In this research, F. subpinnata plant extract had the largest diameter of inhibition zone against S. dysenteriae. The extracts of E. caucasicum and F. subpinnata delivered the largest diameters of inhibition zone against Xanthomonas translucens, and M. sylvestris plant extract revealed the largest inhibition zone diameter against E. coli. Finally, E. caucasicum and U. dioica plant extracts showed the largest diameter of inhibition zone against L. monocytogenes.
In the study of Sengul et al., the inhibition zone diameters observed for the methanolic extract of
S. officinalis against
Bacillus subtilis,
Staphylococcus aureus,
Streptococcus pyogenes, and
Salmonella typhimurium were equal to 10, 18, 0, and 12 mm, respectively (
29). In a study by Veda et al., ethyl acetate extract of
S. officinalis delivered the inhibition zone diameters of 12.67 ± 0.33, 14, 12.3 ± 0.33, 16, and 13.67 ± 0.33 mm against
L. monocytogenes,
Staphylococcus aureus,
Streptococcus pneumoniae,
E. coli, and
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while the inhibition zone diameters of the methanolic extract of this plant against these bacteria were obtained as 13.33 ± 0.33, 14.23 ± 0.33, 16, 19.67 ± 0.33, and 17.67 ± 0.33 mm, respectively (
30). In another study, Nabinejad, who investigated the antimicrobial activity of
S. officinalis extract against
E. coli, reported that the inhibition zone diameters in the dilutions of 10, 15, and 20 microliters were equal to 16, 18, and 19 mm, respectively (
31).
In the study of Choi et al., who investigated the in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activity of
F. subpinnata extract against 16 S
almonella samples, the results showed that the inhibitory concentration range was between 62.5 and 1000x03 BCg mL-1. In addition,
F. subpinnata extract inhibited
Salmonella Typhimurium infection in mice (
32). In the study of Jam et al., the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities of
F. subpinnata L. and Areca nut were investigated against several Gram-positive and Gram-negative resistant bacteria, including
Staphylococcus aureus,
E. coli,
Salmonella, and
Enterobacter aeruginosa. The results showed that the antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activities of the plant extracts were dose-dependent, showing strong growth inhibitory effects against
S. aureus (98.98%),
E. coli (94.98%), and
E. aeruginosa (88.55%) (
33). Niknejad and Asgharian, who assessed the antibacterial and antioxidant effects of
U. dioica leaf essential oil harvested from Tonekabon, Iran, reported that
U. dioica leaf essential oil had acceptable antibacterial effects on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria except for
Bacillus subtilis, where IC
50 and AAI were 21.53 and 2.116 μg/mL, respectively. The main chemical compounds of the extract were found to be phytol (35%), nonanal (3.15%), b-Ionone (0.9%), Phtaleic acid (4.7%), and Carvacrol (5.3%) (
34).
In the study of Hashemi et al., the antimicrobial and healing effects of different extracts of
U. dioica, as well as burdock and Nasturtium with Silver Sulfadiazine, were investigated on burn infections caused by
S. aureus in mice (
35). The results showed that in this animal model, the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of
U. dioica and oleander and burdock root extracts had antimicrobial activity against the growth of
S. aureus, suggesting potent bactericidal effects for the aqueous and ethanolic extracts of
U. dioica, Nasturtium, and burdock (
36). In the study of Roshani et al., they investigated the antibacterial effects of the acetonic and methanolic extracts of
U. dioica and Shirazi thyme against
P. aeruginosa expressing metallo-beta-lactamase genes (bla IMP and bla VIM), 83 strains of which were imipenem-resistant while 48 strains showed the CDDT (imipenem-imipenem + EDTA) metallo-beta-lactamase positive phenotype. Among these strains, six expressed the bla IMP gene, but none of them were positive for the bla VIM gene. The results of the recent study showed that the methanolic and acetonic extracts of
U. dioica and Shirazi thyme were effective on IMP-producing
P. aeruginosa strains (
37).
Oxidation in the human body damages cell membranes and other structures, including cellular proteins, lipids, and DNA. When oxygen is metabolized, it creates unstable molecules called free radicals, which steal electrons from other molecules. This causes damage to the structure of DNA and other cellular components. The body can neutralize some free radicals and even needs them to function effectively, but the damage caused by the excess of free radicals over time may be irreparable, leading to certain diseases, including heart and liver diseases and some cancers such as mouth, esophagus, stomach, and intestinal cancers (
38).
Sources of antioxidants can be natural or synthetic. Some plants are thought to be rich in antioxidants, which comprise a type of plant nutrients. The body obtains antioxidants from either endogenous or exogenous sources. The antioxidants that enter the body from the outside are called exogenous (
39). Antioxidants, sometimes called "free radical scavengers," are essential for preventing the damage caused by free radicals or unstable molecules produced in response to environmental stress and other insults (
40).
5.1. Conclusions
The results of this study showed that the methanolic extract of E. caucasicum was the most potent plant extract in inhibiting the growth of some bacteria, including S. dysenteriae, R. tritici, and L. monocytogenes. The growth of E. coli, however, was most effectively inhibited by M. sylvestris extract, suggesting this plant extract is a potential treatment for infections caused by this organism.