https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.102631

Non-Surgical Management and Post-Surgical Rehabilitation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Algorithmic Approach and Practical Guideline

authors:

avatar Mahshid Nazarieh 1 , avatar Azadeh Hakakzadeh 1 , avatar Shima Ghannadi 1 , avatar Faezeh Maleklou 1 , avatar Zahra Tavakol 1 , avatar Zahra Alizadeh 1 , *

Sports Medicine Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine: Vol.11, issue 3; e102631
published online: July 26, 2020
article type: Review Article
received: March 29, 2020
revised: May 2, 2020
accepted: May 13, 2020

how to cite: Nazarieh M, Hakakzadeh A, Ghannadi S, Maleklou F, Tavakol Z, et al. Non-Surgical Management and Post-Surgical Rehabilitation of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: An Algorithmic Approach and Practical Guideline. Asian J Sports Med. 2020;11(3):e102631. https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.102631.

Abstract

One of the most common forms of entrapment neuropathy is Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS). There are various treatment options for CTS. However, there are no clear and structured guidelines. This review classified the existing treatments and developed an algorithm to help physicians to choose the best option for their patients. Treatment options were summarized in three sections: non-surgical management of CTS, post-operative management of CTS, and practical open carpal tunnel release post-op protocol. The physicians can prescribe multiple treatment options to CTS patients. Corticosteroid in oral or injectable form has strong evidence in pain control and functional improvement in the short term. Shockwave therapy and nocturnal wrist splints display moderate therapeutic effects. Post carpal tunnel release rehabilitation can be started a few days after the operation.

1. Context

One of the most common forms of entrapment neuropathy in the general population and athletes is Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) (1). The prevalence of CTS is around 5% and 2% among adult women and men, respectively (2). In athletes, CTS is especially very common in sporting activities with repetitive wrist movements or vibration and heavy manual weights such as swimming, moto-cross-riding, and body-building (3). Various treatment options are available for management of CTS, and in persistent pain and dysfunction, carpal tunnel release is done. However, due to the lack of appropriate rehabilitation, pain and dysfunction could persist after the operation. The purpose of the present review was to classify the existing non-surgical treatments in the literature, such as ergonomic modifications, exercise therapy, physiotherapy, medications, immobilization, taping and bracing, injections, and acupuncture. In addition, post-surgery management and rehabilitation methods were summarized. The available treatment options were summarized and categorized in three sections (1) non-surgical managements of CTS (summarized in Figure 1), (2) post-operative management of CTS and (3) practical open carpal tunnel release post-op protocol.

Non-surgical treatments of CTS.
Non-surgical treatments of CTS.
Figure 1.

Non-surgical treatments of CTS.

2. Non-Surgical Management of CTS

2.1. Ergonomic Modifications

Although a plethora of conservative treatments are used for CTS, patients’ education and modification of incorrect positions should be considered as the first line of management by specialists. Patients can reduce their symptoms by changing their wrong ergonomic position as well as using ergonomically corrective tools. In order to treat CTS, ergonomic positioning or equipment intend to position the wrist in a neutral position and to prevent prolonged positioning of the wrist in flexion or extension where the median nerve passage is at its most capacious (4). However, studies on the efficacy of ergonomic treatments are few (5-8). A study by Annina et al., demonstrates that ergonomic mouse pads and a vertical mouse change wrist position but do not decrease CTS (9). Based on a recent Cochrane review, there is no strong evidence for using (or non-using) of ergonomic keyboards for the treatment of CTS (10). Overall, due to the lack of sufficient data from randomized controlled trials on the beneficial or detrimental effects of ergonomic treatment on CTS, no conclusions are made, and the choice of ergonomic tools is an individual preference.

2.2. Exercise Therapy

Exercise is recommended for mild to moderate cases of CTS or those waiting for surgery (11-15). Exercise decreases intracarpal pressure and inflammation and improves venous return by lowering edema and adhesions (12, 15, 16). However, studies on the impact of exercise therapy in CTS are limited. Moreover, a Cochrane review highlighted the poor quality of existing studies and concluded that exercise does not have any superiority over other non-surgical treatments. Moreover, exercise doesn’t resolve the need for operative interventions (15). However, several studies recommend that exercise in combination with other methods for short time pain relief in a specialized center under clinical observation may be beneficial (12-17). The most common exercises which are used for CTS, are median nerve glide mobilization and tendon glide. The recommended regimens, such as stretching and soft tissue exercises, should be performed one to five times per day with 5 - 10 repetitions (Figures 2-4). Nerve gliding exercises should be combined with adjacent joints mobilization to increase decompression of the nerve bed. A cautionary note is that the suggested exercises should be done in a manner that does not cause symptoms or increase tension on the nerve (11, 12, 18-21).

Totten and Hunter nerve gliding exercises (11) (A-F): “(A) wrist in neutral, fingers and thumb in flexion; (B) wrist in neutral, fingers and thumb extended; (C) wrist and fingers extended, thumb in neutral; (D) wrist, fingers, and thumbs extended; (E) as in (D) with the forearm in supination; (F) as in (E) with gentle stretch of thumb”.
Totten and Hunter nerve gliding exercises (11) (A-F): “(A) wrist in neutral, fingers and thumb in flexion; (B) wrist in neutral, fingers and thumb extended; (C) wrist and fingers extended, thumb in neutral; (D) wrist, fingers, and thumbs extended; (E) as in (D) with the forearm in supination; (F) as in (E) with gentle stretch of thumb”.
Figure 2.

Totten and Hunter nerve gliding exercises (11) (A-F): “(A) wrist in neutral, fingers and thumb in flexion; (B) wrist in neutral, fingers and thumb extended; (C) wrist and fingers extended, thumb in neutral; (D) wrist, fingers, and thumbs extended; (E) as in (D) with the forearm in supination; (F) as in (E) with gentle stretch of thumb”.

(1-5) Tendon gliding exercises. (1) straight; (2) straight fist; (3) table top; (4) fist; (5) hook.
(1-5) Tendon gliding exercises. (1) straight; (2) straight fist; (3) table top; (4) fist; (5) hook.
Figure 3.

(1-5) Tendon gliding exercises. (1) straight; (2) straight fist; (3) table top; (4) fist; (5) hook.

Illustration of the six different mobilization techniques (11): “(A) sliding technique; (B) tensioning technique; (C) wrist motion with the elbow in flexion; (D) wrist motion with elbow in extension; (E) elbow motion with wrist in neutral; (F) elbow motion with the wrist in extension. The number 1 illustrates the starting position, and the number 2 illustrates the ending position. The techniques consisted of repeated movements between the starting and end position.”
Illustration of the six different mobilization techniques (11): “(A) sliding technique; (B) tensioning technique; (C) wrist motion with the elbow in flexion; (D) wrist motion with elbow in extension; (E) elbow motion with wrist in neutral; (F) elbow motion with the wrist in extension. The number 1 illustrates the starting position, and the number 2 illustrates the ending position. The techniques consisted of repeated movements between the starting and end position.”
Figure 4.

Illustration of the six different mobilization techniques (11): “(A) sliding technique; (B) tensioning technique; (C) wrist motion with the elbow in flexion; (D) wrist motion with elbow in extension; (E) elbow motion with wrist in neutral; (F) elbow motion with the wrist in extension. The number 1 illustrates the starting position, and the number 2 illustrates the ending position. The techniques consisted of repeated movements between the starting and end position.”

2.3. Physiotherapy

A variety of different physiotherapy modalities such as ultrasound, magnet, and shockwave therapy are used for the treatment of CTS and are summarized below.

2.3.1. Therapeutic Ultrasound

According to a Cochrane review, the quality of evidence in comparing therapeutic US with placebo is poor in the short or long-term (22). In the field of comparing different types of therapeutic ultrasound, or comparing US with non-surgical interventions (such as exercise programs, oral drugs, etc.) for CTS treatment, there is insufficient evidence (22). Few studies reported no adverse effect of US (23-25).

2.3.2. Low-Level Laser Therapy

Low-level laser therapy is an alternative for other non-surgical treatments of CTS. However, according to the recent Cochran review, low-level laser therapy studies have poor quality and have little effect in treating CTS (26). Moreover, one study reported harmful laser therapy for CTS (27). Consequently, more data is required before any conclusions on the safety and efficacy of low-level laser therapy can be made.

2.3.3. Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT)

There is moderate evidence for using radial ESWT versus placebo for short or long-term symptom relief in people with CTS (28, 29). On the other hand, there is no evidence for the short term effectiveness of ESWT versus a nutraceutical intervention or for the efficacy of short and midterm efficacy of ESWT versus a steroid injection (30).

2.3.4. Magnet Therapy

There are insufficient data to support the short term, midterm or long-term effectiveness of different types of magnet therapy (e.g., dynamic, static, or pulsed) versus placebo treatment (31-33). A comparative study in 38 CTS patients showed no effect of the magnetic field when compared to placebo on the symptoms of idiopathic CTS (34).

2.4. Medications

2.4.1. NSAID

There is no evidence on the efficacy of NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) on CTS symptoms when compared to placebo or the use of diuretics in the short term (35, 36).

2.4.2. Oral Steroid

There is strong evidence that short term use of oral steroids is more effective than a placebo (37). However, the therapeutic benefits of long-term use of steroids remains unknown (38-40). In some studies, short term oral steroid use was more beneficial than splinting the wrist for treating CTS (41).

2.4.3. Gabapentin

No evidence was found to support the therapeutic benefit of gabapentin (100 and 300 mg) compared to placebo (42), and there is limited evidence for its use as an additive to splinting in the short term (43).

2.5. Immobilization, Bracing, and Taping

2.5.1. Wrist Splint in a Neutral Position

The most common non-surgical treatment is wrist splint prescription, typically at night, and sometimes combined with other treatment modalities (2). The treatment of CTS with wrist splint has been compared with non-surgical treatments such as steroid injection or stretching exercises, in some randomized trials. Studies concluded a better clinical outcome in patients with mild to moderate CTS with a single steroid injection in primary care when compared to night splinting (2, 44-46). Concurrent application of splinting and nerve tendon glides was not more effective than splinting alone (47). On the other hand, a combination of splints and stretch exercises on lumbrical muscles was more effective than splints alone (33, 48, 49). In sum, the clinical effect of splinting or efficacy in comparison with other interventions for CTS treatment was supported only with limited evidence (50).

2.5.2. Nocturnal Wrist Splints

Results from several placebo-controlled studies favor the use of a nocturnal hand brace on symptom relief, hand function, and overall improvement during a 4-week follow-up (2, 44). Based on systematic reviews done so far, in the short-term use of nocturnal hand wrist splints as a therapy for the treatment of patients with CTS, there is moderate evidence. However, in the long-term, there is limited evidence (2, 51). Based on one RCT, steroid injection in local form caused further patient satisfaction and less analgesic use without more side effects in comparison with night splint (46, 52). Furthermore, there is no report for the superiority of using a full-time wrist splint in comparison to night splint in the treatment of CTS in the short term (51). It is concluded that a night splint is a valid treatment option, especially in patients not using medications.

2.5.3. Kinesiotaping

Today, Kinesio taping (KT) has become popular for several forms of musculoskeletal pain such as knee pain and shoulder pain (53, 54). By either inhibition or facilitation of the primary pathology, it provides support and protection to the intended muscle by allowing an efficient and safe range of motion (55, 56). Cochrane reviews related to KT in CTS patients but based on RCTs done so far are lacking. Pain improvement was noted with the KT application, but the best technique remains to be defined. Overall, there is limited evidence in favor of KT application for CTS patients (54).

2.6. Injection

Infiltrations have been studied and shown to cure symptoms, function, and patients’ perception of their wrist pain in CTS (47, 57, 58). The most commonly infiltrated drugs are prednisolone, methylprednisolone, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, triamcinolone acetonide, methylprednisolone acetate, and diclofenac diethyl ammonium (51, 59). The therapeutic effects of NSAID injections of carpal tunnel with lidocaine, ozone, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), and dextrose water (DW) have been reported; however, the best doses and protocols for short-term prescription are still unknown (2, 47, 57, 60, 61).

2.6.1. Local Corticosteroid Injection

A clinical practice guideline published by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) in 2009 indicated that corticosteroid injections cause significant symptom relief in CTS. However, improvement in symptoms did not persist (17, 58, 62, 63). Local injection of corticosteroid for a month in CTS patients provides greater clinical symptom relief when compared to placebo (45, 52). Longer treatments, however, are not effective (48). In a recent review of clinical trials, injection and night splinting are superior to only night splinting in mild or moderate CTS (45, 46). Corticosteroid injection produces the most rapid response option for relieving the symptoms (47).

2.6.2. Local Non-Steroidal Injection

According to a recent clinical trial, injection of lidocaine and normal saline in the carpal tunnel is as effective as low or high dose steroid medication in elderly patients with CTS (64). Multiple local injections of lidocaine were superior to a single injection in significant symptom reduction and electrophysiological improvement. Injection of DW exhibited a significant reduction in pain and disability through the 4th to the 6th month, (60). However, more research is needed to make a conclusion about the effectiveness of DW. In elderly patients, non-steroid injections may be a better option due to fewer adverse effects; however, further studies are needed.

2.6.3. Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection to the injured tissue with a high concentration of autologous growth factors enhances the self-healing ability of the body (65). Limited studies support the efficacy of PRP treatment in CTS. For example, a single perineural PRP injection into the carpal tunnel improved CTS symptoms (66). Malahias et al. showed very encouraging mid-term results (12 weeks) regarding the use of PRP for treatment in CTS patients (67). A single dose of PRP injection improves the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score in CTS patients (67). Results of another high-quality RCT concluded that PRP injection in a single dose was significantly superior to local corticosteroid injection. Study outcomes were the improvement of the VAS pain score and functional domains at short and midterm follow-ups (68). Although the vast majority of the research so far confirmed that PRP improved the clinical outcomes of the patients and that PRP injection was useful for patients with mild-to-moderate CTS, the efficacy of PRP injection in CTS patients requires further clinical investigations (65, 69).

2.6.4. Ozone Injection

Recent studies have recommended local ozone therapy in some musculoskeletal conditions (70, 71). Rascaroli et al. showed that neurophysiological and functional parameters after O2-O3 treatment were improved significantly more than the motor and sensory nerve conduction parameters (72). The best clinical improvements were found in mild and moderate CTS groups (72). Although ozone therapy is a safe and low-cost method with some promising outcomes in patients with mild to moderate CTS, at least for short-term (70), further studies are needed in the future.

2.7. Acupuncture

There is little or no effect of acupuncture or laser acupuncture on the symptoms of CTS in the short term (3 months or less) when compared with placebo according to a Cochran review (73). It is unclear whether acupuncture is more or less effective in improving symptoms of CTS than other treatments such as nerve blocks alonside corticosteroids, oral drugs, or supplements such as corticosteroid, ibuprofen, vitamin B12, and other treatments such as splints (73). Acupuncture, however, was not associated with serious adverse events. Minor complications such as discomfort, pain, local paresthesia, and temporary skin bruises were reported (73). Common protocols involve Daling (PC7) and Neiguan (PC6) as primary acupoints (74).

3. Post-Operative Management of CTS

There is no consensus concerning clinical practice intervention and rehabilitation protocol used by therapists after carpal tunnel release (CTR). Additional studies with a larger sample size and greater power are required to distinguish statistically significant differences between interventions and determine the effects of different rehabilitation programs (75). A Cochrane review from the results of 22 trials with 1521 patients which compared different rehabilitation measures after surgery such as splint application, dressing, local treatment with cold and ice, exercise, applying a mixture of multiple rehabilitation therapies, laser, electricity, desensitization of the scar, and Arnica concluded that there were limited data with poor quality regarding the efficacy of these therapeutic measures as well as limited safety. Types of surgical intervention in the review were endoscopic (single or double portal); open; minimal-incision open (more common); and some other carpal tunnel surgery (including secondary procedures, such as epineurotomy, internal neurolysis, synovectomy or reconstruction of the transverse carpal ligament). The period of treatment ranged from 48 hours to 6 weeks. A summary comparing treatment methods is reviewed below. All studies show limited efficacy. However, the quality of experimental designs is poor (76).

3.1. Low-Level Laser Therapy

In a study between two groups (low-level laser therapy vs. sham therapy) no statistically significant differences were noted in numbness or palmar pain at three months and scar pain and pillar pain at six months follow up post-surgery (77).

3.2. Immobilization, Orthosis

Comparison between wrist immobilization with the orthosis and bulky dressing showed that there is no significant benefit on grip strength (kg), pinch strength, function, pain severity, the incidence of scar tenderness, or pillar pain (78-80).

3.3. Immobilization Versus Mobilization

In a study, the use of volar orthosis with the wrist in neutral position in addition to bulky dressing vs. light bandage dressing for 48 hr post-surgery, showed no significant difference in pain score, swelling, scar pain, excessive scaring, pillar pain, and neurophysiological parameters (81).

In addition, short and long period dressings showed no significant differences in functional improvement and symptom severity (79, 82, 83). Limited studies indicate that shorter post-operative dressing is associated with better grip strength (82, 83).

3.4. Elevation

In a study, home elevation device (with a Bradford sling intervention held over at night) and crepe sling in ambulatory position for five days after surgery was compared with standard care. There was no significant difference in pain score and swelling (84).

3.5. Ice Therapy

Ice therapy was compared to controlled cold therapy (CCT) immediately after CTR among 72 patients after surgery for CTS. Pain, edema, and the need for narcotics were significantly reduced in the CCT group. The authors suggested that using CCT instead of conventional ice therapy in this condition may be advantageous (85).

3.6. Electrical Stimulation

Gordon et al. compared the electrical stimulation of the median nerve 30 min after CTR for one hour versus no treatment. Zero-point and three months after surgery nerve conduction (using motor and sensory nerve conduction latency) were determined. Although there was no significant change in latency among the control group, motor latency was considerably accelerated in the early phase in the stimulation group 3 months after surgery. On the other hand, recovery of conduction velocity was delayed in the control group compared to the stimulation group who showed early recovery at 3 months (84).

3.7. Bath, Exercise

For post-operative edema control immediately after CTR, there were no significant differences in swelling, among the patients who receive bath plus exercise and those receiving bath alone (86).

3.8. Exercise

No significant difference has been shown between multi-modal hand therapy (including range of motion and strengthening sessions with 30 min of nerve gliding, and further treatments such as massage, fluid therapy etc.), and formal therapy regarding pain score, grip strength (kg), return to work and adverse events. However, it is found that multi-modal hand therapy improves lateral pinch strength compared with formal therapy (87). Evaluation of a multi‐modal hand rehabilitation program benefits (10 sessions of intervention such as soft tissue mobilization, scar massage, nerve gliding, and grip and pinch exercises, etc.), compared to a progressive patient‐directed home exercise training, showed no significant difference in the occurrence of CTS symptoms (e.g. pain, numbness, and paresthesia) (88).

3.9. Physiotherapy and Exercise Therapy

No significant difference was reported in the occurrence of CTS symptoms, functional ability, and grip or pinch strength between the multi‐modal hand treatment (physiotherapy) group and the home exercise group (76, 87).

Ultrasound and laser therapy improve some symptoms of CTS, including pain, numbness, and paresthesia. However, ultrasound and laser procedures are favored over the exercise groups; and ultrasound and laser groups are equally effective. Investigators reported improvement in pinch strength with ultrasound, laser, and exercise therapy. (89).

Nerve and tendon gliding exercises alone or plus laser or ultrasound therapy were evaluated. There was a significant improvement after treatment in all groups, and combined groups showed significant improvement compared to the exercise therapy group (89). According to the GRADE approach, the overall quality of evidence in this field was moderated (76, 90).

4. Open Carpal Tunnel Release Post-Operative Management and Rehabilitation Protocol

Several post-operative protocols have been used in CTS patients, some based on surgeons’ experience and others developed by specialized hospitals. The authors summarized the evidence and recommended a step by step post-op education and rehabilitation protocol in Table 1. However, post-operative rehabilitation is not supported by national medical insurance in some countries such as France. Therefore, surgeons could educate their patients for post-operative exercises and other care by prepared pamphlets under the guidance of Table 1.

Table 1.

Open Carpal Tunnel Release Post-Operative Management and Rehabilitation Protocol

Post-Operative TimeGeneral RecommendationsPatient EducationsHome ExercisesGoals
3rd-5th day (1st visit)Remove post-op dressing after 5 days, wound check (91); Usage of the sterile and dry dressing over incision at all times till suture removal; Assess finger mobility (91, 92).Explain the patient to take care of the suture site, and edema control; Patient’s education about ROM of the fingers without wrist flexion and extension; Wear the splint at all times except for exercises until the 2nd visit; Avoid bending the operated wrist forward until 2 weeks post operation, the splint will help with this; Do not perform heavy lifting, gripping or grasping at this time (91, 93, 94).Gentle thumb flexion, extension, and opposition, AROM exercises, as well as elbow and shoulder AROM exercises, 10 reps, 3 - 5 times/day (91, 94-96).Pain reduction; Control of edema (91, 92, 94).
10-12th day (2nd visit) A surgical follow-up; Sutures can be removed from 10 days up to 3 weeks after surgery (according to the hand surgeon) (91, 96); Change sterile dressing (91).Learn patients to keeping hand clean and dry until 2 weeks post-op (91, 93); Continue to use a splint and re-educate about no heavy lifting (91); Symptoms oftentimes resolve quickly after surgery, exception for the numbness that may take time to resolve (94).Similar to the previous stage.Pain reduction; Control of edema (91, 92, 94).
5th day-3rd weekTherapy Visit; Usage the modalities such as ultrasound; Ensure proper wound healing and scar mobility (94); Start desensitization as needed (wound softening, massage and desensitization, at least 5 - 10 minutes, 5 times/day); Start control of edema, elevation, massage, whirlpool, hand fisting with the overhead position, 10 times/hour to prevent swelling; Wear a splint at night for a total of 6 weeks following surgery (91, 92, 97).Similar to the previous stage.Start the gentle active wrist flexion and extension (10 reps, 3 - 5 times/day); Continue of thumb flexion, extension and opposition AROM exercises, in addition to shoulder and elbow AROM exercises (10 reps, 3 - 5 times/day); Do tendon-gliding exercises (complete series of fists 10 repetitions, 5 times/day) (91, 93, 94, 96).Achievement of full PROM and AROM in the fingers and wrist; Pain reduction; Control of edema (91, 93).
3rd-5th week If there is prolonged paresthesia or hypersensitivity, add a program for desensitization such as different textures, pulsed US, topical ointments; If excessive edema persists, may try an isotone glove, or Coban wrapping for compression (93).Massage the scar with cream for 5 minutes 5 times/day; Decrease the scar sensitivity and flatten it by use of moderately deep pressure; For scar flattening/softening wearing the silicone scar pad once the scar has closed, usage Us, mild cross-friction massage and scar pump as needed (93); Wash the wound each morning with soap and water, and dry it (93); Wear the splint at night, as needed for support, till 6 weeks post-operation; Try a gradual return to activities without pain (Begin gentle activities of daily living) (91).Nerve Gliding Exercises (5 Rep/5 times/day –with holding each position 10 seconds) (91); Gentle composite hand/wrist extension (light exercises against resistance) (93).Gradually return to activities (91, 93)
5-6th weekThe patients with poor outcomes where symptoms persist (or other problems such as persistent hypersensitivity or Complex Regional Pain Syndrome) may require longer rehabilitation program, with a gentle progression (consult a surgeon if necessary) (93, 94).Do not start squeezing hand-immobile objects (e.g. tennis ball) (93).Start on a gradual hand grip-strengthening program (repeated 5 times/day), with Thera-putty, power web, etc. Progress strength exercises as the patient tolerate; Add wrist curl with graded weight in multi-direction (flexion, extension, supination, pronation, radial, and ulnar deviation); Use biceps curl and shoulder strengthening trainings if have a weakness (94-97).-Return to full AROM-PROM; Restore grip strengthening (93).
6-8th weekSimilar to the above.The patients can do lighter tasks (house cleaning and work tasks permitted) (93).Progress strengthening exercises as tolerated (93); Wrist curls with graded weight for flexion, extension, supination, pronation, and ulnar and radial deviation (93); Use biceps curls and shoulder strengthening exercises if they are weak (93).Restoration of wrist power (93).
8-12th weeksReturn to work after 8 weeks for sedentary jobs, 10 - 12 weeks for heavier jobs (93).

5. Conclusion

Physicians can prescribe multiple treatment options to CTS patients. Only corticosteroids in oral or injectable form have strong therapeutic effects in pain control, functional improvement in the short term, and some methods have moderate evidence such as shockwave therapy, and nocturnal wrist splints. Post carpal tunnel release rehabilitation can be started a few days after the operation.

References

  • 1.

    Zamborsky R, Kokavec M, Simko L, Bohac M. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Symptoms, Causes and Treatment Options. Literature Reviev. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2017;19(1):1-8. [PubMed ID: 28436376]. https://doi.org/10.5604/15093492.1232629.

  • 2.

    Atroshi I, Tadjerbashi K, McCabe SJ, Ranstam J. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome with wrist splinting: study protocol for a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Trials. 2019;20(1):531. [PubMed ID: 31455398]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6712840]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-019-3635-6.

  • 3.

    Mauer UM, Rath SA. [Stress-induced carpal tunnel syndrome in athletes--exemplified by 3 kinds of sports]. Schweiz Z Sportmed. 1992;40(3):131-5. German. [PubMed ID: 1329198].

  • 4.

    Hagberg M, Morgenstern H, Kelsh M. Impact of occupations and job tasks on the prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1992;18(6):337-45. [PubMed ID: 1485158]. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1564.

  • 5.

    Rempel D, Tittiranonda P, Burastero S, Hudes M, So Y. Effect of keyboard keyswitch design on hand pain. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine. 1999;41(2):111-9.

  • 6.

    Tittiranonda P, Rempel D, Armstrong T, Burastero S. Effect of four computer keyboards in computer users with upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. American journal of industrial medicine. 1999;35(6):647-61.

  • 7.

    Keir PJ, Bach JM, Rempel D. Effects of computer mouse design and task on carpal tunnel pressure. Ergonomics. 1999;42(10):1350-60. [PubMed ID: 10582504]. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401399184992.

  • 8.

    Fagarasanu M, Kumar SH. Carpal tunnel syndrome due to keyboarding and mouse tasks: a review. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics,. 2003;13(2):119-36.

  • 9.

    Schmid AB, Kubler PA, Johnston V, Coppieters MW. A vertical mouse and ergonomic mouse pads alter wrist position but do not reduce carpal tunnel pressure in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Appl Ergon. 2015;47:151-6. [PubMed ID: 25479984]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.020.

  • 10.

    O'Connor D, Page MJ, Marshall SC, Massy‐Westropp N. Ergonomic positioning or equipment for treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012;(1).

  • 11.

    Coppieters MW, Alshami AM. Longitudinal excursion and strain in the median nerve during novel nerve gliding exercises for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Res. 2007;25(7):972-80. [PubMed ID: 17415752]. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.20310.

  • 12.

    Lewis KJ, Ross L, Coppieters MW, Vicenzino B, Schmid AB. Education, night splinting and exercise versus usual care on recovery and conversion to surgery for people awaiting carpal tunnel surgery: a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2016;6(9). e012053. [PubMed ID: 27638495]. [PubMed Central ID: PMCPmc5051399]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012053.

  • 13.

    Middleton SD, Anakwe RE. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Bmj. 2014;349:g6437. [PubMed ID: 25378457]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g6437.

  • 14.

    [No Author Listed]. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Summary of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations-Using the Evidence to Guide Physical Therapist Practice. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019;49(5):359-60. [PubMed ID: 31039688]. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2019.0501.

  • 15.

    Page MJ, O'Connor D, Pitt V, Massy-Westropp N. Exercise and mobilisation interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(6):Cd009899. [PubMed ID: 22696387]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009899.

  • 16.

    Ballestero-Perez R, Plaza-Manzano G, Urraca-Gesto A, Romo-Romo F, Atin-Arratibel MLA, Pecos-Martin D, et al. Effectiveness of Nerve Gliding Exercises on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2017;40(1):50-9. [PubMed ID: 27842937]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.10.004.

  • 17.

    Keith MW, Masear V, Chung KC, Amadio PC, Andary M, Barth RW, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guideline on the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(1):218-9. [PubMed ID: 20048116]. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.i.00642.

  • 18.

    Zidkova V, Nakladalova M, Stepanek L. Effects of Exercise and Enzyme Therapy in Early Occupational Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Preliminary Study. BioMed research international. 2019;2019:8720493. [PubMed ID: 30809548]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8720493.

  • 19.

    Wehbe MA, Hunter JM. Flexor tendon gliding in the hand. Part II. Differential gliding. J Hand Surg Am. 1985;10(4):575-9. [PubMed ID: 4020073]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0363-5023(85)80086-1.

  • 20.

    Lim YH, Chee DY, Girdler S, Lee HC. Median nerve mobilization techniques in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review. J Hand Ther. 2017;30(4):397-406. [PubMed ID: 28764878]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2017.06.019.

  • 21.

    Sim SE, Gunasagaran J, Goh KJ, Ahmad TS. Short-term clinical outcome of orthosis alone vs combination of orthosis, nerve, and tendon gliding exercises and ultrasound therapy for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Ther. 2018. [PubMed ID: 29426574]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2018.01.004.

  • 22.

    Page MJ, O'Connor D, Pitt V, Massy‐Westropp N. Therapeutic ultrasound for carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2013;(3).

  • 23.

    Ebenbichler GR, Resch KL, Nicolakis P, Wiesinger GF, Uhl F, Ghanem A, et al. Ultrasound treatment for treating the carpal tunnel syndrome: randomised “sham” controlled trial. Bmj. 1998;316(7133):731-5.

  • 24.

    Bilgici A, Ulusoy H, Kuru O, Canturk F. The comparison of ultrasound treatment and local steroid injection plus splinting in the carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. Bratislavske lekarske listy. 2010;111(12):659-65.

  • 25.

    Yildiz N, Atalay NS, Gungen GO, Sanal E, Akkaya N, Topuz O. Comparison of ultrasound and ketoprofen phonophoresis in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation. 2011;24(1):39-47.

  • 26.

    Sargeant H, Rehman H, Gurusamy KS, Rankin IA. Low‐level laser therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2017;2017(8).

  • 27.

    Fusakul Y, Aranyavalai T, Saensri P, Thiengwittayaporn S. Low-level laser therapy with a wrist splint to treat carpal tunnel syndrome: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Lasers in medical science. 2014;29(3):1279-87.

  • 28.

    Seok H, Kim SH. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy vs. local steroid injection for management of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. 2013;92(4):327-34.

  • 29.

    Wu Y, Ke M, Chou Y, Chang C, Lin C, Li T, et al. Effect of radial shock wave therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: A prospective randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. 2016;34(6):977-84.

  • 30.

    Notarnicola A, Maccagnano G, Tafuri S, Fiore A, Pesce V, Moretti B. Comparison of shock wave therapy and nutraceutical composed of Echinacea angustifolia, alpha lipoic acid, conjugated linoleic acid and quercetin (perinerv) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology. 2015;28(2):256-62.

  • 31.

    Weintraub MI, Cole SP. A randomized controlled trial of the effects of a combination of static and dynamic magnetic fields on carpal tunnel syndrome. Pain Medicine. 2008;9(5):493-504.

  • 32.

    Colbert AP, Markov MS, Carlson N, Gregory WL, Carlson H, Elmer PJ. Static magnetic field therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a feasibility study. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2010;91(7):1098-104.

  • 33.

    Huisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Franke TP, Randsdorp MS, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome: effectiveness of physical therapy and electrophysical modalities. An updated systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2018;99(8):1623-1634. e23.

  • 34.

    Arıkan F, Yıldız A, Kesiktas N, Karan A, Akı S, Muslumanoglu L. The Effectiveness of Pulsed Magnetic Field Theraphy in Idiopathic Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Randomized, Double Blind, Sham Controlled Trial. Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Sciences/Fiziksel Tup ve Rehabilitasyon Bilimleri Dergisi. 2011;14(1).

  • 35.

    Chang MH, Chiang HT, Lee SS-J, Ger LP, Lo YK. Oral drug of choice in carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology. 1998;51(2):390-3.

  • 36.

    Pal B, Mangion P, Hossain MA, Wallace AS, Diffey BL. Should diuretics be prescribed for idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome? Results of a controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation. 1988;2(4):299-301.

  • 37.

    Huisstede BM, Randsdorp MS, van den Brink J, Franke TP, Koes BW, Hoogvliet P. Effectiveness of oral pain medication and corticosteroid injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2018;99(8):1609-1622. e10.

  • 38.

    Herskovitz S, Berger AR, Lipton RB. Low-dose, short-term oral prednisone in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology. 1995;45(10):1923-5.

  • 39.

    Chang MH, Ger LP, Hsieh PF, Huang SY. A randomised clinical trial of oral steroids in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a long term follow up. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 2002;73(6):710-4.

  • 40.

    Wong SM, Hui ACF, Tang A, Ho PC, Hung LK, Wong KS, et al. Local vs systemic corticosteroids in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neurology. 2001;56(11):1565-7.

  • 41.

    Mishra S, Prabhakar S, Lal V, Modi M, Das CP, Khurana D. Efficacy of splinting and oral steroids in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized clinical and electrophysiological study. Neurology India. 2006;54(3):286.

  • 42.

    Hui ACF, Wong SM, Leung HW, Man BL, Yu E, Wong LKS. Gabapentin for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. European journal of neurology. 2011;18(5):726-30.

  • 43.

    Eftekharsadat B, Babaei-Ghazani A, Habibzadeh A. The efficacy of 100 and 300 mg gabapentin in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Iranian journal of pharmaceutical research: IJPR. 2015;14(4):1275.

  • 44.

    De Angelis MV, Pierfelice F, Di Giovanni P, Staniscia T, Uncini A. Efficacy of a soft hand brace and a wrist splint for carpal tunnel syndrome: a randomized controlled study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;119(1):68-74. [PubMed ID: 18638040]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2008.01072.x.

  • 45.

    Atroshi I. Steroid injection or wrist splint for first-time carpal tunnel syndrome? Lancet. 2018;392(10156):1383-4. [PubMed ID: 30343850]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31929-9.

  • 46.

    So H, Chung VCH, Cheng JCK, Yip RML. Local steroid injection versus wrist splinting for carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Rheum Dis. 2018;21(1):102-7. [PubMed ID: 28901660]. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185x.13162.

  • 47.

    del Barrio SJ, Gracia EB, García CH, de Miguel EE, Moreno JT, Marco SR, et al. Conservative treatment in patients with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic review. Neurología (English Edition). 2018;33(9):590-601.

  • 48.

    Calandruccio JH, Thompson NB. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Making Evidence-Based Treatment Decisions. Orthop Clin North Am. 2018;49(2):223-9. [PubMed ID: 29499823]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2017.11.009.

  • 49.

    Wipperman J, Goerl K. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Management. Am Fam Physician. 2016;94(12):993-9. [PubMed ID: 28075090].

  • 50.

    Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(12):1273-84. [PubMed ID: 27751557]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(16)30231-9.

  • 51.

    Huisstede BM, Hoogvliet P, Randsdorp MS, Glerum S, van Middelkoop M, Koes BW. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Part I: effectiveness of nonsurgical treatments–a systematic review. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2010;91(7):981-1004.

  • 52.

    Stark H, Amirfeyz R. Cochrane corner: local corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2013;38(8):911-4. [PubMed ID: 24065747]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1753193413490848.

  • 53.

    Abolhasani M, Halabchi F, Afsharnia E, Moradi V, Ingle L, Shariat A, et al. Effects of kinesiotaping on knee osteoarthritis: a literature review. Journal of exercise rehabilitation. 2019;15(4):498.

  • 54.

    Külcü DG, Bursali C, Aktaş İ, Alp SB, Özkan FÜ, Akpinar P. Kinesiotaping as an alternative treatment method for carpal tunnel syndrome. Turkish journal of medical sciences. 2016;46(4):1042-9.

  • 55.

    Krause D, Ryan S, Krpalek D, Roll SC, Javaherian-Dysinger H, Daher N. Participants’ perceptions of Kinesio tape for carpal tunnel syndrome: A qualitative study. Hand Therapy. 2019:1758998319841600.

  • 56.

    Guner A, Altan L, Kasapoglu Aksoy M. The effectiveness of the low-power laser and kinesiotaping in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome, a pilot study. Rheumatol Int. 2018;38(5):895-904. [PubMed ID: 29594333]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-018-4020-6.

  • 57.

    Gokoglu F, Findikoglu G, Yorgancoglu ZR, Okumus M, Ceceli E, Kocaoglu S. Evaluation of iontophoresis and local corticosteroid injection in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84(2):92-6. [PubMed ID: 15668556]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.phm.0000151942.49031.dd.

  • 58.

    Armstrong T, Devor W, Borschel L, Contreras R. Intracarpal steroid injection is safe and effective for short-term management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Muscle Nerve. 2004;29(1):82-8. [PubMed ID: 14694502]. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10512.

  • 59.

    Boyer MI. Corticosteroid injection for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2008;33(8):1414-6. [PubMed ID: 18929212]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2008.06.023.

  • 60.

    Wu YT, Ke MJ, Ho TY, Li TY, Shen YP, Chen LC. Randomized double-blinded clinical trial of 5% dextrose versus triamcinolone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome patients. Ann Neurol. 2018;84(4):601-10. [PubMed ID: 30187524]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25332.

  • 61.

    Karimzadeh A, Bagheri S, Raeissadat SA, Bagheri S, Rayegani SM, Rahimi-Dehgolan S, et al. The comparison of the effectiveness between different doses of local methylprednisolone injection versus triamcinolone in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: a double-blind clinical trial. J Pain Res. 2019;12:579-84. [PubMed ID: 30787634]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6368124]. https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s190652.

  • 62.

    Ono S, Clapham PJ, Chung KC. Optimal management of carpal tunnel syndrome. Int J Gen Med. 2010;3:255-61. [PubMed ID: 20830201]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2934608].

  • 63.

    Chen PC, Chuang CH, Tu YK, Bai CH, Chen CF, Liaw MY. Erratum to: A Bayesian network meta-analysis: Comparing the clinical effectiveness of local corticosteroid injections using different treatment strategies for carpal tunnel syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16(1):394. [PubMed ID: 26696377]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4688923]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015-0850-5.

  • 64.

    Salman Roghani R, Holisaz MT, Tarkashvand M, Delbari A, Gohari F, Boon AJ, et al. Different doses of steroid injection in elderly patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: a triple-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:117-24. [PubMed ID: 29403268]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5779277]. https://doi.org/10.2147/cia.s151290.

  • 65.

    Malahias MA, Chytas D, Mavrogenis AF, Nikolaou VS, Johnson EO, Babis GC. Platelet-rich plasma injections for carpal tunnel syndrome: a systematic and comprehensive review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(1):1-8. [PubMed ID: 30022241]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-018-2278-8.

  • 66.

    Guven SC, Ozcakar L, Kaymak B, Kara M, Akinci A. Short-term effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in carpal tunnel syndrome: A controlled study. J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2019;13(5):709-14. [PubMed ID: 30707787]. https://doi.org/10.1002/term.2815.

  • 67.

    Malahias MA, Johnson EO, Babis GC, Nikolaou VS. Single injection of platelet-rich plasma as a novel treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. Neural regeneration research. 2015;10(11):1856.

  • 68.

    Senna MK, Shaat RM, Ali AAA. Platelet-rich plasma in treatment of patients with idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2019. [PubMed ID: 31420812]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-019-04719-7.

  • 69.

    Park G, Kwon DR. Platelet‐rich plasma limits the nerve injury caused by 10% dextrose in the rabbit median nerve. Muscle & nerve. 2014;49(1):56-60.

  • 70.

    Bahrami MH, Raeissadat SA, Nezamabadi M, Hojjati F, Rahimi-Dehgolan S. Interesting effectiveness of ozone injection for carpal tunnel syndrome treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Orthop Res Rev. 2019;11:61-7. [PubMed ID: 31123423]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6510386]. https://doi.org/10.2147/orr.s202780.

  • 71.

    American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, American Academy of Neurology; American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Practice parameter for electrodiagnostic studies in carpal tunnel syndrome: summary statement. Muscle Nerve. 2002;25(6):918-22. [PubMed ID: 12115985]. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10185.

  • 72.

    Rascaroli MW, Borghi B, Rascaroli A, Travagli V. Ozone therapy in idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome. Biochemical, neurophysiological and clinical aspects. Journal of Ozone Therapy. 2019;2(3).

  • 73.

    Choi GH, Wieland LS, Lee H, Sim H, Lee MS, Shin BC. Acupuncture and related interventions for the treatment of symptoms associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;12. CD011215. [PubMed ID: 30521680]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6361189]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011215.pub2.

  • 74.

    Ho CY, Lin HC, Lee YC, Chou LW, Kuo TW, Chang HW, et al. Clinical effectiveness of acupuncture for carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Chin Med. 2014;42(2):303-14. [PubMed ID: 24707864]. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X14500207.

  • 75.

    Whitehead L. Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release: A Cochrane review summary. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018;79:167-8. [PubMed ID: 29525449]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.08.012.

  • 76.

    Peters S, Page MJ, Coppieters MW, Ross M, Johnston V. Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2. CD004158. [PubMed ID: 26884379]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004158.pub3.

  • 77.

    Alves MDPT, Araújo GCSD. Low-level laser therapy after carpal tunnel release. Revista brasileira de ortopedia. 2011;46(6):697-701.

  • 78.

    Huemer GM, Koller M, Pachinger T, Dunst KM, Schwarz B, Hintringer T. Postoperative splinting after open carpal tunnel release does not improve functional and neurological outcome. Muscle & Nerve: Official Journal of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2007;36(4):528-31.

  • 79.

    Martins RS, Siqueira MG, Simplício H. Wrist immobilization after carpal tunnel release: a prospective study. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. 2006;64(3A):596-9.

  • 80.

    Isaac SM, Okoro T, Danial I, Wildin C. Does wrist immobilization following open carpal tunnel release improve functional outcome? A literature review. Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine. 2010;3(1-4):11-7.

  • 81.

    Heuser A, Kourtev H, Winter S, Fensterheim D, Burdea G, Hentz V, et al. Telerehabilitation using the Rutgers Master II glove following carpal tunnel release surgery: proof-of-concept. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. 2007;15(1):43-9.

  • 82.

    Ritting AW, Leger R, O'Malley MP, Mogielnicki H, Tucker R, Rodner CM. Duration of postoperative dressing after mini-open carpal tunnel release: a prospective, randomized trial. The Journal of hand surgery. 2012;37(1):3-8.

  • 83.

    Williams AM, Baker PA, Platt AJ. The impact of dressings on recovery from carpal tunnel decompression. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2008;61(12):1493-5.

  • 84.

    Peters S, Page MJ, Coppieters MW, Ross M, Johnston V. Rehabilitation following carpal tunnel release. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(6). CD004158. [PubMed ID: 23740605]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004158.pub2.

  • 85.

    Hochberg J. A randomized prospective study to assess the efficacy of two cold-therapy treatments following carpal tunnel telease. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2001;14(3):208-15.

  • 86.

    Janssen RG, Schwartz DA, Velleman PF. A randomized controlled study of contrast baths on patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Journal of Hand Therapy. 2009;22(3):200-8.

  • 87.

    Pomerance J, Fine I. Outcomes of carpal tunnel surgery with and without supervised postoperative therapy. The Journal of hand surgery. 2007;32(8):1159-63.

  • 88.

    Provinciali L, Giattini A, Splendiani G, Logullo F. Usefulness of hand rehabilitation after carpal tunnel surgery. Muscle & Nerve: Official Journal of the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. 2000;23(2):211-6.

  • 89.

    Sawan SA, Mahmoud S, Hayam M, Hussien MM. Effect of different physical therapy modalities on post-operative recovery following transverse carpal ligament release: A randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy Practice and Research. 2013;34(2):75-82.

  • 90.

    Schünemann HJ, Vist GE, Higgins JP, Santesso N, Deeks JJ, Glasziou P, et al. Interpreting results and drawing conclusions. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2019:403-31.

  • 91.

    UVA Hand Center – Therapy. Open Carpal Tunnel Release Post-Op Guidelines. Virginia; 2015. Available from: https://med.virginia.edu/orthopaedic-surgery/wp-content/uploads/sites/242/2015/11/copy_of_CTROPENProtocolandHEP.pdf.

  • 92.

    Degnan GG. Postoperative management following carpal tunnel release surgery: principles of rehabilitation. Journal of neurosurgery. 1997;3(1).

  • 93.

    Hand and Upper Limb Clinic. Carpal Tunnel Release Post-Operative Protocol. 2010. Available from: http://www.erveytesi.com/pdf/p17.pdf.

  • 94.

    Sayles J. Standard of Care: Carpal Tunnel Release. The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc. Department of Rehabilitation Services; 2007. Available from: https://www.brighamandwomens.org/assets/BWH/patients-and-families/rehabilitation-services/pdfs/wrist-carpal-tunnel-release-pt.pdf.

  • 95.

    [No Author Listed]. Carpal Tunnel Release: Postoperative Management. Outpatient Rehabilitation Care Center: Southest Georgia Health System. 2013.

  • 96.

    Bakker A. Carpal Tunnel Release Dr. Bakker’s Post-op Protocol. Twin Cities Orthopedics; 2017. Available from: https://tcomn.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Carpal-tunnel-release-protocol.pdf.

  • 97.

    [No Author Listed]. Post-Operative Carpal Tunnel Release Protocol. Oxford orthopedics & sports medicine, pllc; 2016.