Management of Spine-Related Problems Following Sport Injuries: A Review Article

authors:

avatar Faramarz Roohollahi 1 , *

Department of Neurosurgery, Shariati Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

how to cite: Roohollahi F. Management of Spine-Related Problems Following Sport Injuries: A Review Article. Asian J Sports Med. 2022;13(4):e132693. https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm-132693.

Abstract

Context:

Athletes have routine activity programs, and better physical health is expected among them. There is limited information about the connection between athletes' injuries during sports activity and their future health status.

Objectives:

The prevalence of spine changes related to sports activities and what risk factors were associated with these events in athletes.

Method:

SCOPUS, EMBASE, and Web of Science were used for article searching.

Results:

Sports injuries in sports happen frequently. Our data is limited to introducing sports with the highest risk of injury. A history of sports injury, an intense training program, and years of sports activities are factors predicting injury. It has been seen that former top male athletes have more activity than age-matched control individuals.

Conclusions:

Spinal injury management in athletes needs a proper diagnosis, work-up, and complex rehabilitation plans; otherwise, it can lead to spinal complaints in the future. Rest, appropriate analgesia, and rehabilitation are the three main primary treatments. The usage of orthoses is not recommended for these injuries in general.

1. Context

Top-rated athletes are increasingly faced with high physiological activities and contest loads involving repeated mechanical stresses and impacts (1, 2). Although these interactions are different in sports, it is understood that sports activities, especially top ones, are associated with a rise in the risk of acute and chronic musculoskeletal injury (3, 4). Prevention of injuries and keeping athletes safe and healthy are the main principles for world federations (5, 6). Many studies explain top athletes' patterns of injury seasonally (7). Overall data about injury patterns among a top-rated athlete's whole sporting career is limited. A lower morbidity risk and higher self-reported health is reported by the top-rated athletes in the later years compared with the overall population (8-10). Developing our perception of the causes of injury and features experienced by top athletes along their careers will assist in the creation of strategies (11). We want to organize (1) the frequency of athlete's career-related injuries; (2) athletes' self-report of injury-related residual symptoms; and (3) general management. The majority of studies have explained that too little and too much activity is inadvisable for spinal health (12, 13). The association between sports and spinal health has not been appropriately explained. It is well known that sports activities influence health in a good way overall (14).

2. Methods

A systematic survey of the literature was done to find topics that explain the relationship between sports activities and following spine changes. Keywords including sport, injury, demographic, correlates, limit, prevent, restrict, difficult, drop-out, lumbar, thoracic, cervical, treatment, and surgery were searched.

3. Results

3.1. Sign and Symptoms

In Aasa et al.’s study in 2022, the aim was to assess the variability of spine alignment in different loads. Alignment in the beginning, angles of the spine, and complete ROM were the three main outcomes (15). Cervical symptoms such as pain, reduced ROM, paresthesia, and gate disorder have an effect on activity. To evaluate root involvement, myelopathy, and exclude other disorders, a history assessment and physical examination are needed (16). Cervical disc herniation in athletes is common. Pain or stiffness without any arm or radicular symptoms is the usual starting symptom. Exercises that increase discomfort must be stopped in the first 7 - 14 days of the primary phase to reduce the probability of disc herniation. NSAIDs are the choice of treatment for reducing pain (17). If forward flexion, sitting, or coughing/sneezing produce pain, it is indicative of disc-related injury. If standing or walking make the pain intolerable and the pain decreases by bending, spinal stenosis is more likely. Extension and/or rotation-related pain represent spondylolysis. The lateral calf pain is related to the L5 nerve root16. A significant group of athletes experienced a significant injury in their careers. The knee, lumbar spine, shoulder, and clavicle were the most frequently injured anatomical parts. Thirty-three percent of Olympians complained of current pain and functional limitations from Olympic-career injury (2).

3.2. Risk Factors

Most variables are heterogenic in data analyses of different studies. The most frequent risk factors with significant relation for back pain reported among studies were higher training volumes (all high-quality studies), with an OR (18) at 1.1 and 1.2, and periods of increased training (19-21).

Basketball injury rates were more in male players than females (22, 23). Although serious injuries are more common in female athletes, the surgery rate is equal in both sexes (24, 25).

3.3. Diagnostics

Different views of lumbar radiographs are essential. MRI is the best modality to evaluate soft tissue changes and pars and pedicle injuries. Sairyo revealed that MRI is efficient in evaluating spondylolysis. If the patient does not respond to non-surgical treatment, then a CT and bone scan with lumbar SPECT is reasonable (26).

3.4. Treatment

The main aspect of rehabilitation is to correct back pains and discomforts. Sciatica and leg muscles, for example, are important factors in a pitcher: Pitching motion problems will place the arm, shoulder, and elbow in jeopardy. An increase in intra-abdominal pressure can result in a great amount of dysfunction in the throwing motion. Stability is essential, and the presence of pain that may lead to cramping, which can result in a tragic event. A pitcher needs a steady trunk to throw without risk of injury to him/her extremities (27).

Trunk steadiness programs are begun immediately. NSAIDs can be consumed to reduce discomfort in order to launch rehabilitation plans. Orthosis usage is not recommended. Exercise to retain spinal steadiness and improve muscle strength is recommended. Strength with steadiness, and power, will be required (28).

Education, ergonomic adjustment, exercise, and shoe insoles are the main parts of the back pain prevention program (29).

The primary treatment for back pain secondary to disc pathology is resting. In the first week, exercise is not recommended. After one week, some programs will be used for physical therapy. Different types of corticosteroids can be used. The goal is to improve the weakness of muscles to achieve steadiness and balance. Different physical therapy regimes can be used to achieve steadiness. Similar to other people, if conservative treatment is not working, surgical intervention will be recommended (17).

There are few studies regarding artificial disc replacement following pathologies affecting the disc of the lumbar region in sport activities. It seems that the majority of patients who require a lumbar disc replacement will play again, and their activity will be more efficient compared to patients who do not undergo surgery. In high-contact sports, more time (4 - 6 months) will be needed compared to low-contact activities (12 weeks) to return to usual activity after surgery (30).

4. Discussion

This study assessed self-reported injuries by top-rated athletes. The goal was to evaluate the frequency and mechanism of disabling injuries following sports activities, including discomforting symptoms and feeling healthy, across sports careers. The main findings were: (1) a significant number of athletes limited their activities because of pain and discomfort following injury; (2) mood changes and especially depression frequently happens in athletes with significant injuries; (3) the spine and especially the lumbar region is one of the most injured areas (2).

Osteoarthritis is one of the adverse outcomes after disabling injuries and is a common finding in football players (31, 32). It seems there is a significant connection between pain and discomfort and joint injuries that may lead to osteoarthritis (33).

It can be helpful to compare osteoarthritis in athletes and the general population to see if there is a significant difference in prevalence. Until today these studies have been limited to specific groups, and more general studies with appropriate control groups are needed (32).

Joint injuries correlate with higher age, severity of injury, and female sex (34).

It is an important issue whether weight and height in every athlete and, in other words, body mass index is important in future injury outcome, and changes in this parameter can affect injury outcome or not.

Back pain and discomfort may lead to disabling problems in any other aspects of an athlete's life, not just his/her professional life.

One of the main questions in this study is to find in which sport, spinal changes, and following pain episodes are more common. Evidence and research gap mean that health workers faced with athletes have limited evidence to manage prevention and treatment plans. Data from observational studies and also randomized clinical trials is building the foundation for sports injury prevention programs (35, 36).

It is, therefore, important to predict plans to prevent significant injuries at first because it is a non-modifiable risk factor for future disabilities. Back pain was frequent with high-pressure training.

There are studies that confirm the connection of high-intensity training, which is repeated continuously with back pain and discomfort (37), although this relation is not continuous. It may also be justified by a lack of balance in an activity-rest proportion that is connected with problems among different sports, which supports the risk associated with workload peaks (38).

Back pain is a common complaint in athletes. Our study points out that it is feasible that a U- shaped association between the pressure of training programs and exercises in athletes and the risk of developing back pain episodes does exist. Risk factors for back pain in athletes are equivalent to the non-athlete community, but it is likely that appropriate management of training pressure may affect the risk of a back pain episode (14, 29).

Inherent cervical instability is considered the cause of the high frequency of neck and cervical spine injuries in sports (39).

Blunt cervical spine injuries in children are not common. The age of the child is a significant factor in predicting the pattern of injury. Severe neurologic deficits in survivors are rare and have no association with cord level, and rarely is complete (40).

More studies and work are required to see if there is a relationship between lumbosacral injuries and high-pressure training programs. New developing instruments and technology can help assess whole aspects of these matters in a more valid manner (41).

Athletes receive continuous high-intensity impacts, which are transmitted to the spine. A balance between lower extremities and pelvis, and trunk is crucial to tolerate and resolve these forces.

Hip and pelvis joint limitations and muscle weakness accompanied by reduced tolerance of muscles of the trunk can cause an imbalance in the whole spine, which is common and frequently experienced in athletes who suffer from pain and discomfort (42).

A rehabilitation plan that considers the imbalance base primarily and then begins to strengthen the pelvis and hip muscles and movement control in a specific program can result in pain improvement, skill development, and a safe return to activity (42).

Studies related to cervical spine injuries are not enough. Limitations in present studies are the low number of patients examined and also that they are limited to top-level athletes (39).

This study suggests an agreement among caregivers for considering athletes with normal MRI and complete relief of pain to return to even high-pressure sports. Athletes with cervical stenosis or continuous symptoms consider being a problem in management (43).

Cervical spine injuries are minor in most cases. More complex injuries are rare but disabling. Considering all sports in both males and females, most of the injuries were new and happened during the in-season contest. The majority of the athletes returned to activity within 24 hours of injury (44).

After the primary injury, the majority of athletes will ask how many days they need to rest.

A majority of athletes with spine injuries, especially in the cervical area, can play again within one day after the accident. However, 25% did not return for up to six days, but just about five percent did not return for more than three weeks. Overall, about 90% of injuries are not old accidents. In the demographic view, over 90% of injuries in both males and females were new46.

5.1. Limitations

We involved studies in our review that were written in English. No blinding was done.

Also, low sensitivity is expected to determine all aspects which affect study quality. Pediatric professional athletes are not considered in this review. We found that back pain is common in adult sports. The inclusion of a study requires that the back pain that was explained was a consequence of sports training. Because of the complex presentation of back pains, it is hard to validate that sports activities are the main cause of problems. Back pain and low back pain may have been used as the same concept in different studies.

5.2. Conclusions

Spinal injury management in professional athletes needs a proper diagnosis, work-up, and complex rehabilitation plans if an operation is warranted or not. Similar actions used in the general population are also used for athletes. The higher concern will be considered, and scrutiny will be firmer. It is understood that we need faster and more efficient ways for athletes in addition to keeping them safe from future poor outcomes regarding their career injuries.

References

  • 1.

    Soligard T, Schwellnus M, Alonso JM. Infographic. International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury: how much is too much? Br J Sports Med. 2016;50(17):1042. [PubMed ID: 27535990]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096583.

  • 2.

    Palmer D, Cooper DJ, Emery C, Batt ME, Engebretsen L, Scammell BE, et al. Self-reported sports injuries and later-life health status in 3357 retired Olympians from 131 countries: a cross-sectional survey among those competing in the games between London 1948 and PyeongChang 2018. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(1):46-53. [PubMed ID: 33168580]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2019-101772.

  • 3.

    Engebretsen L, Soligard T, Steffen K, Alonso JM, Aubry M, Budgett R, et al. Sports injuries and illnesses during the London Summer Olympic Games 2012. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47(7):407-14. [PubMed ID: 23515712]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-092380.

  • 4.

    Dvorak J, Junge A, Derman W, Schwellnus M. Injuries and illnesses of football players during the 2010 FIFA World Cup. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45(8):626-30. [PubMed ID: 21257668]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3106974]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2010.079905.

  • 5.

    Ljungqvist A. Sports injury prevention: a key mandate for the IOC. Br J Sports Med. 2008;42(6):391. [PubMed ID: 18539657].

  • 6.

    Steffen K, Soligard T, Engebretsen L. Health protection of the Olympic athlete. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(7):466-70. [PubMed ID: 22661696]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2012-091168.

  • 7.

    Brooks JH, Fuller CW, Kemp SP, Reddin DB. Epidemiology of injuries in English professional rugby union: part 1 match injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2005;39(10):757-66. [PubMed ID: 16183774]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1725032]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.018135.

  • 8.

    Kujala U, Orava S, Parkkari J, Kaprio J, Sarna S. Sports career-related musculoskeletal injuries: long-term health effects on former athletes. Sports Med. 2003;33(12):869-75. [PubMed ID: 12974655]. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200333120-00001.

  • 9.

    Batista CH, Soares JM. Is athletic background associated with a future lower prevalence of risk factors for chronic disease? J Exerc Sci Fit. 2014;12(2):47-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2014.06.001.

  • 10.

    Kettunen JA, Kujala UM, Kaprio J, Bäckmand H, Peltonen M, Eriksson JG, et al. All-cause and disease-specific mortality among male, former elite athletes: an average 50-year follow-up. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(13):893-7. [PubMed ID: 25183628]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2013-093347.

  • 11.

    Zhang W, McWilliams DF, Ingham SL, Doherty SA, Muthuri S, Muir KR, et al. Nottingham knee osteoarthritis risk prediction models. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(9):1599-604. [PubMed ID: 21613308]. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2011.149807.

  • 12.

    Heneweer H, Staes F, Aufdemkampe G, van Rijn M, Vanhees L. Physical activity and low back pain: a systematic review of recent literature. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(6):826-45. [PubMed ID: 21221663]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3099170]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1680-7.

  • 13.

    Vuori IM. Dose-response of physical activity and low back pain, osteoarthritis, and osteoporosis. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(6 Suppl):S551-86. discussion 609-10. [PubMed ID: 11427782]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-200106001-00026.

  • 14.

    Heneweer H, Vanhees L, Picavet HS. Physical activity and low back pain: a U-shaped relation? Pain. 2009;143(1-2):21-5. [PubMed ID: 19217208]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2008.12.033.

  • 15.

    Aasa U, Bengtsson V, Berglund L, Öhberg F. Variability of lumbar spinal alignment among power- and weightlifters during the deadlift and barbell back squat. Sports Biomech. 2022;21(6):701-17. [PubMed ID: 31718474]. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2019.1675751.

  • 16.

    Watkins R, Watkins R3. Cervical Disc Herniations, Radiculopathy, and Myelopathy. Clin Sports Med. 2021;40(3):513-39. [PubMed ID: 34051944]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2021.03.006.

  • 17.

    Watkins R, Chang D, Watkins RG. Spinal Injuries in the Overhead Athlete. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022. [PubMed ID: 36173548]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-022-09791-2.

  • 18.

    Fett D, Trompeter K, Platen P. Back pain in elite sports: A cross-sectional study on 1114 athletes. PLoS One. 2017;12(6). e0180130. [PubMed ID: 28662110]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5491135]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0180130.

  • 19.

    Fett D, Trompeter K, Platen P. Prevalence of back pain in a group of elite athletes exposed to repetitive overhead activity. PLoS One. 2019;14(1). e0210429. [PubMed ID: 30677044]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6345455]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0210429.

  • 20.

    Ng L, Sherry D, Loh WB, Sjurseth AM, Iyengar S, Wild C, et al. The prevalence and severity of injuries in field hockey drag flickers: a retrospective cross-sectional study. J Sports Sci. 2016;34(18):1746-51. [PubMed ID: 26760078]. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1136072.

  • 21.

    Hassebrock JD, Patel KA, Makovicka JL, Chung AS, Tummala SV, Peña AJ, et al. Lumbar Spine Injuries in National Collegiate Athletic Association Athletes: A 6-Season Epidemiological Study. Orthop J Sports Med. 2019;7(1):2325967118820050. [PubMed ID: 30719476]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6348522]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118820046.

  • 22.

    Clay H, Mansell J, Tierney R. ASSOCIATION BETWEEN ROWING INJURIES AND THE FUNCTIONAL MOVEMENT SCREEN™ IN FEMALE COLLEGIATE DIVISION I ROWERS. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2016;11(3):345-9. [PubMed ID: 27274420]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4886802].

  • 23.

    Cholewicki J, Silfies SP, Shah RA, Greene HS, Reeves NP, Alvi K, et al. Delayed trunk muscle reflex responses increase the risk of low back injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(23):2614-20. [PubMed ID: 16319747]. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000188273.27463.bc.

  • 24.

    Greene HS, Cholewicki J, Galloway MT, Nguyen CV, Radebold A. A history of low back injury is a risk factor for recurrent back injuries in varsity athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(6):795-800. [PubMed ID: 11734495]. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465010290062001.

  • 25.

    Zuckerman SL, Wegner AM, Roos KG, Djoko A, Dompier TP, Kerr ZY. Injuries sustained in National Collegiate Athletic Association men's and women's basketball, 2009/2010-2014/2015. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(4):261-8. [PubMed ID: 27364907]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096005.

  • 26.

    Sakai T, Sairyo K, Mima S, Yasui N. Significance of magnetic resonance imaging signal change in the pedicle in the management of pediatric lumbar spondylolysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(14):E641-5. [PubMed ID: 20505569]. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181c9f2a2.

  • 27.

    Radcliff KE, Kalantar SB, Reitman CA. Surgical management of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis in athletes: indications and return to play. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2009;8(1):35-40. [PubMed ID: 19142078]. https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0b013e318194f89e.

  • 28.

    Watkins RG, Watkins RG. Lumbar Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Athletes. Semin Spine Surg. 2010;22(4):210-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semss.2010.06.011.

  • 29.

    Huang R, Ning J, Chuter VH, Taylor JB, Christophe D, Meng Z, et al. Exercise alone and exercise combined with education both prevent episodes of low back pain and related absenteeism: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at preventing back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(13):766-70. [PubMed ID: 31672696]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2018-100035.

  • 30.

    Siepe CJ, Wiechert K, Khattab MF, Korge A, Mayer HM. Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(7):1001-13. [PubMed ID: 17205239]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2219656]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0257-y.

  • 31.

    Arliani GG, Astur DC, Yamada RK, Yamada AF, Miyashita GK, Mandelbaum B, et al. Early osteoarthritis and reduced quality of life after retirement in former professional soccer players. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2014;69(9):589-94. [PubMed ID: 25318089]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4192424]. https://doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2014(09)03.

  • 32.

    Fernandes GS, Parekh SM, Moses J, Fuller C, Scammell B, Batt ME, et al. Prevalence of knee pain, radiographic osteoarthritis and arthroplasty in retired professional footballers compared with men in the general population: a cross-sectional study. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(10):678-83. [PubMed ID: 29101102]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5931242]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2017-097503.

  • 33.

    Brauge D, Delpierre C, Adam P, Sol JC, Bernard P, Roux FE. Clinical and radiological cervical spine evaluation in retired professional rugby players. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015;23(5):551-7. [PubMed ID: 26194609]. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.1.spine14594.

  • 34.

    Srikanth VK, Fryer JL, Zhai G, Winzenberg TM, Hosmer D, Jones G. A meta-analysis of sex differences prevalence, incidence and severity of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005;13(9):769-81. [PubMed ID: 15978850]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2005.04.014.

  • 35.

    Bahr R, Clarsen B, Derman W, Dvorak J, Emery CA, Finch CF, et al. International Olympic Committee Consensus Statement: Methods for Recording and Reporting of Epidemiological Data on Injury and Illness in Sports 2020 (Including the STROBE Extension for Sports Injury and Illness Surveillance (STROBE-SIIS)). Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(2):2325967120902910. [PubMed ID: 32118084]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7029549]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120902908.

  • 36.

    Heneweer H, Picavet HS, Staes F, Kiers H, Vanhees L. Physical fitness, rather than self-reported physical activities, is more strongly associated with low back pain: evidence from a working population. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(7):1265-72. [PubMed ID: 22134487]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3389121]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2097-7.

  • 37.

    Swain CTV, Pan F, Owen PJ, Schmidt H, Belavy DL. No consensus on causality of spine postures or physical exposure and low back pain: A systematic review of systematic reviews. J Biomech. 2020;102:109312. [PubMed ID: 31451200]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2019.08.006.

  • 38.

    Windt J, Gabbett TJ. The workload-injury aetiology model. Br J Sports Med. 2017;51(21):1559. [PubMed ID: 27412782]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2016-096653.

  • 39.

    Schroeder GD, Lynch TS, Gibbs DB, Chow I, LaBelle MW, Patel AA, et al. The impact of a cervical spine diagnosis on the careers of National Football League athletes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014;39(12):947-52. [PubMed ID: 24718072]. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000000321.

  • 40.

    Kokoska ER, Keller MS, Rallo MC, Weber TR. Characteristics of pediatric cervical spine injuries. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(1):100-5. [PubMed ID: 11150446]. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.20022.

  • 41.

    Perrett C, Lamb P, Bussey M. Is there an association between external workload and lower-back injuries in cricket fast bowlers? A systematic review. Phys Ther Sport. 2020;41:71-9. [PubMed ID: 31778915]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2019.11.007.

  • 42.

    Donatelli R, Dimond D, Holland M. Sport-specific biomechanics of spinal injuries in the athlete (throwing athletes, rotational sports, and contact-collision sports). Clin Sports Med. 2012;31(3):381-96. [PubMed ID: 22657990]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csm.2012.03.003.

  • 43.

    France JC, Karsy M, Harrop JS, Dailey AT. Return to Play after Cervical Spine Injuries: A Consensus of Opinion. Global Spine J. 2016;6(8):792-7. [PubMed ID: 27853664]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5110349]. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582394.

  • 44.

    Deckey DG, Makovicka JL, Chung AS, Hassebrock JD, Patel KA, Tummala SV, et al. Neck and Cervical Spine Injuries in National College Athletic Association Athletes: A 5-Year Epidemiologic Study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020;45(1):55-64. [PubMed ID: 31464974]. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000003220.