The study explores the cognitive appraisals and progression through experiences within personal and situational backdrop across onset of injury, rehabilitation period and return to play. Of particular interest was how the narrative was constructed within personal and situational context intersecting with cognitive appraisals, emotional responses and behavioral outcome. Injuries are common in sport and athletes who sustain an injury are likely to experience different emotions such as stress, anger, depression, anxiety, tension, fear, and mood disturbances (
13,
14).
The narratives centering on the onset of the injury reflected a series of challenges faced by Fendy. In the beginning, the narrative tone was pessimistic and Fendy’s cognitive appraisals reflected emotional disturbances and personal conflicts. This coincides with the findings by Daly et al. (
4) where they found a correlation with cognitive appraisal and mood disturbance. Fendy’s cognitive appraisals in the initial stages are centrally linked with childhood experiences. The main force that impacted Fendy was situational factors such as interactions with team mates, family, and his own philosophy leading to appraisals such as sense of loss, and negative self-perception. Fendy believed that he would be out of the training program if he does not perform well, indicating self-doubt .This belief is typical among other athletes and research findings show a decline in self-confidence and self-efficacy about sport performance following injury (
15). Fendy’s emotional responses were evident in his expression of grief resulting from shoulder injury. His emotional upheaval was portrayed in his own questioning of who would pay him the incentives if he was not performing well, which can be attributed to the personal stake in the sports market. The thought “why me?” by the injured athlete often leads to hopelessness (
16). Thus, it was reasonable for Fendy to feel disappointed.
During the treatment period, Fendy’s initial thoughts were muddled with doubts and monotony about exercising and adhering to the treatment. The narratives reflected a few tragic features where a profound effect of feeling neglected was evident. For instance, the social support was dented, through the separation of his parents and hostility of friends and the associated negative appraisals would have hampered adherence to rehabilitation. In the absence of a clear understanding of the injury and rehabilitation, Fendy questioned the benefit of rehabilitation and felt it was a monotonous action. These experiences and associated cognitive appraisals explained Fendy’s behavior of refraining from rehabilitation program. It is possible that Fendy experienced events as inappropriate and lacking sensitivity.
In terms of narrative structure, Fendy’s story was stable with a classic beginning, middle and an end. In connecting the narratives with the context, Fendy links his feelings of dejection with his past experience and interpersonal context within the athletic career. The narrative however, had a reversal affect towards the end where the pessimistic narrative tone was replaced by an optimistic tone. Fendy began to see hope in future, and planned for preventive action. Better adherence to rehabilitation ushered in a more positive outlook which is evident in the ending of the narrative explained under positive outlook phase.
At a personal level, the narrative reflected different experiences across onset, treatment and return to play. Fendy’s broken family background rendered feelings of rejection and insecurity in his relationship with his team mates. The injury was perceived as a threat to his sporting life which was evident from his narrative. At an interpersonal level, Fendy details his experiences with team mates and with the rehabilitation staff connecting to the current situation. The cognitive appraisals were rooted in different experiences leading to different emotional responses such as frustration, disappointment, and anger. In the later part during rehabilitation, however, a shift from negative to positive outlook was evident. This is in line with the research findings which states that towards return to play, athletes have better acceptance of their injury and observe the progress (
7).
The narrative captures the lived experiences of an injured athlete and takes us through the cognitive appraisals and, emotional upheaval to provide an understanding of how personal and situational factors affect the psychological responses of an injured athlete. Personal and situational factors have initial impact upon cognitive appraisal. In the applied setting we have observed that when cognitive appraisal represents negative content, an athlete perceives an imbalance between resource and coping, which results in stress response, putting an athlete at a risk of injury. From this narrative we can understand that lived experiences, life stress, and how significant others behave toward an injured athlete, can have tremendous impact upon the cognitive appraisals, feelings, and behavior following an injury.
While generalizing from the experiences of one athlete is limited, we used verbatim quotation to illustrate the participant through his own voice and to evoke authentic description of appraisals and experiences of an injured athlete. The study provides an insight into the complexities of the cognitive appraisals and experiences and suggests developing an integrative framework for a holistic approach in injury rehabilitation of athletes. The quotes from the narrative may well be salient and an eye opener to all the individuals involved in rehabilitation, aiming at ‘return to play’ in the shortest possible time.