The Seroprevalence of Varicella Zoster Virus in a Healthy Population from Tehran, Iran

authors:

avatar Alireza Fahimzad 1 , avatar Mahdi Nouri 1 , avatar Farideh Shiva 1 , avatar Ahmad Reza Shamshiri 2 , avatar Zari Gholinejad 1 , avatar Abdollah Karimi 1 , *

Pediatric Infections Research Center, Research Institute For Children Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

how to cite: Fahimzad A, Nouri M, Shiva F, Shamshiri A R, Gholinejad Z, et al. The Seroprevalence of Varicella Zoster Virus in a Healthy Population from Tehran, Iran. Arch Pediatr Infect Dis. 2018;6(1):e59883. https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect.59883.

Abstract

Background:

Varicella zoster virus (VZV) is responsible for chickenpox, which is generally a mild self-limited disease in healthy children. However, this disease may progress to a complicated and even life-threatening disease in adolescents, young adults, and immunocompromised patients in particular. The present study was conducted to investigate the seroprevalence of VZV in different age groups, selected among residents of Tehran, Iran.

Methods:

We performed varicella serological tests (IgG) on the serum specimens of healthy people, collected from 3 main laboratories in Tehran. VZV IgG was measured with the ELISA method. We divided the subjects into 6 subgroups: below 2 years, 2 - 5 years, 5 - 12 years, 12 - 19 years, 19 - 25 years, and above 25 years. We tested almost 95 specimens from each age group.

Results:

Samples were collected from 570 individuals, including 231 males. The VZV IgG was positive in 393 subjects; cumulatively, 81.3% of the population were immune to VZV. The seroprevalence rate was 43.2% in infants below 2 years, 32.6% in children aged 2 - 5 years, 47.2% in children aged 5 - 12 years, 74.7% in adolescents aged 12 - 19 years, 83.2% in young adults up to 25 years, and 90.5% in adults > 25 years.

Conclusions:

Although the cumulative seroprevalence was estimated at 81.3% for all age groups, this rate was only 43% in children below 12 years; therefore, adolescents and young adults (high-risk age groups) are prone to chickenpox infection. In order to protect individuals against this infection, we suggest well-designed studies to address the need for routine chickenpox immunization programs in young children.

1. Background

Varicella zoster virus (VZV), an alpha-herpesvirus, is responsible for chickenpox, which is a common benign childhood disease (1). If this virus is reactivated, it results in herpes zoster disease or shingles (10% - 15%), associated with decreased T cell immunity (2). VZV is easily transmitted through respiratory droplets, saliva, vesicle fluid, and even aerosol exposure (3, 4); therefore, rate of infection following household exposure is 65-85% in nonimmune individuals (5).

Although varicella is typically a mild, self-limited disease in healthy children, it can progress to a complicated and even life-threatening disease in adolescents, young adults, and immunocompromised patients in particular. In addition, it may cause congenital varicella syndrome among pregnant women in the first trimester (6, 7).

For unclear reasons, the epidemiology of VZV is influenced by regional and seasonal variations. In temperate climates, most cases occur in preschool children (1, 8). For instance, in a study conducted in the United Kingdom in 1996, more than 50% of children had acquired infection by the age of 3 years and more than 90% by the age of 15 years (9). In tropical and subtropical climates, the overall incidence of VZV is lower during childhood, and more infections occur at older ages (10).

The live attenuated varicella vaccine has been available since 1979 and was first introduced to the market in 1988. National immunization programs in many countries have included a single dose of vaccine (0.5 mL) for individuals at 12 - 15 months of age (11, 12). In Iran with various climates in different regions, vaccination against VZV is not routinely performed, and only a limited amount of vaccine is available in private clinics; therefore, there is only limited nonselective varicella vaccine coverage.

In Iran, one of the following major strategies can be applied: 1, general immunization in young children after loss of maternally derived immunity; and 2, selective immunization for certain high-risk groups. In Germany, where nearly more than 760,000 varicella cases occur per year, varicella vaccine is only licensed for particular indications in selected groups, including seronegative children with leukemia and solid tumors before chemotherapy (13).

Prior to the implementation of varicella vaccination in Iran, some public studies are necessary to determine the actual causes of vaccination. Therefore, this cross sectional, age-stratified study was conducted to investigate the seroprevalence of VZV in different age groups from Tehran, Iran.

2. Methods

We collected serum samples of healthy people from 3 laboratories in different parts of Tehran (1 private and 2 public laboratories) and tested the specimens for varicella antibody (IgG). The specimens were obtained from individuals older than 2 months. Serum specimens from any known immunodeficient patients or individuals with chronic diseases were excluded.

The serological test was a microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which uses purified antigen (cell lysate of a human fibroblast cell line, VZV wild strain) to detect VZV IgG (Euroimmun Anti-VZV IgG ELISA; Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG, Lubeck, Germany). After collection of the specimens, they were frozen and kept at -20°C until the process was completed. The VZV IgG was then measured with the ELISA assay. Titers below 80 IU/L were considered negative, 80 - 120 IU/L were considered borderline, and above 120 IU/L were considered positive.

We divided healthy subjects into 6 subgroups: below 2 years, 2 - 5 years, 5 - 12 years, 12 - 19 years, 19 - 25 years, and above 25 years. With a probable estimation of 60% for positive titer, accuracy of 10%, and confidence interval (CI) of 95%, about 95 specimens were collected from each group; finally, we collected a total of 570 specimens in our study.

2.1. Statistical Analysis

The antibody titers are reported as geometric means with 95% CI. The seroprevalence in the population was calculated by weighing the study sample with respect to Tehran population in each age category from the national census 2011. For studying the relationship between age group and IgG titer, Spearman’s correlation coefficient was calculated. To investigate the effects of age (as a dummy variable) and gender on IgG titer (on the logarithmic scale), multiple linear regression analysis was performed. P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

During the study, serum samples were collected from 570 people. In total, 339 samples were from women and 231 from men. Based on the findings, 393 specimens contained positive VZV IgG; cumulatively, 81.3% of Tehran population (age-adjusted) are immune to VZV (Figure 1). The borderline titer in each group (80 - 120 IU/L) was 1 - 2 specimens (below 3% in total); therefore, we excluded these specimens. The antibody titer in each group is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Antibody Titers Against VZV in Each Group in Tehran (2015)

Groups (age), yPositive Titer Number of Samples (%)Negative Titer Number of Samples (%)Geometric Mean IgG Titer (95% CI)
< 241 (43.2)54 (56.8)93.95 (56.01 - 157.58)
2 - 531 (32.6)64 (67.4)54.80 (32.66 - 91.93)
5 - 1245 (47.4)50 (52.6)117.61 (66.26 - 208.74)
12 - 1971 (74.7)24 (25.3)506.53 (310.93 - 825.17)
19 - 2579 (83.2)16 (16.8)958.80 (645.78 - 1423.57)
> 2586 (90.5)9 (9.5)1047.04 (754.11 - 1453.76)
The Cumulative Percentage of Samples with a Positive Antibody Titer Against VZV in Different Age Groups in Tehran, Iran in 2015
The Cumulative Percentage of Samples with a Positive Antibody Titer Against VZV in Different Age Groups in Tehran, Iran in 2015

The IgG titer had a direct relationship with age (spearman’s correlation coefficient, 0.37; P < 0.001), although the age group of 2 - 5 years had a lower IgG titer in comparison to children below 2 years (P = 0.11). Overall, there was no significant difference in VZV IgG titer between genders (P = 0.43).

4. Discussion

In our study on 570 serum samples, the cumulative VZV IgG titer was 81.3% for all age groups. The seropositivity for varicella increased with age from 43% in children below 2 years to 90.5% in people above 25 years. One exception in the increasing trend of positive serology in all age groups was the reduced percentage of seropositive samples in the age group of 2 - 5 years (32.6%), compared to the group below 2 years (43.2%). The main explanation for this decreasing rate is the passive antibody transfer from the mother to child during the first 2 years of life.

In our study, 43% of prepubertal children (below 12 years) were seropositive; therefore, the majority of patients had varicella infection after the beginning of adolescence. Also, in another large-scale study in Shiraz, Iran, the seroprevalence of VZV IgG in 843 people was 25.3% in the age group of 1-5 years, 43.1% in the age group of 5 - 10 years, 73.5% in the age group of 10 - 15 years, and 86% in adults. Therefore, only 33.7% of people under 10 years were VZV seropositive (14). In our study, similar to the mentioned Iranian research, greater susceptibility to varicella was reported among adolescents and young adults.

In 2 other large studies performed in Pakistan (2000) and Turkey (2004), similar results were reported. In the study from Pakistan on 1509 healthy volunteers (1 month to 30 years), 28% of children in the age group of 0 - 5 years, 41% of children in the age group of 5 - 10 years, 42% of subjects in the age group of 10 - 15 years, 46% of subjects in the age group of 15 - 20 years, and 53% of subjects in the age group of 20 - 30 years were seropositive for VZV IgG (15). In the study from Turkey on 885 children aged 0 - 15 years, the VZV IgG titer was positive in 41% of children under 5 years, 80% in children 5 - 10 years, and 85% in adolescents aged 11 - 15 years (16).

In the mentioned studies, considering the different climates of these countries, the percentage of positive VZV IgG titer was different in preadolescence (41% and 80%). In a meta-analysis and systematic review in Iran, it was shown that VZV seroprevalence is in accordance with the region’s climate, ie, low in tropical and high in temperate regions. Also, comparison of trends in studies performed during 2003 - 2011 did not indicate any difference in VZV seroprevalence in Iran (17).

In studies from regions with routine varicella vaccination, study of VZV IgG has shown a higher percentage of positive titer at younger ages. In a study from France in 2006, the VZV percentage of positive IgG titer increased from 15% to 89% (6 times) in children between 1 and 8 years and then increased slowly to 95% by 30 years of age (18). Similar seroepidemiological studies from the USA, Canada, Switzerland, Spain, Czech Republic, and Japan have also concluded that more than 90% of the pediatric population had positive VZV IgG titer postvaccination (19). These studies also show the safety and efficacy of this attenuated viral vaccine.

4.1. Conclusion

Based on the findings of this study, although the cumulative seroprevalence was 81.3% for all ages, this rate was only 43% before 12 years; therefore, adolescents and young adults (high-risk groups) are prone to chickenpox infection. Therefore, to protect individuals against this infection, we suggest well-designed studies to address the need for routine chickenpox immunization programs in the pediatric population.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Arvin AM. Varicella-zoster virus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1996;9(3):361-81. [PubMed ID: 8809466].

  • 2.

    Berger R, Florent G, Just M. Decrease of the lymphoproliferative response to varicella-zoster virus antigen in the aged. Infect Immun. 1981;32(1):24-7. [PubMed ID: 6163722].

  • 3.

    Holmes CN. Predictive value of a history of varicella infection. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:60-5. [PubMed ID: 15732223].

  • 4.

    Wu MF, Yang YW, Lin WY, Chang CY, Soon MS, Liu CE. Varicella zoster virus infection among healthcare workers in Taiwan: seroprevalence and predictive value of history of varicella infection. J Hosp Infect. 2012;80(2):162-7. [PubMed ID: 22188630]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2011.11.011.

  • 5.

    Socan M, Berginc N, Lajovic J. Varicella susceptibility and transmission dynamics in Slovenia. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:360. [PubMed ID: 20573202]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-360.

  • 6.

    Enders G, Miller E, Cradock-Watson J, Bolley I, Ridehalgh M. Consequences of varicella and herpes zoster in pregnancy: prospective study of 1739 cases. Lancet. 1994;343(8912):1548-51. [PubMed ID: 7802767].

  • 7.

    Sauerbrei A. Varicella-zoster virus infections in pregnancy. Intervirology. 1998;41(4-5):191-6. [PubMed ID: 10213895]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000024935.

  • 8.

    Bayani M, Siadati S, Esmaeilzadeh S, Salmani S, Asgari S. Seroprevalence of varicella zoster antibodies among pregnant women in Babol, northern Iran. Iran J Pathol. 2013;8:171-7.

  • 9.

    Fairley CK, Miller E. Varicella zoster virus epidemiology a changing scene? J Infect Dis. 1996;174:314-9. [PubMed ID: 8896538].

  • 10.

    Nichols RA, Averbeck KT, Poulsen AG, al Bassam MM, Cabral F, Aaby P, et al. Household size is critical to varicella-zoster virus transmission in the tropics despite lower viral infectivity. Epidemics. 2011;3(1):12-8. [PubMed ID: 21420656]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2010.11.003.

  • 11.

    Black S, Shinefield H, Ray P, Lewis E, Hansen J, Schwalbe J, et al. Postmarketing evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of varicella vaccine. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1999;18(12):1041-6. [PubMed ID: 10608621].

  • 12.

    Gershon AA. Varicella vaccine: its past, present and future. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1995;14(9):742-4. [PubMed ID: 8559621].

  • 13.

    Robert Koch Institut. Impfempfehlungen der standigen impfkommission (STIKO) am robert koch institut. Epidemiologisches Bull. 2000;2:9–20.

  • 14.

    Ziyaeyan M, Alborzi A, Jamildoust M, Moeini M, Pourabbas B. Seroepidemiology of Varicella zoster virus infection among 1-70 year individuals in Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2010;12:176-80.

  • 15.

    Akram DS, Qureshi H, Mahmud A, Khan AA, Kundi Z, Shafi S, et al. Seroepidemiology of varicella-zoster in Pakistan. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2000;31(4):646-9. [PubMed ID: 11414405].

  • 16.

    Savas S, Dallar Y, Arikan I, Onde U. [Varicella-zoster virus seroprevalence in children between 0-15 years old]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2004;38(1-2):69-75. [PubMed ID: 15293904].

  • 17.

    Allami A, Mohammadi N. Varicella immunity in Iran: an age-stratified systematic review and meta-analysis. Iran J Microbiol. 2014;6(6):372-81. [PubMed ID: 25926953].

  • 18.

    Khoshnood B, Debruyne M, Lancon F, Emery C, Fagnani F, Durand I, et al. Seroprevalence of varicella in the French population. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006;25(1):41-4. [PubMed ID: 16395101].

  • 19.

    Lupi O, Semenovitch I, Pereira ACJ. Epidemiologia dos herpesv.rus. In: Lupi O, Silva AG, Pereira ACJ, editors. Herpes, cl.nica, diagn.stico e tratamento. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Medsi; 2000. p. 15-31.