1. Background
2. Methods
3. Results
| Group | Number | Minimum (Newton) | Maximum (Newton) | Mean (Newton) | Standard Deviation | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classic | 4 | 1610 | 1719 | 1660 | 51.4 | P-value = 0.25 |
| Enfolded | 4 | 1410 | 1672 | 1579 | 117.3 |
a Cases with maximum failure loads.
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine
Image Credit:
Many grafts are used for ACL reconstruction with different methods of fixation. We have presented a new technique for BTB (bone-tendon-bone) graft preparation and compared its biomechanical properties with the classic one to see if the suspensory method of fixation is applicable for BTB grafts.
Eight fresh frozen human BTB grafts were prepared. Grafts were randomly divided into two separate groups. Each containing 4 grafts. In the first group grafts were prepared with standard BTB graft method and in the second group grafts were prepared with new enfolded method. All the grafts were assembled in a universal testing machine for testing the mechanical properties of the grafts. Maximum tensile strength, failure load and failure mode were derived from machine and the values were compared in each group.
Mean failure load for classic group was 1660.25 and for enfolded group it was 1579.25 (P = 0.25). Mean stiffness for classic group was 285.25 N/meter and for enfolded group it was 268.75 N/ per meter (P = 0.1). In classic group, all failures happened at the bone-ligament junction. In the enfolded group, failures also occurred through the tendino-osseous junction except for one case.
Enfolded BTB graft preparation had the same biomechanical indexes of classic method. Therefore this graft preparation method can be used for ACL ligament reconstruction surgery with used of suspensory fixation by Endobutton.
| Group | Number | Minimum (Newton) | Maximum (Newton) | Mean (Newton) | Standard Deviation | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Classic | 4 | 1610 | 1719 | 1660 | 51.4 | P-value = 0.25 |
| Enfolded | 4 | 1410 | 1672 | 1579 | 117.3 |
a Cases with maximum failure loads.
Copyright © 2018, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
Rhatomy S, Chaniago H, Rasyid FA, Phatama KY. Comparing the Stiffness of Peroneus Longus Tendon Versus Hamstrings in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study. Asian J Sports Med. 2021;12(4):e110160. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.110160
Nazem K, JabalAmeli K, Tavakoli A. A study of results of reconstructing posterior cruciate ligament using two-bundle graft from quadriceps muscle tendon. koomesh. 2004;5(3):e153724. doi:
Shahrezayee M, Hashemi F, Sharifzadeh SR, Fallah E, Khodabandehloo F. Study of outcomes after reconstruction of knee’s anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) using Hamstring-tendon autografts from Septamber 2010 to March 2012: 64 cases. Ann Mil Health Sci Res. 2013;11(3):e65093. doi:
Tanpowpong T, Saengkhiew C, Huanmanop T, Itthipanichpong T. Anatomical Variations of Accessory Bands in Semitendinosus and Gracilis Tendons Among the Asian Population. Asian J Sports Med. 2019;10(3):e88812. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.88812
Panigrahi R, Kumari Mahapatra A, Priyadarshi A, Singha Das D, Palo N, et al. Outcome of Simultaneous Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstring Tendon Autograft: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Asian J Sports Med. 2016;7(1):e29287. doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm.29287
Ordering Reprints
Articles are published under the Creative Commons license stated on each article. No permission or royalty fee is required for uses permitted by that license. CCC handles optional bulk and customized reprint orders. Any quotation covers production and delivery services only, not copyright permission. > Request Reprints from CCC
Author(s):