A 9-year-old male patient affected by congenital ichthyosis was referred to our genetics lab, Department of Genetics, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, in 2020. In clinical examination, the proband showed dry, rough, and scaly skin, hand deformity due to scars, dark parts on knees and elbows, not fully developed ears, notable erythroderma, retruded nasal bridge, nail dystrophy, white scales, loss of eyebrows, and scalp involvement. The proband was a collodion at birth (collodion baby); his parents were first cousins, and the mother had experienced a miscarriage. The two younger siblings were normal with no known history of ichthyosis (
Figure 1A).

A, the familial pedigree. The proband (IIâ2) is homozygous for the c.1165C > T (p.Arg389Cys) variant while the parents and the other sibling are heterozygous for the variant; B, the sequence electropherogram of TGM1: the c.1165C > T (p.Arg389Cys) variant in the proband, father, mother, and sibling (the black box); C, the schematic illustration of the transglutaminase-1 enzymeâs domains and the location of mutations in the protein structure. Anchor, the membrane anchorage region; Transglut-N, transglutaminase family N-terminal domain; TGc, transglutaminase/protease-like homologues domain; Transglut-C, transglutaminase family, C-terminal Ig like domain; D, multiple sequence alignment showed that p.Arg389Cys was located in a highly conserved region. Changes in conserved amino acids have been enclosed in a black box; E, the protein structure modeling of wild-type (E1) and mutated (E2) TGM1 (the position of the residue 389 in the protein structure has been indicated). The structures of Arg389 (E3) and Cys389 (E4) residues with their four-angstrom neighbor residues.
The study was approved by the Review Board of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (Grant No. 195122). For sampling, 5 mL of peripheral blood was drawn from the proband and other family members after receiving informed consent. After that, DNA was extracted from blood lymphocytes using a Prime Prep Genomic DNA Extraction kit (GeNet Bio, South Korea), following the instructions of the manufacturer. Then whole-exome sequencing was carried out to detect the possible responsible variant using a next-generation sequencing technology (Novaseq 4000 platform, Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) with the 100X mean depth of coverage for more than 92% of the target sequence.
Aligning the sequence against the human reference genome (hg19, NCBI Build 38) was performed using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner (BWA) software (https://sourceforge.net/projects/bio-bwa/files/latest/download), and variant calling was performed by GATK software (
11,
12). Insertion, deletion, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were sought for using Sequence Alignment/Map tools (SAMtools). Variant filtering was carried out for nonsense, missense, splice site, start codon, stop loss, indel, and frame-shift variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) of < 1% in the 1000 genomes project, exome aggregation consortium (ExAC), NCBI dbSNP version 147, NHLBI GO exome sequencing project (ESP), and Iranome (http://www.iranome.ir/).
We performed Sanger sequencing in a bidirectional manner to confirm the candidate variant derived from WES, followed by co-segregation analysis using exon-specific primers to assess phenotype and genotype segregation in family members. Polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing in the family members were performed using 5âCCTTCTCCCCCTGATACTCC3â and 5âCAGCTGACAAACCCGTTTAAG3â primers, and chromatograms were compared against the human reference genome (hg19, NCBI Build 38) via SeqMan software version 5.00 Š (DNASTAR, Madison, WI, USA). At the final step, the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) and the literature were investigated to assess the novelty of the candidate variant and investigate its association with ichthyosis.
A homozygous variant, c.1165C > T (p. Arg389Cys), in the exon 8 of the
TGM1 gene was observed in the proband (
Figure 1B). We also performed Sanger sequencing on the DNA derived from other family members to conduct co-segregation analysis. While one of the siblings was homozygous for the wild-type allele, the other sibling and parents were heterozygous for this variant (
Figure 1A).
The variant was referred to as rs757905282 in the NCBI dbSNP database. However, there were no reports on its pathogenicity in the literature nor in the NCBI clinvar database. The mutated allele was found neither in our local exome database (Named GTaC) containing about 1500 exome sequenced samples nor in the Iranome database (www.iranome.ir). As shown in
Table 1, in silico analysis was accomplished using mutation taster 2.0 (http://www.mutationtaster.org/) and the FATHMM MKL prediction tool (http://fathmm.biocompute.org.uk/) in conjunction with the evaluation of the variantâs significance at the protein level by SIFT, Polyphen, and PROVEN online software. The variant interpretation was carried out according to the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG) guidelines. Finally, p. Arg389Cys was predicted as a likely pathogenic variant as it met PM1, PM2, PM5, PP1, PP2, and PP3 ACMG criteria (
13).
| Variables | Values |
|---|
| Variant | c.1165C>T (p. Arg389Cys) |
| dbSNP rsID | rs757905282 |
| Zygosity | Homozygous |
| ExAC global MAF | 0.000008 |
| PROVEN | Damaging |
| MutationTaster2 | Disease causing (converted rank score: 0.81) |
| FATHMM MKL coding Pred | Damaging (coding score: 0.9366) |
| SIFT | Damaging |
| Polyphen | Probably damaging with a score of 1.000 |
| ACMG variant category | Likely pathogenic |
The modeling of the 3D structure of the transglutaminase-1 protein was performed using phyre2 web-based services for protein structure prediction (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~phyre2/html/page.cgi?id=index). The PDB files of the wild-type and mutated proteins were generated by phyre2 and UCSF Chimera version 1.13.1 (https://www.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/), which were used to construct the 3D structures of both the wild-type and mutant forms of transglutaminase-1 (
Figure 1E). On the other hand, since only the incomplete crystal structure of transglutaminase-1 is available at Protein Data Bank (PDB), and the fact that it does not cover the p.Arg389 variant (PDB ID: 2XZZ), we performed protein modeling using the 3D structure of the human factor XIIIa subunit (PDB ID: 1GGT), showing more than 40% similarity in conserved amino acid sequences compared to human transglutaminase-1 (
14-
16). The Position-Specific Iterative BLAST (PSI-BLAST) of the transglutaminase-1 amino acid sequence against the 1GGT structure of human factor XIIIa showed that most of the conserved residues were distributed in the transglutaminase/protease-like homolog domain at which the p.Arg389 variant was located (
16).