Abstract
Background:
Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Ureaplasma urealyticum are genital infectious agents that can be sexually transmitted. They are involved in many infections both in women and men and can also be the cause of abortion in women.Objectives:
This study aimed to determine the prevalence of the aforementioned bacteria in pregnant women and those with abortion in Kerman, southeast of Iran. Totally, 200 vaginal specimens were taken from pregnant women (n = 76) and those with abortion (n = 124) and were investigated for chlamydial and mycoplasmal infections using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay.Methods:
From December 2015 to December 2016, 200 women were enrolled in this study. Demographic and behavioral information were gathered for statistical analysis. The prevalence of bacteria was determined in the vaginal samples by PCR.Results:
All the studied bacteria were more frequently isolated from women with abortion, that is, 34.6% versus 15.7% for U. urealyticum, 20.9% versus 17.1% for M. genitalium, and 15.3% versus 10.5% for C. trachomatis. However, only for U. urealyticum the difference was significant (P = 0.0006). Again, occurrence of co-infection was mostly detected in women with abortion, and co-infection of U. urealyticum and M. genitalium was significantly higher (P ≤ 0.03). Also, follow-up studies indicated the importance of U. urealyticum in adverse outcomes of pregnancy in this region. Thus, special attention should be paid to this infection during pregnancy.Conclusions:
The present study showed a significantly high prevalence of U. urealyticum in women with abortion separately and also in combination with M. genitalium. Diagnostic tests are recommended to detect these bacteria in high-risk women.Keywords
Abortion Chlamydia trachomatis Mycoplasma genitalium Ureaplasma urealyticum Pregnant Women Vaginal Swab
1. Background
Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are of global public health problems (1). Among different known STIs, chlamydial and mycoplasmal infections are of great concern because of their association with postoperative difficulties and termination of pregnancy (TOP) (1). Although the causative agents are entirely different, they have similar clinical manifestations (2). It has been reported that C. trachomatis, M. genitalium, and U. urealyticum are all involved in genitourinary tract infections, abortions, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and prenatal mortality or stillbirth (3).
C. trachomatis is of the most important common pathogens involved in sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) worldwide, accounting for 600,000 reported cases annually in USA (3, 4). It is a major cause of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), mucopurulent cervicitis, tubal infertility (5), ectopic pregnancies, preterm birth, and cervical or ovarian cancers (2-4). According to the Center for Disease Control, approximately 4.7% - 14% of C. trachomatis infections occur during pregnancy (6).
In Iran, the isolation frequency of C. trachomatis was reported to be up to 23% in pregnant women (7, 8) and about 11% - 13% in women with abortion (7-9). Among other causative agents of STDs, there are Mycoplasma spp. including M. genitalium and U. urealyticum. These organisms are free-living with small genomes and low metabolic activities, and their association with nongonococcal urethritis (NGU) has been reported (10). In this respect, the prevalence of M. genitalium among female partners of men infected with NGU has been reported to be 32% (10). M. genitalium has also been detected in 56% of male sexual partners of infected women (11). The role of M. genitalium in more severe infections such as cervicitis and PID has been demonstrated (12), and a significant association has been reported between M. genitalium infection and preterm birth, younger maternal age, and low body mass index (13). U. urealyticum is among the most common organisms causing adverse infections of the amniotic fluid and placenta (9). It is known as a normal flora in the lower genital tract, but its association with STDs is still controversial (9). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the frequencies of C. trachomatis, U. urealyticum, and M. genitalium infections in pregnant or women with abortion in southeast of Iran.
2. Objectives
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of infections with mentioned organisms in vaginal samples of women with abortion in comparison with pregnant women. Besides, the association between the presence of these infections and socio-demographic parameters was determined.
3. Methods
3.1. Study Design
In this cross-sectional study conducted from December 2015 to December 2016, 200 vaginal swabs were taken from 124 women who had experienced abortions and 76 pregnant women referring to /or hospitalized at the gynecology department of a university-affiliated hospital in Kerman, Iran. The sample size was determined by an expert statistician. All the volunteers enrolled in this study were asked for some socio-demographic data (e.g., age, education, and place of residence), history of abortion, premature delivery, genital and urinary tract infections through filling out a questionnaire and face to face interviews (Table 1).
Demographic Data and Risk Factors of Women Referring to Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman, Irana
| Characteristicb | Total | Pregnant Group, N = 76 | Abortion Group, N = 124 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | |||
| ≤ 25 | 62 (31) | 25 (32.9) | 37 (29.8) |
| 26 - 35 | 99 (49.5) | 40 (52.6) | 59 (47.8) |
| > 35 | 35 (17.5) | 7 (9.2) | 28 (22.6) |
| Gestational age (week) | |||
| 1 - 10 | 50 (25) | 2 (2.6) | 48 (38.7) |
| 11 - 20 | 75 (37.5) | 3 (3.9) | 76 (61.3) |
| 21 - 30 | 14 (7) | 10 (13.2) | 0 |
| 31 - 40 | 60 (30) | 60 (78.9) | 0 |
| > 40 | 1 (5) | 1 (1.3) | 0 |
| Locality | |||
| Kerman | 92 (46) | 34 (44.7) | 58 (46.8) |
| Township | 87 (43.5) | 32 (42.1) | 55 (44.4) |
| Others | 14 (7) | 3 (3.9) | 11 (8.9) |
| Mother education | |||
| Under diploma | 70 (35) | 28 (36.8) | 42 (33.9) |
| Diploma | 74 (37) | 27 (35.5) | 47 (37.9) |
| Upper diploma | 49 (24.5) | 14 (18.4) | 35 (28.2) |
| Patient’s job | |||
| Housekeeper | 167 (83.5) | 59 (77.6) | 108 (87.1) |
| Employee | 26 (13) | 10 (13.2) | 16 (12.9) |
| Husband’s job | |||
| Governmental | 46 (23) | 16 (21.1) | 30 (24.2) |
| Non-governmental (driver, …) | 147 (73.5) | 53 (69.7) | 94 (75.8) |
| Intercourse (week) | |||
| ≤ 3 | 161 (80.5) | 56 (73.7) | 105 (84.7) |
| > 3 | 32 (16) | 13 (17.1) | 19 (15.3) |
| Contraception method | |||
| Withdrawal | 134 (67) | 52 (68.4) | 82 (66.1) |
| Condom | 23 (11.5) | 6 (7.9) | 17 (13.7) |
| Other | 36 (18) | 11 (14.4) | 25 (20.1) |
| Type of delivery | |||
| NVD | 78 (39) | 27 (35.5) | 51 (41.1) |
| Caesarian | 45 (22.5) | 9 (11.8) | 36 (29) |
| First delivery | 70 (35) | 33 (43.4) | 37 (29.8) |
| Previous TOP | |||
| None | 111 (55.5) | 44 (57.9) | 67 (54) |
| One or more | 82 (41) | 25 (32.9) | 57 (46) |
| History of genital infection | |||
| Yes | 78 (39) | 27 (35.5) | 51 (41.1) |
| No | 115 (57.5) | 42 (55.3) | 73 (58.9) |
| History of genital surgery | |||
| Yes | 22 (11) | 10 (13.2) | 12 (9.7) |
| No | 171 (85.5) | 59 (77.6) | 112 (90.3) |
| History of PROM | |||
| Yes | 38 (19) | 13 (17.1) | 25 (20.2) |
| No | 155 (77.5) | 56 (73.7) | 99 (79.8) |
3.2. Samples and Microbiological Procedures
Specimen collection was performed by inserting 2 - 3 cm of a Dacron swab (Delta Lab, Spain) into the vagina and rotating it in order to obtain a great number of cells. All the specimens were placed into Trypticase soy broth (Conda, Spain) containing 0.6% yeast extract (BBL, USA) and were transferred on ice to laboratory for further processing (14). DNA extraction was performed using High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Eluted DNA was stored at -20°C for further analysis.
3.3. PCR Assay
DNA extraction and amplification for all polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and nested PCR assays were performed using Pars Tous kit (Arya Tous CO. Iran), which amplifies outer membrane protein 1 (omp 1) of C. trachomatis, P protein (mgpa) of M. genitalium, and urease of U. urealyticum (9, 15, 16). For C. trachomatis, nested PCR was performed according to the kit’s instructions (Table 2). The amplified products were subjected to electrophoresis using 1.5% agarose gel.
PCR Protocol for Detection of U. urealyticum and M. genitalium and Nested PCR for C. trachomatisa
| Gene | Annealing Temperature °C (Time) | Extension Temperature °C (Time) | Number of Cycles | Amplication Size (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Omp 1 of C. trachomatis | 55 (40 s) | 72 (30 s) | 30 | 500 |
| Mgpa (P protein of M. genitalium) | 56 (40 s) | 67 (30 s) | 40 | 255 |
| Urease (urease of U. urealyticum) | 57 (40 s) | 72 (30 s) | 40 | 370 |
3.4. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 20. T-test was performed to analyze the relationship between the presence of infections and demographic variables. P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
3.5. Ethical Considerations
This study was performed under approval of institutional review board of Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR.KMU.REC.1395.339). Written informed consent form was obtained from all the participant in this study.
4. Results
Overall, 200 women were recruited, of whom 92.7% were Iranian women and 7.3% were Afghans. The mean age of the pregnant women and those with abortion was 32 ± 2.8 and 31 ± 3.1 years, respectively. Also, history of genitourinary infection was reported in 40.42% of the subjects.
C. trachomatis was found in 15.32% (19/124) of aborted and 10.52% (8/76) of pregnant women. In the pregnant group, association between infection and gestational age was significant, such that 9.3% of the specimens from pregnant women which were positive for C. trachomatis, were recovered from women at the third trimester (vs. 1.32% for women with abortion; P ≤ 0.05). The frequency of the studied bacteria and co-infection rates are shown in Table 3.
Frequency of C. trachomatis, M. genitalium and U. urealyticum in Studied Groupsa
| Bacterial Species | Groups, No. (%) | P-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnant Group, N = 76 | Abortion Group, N = 124 | ||
| C. trachomatis | 8 (10.52) | 19 (15.32) | ≥ 0.4 |
| M. genitalium | 13 (17.1) | 26 (21) | ≥ 0.6 |
| U. urealyticum | 12 (15.8) | 43 (34.13) | ≤ 0.006* |
| C. trachomatis and M. genitalium | 1 (1.3) | 5 (4.03) | ≥ 0.4 |
| C. trachomatis and U. urealyticum | 3 (3.9) | 9 (7.25) | ≥ 0.5 |
| M. genitalium and U. urealyticum | 2 (2.6) | 15 (12.1) | ≤ 0.03* |
No co-infection with the three studied microorganisms was found, while co-infection with two microorganisms was more frequently found in abortion group (23.3%) in comparison with pregnant one (7.89%). However, only high frequency of co-infection with M. genitalium and U. urealyticum was statistically significant (P = 0.03; Table 3).
Co-infection with C. trachomatis and M. genitalium was only detected in Afghan women older than 25 years old, while co-infection with C. trachomatis and U. urealyticum was more frequently observed in women younger than 25 years old who had history of vaginal infection and PROM; however, this difference was not significant. Co-infection with C. trachomatis and U. urealyticum was mostly detected in women who had previously experienced abortion. The demographic data of C. trachomatis, M. genitalium, and U. urealyticum-positive patients are summarized in Tables 4 and 5 in both pregnant and abortion groups. Gel agarose electrophoresis for detection of genes representative for C. trachomatis, M. genitalium, and U. urealyticum are displayed in Figures 1 - 3.
Distribution of Demographic Factors in Pregnant Women with M. genitalium, C. trachomatis, and U. urealyticum Infection Admitted to Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman, 2017a,b
| Characteristic | C. trachomatis | P Value | M. genitalium | P Value | U. urealyticum | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 0.932 | 0.972 | 0.691 | |||
| ≤ 25 | 3/25 (12) | 4/25 (16) | 3/25 (12) | |||
| 26 - 35 | 4/40 (10) | 7/40 (17.5) | 8/40 (20) | |||
| > 35 | 1/7 (14.29) | 1/7 (14.29) | 1/7 (14.29) | |||
| Gestational age (week) | 0.050* | 0.659 | 0.490 | |||
| 1 - 10 | 0/2 (0) | 0/2 (0) | 0/2 (0) | |||
| 11 - 20 | 0/3 (0) | 0/3 (0) | 1/3 (33.33) | |||
| 21 - 30 | 1/10 (10) | 3/10 (30) | 0/10 (0) | |||
| 31 - 40 | 6/60 (10) | 10/60 (16.67) | 11/60 (18.34) | |||
| > 40 | 1/1 (100) | 0/1 (0) | 0/1 (0) | |||
| Locality | 0.286 | 0.044* | 0.690 | |||
| Kerman | 6/34 (17.65) | 2/34 (5.88) | 5/34 (14.70) | |||
| Township | 2/32 (6.25) | 9/32 (28.12) | 6/32 (18.75) | |||
| Others | 0/3 (0) | 1/3 (33.34) | 1/3 (33.33) | |||
| Mother’s education | 0.406 | 0.866 | 0.375 | |||
| Under diploma | 3/28 (10.72) | 5/28 (17.85) | 5/28 (17.85) | |||
| Diploma | 2/27 (7.41) | 4/27 (14.81) | 3/27 (11.11) | |||
| Upper diploma | 3/14 (21.43) | 3/14 (21.42) | 0.235 | 4/14 (28.57) | ||
| Patient’s job | 0.327 | 0.556 | ||||
| Housekeeper | 6/59 (10.17) | 9/59 (15.25) | 10/59)16.94) | |||
| Employee | 2/10 (20) | 3/10 (30) | 2/10 (20) | |||
| Husband’ s job | 0.401 | 0.434 | 0.566 | |||
| Governmental | 1/16 (6.25) | 2/16 (12.5) | 3/16 (18.75) | |||
| Non - governmental (driver, …) | 7/53 (13.21) | 10/53 (18.86) | 9/53 (16.98) | |||
| Intercourse (week) | 0.530 | 0.402 | 0.283 | |||
| ≤ 3 | 7/56 (12.5) | 9/56 (16.07) | 11/56 (19.64) | |||
| > 3 | 1/13 (7.69) | 3/13 (23.07) | 1/13 (7.69) | |||
| Contrace ption method | 0.361 | 0.851 | 0.851 | |||
| Withdrawal | 7/52 (13.46) | 10/52 (19.23) | 10/52 | |||
| Condom | 1/6 (16.67) | 1/6 (16.67) | 1/6 (16.67) | |||
| Others | 0/11 (0) | 1/11 (9.09) | 1/11 (9.09) | |||
| Type of delivery | 0.050 | 0.309 | 0.543 | |||
| NVD | 1/27 (3.7) | 3/27 (11.11) | 3/27 (11.11) | |||
| Caesarian | 3/9 (33.34) | 3/9 (33.33) | 2/9 (22.23) | |||
| First delivery | 4/33 (12.13) | 6/33 (18.18) | 7/33 (21.21) | |||
| Previous TOP | 0.107 | 0.548 | 0.221 | |||
| None | 3/44 (6.8) | 8/44 (18.18) | 6/44 (16.64) | |||
| One or more | 5/25 (20) | 4/25 (16) | 6/25 (24) | |||
| History of genital infection | 0.146 | 0.127 | 0.297 | |||
| Yes | 5/27 (18.51) | 5/27 (18.51) | 6/27 (33.33) | |||
| No | 3/42 (7.14) | 7/42 (16.67) | 6/42 (14.29) | |||
| History of genital surgery | 0.327 | 0.544 | 0.556 | |||
| Yes | 2/10 (20) | 0/10 (0) | 2/10 (20) | |||
| No | 6/59 (10.16) | 12/59 (20.33) | 10/59 (16.95) | |||
| History of PROM | 0.470 | 0.402 | 0.402 | |||
| Yes | 2/13 (15.38) | 3/13 (23.07) | 3/13 (23.07) | |||
| No | 6/56 (10.71) | 9/56 (16.07) | 9/56 (16.07) |
Distribution of Demographic Factors in Patients with Abortion with M. genitalium, C. trachomatis, and U. urealyticum Infection Admitted to Afzalipour Hospital, Kerman, 2017a,b
| Characteristic | C. trachomatis | P Value | M. genitalium | P Value | U. urealyticum | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 0.766 | 0.800 | 0.670 | |||
| ≤ 25 | 7/37 (8.10) | 9/37 (24.32) | 15/37 (40.54) | |||
| 26 - 35 | 8/59 (13.55) | 11/59 (18.64) | 19/59 (32.20) | |||
| > 35 | 4/28 (14.29) | 6/28 (21.42) | 9/28 (32.14) | |||
| Gestational age (week) | 0.857 | 0.471 | 0.695 | |||
| 1 - 10 | 7/48 (14.58) | 9/48 (18.75) | 15/48 (31.25) | |||
| 11 - 20 | 12/76 (15.79) | 17/76 (22.37) | 28/76 (36.85) | |||
| Locality | 0.119 | 0.556 | 0.719 | |||
| Kerman | 7/58 (12.07) | 12/58 (20.69) | 19/58 (32.75) | |||
| Township | 12/55 (21.82) | 13/55 (23.64) | 19/55 (34.54) | |||
| Others | 0/11 (0) | 1/11 (0.09) | 5/11 (45.45) | |||
| Mother’s education | 0.037* | 0.697 | 0.704 | |||
| Under diploma | 7/42 (16.67) | 10/42 (23.80) | 13/42 (39.45) | |||
| Diploma | 11/47 (23.4) | 8/47 (17.02) | 16/47 (34.04) | |||
| Upper diploma | 1/35 (2.85) | 8/35 (22.85) | 14/35 (40) | |||
| Patient’s job | 0.252 | 0.557 | 0.498 | |||
| Housekeeper | 18/108 (16.67) | 23/108 (21.3) | 38/108 (35.18) | |||
| Employee | 1/16 (6.25) | 3/16 (18.75) | 5/16 (31.25) | |||
| Husband’s job | 0.269 | 0.447 | 0.177 | |||
| Governmental | 3/30 (10) | 7/30 (23.34) | 13/30 (43.34) | |||
| Non - governmental (driver, …) | 16/94 (17.02) | 19/94 (20.22) | 30/94 (31.92) | |||
| Intercourse (week) | 0.410 | 0.175 | 0.136 | |||
| ≤ 3 | 17/105 (16.19) | 20/105 (19.04) | 39/105 | |||
| > 3 | 2/19 (10.52) | 6/19 (31.58) | 4/19 | |||
| Contraception method | 0.481 | 0.064 | 0.720 | |||
| Withdrawal | 15/82 (18.3) | 13/82 (15.85) | 30/82 (36.58) | |||
| Condom | 1/17 (5.89) | 7/17 (41.18) | 4/17 (23.52) | |||
| Others | 3/25 (12) | 6/25 (12) | 9/25 (36) | |||
| Type of delivery | 0.717 | 0.528 | 0.364 | |||
| NVD | 7/51 (13.72) | 10/51 (19.60) | 14/51 (27.45) | |||
| Caesarian | 7/36 (19.44) | 6/36 (16.67) | 14/36 (38.89) | |||
| First delivery | 5/37 (13.51) | 10/37 (27.03) | 15/37 (40.54) | |||
| Previous TOP | 0.270 | 0.246 | 0.316 | |||
| None | 12/67 (17.92) | 12/67 (17.92) | 25/67 (37.32) | |||
| One or more | 7/57 (12.29) | 14/57 (24.57) | 18/57 (31.58) | |||
| History of genital infection | 0.559 | 0.376 | ||||
| Yes | 8/51 (15.69) | 10/51 (19.60) | 19/51 (37.26) | |||
| No | 11/73 (15.07) | 16/73 (21.92) | 0.469 | 24/73 (32.88) | ||
| History of genital surgery | 0.420 | 0.520 | 0.346 | |||
| Yes | 1/12 (8.34) | 2/12 (16.67) | 3/12 (25) | |||
| No | 18/112 (16.07) | 24/112 (21.42) | 40/112 (35.72%) | |||
| History of PROM | 0.326 | 0.240 | 0.474 | |||
| Yes | 5/25 (20) | 7/25 (28) | 8/25 (32) | |||
| No | 14/99 (14.14) | 19/99 (19.2) | 35/99 (35.35) |
PCR products of Urease encoding gene in U. urealyticum (370 bp), Lane 1, positive control; lanes 4 - 8 positive samples; lane 3, negative control; Lane M, 100 bp size marker.
PCR products of omp encoding gene in C. trachomatis (250 bp), Lane 1, positive control; lanes 3 - 5 positive samples; lane 2, negative control; Lane M, 100 bp size marker.
PCR products of mgpa gene in M. genitalium (255 bp), Lane 3, positive control; lanes 8 - 9 positive samples; lane 2, negative control; Lane M, 100 bp size marker.
5. Discussion
Abortion remains a major public health concern worldwide and is usually a consequence of serious genital tract infections. Among important genital bacteria causing infections, there are U. urealyticum, M. genitalium, and C. trachomatis (13, 17, 18). Depending on the type of sample and different methods of isolation, different frequencies for these bacteria are reported. For example, the frequencies of C. trachomatis among women with TOP in Swiss, Sweden, New Zealand, and Poland were 16.37%, 5.4%, 15.7%, and 32%, respectively (16, 19-21). In Iran (Tehran) and Iraq, the rates of 13.25% and 6.4% have been reported, respectively (9, 22). Our result is similar to the reported case from Swiss and higher than those reported from Iran (19).
In pregnant women, the prevalence of C. trachomatis has been reported from 1% in Saudi Arabia to 13.6% in Iraq (23-26). In Iran, the isolation of C. trachomatis from various regions was reported to range from 2.9% to 13.7% (8, 27-29). The frequency of C. trachomatis in this study was 10.52%, which is in line with the reported range of isolation from our country. The difference in the isolation frequency of these bacteria can be attributed to the type of samples, the methods of isolation, and understudied patients.
M. genitalium infection among women with TOP in Denmark, Sweden, and Iran in 2013 and 2014 ranged from 0.91% to 16.5%. Our results (21%) were in accordance with the reported case in Iran in 2014 (16, 23, 30, 31). The infection rates of M. genitalium among pregnant women in the UK, New Zealand, USA, and Sweden were 0.7%, 8.7%, 6.7 %, and 2.8%, respectively (16, 20, 32, 33). Besides, the prevalence of M. genitalium among pregnant women in various regions of Iran is varied, such that it was 1.02% in Sabzevar, 22.7% in Tonekabon, and 2.75% in Sanandaj (8, 23, 31). Herein, we observed that 22.41% and 17.1% of women with abortion and pregnant women were infected with M. genitalium, respectively, that is similar to Tonekabon report.
Difference in U. urealyticum isolation in various specimens has been reported, such that it was 10% among women with TOP in Iran and 74.1% in China (15, 34), and in pregnant women in Iran, it ranged from 7.3% to 15.2% (15, 35). In this study, U. urealyticum was isolated more frequently from the abortion group and we found a higher frequency of this bacterium than other studies in our country. The important role of U. urealyticum in various vaginal infections, resulting in pyelonephritis, PID, chorioamnionitis, and postpartum and postabortal fever, has been implicated in many studies (15). In addition, the co-infection of U. urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis has been reported to increase the risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes in high-risk patients such as those with premature labor or PROM (36).
Various studies have focused on the relationship between risk factors and STIs in women (3). In some studies, association between maternal age (young women) and infection with C. trachomatis and M. genitalium has been reported (4, 7, 37). However, in other studies, in accordance with our research, no association was found between maternal age and the presence of C. trachomatis and M. genitalium (32). Other demographic factors that have been associated with these bacteria were contraceptive method, history of PROM, gestational age, and history of miscarriage (7, 15, 37, 38). In our study, there was a significant correlation between C. trachomatis infection and mother’s educational level in women who experienced abortion. Also, C. trachomatis infection was found to be significantly more prevalent in pregnant women in the third trimester of pregnancy compared to other times.
M. genitalium was found to be more frequent in rural and Afghan women in the pregnant group compared to the abortion group. Since neither the studied risk factors nor the study groups are similar in all studies, comparing the results is difficult. History of PROM was correlated with C. trachomatis infection according to Ahmadi et al. (7), while we found that history of PROM was more prevalent in patients co-infected with C. trachomatis and M. genitalium. There are some differences in cultural issues such as having different partners, which make comparison limited. Another limitation is the kind of specimen or sampling methods as well as various identification methods used in different studies. We used vaginal swabs for detection of the bacteria since this method is reported to give a high load of bacteria (9, 39).
In conclusion, we found that U. urealyticum is an important cause of infection in pregnant women in this region and its role in abortion and abnormalities needs special attention. Our follow-up studies indicated the important role of U. urealyticum in adverse outcomes of pregnancy. However, a higher number of cases should be examined and diagnostic screening tests should be performed in order to reduce the risk of premature stillbirth or abortions due to these infections. Gynecologists should adopt proper plans for the diagnosis and treatment of these infections in order to diminish the resulting complications in women.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Rumyantseva T, Golparian D, Nilsson CS, Johansson E, Falk M, Fredlund H, et al. Evaluation of the new AmpliSens multiplex real-time PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma genitalium, and Trichomonas vaginalis. APMIS. 2015;123(10):879-86. [PubMed ID: 26299582]. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12430.
-
2.
Ljubin-Sternak S, Mestrovic T. Chlamydia trachomatis and genital mycoplasmas: Pathogens with an impact on human reproductive health. J Pathog. 2014;2014:183167. [PubMed ID: 25614838]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4295611]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/183167.
-
3.
Pinto VM, Szwarcwald CL, Baroni C, Stringari LL, Inocencio LA, Miranda AE. Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence and risk behaviors in parturient women aged 15 to 24 in Brazil. Sex Transm Dis. 2011;38(10):957-61. [PubMed ID: 21934572]. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e31822037fc.
-
4.
Baud D, Goy G, Jaton K, Osterheld MC, Blumer S, Borel N, et al. Role of Chlamydia trachomatis in miscarriage. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(9):1630-5. [PubMed ID: 21888787]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3322049]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1709.100865.
-
5.
Omo-Aghoja LO, Okonofua FE, Onemu SO, Larsen U, Bergstrom S. Association of Chlamydia trachomatis serology with tubal infertility in Nigerian women. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;33(5):688-95. [PubMed ID: 17845331]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2007.00633.x.
-
6.
Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2018. Available from: www.CDC.gov.
-
7.
Ahmadi A, Khodabandehloo M, Ramazanzadeh R, Farhadifar F, Roshani D, Ghaderi E, et al. The relationship between chlamydia trachomatis genital infection and spontaneous abortion. J Reprod Infertil. 2016;17(2):110-6. [PubMed ID: 27141466]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4842232].
-
8.
Haghighi Hasanabad M, Mohammadzadeh M, Bahador A, Fazel N, Rakhshani H, Majnooni A. Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis and Mycoplasma genitalium in pregnant women of Sabzevar-Iran. Iran J Microbiol. 2011;3(3):123-8. [PubMed ID: 22347594]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3279818].
-
9.
Eslami G, Goudarzi H, Taheripanah R, Taheri S, Fallah F, Moazzami B, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis detection by nested-pcr method on females referred to medical centers of Tehran, Iran. Arch Clin Infect Dis. 2012;7(4):124-7. https://doi.org/10.5812/archcid.15087.
-
10.
Keane FE, Thomas BJ, Gilroy CB, Renton A, Taylor-Robinson D. The association of Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma genitalium with bacterial vaginosis: Observations on heterosexual women and their male partners. Int J STD AIDS. 2000;11(6):356-60. [PubMed ID: 10872907]. https://doi.org/10.1258/0956462001916056.
-
11.
Zheng BJ, Yin YP, Han Y, Shi MQ, Jiang N, Xiang Z, et al. The prevalence of urethral and rectal Mycoplasma genitalium among men who have sex with men in China, a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:195. [PubMed ID: 24559387]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3938087]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-195.
-
12.
Bjartling C, Osser S, Persson K. Mycoplasma genitalium in cervicitis and pelvic inflammatory disease among women at a gynecologic outpatient service. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(6):476 e1-8. [PubMed ID: 22483084]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.036.
-
13.
Hitti J, Garcia P, Totten P, Paul K, Astete S, Holmes KK. Correlates of cervical Mycoplasma genitalium and risk of preterm birth among Peruvian women. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(2):81-5. [PubMed ID: 20051932]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4623580]. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181bf5441.
-
14.
Domeika M, Litvinenko I, Smirnova T, Gaivaronskaya O, Savicheva A, Sokolovskiy E, et al. Laboratory diagnostics for non-viral sexually transmitted infections in St. Petersburg, Russia: Current situation and hallmarks for improvements. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2008;22(9):1094-100. [PubMed ID: 18410333]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02739.x.
-
15.
Ahmadi A, Khodabandehloo M, Ramazanzadeh R, Farhadifar F, Nikkhoo B, Soofizade N, et al. Association between Ureaplasma urealyticum endocervical infection and spontaneous abortion. Iran J Microbiol. 2014;6(6):392-7. [PubMed ID: 25926956]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4411424].
-
16.
Bjartling C, Osser S, Persson K. The association between Mycoplasma genitalium and pelvic inflammatory disease after termination of pregnancy. BJOG. 2010;117(3):361-4. [PubMed ID: 20015303]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02455.x.
-
17.
Haggerty CL, Totten PA, Astete SG, Ness RB. Mycoplasma genitalium among women with nongonococcal, nonchlamydial pelvic inflammatory disease. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2006;2006:30184. [PubMed ID: 17485798]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1581464]. https://doi.org/10.1155/IDOG/2006/30184.
-
18.
Manhart LE, Holmes KK, Hughes JP, Houston LS, Totten PA. Mycoplasma genitalium among young adults in the United States: An emerging sexually transmitted infection. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(6):1118-25. [PubMed ID: 17463380]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1874220]. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.074062.
-
19.
Wesbonk J, Chmiel C, Rosemann T, Seidenberg A, Senn O. Prevalence and determinants of sexually transmitted infections in women at risk undergoing abortion in a Swiss primary care setting. Praxis (Bern 1994). 2014;103(15):875-82. [PubMed ID: 25051930]. https://doi.org/10.1024/1661-8157/a001724.
-
20.
Lawton BA, Rose SB, Bromhead C, Gaitanos LA, MacDonald EJ, Lund KA. High prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in women presenting for termination of pregnancy. Contraception. 2008;77(4):294-8. [PubMed ID: 18342654]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2007.12.002.
-
21.
Magon T, Kluz S, Chrusciel A, Obrzut B, Skret A. The PCR assessed prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis in aborted tissues. Med Wieku Rozwoj. 2005;9(1):43-8. [PubMed ID: 16082064].
-
22.
Abdul-Karim ET, Abdul-Muhymen N, Al-Saadie M. Chlamydia trachomatis and rubella antibodies in women with full-term deliveries and women with abortion in Baghdad. East Mediterr Health J. 2009;15(6):1407-11. [PubMed ID: 20218131].
-
23.
Mohseni R, Sadeghi F, Miri NM, Eghbali M, Dezhkame S, Ghane M. A study on the frequency of vaginal species of Mycoplasma genitalium, Gardnerella vaginalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae among pregnant women by PCR technique. Int J Molecul Clin Microbiol. 2013.
-
24.
Choi Y, Roh J. Cervical cytopathological findings in Korean women with Chlamydia trachomatis, Mycoplasma hominis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum infections. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:756713. [PubMed ID: 24526918]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3910385]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/756713.
-
25.
Alfarraj DA, Somily AM, Alssum RM, Abotalib ZM, El-Sayed AA, Al-Mandeel HH. The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection among Saudi women attending the infertility clinic in Central Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J. 2015;36(1):61-6. [PubMed ID: 25630006]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4362201]. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.1.9967.
-
26.
Shimano S, Nishikawa A, Sonoda T, Kudo R. Analysis of the prevalence of bacterial vaginosis and Chlamydia trachomatis infection in 6083 pregnant women at a hospital in Otaru, Japan. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2004;30(3):230-6. [PubMed ID: 15210049]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-0756.2004.00181.x.
-
27.
Sohrabi A, Samarbafzadeh A, Makvandi M, Maraghi S, Razi T, Darban D. [A seroepidemiological study of Parvovirus B19, Toxoplasma gondii and Chlamydia trachomatis in pregnant women referring to Obs and Gyn ward of Ahwaz Imam Khomeini Hospital]. J Reproduction Infertility. 2007;8(2). Persian.
-
28.
Jahromi AS, Farjam MR, Mogharrab F, Amiryan M, Makiani MJ, Madani A, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis in women with ful-term deliveries and women with abortion. Am J Infect Dis. 2010;6(3):66-9. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajidsp.2010.66.69.
-
29.
Khezerdoust S, Haghollahi F, Roostaie S, Badami N, Naghizadeh MM, Jafarabadi M. [Chlamydia trachomatis infection in pregnant women]. J Reproduct Infertility. 2009;10(2). Persian.
-
30.
Baczynska A, Hvid M, Lamy P, Birkelund S, Christiansen G, Fedder J. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium, Mycoplasma hominis and Chlamydia trachomatis among Danish patients requesting abortion. Syst Biol Reprod Med. 2008;54(3):127-34. [PubMed ID: 18570048]. https://doi.org/10.1080/19396360802042838.
-
31.
Ramazanzadeh R, Khodabandehloo M, Farhadifar F, Rouhi S, Ahmadi A, Menbari S, et al. A Case-control Study on the Relationship between Mycoplasma genitalium Infection in Women with Normal Pregnancy and Spontaneous Abortion using Polymerase Chain Reaction. Osong Public Health Res Perspect. 2016;7(5):334-8. [PubMed ID: 27812493]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5079204]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrp.2016.07.001.
-
32.
Short VL, Jensen JS, Nelson DB, Murray PJ, Ness RB, Haggerty CL. Mycoplasma genitalium among young, urban pregnant women. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2010;2010:984760. [PubMed ID: 20379360]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2850137]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/984760.
-
33.
Oakeshott P, Hay P, Taylor-Robinson D, Hay S, Dohn B, Kerry S, et al. Prevalence of Mycoplasma genitalium in early pregnancy and relationship between its presence and pregnancy outcome. BJOG. 2004;111(12):1464-7. [PubMed ID: 15663138].
-
34.
Ye LL, Zhang BY, Cao WL. [Relationship between the endocervical mycoplasma infection and spontaneous abortion due to early embryonic death]. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2004;39(2):83-5. [PubMed ID: 15059581].
-
35.
Sobouti B, Fallah S, Mobayen M, Noorbakhsh S, Ghavami Y. Colonization of Mycoplasma hominis and Ureaplasma urealyticum in pregnant women and their transmission to offspring. Iran J Microbiol. 2014;6(4):219-24. [PubMed ID: 25802703]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4367936].
-
36.
Kwak DW, Hwang HS, Kwon JY, Park YW, Kim YH. Co-infection with vaginal Ureaplasma urealyticum and Mycoplasma hominis increases adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(4):333-7. [PubMed ID: 23796000]. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2013.818124.
-
37.
Hancock EB, Manhart LE, Nelson SJ, Kerani R, Wroblewski JK, Totten PA. Comprehensive assessment of sociodemographic and behavioral risk factors for Mycoplasma genitalium infection in women. Sex Transm Dis. 2010;37(12):777-83. [PubMed ID: 20679963]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4628821]. https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181e8087e.
-
38.
Manhart LE, Critchlow CW, Holmes KK, Dutro SM, Eschenbach DA, Stevens CE, et al. Mucopurulent cervicitis and Mycoplasma genitalium. J Infect Dis. 2003;187(4):650-7. [PubMed ID: 12599082]. https://doi.org/10.1086/367992.
-
39.
Schachter J, McCormack WM, Chernesky MA, Martin DH, Van Der Pol B, Rice PA, et al. Vaginal swabs are appropriate specimens for diagnosis of genital tract infection with Chlamydia trachomatis. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(8):3784-9. [PubMed ID: 12904390]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC179798].