https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm-129312

Comparison of Low-Intensity and High-Intensity Exercise in Salivary Nitric Oxide Response: A Pilot Study

authors:

avatar Ryota Sone 1 , avatar Keisei Kosaki 2 , avatar Rei Tahara 3 , avatar Koichi Watanabe 2 , avatar Koichiro Hayashi 4 , *

Faculty of International Agriculture and Food Studies, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Tokyo, Japan
Faculty of Health and Sport Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
Faculty of Business Administration, Seikei University, Musashino, Japan
Faculty of Human Development, Department of Health and Physical Education, Kokugakuin University, Yokohama, Japan
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine: Vol.14, issue 4; e129312
published online: October 14, 2023
article type: Rapid Communication
received: June 25, 2022
revised: July 25, 2023
accepted: August 12, 2023

how to cite: Sone R, Kosaki K, Tahara R, Watanabe K, Hayashi K. Comparison of Low-Intensity and High-Intensity Exercise in Salivary Nitric Oxide Response: A Pilot Study. Asian J Sports Med. 2023;14(4):e129312. https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm-129312.

Abstract

Background:

Excessive production of salivary nitric oxide (s-NO) is a risk factor for oral diseases such as Sjögren syndrome and periodontal disease. Although s-NO is known to be affected by exercise, it is unclear how the difference in exercise intensities affects the s-NO response.

Objectives:

The purpose of this study was to investigate the acute effect of different exercise intensities (high vs. low intensity) on s-NO production using a cross-over design.

Methods:

Five healthy male young adults (21.6 ± 0.9 years) performed two ergometer exercises for 30 min at different exercise intensities: 50% heart rate (HR)reserve (low-intensity condition) and 80% HRreserve (high-intensity condition). Saliva samples were collected before (pre) and after (post 0-h and post 1-h) exercises.

Results:

The s-NO concentration significantly increased (P < 0.05) after the high-intensity exercise (∆changes in post 0-h; +244 ± 53 µmol/L, post 1-h; +352 ± 58 µmol/L), but the s-NO concentration did not change after the low-intensity exercise (∆changes in post 0-h; +11 ± 37 µmol/L, post 1-h; +64 ± 69 µmol/L).

Conclusions:

This study reveals that s-NO production is dependent on exercise intensities, suggesting that low-intensity exercise can be possible without increasing the risk of oral diseases.

1. Background

Salivary nitric oxide (s-NO) concentration is one of the markers for respiratory inflammation, such as asthma (1). Excessive s-NO production is associated with various oral diseases such as Sjögren syndrome and periodontitis (2, 3). The s-NO concentration may be a physiological marker for systemic conditions (4, 5) because acute whole-body exercise can induce a s-NO response (4, 6). However, there have been conflicting results on whether acute aerobic exercise increases s-NO production (4, 6) or not (7). This may be due to differences in exercise intensity because the chronic response of s-NO showed a proportional response to the intensity of the training (8). However, no previous studies have investigated the acute effects of exercise intensity on s-NO responses.

2. Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the effect of exercise intensity on the s-NO response at the same exercise duration. Our hypothesis was that the s-NO responses differed depending on the exercise intensity, even if the duration of exercise was the same.

3. Methods

3.1. Participants

We enrolled five healthy adult men (21.6 ± 0.9 years, 170.1 ± 5.4 cm, 62.9 ± 5.4 kg) who were non-smokers and had no other diseases or injuries. The fitness level of the participants was recreational, with no regular high-intensity exercise and exercise habits of less than two days a week. The present study was approved by the ethical committees and conformed to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki, and all participants provided written informed consent before being included in the study.

3.2. Design

The participants performed two exercise sessions for 30 min each at different exercise intensities based on a cross-over design, 50% heart rate (HR)reserve (low-intensity condition) and 80% HRreserve (high-intensity condition), using a bicycle ergometer (75XL.; Combi Wellness Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Each exercise was safely performed with no reported adverse events or discomfort during or after exercise sessions. Participants were instructed to refrain from performing intensive exercise and consuming alcohol and caffeine 24 h before the 2 experimental days. They were asked to fast overnight for 12 h, and only water was allowed. Both sessions were conducted in a laboratory maintained at 24 - 26°C. Participants were asked for a subjective evaluation of exercise intensity (rating of perceived exertion (RPE)) using the Borg scale every 5 min during the two experimental exercises. Stimulated saliva samples were collected before (pre), immediately after (post 0-h), and 1 hour after exercises (post 1-h) using a cotton swab (Salivette; Sarstedt Inc., Nümbrecht, Germany) for s-NO concentration. Saliva was collected according to the method described previously (9).

3.3. Assay of Salivary Components

After measuring the saliva flow, samples were frozen at -40°C until analyses. The nitrate concentration, as the s-NO concentration, was assessed using a commercially available colorimetric assay kit (Nitric Oxide detection kit #ADI-917-010, Enzo Life Sciences, Inc., Farmingdale, NY, USA).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analysis data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). Paired sample t-tests were used to examine the difference in the total RPE during exercise between the two intensities. A two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures (time*condition) was used to analyze s-NO. The Bonferroni post hoc test was performed when a significant interaction was observed. A two-tailed P-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS software (ver. 25) (IBM SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan).

4. Results

All participants completed two different exercise sessions (low and high intensity). No significant differences were found in s-NO concentration between the low- (629 ± 217 µmol/L) and high- (327 ± 133 µmol/L) intensity conditions at pre. s-NO concentrations were post 0-h (640 ± 208 µmol/L), post 1-h (694 ± 200 µmol/L) after low-intensity exercise, and post 0-h (572 ± 111 µmol/L), post 1-h (731 ± 94 µmol/L) after high-intensity exercise.

Figure 1 shows the changes in s-NO concentration after high- and low-intensity exercise. A two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures followed by a post hoc test showed a significant interaction (F(2, 8) = 4.639, partial η2 = 0.537) between the two intensities. The post hoc test showed that the s-NO concentration increased significantly at post 0-h (+244 ± 53 µmol/L) and post 1-h (+362 ± 58 µmol/L) after high-intensity exercise compared to that at pre. In contrast, the s-NO concentration after low-intensity exercise did not change at post 0-h (+11 ± 37 µmol/L) and post 1-h (+64 ± 69 µmol/L). At post 0-h, the s-NO concentration was significantly higher after high-intensity exercise than after low-intensity exercise.

Change in (∆) s-NO concentration from pre to post 1-h in high-intensity (black) and low-intensity (white) conditions. Values are represented as mean ± standard error. * P < 0.05 vs. pre. † P < 0.05 vs. low-intensity condition. s-NO, salivary nitric oxide.
Change in (∆) s-NO concentration from pre to post 1-h in high-intensity (black) and low-intensity (white) conditions. Values are represented as mean ± standard error. * P < 0.05 vs. pre. † P < 0.05 vs. low-intensity condition. s-NO, salivary nitric oxide.
Figure 1.

Change in (∆) s-NO concentration from pre to post 1-h in high-intensity (black) and low-intensity (white) conditions. Values are represented as mean ± standard error. * P < 0.05 vs. pre. † P < 0.05 vs. low-intensity condition. s-NO, salivary nitric oxide.

Figure 2 shows the changes in the total RPE during the exercises. The total RPE was higher during high-intensity exercise (92 ± 4) than during low-intensity exercise (68 ± 3).

Total RPE during exercise in high-intensity (black) and low-intensity (white) conditions. Values are represented as mean ± standard error. RPE, rating of perceived exertion.
Total RPE during exercise in high-intensity (black) and low-intensity (white) conditions. Values are represented as mean ± standard error. RPE, rating of perceived exertion.
Figure 2.

Total RPE during exercise in high-intensity (black) and low-intensity (white) conditions. Values are represented as mean ± standard error. RPE, rating of perceived exertion.

5. Discussion

This study demonstrated that s-NO production depended on exercise intensity. s-NO concentration did not change during low-intensity exercise but increased substantially during high-intensity exercise.

Ergometer exercise for 30 min at a high intensity of 80% HRreserve increased s-NO concentration after exercise, consistent with the previous findings (4, 6). Moreover, the interaction (time*condition) of s-NO changes was also observed, with a significant difference between low- and high-intensity exercises at post 0-h. Although the sample size was small, the effect size of the s-NO change was large (> 0.50). However, the possibility of type 2 errors due to the small sample size should also be considered. Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), which plays an important role in the mechanism of s-NO production, is over-secreted from inflamed salivary glands (3, 10), which was not measured in this study. The mechanism by which the difference in exercise intensity affects s-NO production should be further investigated. Exhaled NO, which reflects the inflammatory status of the lower respiratory tract, also needs exploration.

High s-NO levels were reported in individuals with various oral diseases and athletes with a history of asthma (1-3). Increased s-NO concentration after high-intensity exercise in our study might indicate that high-intensity exercise in training strategies increases the risk of inflammation in the oral cavity and lower respiratory tract. In contrast, low-intensity exercise did not affect s-NO concentrations, implying that low-intensity exercise might not increase the risk of oral and respiratory diseases in exercise prescriptions for patients. Since measurements in the present study were only taken up to 1 hour after exercise, it is unclear how long the acute s-NO increase lasts. Observation for a longer time after exercise is required to clarify recovery of the exercise-induced increase in s-NO concentration. Continued high s-NO levels may be a risk factor for developing chronic oral and respiratory diseases. Therefore, for using s-NO as an inflammation marker of oral and respiratory tracts, further study should be investigated, including conventional markers of inflammation such as interleukin-6 (IL-6).

In conclusion, our study indicates that s-NO responds differently in the acute phase depending on the exercise intensity.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Sone R, Matsuba K, Tahara R, Eda N, Kosaki K, Jesmin S, et al. Assessment of Salivary Nitric Oxide Levels in Elite University Athletes in Japan: Findings From a Cross Sectional Study Design. J Clin Med Res. 2019;11(2):114-20. [PubMed ID: 30701003]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6340678]. https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr3670.

  • 2.

    Reher VG, Zenobio EG, Costa FO, Reher P, Soares RV. Nitric oxide levels in saliva increase with severity of chronic periodontitis. J Oral Sci. 2007;49(4):271-6. [PubMed ID: 18195509]. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.49.271.

  • 3.

    Konttinen YT, Platts LA, Tuominen S, Eklund KK, Santavirta N, Tornwall J, et al. Role of nitric oxide in Sjogren's syndrome. Arthritis Rheum. 1997;40(5):875-83. [PubMed ID: 9153549]. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.1780400515.

  • 4.

    Sone R, Eda N, Kosaki K, Endo M, Watanabe K. Influence of acute high-intensity exercise on salivary nitric oxide levels. J Oral Sci. 2019;61(2):307-12. [PubMed ID: 31217380]. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.18-0205.

  • 5.

    Ulkar B, Elgun S, Ozmeric N, Ozdemir B, Boynuegri D. Periodontal nitric oxide pathway alteration due to precompetition anxiety in handball players. J Periodontol. 2012;83(2):204-10. [PubMed ID: 21627461]. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2011.110145.

  • 6.

    Rahman ZA, Abdullah N, Singh R, Sosroseno W. Effect of acute exercise on the levels of salivary cortisol, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and nitric oxide. J Oral Sci. 2010;52(1):133-6. [PubMed ID: 20339244]. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.133.

  • 7.

    Gonzalez D, Marquina R, Rondon N, Rodriguez-Malaver AJ, Reyes R. Effects of aerobic exercise on uric acid, total antioxidant activity, oxidative stress, and nitric oxide in human saliva. Res Sports Med. 2008;16(2):128-37. [PubMed ID: 18569946]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15438620802103700.

  • 8.

    Diaz MM, Bocanegra OL, Teixeira RR, Soares SS, Espindola FS. Salivary nitric oxide and alpha-amylase as indexes of training intensity and load. Int J Sports Med. 2013;34(1):8-13. [PubMed ID: 22960992]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1316318.

  • 9.

    Akimoto T, Kumai Y, Akama T, Hayashi E, Murakami H, Soma R, et al. Effects of 12 months of exercise training on salivary secretory IgA levels in elderly subjects. Br J Sports Med. 2003;37(1):76-9. [PubMed ID: 12547749]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1724582]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.37.1.76.

  • 10.

    Correia PN, Carpenter GH, Paterson KL, Proctor GB. Inducible nitric oxide synthase increases secretion from inflamed salivary glands. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49(1):48-56. [PubMed ID: 19933597]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2789584]. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kep313.