https://doi.org/10.5812/gct.89849

The Clinical Indications and Cytogenetic Analysis of Genetic Amniocentesis Cases

authors:

avatar Seyed Mehdi Tabatabaei ORCID 1 , * , avatar Zahra Metanat 2

Pregnancy Health Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
Provincial Clinical Genetic Counseling Center, Ali-Asgahr Pediatric Hospital, Zahedan, Iran
Gene, Cell and Tissue: Vol.6, issue 3; e89849
published online: July 24, 2019
article type: Letter
received: January 24, 2019
revised: March 5, 2019
accepted: July 14, 2019

How To Cite Tabatabaei S M , Metanat Z . The Clinical Indications and Cytogenetic Analysis of Genetic Amniocentesis Cases. Gene Cell Tissue. 2019;6(3):e89849. https://doi.org/10.5812/gct.89849.

Dear Editor,

Prenatal genetic screening tests are planned to screen for structural abnormalities, aneuploidy, and genetic diseases in the prenatal period. The prevalence of genetically modified disorders in neonates is estimated to be 4%, and the risk increases with increasing maternal age (1). Down syndrome is one of the most prevalent genetic diseases affecting about 1 in 400 - 1500 newborns, and the risk increases with increasing maternal age (2). Screening for this syndrome is recommended to all pregnant women, especially in women 35 years of age and older.

Prenatal genetic screening tests of pregnant woman include first-trimester screening, second-trimester screening, and combined first- and second-trimester screening tests. First-trimester screening (FTS) for common chromosomal aneuploidies is based on a combination of maternal age and biochemical serum measurements of free beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG), pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A), and ultrasonographic evaluation of nuchal translucency (NT). These tests are usually performed between 11 weeks and 13 weeks of pregnancy. Second-trimester screening (STS) includes biochemical serum measurements of triple-markers (alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated estriol, and B-HCG) or quad-markers (alpha-fetoprotein, unconjugated estriol, B-HCG, and inhibin A), and ultrasound exams that screen the fetus for anomalies. The tests are usually done between 15 weeks and 22 weeks of pregnancy. However, in Iran, because of legal constraints for therapeutic abortions after the 20th week of pregnancy, STS is mostly recommended before the 17th week of pregnancy.

The detection rate of down syndrome for the first-trimester screening at earlier stages of pregnancy is higher than the second-trimester screening (approximately 87% versus 81%) (3). The screening tests that involve two markers, specifically PAPP-A, free β-hCG, in combination with maternal age have a considerably better performance than those involving single markers with and without maternal age, and they can detect 70% of down syndrome affected pregnancies (4). However, underutilization of the first-trimester screening shows that the advantage of earlier diagnosis associated with FTS has been overlooked by clinicians providing genetic counseling.

The risk of fetal loss and other complications associated with amniocentesis is very low, and the risks of invasive procedures have also decreased over time (5). However, not all women with abnormal screening test results agree to undertake such an invasive procedure. Offering pregnant women the relatively new noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) tests that use cell-free fetal DNA sequences isolated from a maternal blood sample may provide reassurance to women who have concerns about undertaking an amniocentesis (6).

GA is recommended for pregnant women with abnormal screening tests. FTS has acceptable performance for detection of pregnancies with chromosomal abnormalities; however, this method has been hardly recommended by clinicians. Some pregnant women who are GA candidates refuse invasive prenatal diagnosis. Moreover, a large fraction of pregnant women have a delayed diagnosis or recommendations for therapeutic abortion. Training of the clinicians on the principles of genetic counseling and increasing public awareness regarding prenatal genetic screening tests and providing pre- and post-test genetic counseling is of great importance.

References

  • 1.

    Wieacker P, Steinhard J. The prenatal diagnosis of genetic diseases. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(48):857-62. [PubMed ID: 21173933]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3004373]. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2010.0857.

  • 2.

    Asim A, Kumar A, Muthuswamy S, Jain S, Agarwal S. "Down syndrome: An insight of the disease". J Biomed Sci. 2015;22:41. [PubMed ID: 26062604]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4464633]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-015-0138-y.

  • 3.

    Seyyed Kavoosi E, Younessi S, Farhud DD. Screening of fetal chromosome aneuploidies in the first and second trimester of 125,170 Iranian pregnant women. Iran J Public Health. 2015;44(6):791-6. [PubMed ID: 26258091]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4524303].

  • 4.

    Alldred SK, Takwoingi Y, Guo B, Pennant M, Deeks JJ, Neilson JP, et al. First trimester serum tests for Down's syndrome screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(11). CD011975. [PubMed ID: 26617074]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6465076]. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011975.

  • 5.

    Wulff CB, Gerds TA, Rode L, Ekelund CK, Petersen OB, Tabor A, et al. Risk of fetal loss associated with invasive testing following combined first-trimester screening for Down syndrome: a national cohort of 147,987 singleton pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(1):38-44. [PubMed ID: 26581188]. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.15820.

  • 6.

    Kazemi M, Salehi M, Kheirollahi M. Down syndrome: Current status, challenges and future perspectives. Int J Mol Cell Med. 2016;5(3):125-33. [PubMed ID: 27942498]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5125364].