It has been more than 30 years since fluoroquinolones were first introduced in Syria. A Syrian study suggested that the resistance rate against ciprofloxacin has reached 39.1%, with upward trends in the use of fluoroquinolones in community and hospital settings (
14). In the present study, 65.81% of the ESBL-producing isolates from Aleppo University Hospitals were resistant to ciprofloxacin. Therefore, we investigated the prevalence of PMQR determinants and analyzed their association with phenotypic ciprofloxacin resistance.
Previous studies reported that
qnr genes were rare (
20); however, in the present study, we found that the prevalence of
qnr genes in our study was higher (34.14%) than that reported in other studies (
21-
23). Although the prevalence of each PMQR gene varied by species, in general,
qnr genes were more prevalent in
K. pneumoniae (62.50%, 15/24) than in
E. coli (27.27%, 27/99), as was previously described in studies conducted in France (
24), the United States (
17), Spain (
21), and China (
25). The most frequently detected
qnr gene was
qnrB (24.4%), as has been reported in in other studies (
23,
26), and we also noted an absence of
qnrA, which has also been reported previously (
1,
18,
23,
26-
28).
Notably, there was no statistically significant association between
qnr and ciprofloxacin resistance, and
qnr genes were common among both ciprofloxacin-sensitive/intermediate isolates (28.5%, 12/42) and resistant isolates (37%, 30/81). Our findings agree with other reports demonstrating that
qnr alone does not confer resistance to fluoroquinolones. However, its presence may facilitate the selection of additional chromosomal mechanisms, such as changes in DNA gyrase (
gyrA) and/or topoisomerase IV (
parC) genes (
2,
10,
17,
26,
29), and the presence of
qnr does not necessarily lead to MICs above the CLSI breakpoints for resistance to ciprofloxacin (
30). Furthermore, using ciprofloxacin breakpoints as markers for detection may underestimate the prevalence of
qnr genes, which raises concern for the undetected spread of these genes (
23). Consequently, infections caused by
qnr-positive isolates might be treated with quinolones, thus enhancing the selection of resistant mutants (
2) and increasing the risk of therapeutic failure (
23).
We noted the absence of
qepA among the studied strains. The QepA efflux pump, first described in 2007 in two
E. coli clinical isolates from Japan and Belgium (
12,
13), has already been detected in France, with a new variant QepA2 (
31). However,
qepA is still very rare, except in China where two recent studies underlined the predominance of the
qepA gene in enterobacterial strains isolated from food-producing animals. The most surprising finding of our study was the wide penetration of the
aac (6’)-Ib-cr allele, which was more prevalent (75.6%) than the
qnr genes (43.14%). Notably,
aac (6’)-Ib-cr accounted for 94% (93/98) of the
aac (6’)-Ib genes detected.
This high proportion of
aac (6’)-Ib-cr/
aac (6’)-Ib has also been reported in other studies (
11,
25), and it probably reflects an extended emergence and ongoing dissemination of under detected
aac (6’)-Ib-cr. Moreover, its presence as part of an integron cassette (
11,
32) suggests that it could be widely mobile among plasmids.
Although the
qnr genes were predominant in
K. pneumoniae,
aac (6’)-Ib-cr was the most prevalent PMQR gene in
E. coli (78/99, 63.4%), and it was much less prevalent in
K. pneumonia (12.20%, 15/24). These differences are in agreement with previous observations (
16,
18,
23); however, the reason for these differences is not yet understood, since it is known that some plasmids can carry both
aac (6’)-Ib-cr and
qnrA genes (
17).
To investigate the contribution of the aac (6’)-Ib-cr gene to ciprofloxacin resistance, we analyzed the relationship between the presence of aac (6’)-Ib-cr and resistance to ciprofloxacin. Our resistant isolates were significantly more frequently aac (6’)-Ib-cr–positive (81.8%, 66/81) than our sensitive/intermediate isolates (64.28%, 27/42). Thus, aac (6’)-Ib-cr was significantly associated with phenotypic ciprofloxacin resistance (P = 0.02).
There was no relationship between the presence of
qnrA,
qnrB, or
qnrS and
aac (6’)-Ib-cr;
qnr genes were present in 33.33% (31/93) of the
aac (6’)-Ib-cr-positive strains and 28.57% (10/35) of the
aac (6’)-Ib-cr-negative strains, indicating that the
qnr genes and
aac (6’)-Ib-cr can circulate independently. This result is consistent with some previous results (
16), but is in contrast to other results from China where the
aac (6’)-Ib-cr variant was detected in 55.2% of
qnr-positive in
E. coli and
K. pneumoniae isolates but in only 6% of
qnr-negative isolates (
25). In conclusion, our study showed that the prevalence of plasmid-mediated
qnr and
aac (6’)-Ib-cr quinolone resistance genes was high among Syrian clinical ESBL-producing isolates of
E. coli and
K. pneumonia, and that this association should be further studied in the future. However, the distribution of the
aac (6’)-Ib-cr variant differed between the two species; it was detected more often in
E. coli isolates than in
K. pneumonia isolates, which is the reverse of that for
qnr genes. Conversely, the
qnr genes were more prevalent in
K. pneumoniae than in
E. coli, and
qnrB was more prevalent than
qnrA or
qnrS, and the prevalence of ciprofloxacin resistance in our isolates was associated with the prevalence of the
aac (6’)-Ib-cr variant.
Finally, it seems likely that the increasing use of fluoroquinolones over the last 10 years created an opportunity for the emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant clinical isolates with PMQR determinants. Additional regional epidemiological data on antimicrobial resistance throughout Syria is needed to promote appropriate antimicrobial therapy and effective infection control. In addition, ensuring the use of antibiotics that are not substrates for aac (6’)-Ib-cr might reduce selection pressure for this variant but not for the qnr genes.