The main finding of our study was that NLR was significantly higher in the PPROM with chorioamnionitis group compared to the cases without chorioamnionitis. Chorioamnionitis is the bacterial intra-amniotic infection of the fetal membrane (amnion and chorion). It is usually due to the bacteria from the vagina to the uterus and is related to long work hours. Chorioamnionitis occurs in 2% of births in the USA and is one of the causes of preterm birth. In general, 1 - 4% of all births in the USA are coupled with chorioamnionitis. The prevalence of chorioamnionitis is related to diagnostic criteria, known risk factors, and gestational age (
3-
8). Chorioamnionitis is associated with 40% of neonatal sepsis cases. It is also a risk factor for long-term neurodevelopmental disorders. Ten percent of women with chorioamnionitis have a positive bacterial blood test, including Group B Streptococcus (GBS) and
Escherichia coli (
1-
5).
Subclinical chorioamnionitis is an important clinical problem in obstetrics (
18). Placental histology is the gold standard for diagnosing chorioamnionitis and has a role in guiding the postnatal care of the newborn. It is used and available after delivery. Maternal serological markers are inexpensive and easily accessible (
19). In general, an intra-amniotic inflammatory response is shown by different markers, such as white blood cell count, IL-6 in amniotic fluid, obtained, and matrix metalloproteinase-8 (MMP-8) by amniocentesis (
20).
PLR is an important marker in predicting thrombotic events, inflammatory diseases, and malignancies (
21). However, reducing the time between diagnosis and cesarean delivery in adjusting broad-spectrum antibiotics does not improve the final results (
8-
14). Recent studies have discussed the faster diagnosis of this condition. Numerous studies in recent years have been conducted to identify markers predicting chorioamnionitis infection and neonatal sepsis, showing different or sometimes contradictory results. There are several reports on the importance of CRP levels in diagnosing chorioamnionitis (
5).
A retrospective study by Yoon et al. found that CRP and WBC did not have a high predictive power for the diagnosis of chorioamnionitis (
22). Nevertheless, according to Popowski et al., CRP equal to or above 5 was related to chorioamnionitis and neonatal sepsis (
23). In addition, Buhimschi et al. predicted the amniotic liquid, umbilical cord inflammation, and early-onset neonatal sepsis by amniocentesis and evaluated human neutrophil defensin and calgranulin A and C biomarkers (
24). Moreover, Yücel and Ustun used NLR, PLR, and PLT as inflammatory factors to measure the severity of preeclampsia (
25).
Soykan Sert and Bülbül showed that PLR and NLR values were higher in women with preterm than those with term labor (
26). In another study, some clinicians showed that PLR increased in patients with premature rupture of membranes, and they recommended this parameter as a new inflammation marker (
21). Ekin et al. found a relationship between PLR and PPROM regarding the latency period. They did not observe a significant difference between PRL and latency periods < 72 hours and > 72 hours (
27). Mahmoud showed that PLR and NLR are important predictive markers for early-onset neonatal sepsis (
28).
The PLT, NLR, and PLR have not been used in diagnosing chorioamnionitis and its neonatal complications. In this study, NLR at the cut-off points of 2.3 - 5.3 had an acceptable sensitivity and a low specificity for identifying cases with chorioamnionitis. The NLR is a simple ratio obtained from CBC routinely performed during pregnancy. A high NLR can indicate the risk of placental inflammation, possibly a simple diagnostic warning for possible infection in women without signs or symptoms. Future trials can be conducted to evaluate and investigate its ability to predict desired pregnancy outcomes. This study showed that inflammatory markers in maternal blood have diagnostic value and are important for pregnant women at risk of premature birth and infection of mother and baby.
5.1. Study Limitations
There were some limitations to the present study. First, this study had a small sample size. Second, we did not have NLR in the first trimester of pregnancy.