazidime-avibactam) or polymyxins (e.g., colistin) (
23). Again, susceptibility testing is important for choosing appropriate antibiotics. For
Staphylococci, including
methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), treatment options may encompass vancomycin, daptomycin, linezolid, or newer agents such as cefazoline or tedizolid (
24). Susceptibility testing should be performed to determine the most effective antibiotic. It is crucial to note that the choice of antibiotics should be based on local resistance patterns, individualized patient-related factors, and guidance from infectious disease specialists. The regular surveillance of antimicrobial resistance patterns is important to be informed of empirical therapy choices and ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes (
25).
Antibiotic resistance is a significant concern when treating pediatric UTIs. Empirical treatment should be based on the local prevalence and patterns of antibiotic resistance. Although E. coli is the most commonly isolated pathogen in UTIs, it is important to note that the susceptibility patterns of this bacterium can vary between regions and change over time. However, based on the susceptibility results observed in the present study, E. coli showed susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, nitrofurantoin, amikacin, gentamicin, and nalidixic acid. Considering the potential side effects of ciprofloxacin in children, it is reasonable to consider alternative antibiotics with suitable therapeutic effects and fewer side effects, such as aminoglycosides (e.g., amikacin and gentamicin). These antibiotics can be effective in controlling potentially drug-resistant pediatric UTIs. Nitrofurantoin and nalidixic acid have also been mentioned as appropriate choices for treating lower UTIs (e.g., cystitis) but not upper UTIs and pyelonephritis due to their limited tissue penetration. It is important to consider the age of the children being treated. As mentioned in the present study, different age groups may have different susceptibility patterns, requiring necessary adjustments in therapeutic approaches.
We should acknowledge some limitations of our study, including the limited age groups studied. There is a need for a larger multicenter study to obtain more valuable and generalizable results. Conducting multicenter studies can provide a broader perspective on regional variations in antibiotic resistance patterns and guide healthcare professionals in choosing appropriate empirical treatments. In summary, the choice of empirical treatment for pediatric UTIs should be based on the local prevalence and patterns of antibiotic resistance. Regular surveillance of resistance patterns is crucial to make informed treatment decisions and ensure optimal clinical outcomes in children with UTIs.
5.1. Conclusions
It is recommended to use aminoglycosides as the first-line drugs for the empirical treatment of pediatric UTIs. If aminoglycosides cannot be used due to contraindications, third-generation cephalosporins can be considered. If there is no improvement in symptoms within 48 to 72 hours, ciprofloxacin can be substituted unless the antibiogram suggests a more appropriate antibiotic. Nalidixic acid or nitrofurantoin can be used in children over the age of two years with suspected cystitis. Due to the high rate of antibiotic resistance, ampicillin, amoxicillin, cotrimoxazole, and cephalosporins are not recommended as the first-line choices for the empirical treatment of UTIs in children.