With regard to women’s health, childbirth is one of the most medicalized areas. After the first use of forceps and chloroform, many interventions, equipment, and methods have been used to facilitate childbirth. Over time, birth has been defined as a risky process, so medical interventions started to be assimilated into obstetrics as a necessity (
7). Today, birth is seen as a more risky event than it used to be, so medical interventions are considered normal. Some women who see childbirth as a risky event do not have sufficient education and knowledge on this subject and believe that cesarean deliveries are safer than vaginal deliveries. In the current literature, medicalization of labor may be regarded as the use of forceps, vacuum, blood transfusion, episiotomy, and cesarean section, but it is recommended that the use of these interventions should not become routine, sparing them only for necessary situations when maternal or neonatal health is compromised (
13). The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended that labor induction should not be performed without a clear medical indication because of the risk of uterine hyperstimulation, rupture, and fetal distress. In addition, the routine use of electronic fetal monitoring, routine active care management, and episiotomy without indication is not recommended (
14). With an increase in the medicalization of childbirth and technological advances, pregnancies are increasingly monitored, managed, and often terminated using medical interventions. The medicalization of childbirth undermines the mother’s ability to give birth naturally and adversely affects the labor experience for her. The use of fewer interventions improves the quality of care during pregnancy and childbirth, increasing women’s satisfaction and making childbirth a safer experience (
15). The use of cesarean section has been reported to increase globally, which currently accounts for more than 1 in 5 (21%) of all births, in a study by the WHO. In addition, this rate is expected to continue to increase in the next decade, reaching approximately one-third (29%) of all births by 2030 (
16). In Turkey, the rate of cesarean section has been reported to be influenced by various factors, including the preferences of and referrals by physicians, the desire of mothers, perceiving cesarean delivery a safer, more comfortable, easy, and painless modality, the reluctance of pregnant mothers to experience pain, mothers’ fear of natural labor, anxiety, the desire for tubal ligation, the ability to plan the birth date, the advanced age of the mother, high socioeconomic status, high level of education, history of previous cesarean section, physicians’ concerns over legal issues in case of complications during vaginal delivery, limited availability of painless delivery options other than cesarean section, the increasing rate of preterm and multiple pregnancies due to assisted reproductive techniques, the widespread use of ultrasound and antenatal fetal monitoring leading to the diagnosis of fetal distress, a decrease in parity, the mother’s occupational concerns, the impatience of expectant mothers to accomplish childbirth more quickly, and perceiving the baby as a precious creature. All these factors have partly contributed to the increase in cesarean section deliveries (
17,
18). In another study conducted in Turkey, the rate of cesarean section was found to be 51.2% (
19). In Sweden, one of the Scandinavian countries, although technological and media coverage is at a higher level than in many countries, a tendency toward cesarean section is lower, which is believed to be related to positive attitudes and beliefs toward natural childbirth and related initiatives. Among these initiatives are the promotion of natural childbirth, management of birth-related anxiety, adaptation of a multidisciplinary approach, and provision of effective care by midwives (
20).
In the media, which is one of the most effective means of communication and spreading popular culture, natural childbirth should not be displayed as a risky, dramatic, and painful experience. The media plays an important role in shaping women’s decisions on the method of childbirth, their expectations, and choosing the place for giving birth. The media’s moving in the opposite direction is partially responsible for the increase in the rate of intervened births (
21). In popular culture and in a fictional virtual environment, the medicalization of birth is portrayed as normal or even necessary, where women play a passive role in the birth process. Even most physicians and midwives found the media’s portrayals of birth realistic. In many popular cultures, birth is depicted as a sudden event characterized by the leakage of the amniotic fluid. In real life, however, about 85% of pregnant women feel contractions before membrane rupture. The labor generally progresses so fast that mothers barely enter the birth area before they feel the urge to push especially first-time mothers. Women with an upright position feel less pain and, despite being warm, give birth on the back without moving while their knees are raised (the common position in hospitals). However, such scenes still become highly medicalized, causing the birth to be perceived as a non-natural process that requires the support of medicalization, affecting women’s birth experiences in hospitals and the extent to which mothers maintain social control during their labor (
22,
23). Popular culture can instill the perception that childbirth is too medicalized and scary, medicalized delivery is normal and safe, and women in labor should use painkillers or undergo a routine cesarean delivery (
24).