Abstract
Background:
Antibiotic resistance and adverse effects pose significant challenges to the effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies, such as clarithromycin-based triple therapy. Alternative treatments, including bismuth quadruple therapy, are effective in cases of clarithromycin resistance. Levofloxacin and metronidazole-based triple therapy have demonstrated high success rates with fewer side effects, making it a preferred option following clarithromycin treatment failure.Objectives:
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of levofloxacin and metronidazole in eradicating H. pylori among patients with chronic epigastric pain in Zakho, Iraq. It also assessed the accuracy of diagnostic tests, patient history, and post-treatment confirmation of eradication.Methods:
A prospective study was conducted involving 100 patients with chronic epigastric pain at Zakho General Teaching Hospital. Diagnosis was performed using the fecal antigen test, urea breath test (UBT), and endoscopy with biopsy. Patients were treated with a 14-day regimen comprising levofloxacin, metronidazole, and either esomeprazole or pantoprazole.Results:
Of the 100 participants, 66% were female, with a mean age of 37.85 years. The fecal antigen test, performed on 60 patients, showed a positivity rate of 96.5%, while the UBT, conducted on 40 patients, revealed a positivity rate of 97.5%. The highest infection rate was observed in the 51 - 60 age group. The 14-day levofloxacin and metronidazole regimen achieved a 99% eradication rate with minimal side effects.Conclusions:
This study underscores the high efficacy of levofloxacin and metronidazole-based therapy for H. pylori eradication. It highlights the importance of non-invasive diagnostic methods, enhanced patient follow-up, and international collaboration to achieve optimal treatment outcomes.Keywords
Helicobacter Pylori Levofloxacin and Metronidazole 14C-Urea Breath Test Gastritis Stool Antigen Test (SAT)
1. Background
Eradicating Helicobacter pylori often alleviates symptoms, underscoring the importance of early diagnosis and treatment. Diagnostic methods include the urea breath test (UBT), fecal antigen tests for detecting active infections, histology for examining biopsy samples, stool PCR tests for assessing antibiotic resistance, and serological tests to detect anti-H. pylori antibodies (1-3).
Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies, such as clarithromycin-based triple therapy, face challenges due to antibiotic resistance and side effects, which can impact patient adherence (4). Alternative treatments include bismuth quadruple therapy, which is particularly beneficial in cases of clarithromycin resistance (5). Levofloxacin- and metronidazole-based triple therapy, which combines levofloxacin, metronidazole, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), has shown high success rates with fewer severe side effects, making it a preferred option following clarithromycin-based treatment failure (6). However, increasing antibiotic resistance to drugs like metronidazole and clarithromycin remains a significant challenge, driven by factors such as over-prescription and patient noncompliance. This emphasizes the need for judicious antibiotic use and consistent monitoring (7).
2. Objectives
This study aims to assess the efficacy of levofloxacin-metronidazole therapy in H. pylori eradication in Zakho, Iraq. It also seeks to evaluate diagnostic tools such as the fecal antigen test, UBT, and endoscopy for H. pylori detection, document patient histories of H. pylori tests and treatments, and confirm post-treatment eradication while identifying any correlations with patient histories or characteristics.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design
This prospective study, conducted from July 2022 to October 2023 in Zakho, Iraq, enrolled 100 patients with chronic, recurrent epigastric pain.
3.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Eligible patients had chronic epigastric pain, a positive H. pylori test (via fecal antigen test, UBT, or biopsy), and a history of incomplete H. pylori eradication. Exclusions included individuals under 18 years old, those resistant to levofloxacin/metronidazole therapy, or those who had previously received bismuth quadruple therapy. The study adhered to the STROBE checklist (8).
3.3. Patient Assessment
Patients' H. pylori test history, prior treatments, confirmatory tests, and PPI usage were reviewed. Diagnostic methods were determined based on recent PPI use: Fecal antigen testing for recent PPI users and UBT for those who had been off PPIs for two weeks. Endoscopy was used for patients with negative fecal antigen test results.
3.4. Sample Size and Data Collection
Data were collected using the census method and gathered through structured questionnaires, which were recorded electronically to cover medical history, demographics, and clinical outcomes, ensuring a comprehensive analysis.
3.5. Sample Collection
Endoscopic tissue samples were stored at 2 - 8°C, while stool samples were either preserved or frozen at -20°C to maintain sample integrity.
3.6. Diagnostic and Assessment Tools
The UBT (14C- UBT) required fasting for six hours, discontinuation of antibiotics for four weeks, and PPI discontinuation for two weeks, with elevated labeled carbon indicating H. pylori. The fecal antigen test detected H. pylori antigens using the EpiTuub® lateral flow immunoassay. Histological examination involved formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens.
3.7. Treatment Regimens
Patients received a triple therapy regimen comprising esomeprazole or pantoprazole (40 mg/day), levofloxacin (750 mg/day), and metronidazole (500 mg three times daily) for 10 - 14 days, followed by 2 - 4 weeks of PPI monotherapy.
3.8. Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics provided an overview of the data. Inferential methods, including chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis H tests, were used for in-depth analysis. Multivariate techniques such as logistic regression and multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) were employed to control for potential confounders and explore relationships between variables. Hypothesis testing was performed at a significance level of P < 0.05. Data processing was conducted using statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS) version 27.0.
3.9. Potential Confounders
Confounders, including prior medication use, dietary habits, and demographic factors, were adjusted for using multivariate regression analyses to ensure accurate outcomes.
4. Results
This study, conducted in Zakho, Iraq, from July 2022 to October 2023, evaluated the efficacy of levofloxacin- and metronidazole-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication in patients with chronic epigastric pain.
4.1. Demographic Characteristics of Study Patients
Of the participants, 66% were female and 34% were male, with an average age of 37.85 years (SD = 1.18). In the 15 - 25 age group, females comprised 72.73%, and the largest age group was 31 - 40 years (44%). The 26 - 30 age range showed the highest gender disparity, with females constituting 90%. A chi-squared test revealed a significant gender disparity (P < 0.001) and a significant deviation in age distribution (P < 0.001), as shown in Table 1.
Distribution of Study Participants by Age Group and Gender a
| Age Group | Female | Male | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 - 25 | 8 (72.73) | 3 (27.27) | 11 |
| 26 - 30 | 9 (90.00) | 1 (10.00) | 10 |
| 31 - 40 | 29 (65.91) | 15 (34.09) | 44 |
| 41 - 50 | 11 (55.00) | 9 (45.00) | 20 |
| 51 - 60 | 5 (62.50) | 3 (37.50) | 8 |
| > 60 | 4 (57.14) | 3 (42.86) | 7 |
| Total | 66 | 34 | 100 |
4.2. Laboratory Results for Helicobacter pylori Tests
Among the 60 patients tested using the fecal H. pylori antigen test, 96.5% showed positive results. For the 40 patients tested with the UBT, the positive rate was 97.5%. Negative results were minimal: 2.5% for the UBT and 3.5% for the fecal antigen test, as shown in Table 2.
Frequency and Percentage of Lab Results for Helicobacter pylori Tests
| Test | Frequency Positive | Positive Rate (%) | Frequency Negative | Negative Rate (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fecal Helicobacter pylori Ag | 58/60 | 96.5 | 2 | 3.5 |
| Urea breath test | 39/40 | 97.5 | 1 | 2.5 |
| EGD and biopsy for Helicobacter pylori | 3/3 | 100 | - | - |
4.3. Distribution of Test Results by Gender
The positive rates were 37.88% for females and 41.18% for males, with males exhibiting a slightly higher H. pylori prevalence based on both diagnostic tests. The Kruskal-Wallis H test found no significant gender differences in detection rates (P = 0.3679).
4.4. Treatment Regimens
Patients received levofloxacin, metronidazole, and either esomeprazole or pantoprazole for 10 or 14 days, with 71% on the 14-day regimen. Side effects were minimal, with 93% of patients reporting none. Post-treatment, H. pylori was eradicated in 99% of cases, demonstrating high efficacy and tolerability (Figure 1).
Treatment regimens, side effects, and Helicobacter pylori eradication confirmation in studied patients
5. Discussion
Globally, H. pylori infection rates average 50.8% in developing nations, compared to 34.7% in developed regions (9). This study reported a 33.33% prevalence in Zakho, with higher rates among males. Similar studies by Pshtewan and Khoshnaw (10, 11) showed prevalence rates of 53.3% in Erbil, 51.2% in Sulaymaniyah, and 28% in Dohuk, emphasizing the need for localized research to understand regional variations.
Only 3% of patients in this study were diagnosed using esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy, reflecting the invasive nature of this method. The study prioritized non-invasive diagnostics, aligning with global trends favoring patient-friendly approaches (12).
The fecal antigen test demonstrated 96.5% accuracy, proving its reliability as a non-invasive, quick diagnostic option (13). With accuracy exceeding 90%, stool antigen testing (SAT) is both cost-effective and convenient for detecting H. pylori, as noted by Cardos et al. (14) and Elbehiry et al. (15). Its utility extends to post-treatment assessments, making it invaluable across patient demographics.
The UBT yielded a 97.5% positivity rate, with minimal false negatives, supporting its reliability in diagnosing H. pylori. These findings align with Gomollon et al. (16), who confirmed UBT's high sensitivity and specificity.
Using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, no significant age-based differences in H. pylori detection were found (P ≈ 0.4159). However, the 51 - 60 age group exhibited a higher susceptibility, potentially due to prolonged exposure or delayed diagnoses. This highlights the need for targeted interventions for older demographics to mitigate H. pylori-associated risks (17).
The study evaluated one of the primary H. pylori treatment regimens using levofloxacin and metronidazole combined with either esomeprazole or pantoprazole. Treatment duration (10 or 14 days) was based on infection severity, with 71% of patients receiving the 14-day regimen for enhanced efficacy.
Levofloxacin's superior efficacy over clarithromycin, especially in resistant regions, was evident, corroborated by Keikha et al. (6). Studies from northeastern Poland also demonstrated levofloxacin-based triple therapy (L-TT) as a potent treatment option (18).
Using UBT to assess treatment outcomes, this study achieved a 99% H. pylori eradication rate. The high success rate, combined with minimal adverse effects, underscores the effectiveness and safety of the modified regimen.
5.1. Practical Significance and Implications
This study highlights age-related variations in H. pylori prevalence, advocates for non-invasive diagnostic methods, and demonstrates the efficacy of levofloxacin-metronidazole therapy. It provides valuable insights for improving patient outcomes and contributes to clinical practice and policy-making.
5.2. Study Limitations
Despite the significant sample size, selection and recall biases may affect the generalizability of the findings. Unvalidated instruments and uncontrolled confounders present potential measurement errors and causality issues in this cross-sectional study, highlighting the need for further research.
5.3. Conclusions
This study offers valuable insights into H. pylori prevalence, diagnostic methods, and treatment efficacy. It underscores age and gender patterns, advocates for non-invasive diagnostics, and highlights the superior efficacy of levofloxacin-metronidazole therapy. Policymakers should allocate resources to support these findings to optimize H. pylori management.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Best LM, Takwoingi Y, Siddique S, Selladurai A, Gandhi A, Low B, et al. Non-invasive diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori infection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;3(3). CD012080. [PubMed ID: 29543326]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6513531]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012080.pub2.
-
2.
Lee JY, Kim N. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori by invasive test: histology. Ann Transl Med. 2015;3(1):10. [PubMed ID: 25705642]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4293485]. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2305-5839.2014.11.03.
-
3.
Wang L, Lai J, Si Y, Cui X, Umar Z, Ru X, et al. Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR)-Based Rapid Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Antibiotic Resistance. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2023;(197). https://doi.org/10.3791/65689.
-
4.
Yu JH, Zhao Y, Wang XF, Xu YC. Evaluation of Anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG Antibodies for the Detection of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Different Populations. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(5). [PubMed ID: 35626369]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9139928]. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12051214.
-
5.
de Moraes Andrade PV, Monteiro YM, Chehter EZ. Third-line and rescue therapy for refractory Helicobacter pylori infection: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol. 2023;29(2):390-409. [PubMed ID: 36687120]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9846933]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v29.i2.390.
-
6.
Keikha M, Askari P, Ghazvini K, Karbalaei M. Levofloxacin-based therapy as an efficient alternative for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022;29:420-9. [PubMed ID: 34788690]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgar.2021.10.019.
-
7.
Boyanova L, Hadzhiyski P, Gergova R, Markovska R. Evolution of Helicobacter pylori Resistance to Antibiotics: A Topic of Increasing Concern. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(2). [PubMed ID: 36830243]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9952372]. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020332.
-
8.
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1495-9. [PubMed ID: 25046131]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.013.
-
9.
Zamani M, Ebrahimtabar F, Zamani V, Miller WH, Alizadeh-Navaei R, Shokri-Shirvani J, et al. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;47(7):868-76. [PubMed ID: 29430669]. https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.14561.
-
10.
Pshtewan M, Khoshnaw JSK. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter Pylori Infection among Patients with Gastroduodenal Disorders in Erbil City. Diyala Journal of Medicine. 2020;18(2):91-101. https://doi.org/10.26505/djm.18014880818.
-
11.
Sorchee S, Hassan SR, Ramadhan AO, Sleman EE. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter Pylori among Human in Erbil and Rania City, Kurdistan Region, Iraq. Int J Medical Sci. 2020;3(3):82-92.
-
12.
Ahlawat R, Hoilat GJ, Ross AB. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Island (FL): Treasure: Publishing, StatPearls; 2023.
-
13.
Nieuwenburg SAV, Mommersteeg MC, Wolters LMM, van Vuuren AJ, Erler N, Peppelenbosch MP, et al. Accuracy of H. pylori fecal antigen test using fecal immunochemical test (FIT). Gastric Cancer. 2022;25(2):375-81. [PubMed ID: 34792700]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8882108]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-021-01264-8.
-
14.
Cardos AI, Maghiar A, Zaha DC, Pop O, Fritea L, Miere Groza F, et al. Evolution of Diagnostic Methods for Helicobacter pylori Infections: From Traditional Tests to High Technology, Advanced Sensitivity and Discrimination Tools. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022;12(2). [PubMed ID: 35204598]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8871415]. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020508.
-
15.
Elbehiry A, Marzouk E, Aldubaib M, Abalkhail A, Anagreyyah S, Anajirih N, et al. Helicobacter pylori Infection: Current Status and Future Prospects on Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Control Challenges. Antibiotics (Basel). 2023;12(2). [PubMed ID: 36830102]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9952126]. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12020191.
-
16.
Gomollon F, Ducons JA, Santolaria S, Lera Omiste I, Guirao R, Ferrero M, et al. Breath test is very reliable for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in real clinical practice. Dig Liver Dis. 2003;35(9):612-8. [PubMed ID: 14563182]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1590-8658(03)00373-6.
-
17.
Marginean CM, Cioboata R, Olteanu M, Vasile CM, Popescu M, Popescu AIS, et al. The Importance of Accurate Early Diagnosis and Eradication in Helicobacter pylori Infection: Pictorial Summary Review in Children and Adults. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022;12(1). [PubMed ID: 36671261]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9854763]. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12010060.
-
18.
Wasielica-Berger J, Gugnacki P, Mlynarczyk M, Rogalski P, Swidnicka-Siergiejko A, Antonowicz S, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Various Eradication Regimens for Helicobacter Pylori Infection in the Northeastern Region of Poland. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(11). [PubMed ID: 35682504]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9180243]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116921.