The main findings of the present study were, first, that high intensity fatigue had an immediate effect on kicking performance, which recovered to pre-fatigue levels approximately within 1-minute after the end of the fatigue protocol. Second, we noticed minor gender differences in fatigue responses. Consequently, the first research hypothesis of the study is accepted, while the second research hypothesis is rejected.
The exercise protocol applied in the present study has been previously validated (
9) and used to simulate high intensity running conditions. Mohr et al. (
2) reported that players experience fatigue during intense periods of a soccer game. During the performance of the present protocol players gradually increase their effort, similar to several actions taking place during a real game, at the end of which players are exhausted. This is the main reason for selecting the present protocol as it allows examination of the technique responses after intense periods of running.
The present results are in agreement with the three previous studies which reported a decline in ball speed immediately after various fatigue protocols (
3-
5). However, only Lees and Davies (
3) applied a step exercise protocol that was of similar duration and intensity with the present protocol, thus permitting comparisons. Lees and Davies (
3) reported that players performed slower kicks in the post-fatigue condition. It was suggested that timing and co-ordination were impaired as a result of fatigue. The results of the present study did confirm this finding as joint velocities and displacements significantly changed after fatigue (
Figures 1 -
4). This indicates that co-ordination was affected and the kicking technique was quite different between pre- and (first and second) post-fatigue kicking trials.
Previous studies analyzed only one trial after fatigue (
3) or the average ball speed after several kicking trials post-fatigue (
4) or the trial that produced the highest ball speed post-fatigue (
5), thus leaving several questions unanswered regarding the acute effects of fatigue on kicking performance and the duration of these effects. In the present study it was clear that players performed less powerful kicks during the first and the second trial post-fatigue, but they were able to perform powerful kicks during the third trial post-fatigue in levels comparable to pre-fatigue kicking conditions. Within the limitations of the present protocol, it could be suggested that fatigue effects on soccer kicking technique and performance probably occur within seconds after fatigue, which should be taken into consideration by both players and coaches.
The results of the present study showed a decline in maximum and at impact joint velocities during the first two, but not during the third post-fatigue trial (
Figures 1 and
2). Foot speed at ball impact is crucial for powerful kicking performance (
14,
15). Powerful kicking trials require a high foot speed at impact with the ball. The present results indicate that the whole kicking motion became slower immediately post-fatigue, thus explaining the decreased kicking performance during the first two trials post-fatigue.
The quality and the characteristics of foot/ball impact have also been reported as significant determinants of kicking performance (
16). A more plantar flexed ankle during instep kicking is associated with increased effective striking mass and consequently with a more powerful kicking performance (
17). In contrast, a dorsi flexed ankle would lead to an inappropriate foot/ball collision and lower ball speed. The present results showed a less plantar flexed ankle in males (1st trial) and females (1st and 2nd trial) post-fatigue (
Figures 3 and
4). This indicates that fatigue might have altered the quality of ball/foot contact. This is further supported by the recovery of plantar flexion accompanied by increases in ball speed during the third post-fatigue trial.
Kicking performance is also affected by player’s technique (
14). The present results showed that both males and females demonstrate significant differences in their technique between pre- and post-fatigue kicking trials (
Figures 3 and
4). Males showed a more flexed knee during the pre-support kicking phase after fatigue (
Figure 3). Practically this means that during the post-fatigue condition the foot travelled through a shorter trajectory until ball impact, which might reduce final foot velocity. Similarly, males showed a smaller ankle plantar flexion post-fatigue (
Figure 3), which might be indicative of a less optimal foot position at ball impact for achieving a powerful kick after fatigue. In addition, females showed a more abducted hip after fatigue which is also a sign of unnecessary movement initiation as a result of fatigue (
Figure 4). It seems, therefore, that both technique and co-ordination were affected in the presence of fatigue, which subsequently leads to decreased kicking performance. However, the effects disappeared after a minute of rest, during the third post-fatigue trial.
In the present study, we have found minor gender differences in fatigue responses during kicking. Studies examining gender differences in fatigue responses in non-soccer players have yielded conflicting results as some studies found greater resistance to fatigue for females compared to male counterparts (
18), while other studies reported no gender effects (
19). Our observation, that fatigue affected the ankle and the knee in males and the ankle and the hip kinematics in females, is not sufficient to provide conclusive evidence that there are gender differences in fatigue responses in kicking technique.
A limitation of the study was that fatigue was assessed by recording the perceived exhaustion of the players. Monitoring the biochemical indices of fatigue or recording the heart rate might have provided a more standardized level of fatigue for each participant. Even in this case, the protocol would have led to the exhaustion of the player, defined by his/her inability to continue running at the same rate. Therefore, any changes in the effects of this high intensity fatigue task on kicking performance seem unlikely. Finally, the participants of the present study were amateur soccer players. The same protocol might have different effect on younger or professional players.
The results of the present study indicated that a generic task, such as continuous running, did affect kicking performance, but players were able to perform powerful kicks after at least a minute of rest. This has a practical meaning for both players who have to perform kicks under fatigue conditions and their coaches. When a player performs a high intensity running during a game, he/she needs to then “gain” time before performing a powerful kick. Based on the results and the skills and abilities of the participants of the present study, a rest interval greater than a minute would permit players to perform a powerful kick. Such information may be used by coaches to design soccer-specific training games and exercises so that players could improve their ability for fast recovery after fatigue. Such information can also assist coaches to select the most suitable players for performing kicks under set play conditions.
High intensity running till exhaustion resulted in reduced foot speed and joint velocities at impact and reduced ball speed when players performed two kicks immediately after the end of a fatigue protocol. However, performance and technique alterations recovered during the third kicking trial after approximately 1 minute of the ending of the fatigue protocol. Furthermore, fatigue responses were similar for both males and females. These results indicate that any fatigue effects on soccer kicking technique and performance probably occur within seconds after fatigue inducement activity ends. Players, therefore, should gain time after intense periods of running before performing a kick, and coaches should plan appropriate training sessions in order to minimize these fatigue effects.