The results of this study showed that the most common signs in neonates with sepsis were respiratory distress, jaundice, vomiting and poor feeding. In fact, respiratory distress was more common in EOS while jaundice, fever and seizure were associated with LOS. Respiratory distress and poor feeding were the most common signs reported in various studies (
2,
14). It is presumed that there is an association between poor feeding and jaundice as common presentations of LOS. Following introduction of CRP and its role in duration of antibiotic therapy in neonatal sepsis (
11), some studies were undertaken based on the relationship between CRP and septicemia. Berger et al. (
15) compared the diagnostic value of CRP and WBC counts in EOS and LOS and introduced elevated CRP as the best particular test in early detection of both these complications. Furthermore, a number of studies showed the accordance of clinical manifestations and laboratory results in EOS and LOS (
6,
9). Mannan et al. in 2010 (
16), Chacha et al. in 2014 (
17) and Hedegaard et al. in 2014 (
18) showed elevated CRP level in neonates with sepsis. However, there were some disadvantages related to the use of CRP, such as lack of capacity in detection of a specific pathogen, positive predictive value (
12) and inaccessibility in many developing countries (
19). In this study, CRP positivity, which is most seen in LOS was 17.3% (19/110 neonates). These results are similar to that of Luck (
20), who showed that the CRP concentration is low in the beginning of the infection. It was shown that most infants had clinical signs within the first 12 birth hours (
21,
22) with a low positive prediction in CRP and CBC (
12,
13,
23,
24). However, on the basis of our results, more accurate diagnosis of sepsis is attainable when considering clinical signs so that prompt antibiotic treatment is initiated. Selimovic et al. (
25) emphasized that WBC > 26400 may predict EOS. Due to physiologic leukocytosis, which is usually observed in newborn infants related to stress of delivery and a low positive predictive value, we suggested that leukocytosis should not be considered as a specific test. Furthermore, Manucha et al. (
10) introduced thrombocytopenia, band cell > 15% and the ratio of immature and mature neutrophil as indicators of sepsis. Although we did not find a noteworthy accordance between baby’s gender, gestational age and two categories of sepsis, we proposed meaningful differences between LBW and EOS, despite the fact that Prasetsom et al. (
26) reported that there was no agreement between EOS and LOS and birth weight. Jiang et al. (
1) showed a relationship between LBW and LOS. Some authors believed that the incidence of LOS increased among LBWs (
1,
27), however in this study LBW neonates were usually diagnosed as septicemia in the first 72 hours of life. This study indicates that common signs and laboratory data among neonatal EOS, are respiratory distress, leukocytosis and thrombocytopenia. On the other hand, through diagnosing neonatal LOS, patients are usually observed with jaundice, fever and seizure. Also anemia and positive urine culture are more associated with neonatal LOS (
28). In conclusion, according to the difficulties in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and the importance of early diagnosis and timely initiation of treatment, clinical manifestations are an important part of early sepsis diagnosis. Additional studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further clarify clinical manifestations, which lead to early sepsis detection.