Abstract
Background:
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains are a common cause of emerging nosocomial infections and are a major public health concern.Objectives:
The aim of the present study was to determine the prevalence of MRSA, its antibiotic resistance pattern, and the virulence gene profiles in hospitalized patients admitted to ICUs.Methods:
During a 6-month period, a total of 70 S. aureus isolates were collected from 249 patients admitted to the ICU in five hospitals. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility testing of the S. aureus isolates was carried out using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method with 16 antibiotic disks. Molecular detection of toxin and adhesion genes was carried out using PCR.Results:
All the 70 S. aureus isolates were confirmed to be MRSA strains. The largest number of S. aureus isolates was found in the blood (42.9%) and wound (21.4%) samples. The MDR pattern was detected in 71.4% of the isolates, which were obtained from wound and blood samples. Simultaneous resistance to seven, six, five, four and three drugs was common in 35 (50%), 7 (10%), 8 (11.4%), 11 (15.7%), 2 (2.9%) and 5 (7.1%) isolates, respectively. The frequency of the spa, fnbB, fnbA, clfB, clfA, can, bbp, ebp, etb, eta, pvl, and tst genes was 100%, 75.7%, 74.3%, 78.6%, 71.4%24.3%, 0%, 58.6%, 2.9%, 7.1%, 21.4%, and 51.4%, respectively. In addition, among all the examined genes, the clfB (78.6%) and etb (2.9%) genes had the highest and lowest prevalence respectively.Conclusions:
In the present study, we found a high prevalence of MRSA at the hospitals studied. The findings emphasized the increased prevalence of MRSA isolates containing different toxin and adhesion genes, probably accompanied by antimicrobial resistance. Infection with such isolates worsens the clinical outcomes as well as the morbidity and mortality rates in hospitalized patients in ICUs.Keywords
ICU Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
1. Background
As a leading cause of infection in hospitals and within communities, Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for a wide range of important infections, ranging from wound infections to life-threatening diseases (1). The transmission of this bacterium easily takes place via direct contact, such as touching contaminated hands (or other body parts) and droplet transmission, and via indirect contact, such as through the breathing of contaminated air in the hospital or other environments (2). The most significant factor that contributes to the successful and extensive distribution of this pathogen is the ability of S. aureus strains to express a variety of virulence factors and acquire resistance to new antimicrobial agents (3, 4).
There is a broad range of virulence factors whose expression is related to the pathogenesis of S. aureus infections. These factors include extracellular proteins with low molecular weight and toxins such as staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs), staphylokinase, toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TST-1), microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs), hemolysin (alpha, beta, gamma and delta types), capsular polysaccharides, panton-valentine leukocidin (PVL), lipase, and exfoliative toxins (eta and etb). The most common cause of biofilm formation is adhesion proteins. Several types of cell wall-associated adhesion proteins have been reported, namely fnb, which encodes fibronectin-binding protein; cna, which encodes collagen-binding protein; clf, which encodes clumping factor; and ebp, elastin-binding protein (5-7). TST-1 can cause toxic shock syndrome and ETs cause peeling skin syndrome. PVL is a putative virulence factor that is hypothesized to increase the ability of the bacterium to cause severe infections in human and animal hosts.
In recent decades, a wide pattern of resistance has been observed in S. aureus strains, not only to β-lactams but also to other therapeutic agents including macrolides, lincosides, and aminoglycosides (3, 7). An important characteristic of S. aureus is its ability to acquire resistance to antimicrobial agents, especially methicillin, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) has emerged as a major public health concern. Methicillin resistance develops mainly due to the presence of the mecA gene, which encodes a modified penicillin-binding protein (PBP2α) and has low affinity for β-lactams (4).
During the last few decades, MRSA strains have shown an extraordinary ability to rapidly develop multi-drug resistance (MDR), which has proven to be a challenge to health care providers and has taken a toll on patients too (2).
2. Objectives
The objective of the current study was to profile certain virulence genes, including those encoding adhesion proteins (spa, can, bbp, ebp, fnbB, fnbA, clfB, clfA) and toxins (etb, eta, pvl, tst), in hospitalized patients admitted to ICUs. Moreover, the pattern of antibiotic resistance was examined via antibiotic sensitivity testing.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design and Population
The present descriptive cross-sectional study was carried out over a six-month period, between March and August 2015. A total of 70 S. aureus isolates were recovered from hospitalized patients admitted to the ICUs of seven hospitals. The research was approved by the ethics committee of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran (Code # 6041). S. aureus isolates from outpatients, community-acquired infections, and other hospital wards were not included. The samples obtained from patients were transported to the laboratory within 4 h of collection and were immediately processed according to standard microbiological procedures. All the isolates were confirmed by PCR analysis of the femA and nucA genes (8, 9). The S. aureus isolates were stored in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Merck, Germany) containing 20% glycerol at -70°C for further investigation.
3.2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
After the identity of the S. aureus strains was confirmed, their in vitro antimicrobial resistance pattern was tested using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method on Mueller- Hinton agar (Mast, UK) with a panel of 16 antibiotic disks. The susceptibility interpretive criteria of the clinical and laboratory standards institute (CLSI) were used (10). After incubation for 18 hours at 37°, the results were recorded. The antimicrobial drugs tested included ampicillin (AP, 10 µg), kanamycin (K, 30 µg), ciprofloxacin (CIP, 5 µg), clindamycin (CD, 2 µg), linezolid (LZD, 30 µg), penicillin (PG, 10 µg), teicoplanin (TEC, 30 µg), amikacin (AK, 30 µg), tobramycin (TN, 10 µg), gentamicin (GM, 10 µg), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TS, 2.5 µg), and ceftriaxon (CRO, 30 µg). The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) for vancomycin was determined using E-test strips (AB Biodisk, Sweden) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Moreover, MDR was defined as resistance to three or more unique antibiotic classes in addition to beta-lactams. All the antibiotic disks used in the present study were purchased from Mast, UK. In every test run, S. aureus ATCC25923 was used as the quality control strain.
3.3. MRSA Screening
MRSA isolates were screened using cefoxitin (30 µg) and oxacillin discs (1 µg) on Mueller Hinton agar plates supplemented with 4% NaCl according to the guidelines provided by the CLSI (10). Isolates with phenotypic resistance to oxacillin were confirmed to harbor the mecA gene using PCR.
3.4. Genomic DNA Extraction
The QIAamp DNA mini kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) was used to extract genomic DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Lysostaphin (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), to a final concentration of 15 µg/mL, was used for cell wall lysis. The concentration of DNA was assessed using a spectrophotometer.
3.5. Detection of Adhesion and Toxin Encoding Genes
All the isolates were examined for the presence of adhesion (spa, can, bbp, ebp, fnbB, fnbA, clfB, clfA) and toxin (etb, eta, pvl, tst) genes with the degenerate primers listed in Table 1.
Oligonucleotide Primers Used in This Study
| Target | Primer | Primer Sequence (5′ → 3′) | Product Size, bp | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| femA | F | CTTACTTACTGCTGTACCTG | 648 | (8) |
| R | ATCTCGCTTGTTGTGTGC | |||
| nucA | F | GCGATTGATGGTGATACGGTT | 270 | (9) |
| R | AGCCAAGCCTTGACGAACTAAAGC | |||
| mecA | F | AGAAGATGGTATGTGGAAGTTAG | 583 | (7) |
| R | ATGTATGTGCGATTGTATTGC | |||
| luk-PV | F | TTCACTATTTGTAAAAGTGTCAGACCCACT | 180 | (11) |
| R | TACTAATGAATTTTTTTATCGTAAGCCCTT | |||
| tst-1 | F | TTATCGTAAGCCCTTTGTTG | 398 | (7) |
| R | TAAAGGTAGTTCTATTGGAGTAGG | |||
| eta | F | GCAGGTGTTGATTTAGCATT | 93 | (12) |
| R | AGATGTCCCTATTTTTGCTG | |||
| etb | F | ACAAGCAAAAGAATACAGCG | 226 | (12) |
| R | GTTTTTGGCTGCTTCTCTTG | |||
| fnbA | F | CACAACCAGC AAATATAG | 1362 | (3) |
| R | CTGTGTGGTAATCAATGTC | |||
| fnbB | F | GGAGAAGGAATTAAGGCG | 813 | (3) |
| R | GCCGTCGCCTTGAGCGT | |||
| clfA | F | GTAGGTACGTTAATCGGTT | 1586 | (3) |
| R | CTCATCAGGTTGTTCAGG | |||
| clfB | F | TGCAAGATCAAACTGTTCCT | 596 | (3) |
| R | TCGGTCTGTAAATAAAGGTA | |||
| cna | F | AGTGGTTACTAATACTG | 744 | (13) |
| R | CAG GAT AGA TTG GTTTA | |||
| spa | F | TAAAGACGATCCTTCGGTGAGC | Variable | (14) |
| R | CAGCAGTAGTGCCGTTTGCTT | |||
| bbp | F | CAGTAAATGTGTCAAAAGA | 1055 | (15) |
| R | TACACCCTGTTGAACTG | |||
| ebp | F | CAATCGATAGACACAAATTC | 526 | (15) |
| R | CAGTTACATCATCATGTTTA |
3.6. Statistical Analysis
To analyze the data collected, SPSS (version 18.0) (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used.
4. Results
A total of 70 non-duplicate S. aureus isolates were recovered from 249 clinical specimens isolated from hospitalized patients during the 6-month period of this study. From the 70 S. aureus isolates, 8 isolates (11.4%) were obtained from Mofid children’s hospital, 8 isolates (11.4%) from Pars hospital, 14 isolates (20%) from Shohada Tajrish hospital, 15 isolates (21.5%) from Ayatollah Teleghani hospital, and 25 isolates (35.7%) from Imam Khomeini hospital. All the isolates were of MRSA. All the mecA gene-positive MRSA strains were found to be phenotypically methicillin resistant. The patients’ mean age was 39 years (median, 40.1 years; range, 6 months to 68 years). The highest incidence of MRSA infection was observed in the 21- to 45-year-old age group (55.7%), while the lowest incidence was observed in the 6-month to 20-year age group (17.1%). Blood samples (42.9%) were the most common samples, followed by wound (21.4%), ear (11.4%), pus (10%), body fluid (7.1%), catheter (4.3%), and urine samples (2.9%).
All the isolates were susceptible to linezolid, teicoplanin, and vancomycin. According to the results of microbroth dilution, all the strains were inhibited by vancomycin at a similar MIC50 and MIC90 of 1 µg/mL. The highest rate of resistance was observed against ampicillin and penicillin (97.1%), followed by ciprofloxacin (71.4%), amikacin (64.3%), gentamicin (60%), and clindamycin (60%). The rate of drug resistance against the other tested antibiotics was between 8.6% (for ceftriaxon) and 57.1% (for kanamycin). From among the 70 MRSA isolates, 50 (71.4%) were MDR. MDR strains were most commonly identified among MRSA strains isolated from blood and wound samples. Table 2 presents the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the isolates. The major resistance profile among isolates in the present study included resistance to seven antimicrobial drugs and four antimicrobial drugs, which was found in 35 (50%) and 11 (15.7%) of the isolates respectively. The MRSA isolates that were resistant to seven antibiotics were isolated mostly from blood and wound samples. Table 3 presents the distribution of the resistance profiles among different types of clinical samples.
The Susceptibly Patterns of the 70 MRSA Isolates Obtained From ICU Hospitalized Patients Against 13 Antimicrobial Agents
| Antibiotics | Antibiotic Susceptibility (n = 70), No. (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| R | I | S | |
| Penicillin | 68 (97.1) | 0 | 2 (2.9) |
| Ampicillin | 68 (97.1) | 0 | 2 (2.9) |
| Vancomycin | 0 | 2 (2.9) | 68 (97.1) |
| Teicoplanin | 0 | 0 | 70 (100) |
| Ceftriaxon | 6 (8.6) | 0 | 64 (91.4) |
| Gentamicin | 42 (60) | 5 (7.1) | 23 (32.9) |
| Kanamycin | 40 (57.1) | 3 (4.3) | 27 (38.6) |
| Amikacin | 45 (64.3) | 5 (7.1) | 20 (28.6) |
| Tobramycin | 40 (57.1) | 6 (8.6) | 24 (34.3) |
| Linzolid | 0 | 0 | 70 (100) |
| Clindamycin | 42 (60) | 0 | 28 (40) |
| Ciprofloxacin | 50 (71.4) | 4 (5.7) | 16 (22.9) |
| Trimetoprim-sulfamethoxazole | 21 (30) | 9 (12.9) | 40 (57.1) |
Distribution of Different Clinical Samples and the Resistance Profile of MRSA Isolates Obtained From ICUs
| Resistance Profile | Number of Isolates (%) | Type of Samples (No., %) |
|---|---|---|
| PG, AP, GM, AK, TN, CD, CIP | 35 (50) | B (28, 80), W (7, 20) |
| PG, AP, AK, CIP, TS | 8 (11.4) | W (3, 37.5), E (3, 37.5), P (2, 25) |
| PG, AP, GM, CD, CIP, TS | 7 (10) | E (3, 43), P (2, 28.5), BF (2, 28.5) |
| PG, AP, CRO, TS | 6 (8.6) | E (2, 33.3), P (2, 33.3), BF (1, 16.7), U (1, 16.7) |
| PG, AP, K, TN | 5 (7.1) | B (2, 40), P (1, 20), BF (2, 40) |
| PG, AP, AK | 2 (2.9) | W (2, 100) |
| PG, AP, | 5 (7.1) | W (3, 60), C (2, 40) |
It was found that among the adhesion protein- and toxin-coding genes, the most commonly found and the least commonly found genes were spa (100%) and etb (2.9%), respectively. It was also observed that all the MRSA isolates carried a minimum of two virulence genes. The spa genes were present in all the isolates, too, but they were most commonly isolated from blood and wound samples.
Fifteen isolates (21.4%) were found to be positive for pvl-encoding genes. Isolates carrying the pvl gene were obtained from blood (66.7%), wound (20%), and body fluids (13.3%). Most strains carried the spa, fnbB, fnbA, clfB, and clfA genes, whereas the bbp gene was not detected. Table 4 provides a summary of the distribution of virulence determinants among the isolates obtained from different clinical sources. As can be seen, a total of seven different patterns were identified based on the presence of different virulence genes. Table 5 illustrates the coexistence of various genes. Co-existence of the spa, clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB, and ebp genes was most commonly observed (57.1%), while co-existence of the spa, ebp, and tst genes showed the lowest prevalence (1.4%). Moreover, the majority (96%) of the MDR-MRSA variants that harbored these virulence-related genes were identified in MRSA strains isolated from blood and wound samples.
Incidence of Virulence Determinants in MRSA Strains Isolated From ICU Patients
| Sample | Adhesions, No. (%) | Toxins, No. (%) | Total, No. (%) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| clfA 50 (71.4) | clfB 55 (78.6) | fnbA 52 (74.3) | fnbB 53 (75.7) | Ebp 1 (58.6) | Bbp 0 (0) | Can 17 (24.3) | spa 70 (100) | Tst 30 (51.4) | Pvl 15 (21.4) | Eta 5(7.1) | Etb 2(2.9) | ||
| Blood | 29 (58) | 30 (54.5) | 30 (57.7) | 30 (56.6) | 18 (43.9) | 0 | 12 (70.6) | 30 (42.9) | 24 (80) | 10 (66.7) | 4 (80) | 2 (100) | 30 (42.9) |
| Wound | 15 (30) | 14 (25.5) | 15 (28.8) | 12 (22.6) | 14 (34.1) | 0 | 2 (11.8) | 15 (21.4) | 6 (20) | 3 (20) | 1 (20) | 0 | 15 (21.4) |
| Ear | 0 | 0 | 2 (3.8) | 0 | 2 (4.9) | 0 | 0 | 8 (11.4) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 (11.4) |
| Pus | 0 | 4 (7.3) | 5 (9.7) | 1 (1.9) | 4 (9.8) | 0 | 3 (17.6) | 7 (10) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 (10) |
| Body fluids | 3 (6) | 4 (7.3) | 0 | 5 (9.4) | 2 (4.9) | 0 | 0 | 5 (7.1) | 0 | 2 (13.3) | 0 | 0 | 5 (7.1) |
| Catheter | 3 (6) | 3 (5.4) | 0 | 3 (5.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (4.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (4.3) |
| Urine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (3.8) | 1 (2.4) | 0 | 0 | 2 (2.9) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (2.9) |
Virulence Patterns of the MRSA Strains Isolated From ICU Patients
| Virulence Genes | Number of Isolates (%) |
|---|---|
| Spa, clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB, ebp | 40 (57.1) |
| Spa, clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB, ebp, can, tst, pvl | 10 (14.3) |
| Spa, clfB, can, tst, pvl | 5 (7.1) |
| Spa, fnbB, eta, tst | 3 (4.3) |
| Spa, fnbA, can, eta, etb, tst | 2 (2.9) |
| Spa, ebp, tst | 1 (1.4) |
| Spa, tst | 9 (12.9) |
5. Discussion
The high incidence of infections caused by S. aureus, particularly MRSA strains, in ICUs has become a serious threat to world health in recent decades. In such a scenario, ICUs, as high-risk environments for MRSA infections, must be investigated in more detail (16). As there is only limited data available on the distribution of virulence genes in MRSA samples isolated from hospitalized patients in ICUs, the present study was conducted in an attempt to characterize MRSA strains isolated from ICUs at seven hospitals in Tehran, Iran. The main sources of S. aureus isolates, according to the findings of the present study, were blood and wound specimens, which is in keeping with previously reported data (7).
A significant element in the good prognosis of infections caused by S. aureus isolates is the accurate and early determination of MRSA infections. In the present study, MRSA screening showed that all the tested isolates were MRSA; this has been previously reported in other studies from Iran by Vahdani et al. (16) and Mirzaii et al. (17). However, this incidence is higher than that found in other studies in Taiwan (18), Nigeria (19), and Hungary (20). The studies from Iran indicate that the incidence of MRSA in clinical specimens has increased over time. Yet, the prevalence rates for MRSA infections in these studies are varied. This could be attributed to the differences in the standard infection control programs at ICUs, study design, antibiotic prescriptions, sample types, the investigated population, and laboratory testing to determine methicillin resistance. Phenotypic testing for MRSA screening, as performed in the present study, showed that its sensitivity was similar to that of PCR. These results are in agreement with previous reports (21).
As stated in a literature review, MRSA strains are usually resistant to macrolides, lincosides, and aminoglycosides, as well as all currently available beta-lactam antimicrobial agents such as penicillin and cephalosporin (16). In the current study, a high level of resistance to ampicillin and penicillin (97.1%) was observed; this was followed by ciprofloxacin (71.4%), amikacin (64.3%), gentamicin (60%), and clindamycin (60%) resistance. Previous studies in Iran (16, 17), Italy (22), and Turkey (23) also reported the rate of resistance against beta-lactam antibiotics, as demonstrated in the presented study.
Similar to the studies carried out in Italy (22) and Hungary (20), high resistance to ciprofloxacin was observed in our study (71.4%). The high resistance against ciprofloxacin observed in the present study may be related to the use of erythromycin in treating diseases caused by S. aureus and its variants. Other possible reasons include the permeability effect, efflux pumps, and decreased availability of quinolones at the target site (24).
The current study revealed relatively high resistance to amikacin (64.3%), gentamicin (60%), kanamycin (57.1%), and tobramycin (57.1%). High resistance to aminoglycosides was previously reported by Ko et al. (25) in a study of 74 MRSA strains isolated from 12 Asian countries. The main mechanism of aminoglycoside resistance is drug inactivation by plasmid or transposon-mediated aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes (AMEs) (7).
According to the data collected in the present study, none of the isolates inhibited by concentration of vancomycin did exceed 1 µg/mL. These findings are in line with those reported in other studies carried out in Italy (22) and Taiwan (18). Although some studies have shown that there has been a gradual increase in the resistance of MRSA variants against vancomycin in Iran (7), the results obtained in the current study indicate that limited and appropriate use of vancomycin, establishment of appropriate prescription protocols, and standard infection control measures in health care systems can be effective in decreasing the resistance of MRSA to vancomycin.
As shown in Table 2, co-trimoxazol and ceftriaxone demonstrated the lowest resistance rate among the MRSA isolates. The resistance rate to co-trimoxazole varies between 19.3% and 69% in Iran (7). Similarly, varying levels of resistance against co-trimoxazole have been reported worldwide (26).
The increase in the prevalence of MDR S. aureus strains has restricted the number of therapeutic options available and resulted in severe morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. This problem is currently a challenge and is viewed as a public health concern, especially in Iran. In the present study, we reported a substantial increase in the prevalence of MDR MRSA strains, as we found its incidence to be 71.4%. However, the prevalence of MDR ranges widely among different nations, from 83.9% in Serbia (27) to 75.8% in Taiwan (18).
The most prevalent toxin gene was found to be tst, with a prevalence rate of 51.4%, which is higher than that reported in previous studies conducted in Iran (11.6%) (12), Sweden (22%) (28), Malaysia (0.5%) (6) and Colombia (10%) (29). An interesting finding in the present study is that all the MRSA strains that harbored the tst gene were recovered from blood (80%) and wound (20%) samples. These results are in line with those of other studies which reported high frequency of the tst gene in MRSA strains isolated from blood and wound samples (12). However, a study in Malaysia (6) found that the tst gene was only isolated from respiratory samples.
Community acquired-MRSA (CA-MRSA) may be more virulent than hospital acquired-MRSA (HA-MRSA) (7). These two types can be distinguished from each other based on their virulence factors. Although pvl cannot be used as a sole marker of CA-MRSA, it is important to promptly diagnose and treat infections caused by S. aureus strains harboring the pvl gene. In the current study, the incidence rate of MRSA strains harboring the pvl gene was observed to be 21.4%, which is similar to the results of other studies that reported the prevalence to be 2% - 35% among MRSA strains (30, 31). Most of the isolates carrying the pvl gene were obtained from blood samples (66.7%), which is in contrast to the findings reported in other studies, where skin and soft tissue infections were the main presentations (30).
With regard to the other toxin genes, the eta gene was present in five isolates (7.1%) and was observed to be associated with etb in two isolates (2.9%). In the present study, the incidence rate of the eta gene was higher than that reported in other studies from Iran 0.68% (12), Colombia (3%) (29), and Malaysia (0%) (6). Unlike the results of the present study, high prevalence of the eta gene was reported in studies conducted in Czech (10%) (5) and Turkey 19.2% (32). It was observed that the incidence of the etb gene differs across studies, ranging from 0% in Colombia (29) and Malaysia (6) to 9.2% in Turkey (32).
According to the literature, S. aureus biofilm formation is regulated through expression of adhesion-related genes and mediates the spreading of antibiotic resistance. In the current study, the prevalence rates of the clfA, clfB, fnbA, fnbB, can, ebp and bbp genes were found to be 71.4%, 78.6%, 74.3%, 75.7%, 24.3%, 58.6%, and 0%, respectively. The results for the clfA and clfB genes obtained in the present study were in contrast to those reported by Ghasemian et al. (3), who reported high prevalence of the clfA and clfB genes (100%). In the present study, similar to the studies previously reported, the incidence of the fnbA and fnbB genes was relatively high (3), which shows the important role of these genes in the colonization of MRSA strains. The present study showed that the can, ebp, and bbp genes accounted for 24.3%, 58.6%, and 0% of S. aureus infections, respectively. These results are in agreement with those of other studies which found that the incidence of the bbp genes in MRSA clinical isolates was lower. These results, however, are in contrast with those reported by Ghasemian et al. (3), who found that the can and ebps genes were detected in 78% and 7% of MRSA isolates, respectively. This discrepancy in the incidence of the can and ebp genes in MRSA isolates can be explained by the type of clinical isolate and the factors which affect gene regulation that may be important in the prevalence of these genes for colonization. It is worth noting that in wound and burn infections, due to the high incidence of laminin and collagen in tissues, S. aureus isolates with overexpression of several virulence factors, such as can and ebp, can easily and rapidly bind to the specific receptors.
The majority of the genes examined in this study were found to be significantly more prevalent among MDR-MRSA strains isolated from blood and wound infections than from other infection sites. As previously confirmed, the clinical origins of the isolates and infection sites may be significant factors related to the ability of the isolates to form biofilms.
5.1. Conclusion
In the present study, data on the antibiotic susceptibility and the distribution of the virulence genes of S. aureus were reviewed in hospitalized patients in ICUs. The results demonstrated high prevalence of MDR MRSA strains among the isolates. The high prevalence of antibiotic resistance in the MRSA strains indicated that the antimicrobial agents currently used for treating MRSA infections may be inadequate. Therefore, it is essential for clinicians to consider the treatment guidelines for MRSA infections. It is also worth mentioning that the incidence of toxin- and adhesion-related genes in MRSA strains isolated from wound and blood samples was higher than that in strains isolated from other clinical samples. Future studies should aim at understanding the different virulence and resistance profiles, which can be vital for risk prediction and the treatment of MRSA infections.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Bartoloni A, Riccobono E, Magnelli D, Villagran AL, Di Maggio T, Mantella A, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in hospitalized patients from the Bolivian Chaco. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;30:156-60. [PubMed ID: 25486009]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.006.
-
2.
Navidinia M, Fallah F, Lajevardi B, Shirdoost M, Jamali J. Epidemiology of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated From Health Care Providers in Mofid Children Hospital. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2015;3(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect.16458.
-
3.
Ghasemian A, Najar Peerayeh S, Bakhshi B, Mirzaee M. Several Virulence Factors of Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates From Hospitalized Patients in Tehran. International Journal of Enteric Pathogens. 2015;3(2). https://doi.org/10.17795/ijep25196.
-
4.
Amirkhiz Fateh M, Rezaee Ahangarzadeh M, Hasani A, Aghazadeh M, Naghili B. SCC mec Typing of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: An Eight Year Experience. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2015;3(4).
-
5.
Sila J, Sauer P, Kolar M. Comparison of the prevalence of genes coding for enterotoxins, exfoliatins, panton-valentine leukocidin and tsst-1 between methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible isolates of Staphylococcus aureus at the university hospital in olomouc. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2009;153(3):215-8. [PubMed ID: 19851435].
-
6.
Lim KT, Hanifah YA, Mohd Yusof MY, Thong KL. Investigation of toxin genes among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. Trop Biomed. 2012;29(2):212-9. [PubMed ID: 22735842].
-
7.
Goudarzi M, Goudarzi H, Sa Figueiredo AM, Udo EE, Fazeli M, Asadzadeh M, et al. Molecular Characterization of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Intensive Care Units in Iran: ST22-SCCmec IV/t790 Emerges as the Major Clone. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):155529. [PubMed ID: 27171373]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0155529.
-
8.
Ardic N, Sareyyupoglu B, Ozyurt M, Haznedaroglu T, Ilga U. Investigation of aminoglycoside modifying enzyme genes in methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Microbiol Res. 2006;161(1):49-54. [PubMed ID: 16338590]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2005.05.002.
-
9.
Kim CH, Khan M, Morin DE, Hurley WL, Tripathy DN, Kehrli M, et al. Optimization of the PCR for detection of Staphylococcus aureus nuc gene in bovine milk. J Dairy Sci. 2001;84(1):74-83. [PubMed ID: 11210052]. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(01)74454-2.
-
10.
Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-Second Informational Supplement. 31. Wayne: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014. p. M100-S22.
-
11.
Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, et al. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun. 2002;70(2):631-41. [PubMed ID: 11796592].
-
12.
Alfatemi Hoseini SM, Motamedifar M, Hadi N, Saraie HSE. Analysis of virulence genes among methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2014;7(6).
-
13.
Kumar JD, Negi YK, Gaur A, Khanna D. Detection of virulence genes in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from paper currency. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13(6):450-5. [PubMed ID: 19477670]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2009.02.020.
-
14.
Neela V, Ghasemzadeh Moghaddam H, van Belkum A, Horst-Kreft D, Mariana NS, Ghaznavi Rad E. First report on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of Spa type T037, Sequence Type 239, SCCmec type III/IIIA in Malaysia. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010;29(1):115-7. [PubMed ID: 19779745]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-009-0813-6.
-
15.
Peacock SJ, Moore CE, Justice A, Kantzanou M, Story L, Mackie K, et al. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 2002;70(9):4987-96. [PubMed ID: 12183545].
-
16.
Vahdani P, Saifi M, Aslani MM, Asarian AA, Sharafi K. Antibiotic resistant patterns in MRSA isolates from patients admitted in ICU and infectious ward. Tanaffos. 2004;3(11):37-44.
-
17.
Mirzaii M, Emaneini M, Jabalameli F, Halimi S, Taherikalani M. Molecular investigation of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from the patients, personnel, air and environment of an ICU in a hospital in Tehran. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8(2):202-6. [PubMed ID: 25458916]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.09.002.
-
18.
Wang WY, Chiueh TS, Sun JR, Tsao SM, Lu JJ. Molecular typing and phenotype characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from blood in Taiwan. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):30394. [PubMed ID: 22291948]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030394.
-
19.
O'Malley SM, Emele FE, Nwaokorie FO, Idika N, Umeizudike AK, Emeka-Nwabunnia I, et al. Molecular typing of antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nigeria. J Infect Public Health. 2015;8(2):187-93. [PubMed ID: 25441090]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2014.08.001.
-
20.
Conceicao T, Aires-de-Sousa M, Fuzi M, Toth A, Paszti J, Ungvari E, et al. Replacement of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Hungary over time: a 10-year surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007;13(10):971-9. [PubMed ID: 17697003]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-0691.2007.01794.x.
-
21.
Farahani A, Mohajeri P, Gholamine B, Rezaei M, Abbasi H. Comparison of different phenotypic and genotypic methods for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(11):637-40. [PubMed ID: 24404541]. https://doi.org/10.4103/1947-2714.122305.
-
22.
Campanile F, Bongiorno D, Borbone S, Stefani S. Hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (HA-MRSA) in Italy. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2009;8:22. [PubMed ID: 19552801]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-0711-8-22.
-
23.
Guney AK. A Study on Class I Integrons and Antimicrobial Resistance among Clinical Staphylococci Isolates from a Turkish Hospital. Clin Microbiol. 2015;2014.
-
24.
Hashem RA, Yassin AS, Zedan HH, Amin MA. Fluoroquinolone resistant mechanisms in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in Cairo, Egypt. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7(11):796-803. [PubMed ID: 24240036]. https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.3105.
-
25.
Ko KS, Lee JY, Suh JY, Oh WS, Peck KR, Lee NY, et al. Distribution of major genotypes among methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus clones in Asian countries. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):421-6. [PubMed ID: 15635004]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.1.421-426.2005.
-
26.
Dibah S, Arzanlou M, Jannati E, Shapouri R. Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance pattern of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from clinical specimens in Ardabil, Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2014;6(3):163-8. [PubMed ID: 25870749].
-
27.
Cirkovic I, Stepanovic S, Skov R, Trajkovic J, Grgurevic A, Larsen AR. Carriage and Genetic Diversity of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Patients and Healthcare Workers in a Serbian University Hospital. PLoS One. 2015;10(5):127347. [PubMed ID: 25993538]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127347.
-
28.
Nowrouzian FL, Dauwalder O, Meugnier H, Bes M, Etienne J, Vandenesch F, et al. Adhesin and superantigen genes and the capacity of Staphylococcus aureus to colonize the infantile gut. J Infect Dis. 2011;204(5):714-21. [PubMed ID: 21844297]. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jir388.
-
29.
Jimenez JN, Ocampo AM, Vanegas JM, Rodriguez EA, Garces CG, Patino LA, et al. Characterisation of virulence genes in methicillin susceptible and resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from a paediatric population in a university hospital of Medellin, Colombia. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;106(8):980-5. [PubMed ID: 22241120].
-
30.
Rossney AS, Shore AC, Morgan PM, Fitzgibbon MM, O'Connell B, Coleman DC. The emergence and importation of diverse genotypes of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) harboring the Panton-Valentine leukocidin gene (pvl) reveal that pvl is a poor marker for community-acquired MRSA strains in Ireland. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(8):2554-63. [PubMed ID: 17581935]. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00245-07.
-
31.
Khosravi AD, Hoveizavi H, Farshadzadeh Z. The prevalence of genes encoding leukocidins in Staphylococcus aureus strains resistant and sensitive to methicillin isolated from burn patients in Taleghani Hospital, Ahvaz, Iran. Burns. 2012;38(2):247-51. [PubMed ID: 21924558]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2011.08.002.
-
32.
Demir C, Aslantas O, Duran N, Ocak S, Ozer B. Investigation of toxin genes in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in Mustafa Kemal University Hospital. Turk J Med Sci. 2011;41(2):343-52.