Effect of rs4680 (Val158Met) Polymorphism of the COMT Gene on Opioid Addiction in an Iranian Population: A Case-Control Study

authors:

avatar Fatemeh Dahmardeh ORCID 1 , * , avatar Alireza Rezaeifar ORCID 2

Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Zabol University of Medical Sciences, Zabol, Iran

how to cite: Dahmardeh F, Rezaeifar A. Effect of rs4680 (Val158Met) Polymorphism of the COMT Gene on Opioid Addiction in an Iranian Population: A Case-Control Study. Gene Cell Tissue. 2019;6(2):e91912. https://doi.org/10.5812/gct.91912.

Abstract

Background:

Drug addiction is a serious neurological disorder that is significantly associated with mortality and morbidity. It is accompanied by social, economic, and health problems for both the individual and the whole society. Genes playing a role in the catabolism of dopamine (DA), such as catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), seem to be plausible candidate genes for drug dependence.

Objectives:

This study aimed to investigate the effect of rs4680 (Val158Met) polymorphism of the COMT gene on opioid addiction (OA) in the whole samples and male/female subsamples of an Iranian population.

Methods:

The current case-control study was conducted with 96 cases (87 men and nine women with OA) and 142 controls (117 men and 25 women). Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) was used to genotype the samples.

Results:

Our results showed no significant association between the COMT rs4680 gene polymorphism and OA in the total population. In addition, we found no notable correlation between rs4880 and OA in male and female subsamples.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, there was no correlation between the rs4680 polymorphism of the COMT gene and opioid addiction. The conflicting results in studies with different ethnicities and sample sizes suggest that additional studies are needed to investigate the Val158Met polymorphism correlation with other variants of the COMT gene in larger populations and in both genders with opioid and other addictions.

1. Background

Substance abuse is a universal health and social problem. According to the available information, the global prevalence of opioid users is estimated to be approximately 32.4 million, accounting for 0.7% of the world's adult population (aged 15 - 64 years) (1). Opioids are the most popular drugs of use in Iran because of a long border with the main producer of illicit opioids, Afghanistan (2). Opioids refer to drugs extracted from the opium poppy, including morphine, codeine, and derivatives like heroin (1). Opioid addiction (OA) is a chronic disease that can affect the brain and behavior (3). OA is significantly associated with mortality and morbidity and is accompanied by social, economic, and health problems for both the individual and the whole society (4).

Several family, adoption, and twin studies have identified the notable role of heritable determinants on individual differences in addiction (5). Previous studies have shown that genetic factors may constitute 30% - 60% of risk factors for drug addiction (6). It has been suggested that genes involved in molecular events and altered due to drug abuse are the first candidates for identifying specific genes involved in drug addiction (7). For example, prolonged drug abuse alters the levels of dopamine (DA), a kind of neurotransmitter in the dopaminergic system, which plays an important role in drug reward and has been assumed to underlie addiction development and permanence (8).

The critical mechanism to control the levels of synaptic dopamine is the degradation of DA by the enzyme Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). The COMT is an important enzyme to metabolize catechol neurotransmitters such as DA and regulates the level of DA, especially in the frontal cortical areas of the brain. The COMT enzyme deactivates DA by methylation (9). In humans, there are two isoforms of COMT, soluble form (S-COMT) and membrane-bound form (MB-COMT), which are formed through alternative splicing. The MB-COMT is 50 amino acids longer than the S-COMT and prevails in the brain (10). It has a higher catechol affinity than the S-form; thus, MB-COMT is able to terminate the dopaminergic neurotransmission at low concentrations of catecholamines (9).

Linkage studies have identified many genetic determinants of addictive diseases and genetic variants contributing to opiate addiction (7). Furthermore, the relationship of COMT gene polymorphisms and psychiatric disorders (11) with alcohol (12) and drug dependence (13) in different populations was reported previously. However, there are a few studies on the association between rs4680 (Val158Met) polymorphism of the COMT gene and drug dependence (14).

2. Objectives

Considering the crucial role of COMT in DA metabolism, as a major contributor to the etiology of drug dependence, the present study was designed to evaluate the effect of COMT rs4880 polymorphism (common missense SNP) on opiate addiction in both the whole sample and the male/female subsamples in the Southeast population of Iran (Zabol city).

3. Methods

3.1. Subjects

In this study, 96 people with OA (87 men, nine women) were recruited from a drug addiction treatment center in Zabol city, Sistan and Baluchistan province, Iran. They all met the criteria for drug dependence based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases. The subjects suffering a major psychiatric disorder with possible involvement of the neurotransmitter systems under study were excluded (12, 15). In addition, 117 men and 25 women were selected as the control group that self-reported no history of drug abuse and major psychiatric disorders.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Zabol (IR.UOZ.REC.1393.01) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

3.2. DNA Extraction and Genotyping

Blood samples of volunteers participated in the study were collected and stored at -20°C until further experiments. The genomic DNA extraction was conducted by the salting-out method.

The polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method was applied to genotype the samples. The favorable segment of the COMT gene with 628 bp in length was amplified by 5'-CGACTTAGTACATCCTTC-3' and 5'-GAGTAGAATCTTGGCTAG-3' forward and reverse primers, respectively. The primers were designed by the beacon designer program. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was done by routine PCR Mastermix (Genetbio, Denmark) based on the manufacturer’s recommended procedure. PCR thermocycling conditions were as follows: denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 51.8°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 50 s for 34 cycles. The PCR products were digested with the restriction enzyme (MSPI-Roche diagnostics, Swiss). The digested DNA products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel and stained with the green viewer. Gel images were taken by a Life Technologies E-gel imager instrument. The resulting fragments are shown in Figure 1. We repeated the genotyping for random samples (~20% of the total samples) and did not observe any genotyping error.

The PCR-RFLP results for COMT rs4680 polymorphism; L: 100-bp DNA ladder; 1 and 7: GG (225 and 403 bp); 2, 3, 4, 6: GA (225, 443, and 625 bp); 5, 8, 9: AA (625 bp)
The PCR-RFLP results for COMT rs4680 polymorphism; L: 100-bp DNA ladder; 1 and 7: GG (225 and 403 bp); 2, 3, 4, 6: GA (225, 443, and 625 bp); 5, 8, 9: AA (625 bp)

3.3. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were done by SPSS version 20.0. The logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between rs4680 polymorphism and OA by calculating a 95% confidence interval (CI) and odds ratio (OR). The values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

4. Results

Table 1 presents the frequency of the rs4680 COMT genotype in the total population, females, and males. The observed genotypes in the total population were found in Hardy Weinberg equilibrium.

Table 1.

COMT rs4680 Genotype Frequencya

GenotypeOpioids DependenceControls
Male, N = 87Female, N = 9Total, N = 96Male, N = 117Female, N = 25Total, N = 142
GG19 (21.8)1 (11.1)20 (20.8)31 (26.5)5 (20.0)36 (25.4)
GA47 (54.0)8 (88.9)55 (57.3)50 (42.7)8 (32.0)58 (40.8)
AA21 (24.1)021 (21.9)36 (30.8)12 (48.0)48 (33.8)

As shown in Table 2, the frequency of GG (ancestral), GA, and AA genotypes of COMT rs4680 was 20.8%, 57.3%, and 21.9% in cases and 25.4%, 40.8%, and 33.8% in controls, respectively. No significant association was found between COMT rs4680 gene polymorphism and OA in the total population. The frequency of AA genotype versus GG + GA in the recessive model was higher in controls than in the OA group, but the difference was marginally insignificant (P = 0.06).

Table 2.

The Frequency of Alleles and Genotypes of COMT rs4680 Polymorphism in the Case and Control Groups (Total Study Population)a

COMT, rs4680Case, N = 96Control, N = 142P ValueOR (95% CI)
GG20 (20.8)36 (25.4)1
GA55 (57.3)58 (40.8)0.11.8 (0.9 - 3.3)
AA21 (21.9)48 (33.8)0.50.8 (0.4 - 1.7)
Dominant (GA + AA vs. GG) 0.41.3 (0.7 - 2.4)
Recessive (AA vs. GG + GA)0.060.6 (0.3 - 1)
G95 (49.5)130 (45.8)
A97 (50.5)154 (54.2)0.40.9 (0.6 - 1.2)

In addition, the logistic regression analysis showed no notable correlation between rs4880 and OA in female and male subsamples (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3.

The Frequency of Alleles and Genotypes of COMT rs4680 Polymorphism in the Case and Control Groups (Female Subsamples)a

COMT, rs4680OA, Females, N = 9Control, Females, N = 25P ValueOR (95% CI)
GG1 (11.1)5 (20.0)1
GA8 (88.9)8 (32.0)0.25 (0.5 - 53)
AA012 (48.0)--
Dominant (GA + AA vs. GG) 0.52 (0.2 - 20)
Recessive (AA vs. GG + GA)-
G10 (55.5)18 (36)
A8 (44.5)32 (64)0.10.4 (0.2 - 1.3)
Table 4.

The Frequency of Alleles and Genotypes of COMT rs4680 Polymorphism in the Case and Control Groups (Male Subsamples)a

COMT, rs4680OA, Males, N = 87Control, Males, N = 117P ValueOR (95% CI)
GG19 (21.8)31 (26.5)
GA47 (54.0)50 (42.7)0.31.5 (0.8 - 3.1)
AA21 (24.1)36 (30.8)0.90.9 (0.4 - 2.1)
Dominant (GA + AA vs. GG) 0.40.3 (0.7 - 2.5)
Recessive (AA vs. GG + GA)0.30.7 (0.4 - 1.3)
G85 (48.8)112 (47.9)
A89 (51.2)122 (52.1)0.81 (0.6 - 1.4)

5. Discussion

Drug addiction is a serious neurological disorder influenced by many factors including genetic, behavioral, and environmental factors (16). Opioids are a major series of lethal substances. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse reports, the death rate involving opioid drugs and drug overdose has increased about six to eight folds in recent decades (17).

Due to the critical role of DA pathways in drug reward, the genes involved in DA neurotransmission are the probable candidates for correlation with drug addiction (5). However, there are discrepant results in dopamine receptor and transporter genes in genetic association studies due to small sample size and complexity of the phenotype (18). Although many gene variants have been found to be risk factors for drug dependence (16, 19, 20), a few studies have examined associations between variation in the COMT gene and opioid addiction.

The COMT enzyme is a major regulator of the synaptic DA levels and plays an important role in DA catabolism. The human COMT gene is located on chromosome 22q11. The rs4680 polymorphism in the fourth exon of the COMT gene leads the substitution of Met for Val in residue 158 (Val158Met) of its protein (21). It has been suggested that rs4680 may alter enzyme activity and subsequently, the efficiency of DA degradation and vulnerability to substance dependence. It has been shown that the COMT enzyme with Val/Val genotype leads to a three to four-fold increase in enzymatic activity as compared to Met/Met genotype (22, 23). Therefore, the rs4680 polymorphism of the COMT gene is a plausible marker for the genetic predisposition to addiction. To our knowledge, this is the first study investigating the effect of COMT Val158Met polymorphism on opioid addiction in an Iranian population.

The results of a recent meta-analysis by Taylor revealed a significant association between COMT Val158Met polymorphism and different psychiatric disorders (24). Similar results showed the contribution of rs4680 to susceptibility to schizophrenia and bipolar mood disorder in southwest Iran (25), but no association was found between rs4680 and schizophrenia in southeast Iran (26).

Controversial results have also been reported when evaluating rs4680 SNP in relation to addictive diseases. Horowitz et al. found an association between the G (Val) allele and heroin addiction (27). Lohoff et al. found a statistically significant difference between cocaine-dependent individuals (f (Met) = 35%) and normal controls (f (Met) = 27%) (P = 0.004) of African descent (28). Similar results on the implication of Val158Met polymorphism in a variety of substance abuse disorders were reported by several previous studies (29-31). However, no similar finding was shown by others (32-34). Moreover, Cao et al. observed no differences in genotype or allele frequencies for the rs4680 polymorphism between opiate-dependent cases and controls (35). The results from Voisey et al.’s study showed a weak association between rs4680 SNP and alcohol dependence (at the allele level), but it was not associated with nicotine or opiate dependence (12). Omidvar et al. demonstrated that GG (Val/Val) genotype of the COMT gene was associated with smoking cessation. However, they found no sex difference and no effect of the COMT polymorphism on smoking initiation (13). Christoffersen et al. showed that the AA genotype of rs4680 is less frequent in deceased patients with OA than in living patients with OA in Caucasian subjects (14).

Since different results have been observed when evaluating the effect of Val158Met SNP on behavioral disorders in males and females, it has been suggested that the Val158Met substitution has gender-specific implications (36). Therefore, in the current study, we conducted the association tests in both genders; however, our results showed no significant association between rs4680 SNP and OA in males and females. Similar to our results, Demetrovics et al. observed that the genotype frequency of COMT Val158Met did not differ between Hungarian opiate-dependent patients and controls (in the whole population and male/female subsamples) (15). Contrary to these results, Oosterhuis et al. found a marked association between rs4680 polymorphism in Hispanic women and heroin addiction, but not in men (36). Moreover, Enoch et al. demonstrated the major effect of Val158 on smoking in American-Indian women and suggested that there may be sex differences in the genetic origins of alcoholism and smoking in that population, overlapping in genetic vulnerability to both addictions in women (37).

This study has several limitations. First, based on the information available about the effect of rs4680 on enzyme activity, we did not evaluate the expression of the COMT gene. The second limitation of this study was the small sample size (especially in the female group).

5.1. Conclusions

In the current study, we found no significant correlation between rs4680 polymorphism of the COMT gene and opioid addiction. According to the size of the Iranian population and possible genetic differences among them, investigations in different cities can be extremely helpful for a better understanding of the association between variations of the COMT gene and opioid addiction in Iran. On the other hand, due to conflicting results in studies with different ethnicities and population sizes, additional studies of the correlation between Val158Met polymorphism and other variants of the COMT gene in a larger population and in both genders with opioid and other addictions should be done to obtain more reliable results and find new potential biomarkers for drug dependence.

References

  • 1.

    Vasilev G, Milcheva S, Vassileva J. Opioid use in the twenty first century: Similarities and differences across national borders. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry. 2016;3(3):293-305. [PubMed ID: 27493878]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4968876]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40501-016-0089-2.

  • 2.

    Mohebbi E, Haghdoost AA, Noroozi A, Molavi Vardanjani H, Hajebi A, Nikbakht R, et al. Awareness and attitude towards opioid and stimulant use and lifetime prevalence of the drugs: A study in 5 large cities of Iran. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;8(4):222-32. [PubMed ID: 31050967]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6499902]. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2018.128.

  • 3.

    Kosten TR, George TP. The neurobiology of opioid dependence: Implications for treatment. Sci Pract Perspect. 2002;1(1):13-20. [PubMed ID: 18567959]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2851054].

  • 4.

    Dasgupta N, Beletsky L, Ciccarone D. Opioid crisis: No easy fix to its social and economic determinants. Am J Public Health. 2018;108(2):182-6. [PubMed ID: 29267060]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5846593]. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304187.

  • 5.

    Agrawal A, Verweij KJ, Gillespie NA, Heath AC, Lessov-Schlaggar CN, Martin NG, et al. The genetics of addiction-a translational perspective. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2. e140. [PubMed ID: 22806211]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3410620]. https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2012.54.

  • 6.

    Kreek MJ, Nielsen DA, Butelman ER, LaForge KS. Genetic influences on impulsivity, risk taking, stress responsivity and vulnerability to drug abuse and addiction. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(11):1450-7. [PubMed ID: 16251987]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1583.

  • 7.

    Kreek MJ, Bart G, Lilly C, LaForge KS, Nielsen DA. Pharmacogenetics and human molecular genetics of opiate and cocaine addictions and their treatments. Pharmacol Rev. 2005;57(1):1-26. [PubMed ID: 15734726]. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.57.1.1.

  • 8.

    Diana M. The dopamine hypothesis of drug addiction and its potential therapeutic value. Front Psychiatry. 2011;2:64. [PubMed ID: 22144966]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3225760]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2011.00064.

  • 9.

    Kaenmaki M, Tammimaki A, Garcia-Horsman JA, Myohanen T, Schendzielorz N, Karayiorgou M, et al. Importance of membrane-bound catechol-O-methyltransferase in L-DOPA metabolism: A pharmacokinetic study in two types of Comt gene modified mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2009;158(8):1884-94. [PubMed ID: 19930170]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2807650]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00494.x.

  • 10.

    Mannisto PT, Kaakkola S. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): Biochemistry, molecular biology, pharmacology, and clinical efficacy of the new selective COMT inhibitors. Pharmacol Rev. 1999;51(4):593-628. [PubMed ID: 10581325].

  • 11.

    Sun Z, Zhang Z, Mao P, Ma Y, Li W, Li J, et al. Association between COMT gene polymorphisms, clinical symptoms, and cognitive functions in Han Chinese patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Genet. 2018;28(3):47-54. [PubMed ID: 29634613]. https://doi.org/10.1097/YPG.0000000000000194.

  • 12.

    Voisey J, Swagell CD, Hughes IP, Lawford BR, Young RM, Morris CP. A novel SNP in COMT is associated with alcohol dependence but not opiate or nicotine dependence: A case control study. Behav Brain Funct. 2011;7:51. [PubMed ID: 22208661]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3268714]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-7-51.

  • 13.

    Omidvar M, Stolk L, Uitterlinden AG, Hofman A, Van Duijn CM, Tiemeier H. The effect of catechol-O-methyltransferase Met/Val functional polymorphism on smoking cessation: Retrospective and prospective analyses in a cohort study. Pharmacogenet Genomics. 2009;19(1):45-51. [PubMed ID: 19160592].

  • 14.

    Christoffersen DJ, Damkier P, Feddersen S, Moller S, Thomsen JL, Brasch-Andersen C, et al. The ABCB1, rs9282564, AG and TT genotypes and the COMT, rs4680, AA genotype are less frequent in deceased patients with opioid addiction than in living patients with opioid addiction. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016;119(4):381-8. [PubMed ID: 27061230]. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.12602.

  • 15.

    Demetrovics Z, Varga G, Szekely A, Vereczkei A, Csorba J, Balazs H, et al. Association between Novelty Seeking of opiate-dependent patients and the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(158)Met polymorphism. Compr Psychiatry. 2010;51(5):510-5. [PubMed ID: 20728009]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.11.008.

  • 16.

    Ahmed M, Ul Haq I, Faisal M, Waseem D, Taqi MM. Implication of OPRM1 A118G polymorphism in opioids addicts in Pakistan: In vitro and in silico analysis. J Mol Neurosci. 2018;65(4):472-9. [PubMed ID: 30033503]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6132783]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-018-1123-1.

  • 17.

    Hu R, Dai Y, Jia P, Zhao Z. ANCO-GeneDB: annotations and comprehensive analysis of candidate genes for alcohol, nicotine, cocaine and opioid dependence. Database (Oxford). 2018;2018. [PubMed ID: 30403795]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6310508]. https://doi.org/10.1093/database/bay121.

  • 18.

    Gorwood P, Le Strat Y, Ramoz N, Dubertret C, Moalic JM, Simonneau M. Genetics of dopamine receptors and drug addiction. Hum Genet. 2012;131(6):803-22. [PubMed ID: 22350797]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-012-1145-7.

  • 19.

    Levran O, Correa da Rosa J, Randesi M, Rotrosen J, Adelson M, Kreek MJ. A non-coding CRHR2 SNP rs255105, a cis-eQTL for a downstream lincRNA AC005154.6, is associated with heroin addiction. PLoS One. 2018;13(6). e0199951. [PubMed ID: 29953524]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6023117]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199951.

  • 20.

    Oueslati B, Moula O, Ghachem R. The impact of OPRM1's genetic polymorphisms on methadone maintenance treatment in opioid addicts: A systematic review. Pharmacogenomics. 2018;19(8):741-7. [PubMed ID: 29785888]. https://doi.org/10.2217/pgs-2018-0017.

  • 21.

    Mattay VS, Goldberg TE, Fera F, Hariri AR, Tessitore A, Egan MF, et al. Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(10):6186-91. [PubMed ID: 12716966]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC156347]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0931309100.

  • 22.

    Lachman HM, Papolos DF, Saito T, Yu YM, Szumlanski CL, Weinshilboum RM. Human catechol-O-methyltransferase pharmacogenetics: description of a functional polymorphism and its potential application to neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacogenetics. 1996;6(3):243-50. [PubMed ID: 8807664].

  • 23.

    Mukherjee N, Kidd KK, Pakstis AJ, Speed WC, Li H, Tarnok Z, et al. The complex global pattern of genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium at catechol-O-methyltransferase. Mol Psychiatry. 2010;15(2):216-25. [PubMed ID: 18574484]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2811226]. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2008.64.

  • 24.

    Taylor S. Association between COMT Val158Met and psychiatric disorders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2018;177(2):199-210. [PubMed ID: 28608575]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32556.

  • 25.

    Behbahani P, Kazemi-Nezhad SR, Foroughmand AM, Ahmadi L. Association study of single nucleotide polymorphism rs165599 of COMT gene, with schizophrenia and bipolar mood disorder in the south-west of Iran. Mol Biol Res Commun. 2015;4(2):67-72. [PubMed ID: 27843998]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5019293].

  • 26.

    Saravani R, Galavi HR, Lotfian Sargazi M. Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) gene (Val158Met) and brain-derived neurotropic factor (BDNF) (Val66Met) genes polymorphism in schizophrenia: A case-control study. Iran J Psychiatry. 2017;12(4):265-70. [PubMed ID: 29472953]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5816916].

  • 27.

    Horowitz R, Kotler M, Shufman E, Aharoni S, Kremer I, Cohen H, et al. Confirmation of an excess of the high enzyme activity COMTval allele in heroin addicts in a family-based haplotype relative risk study. Am J Med Genet. 2000;96(5):599-603. https://doi.org/10.1002/1096-8628(20001009)96:5<599::aid-ajmg4>3.0.co;2-o.

  • 28.

    Lohoff FW, Weller AE, Bloch PJ, Nall AH, Ferraro TN, Kampman KM, et al. Association between the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val158Met polymorphism and cocaine dependence. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2008;33(13):3078-84. [PubMed ID: 18704099]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2583214]. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2008.126.

  • 29.

    Hosak L, Libiger J, Cizek J, Beranek M, Cermakova E. The COMT Val158Met polymorphism is associated with novelty seeking in Czech methamphetamine abusers: Preliminary results. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2006;27(6):799-802. [PubMed ID: 17187009].

  • 30.

    Beuten J, Payne TJ, Ma JZ, Li MD. Significant association of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) haplotypes with nicotine dependence in male and female smokers of two ethnic populations. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006;31(3):675-84. [PubMed ID: 16395295]. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300997.

  • 31.

    Guillot CR, Fanning JR, Liang T, Berman ME. COMT associations with disordered gambling and drinking measures. J Gambl Stud. 2015;31(2):513-24. [PubMed ID: 24390676]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4082478]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-013-9434-1.

  • 32.

    Cevoli S, Mochi M, Scapoli C, Marzocchi N, Pierangeli G, Pini LA, et al. A genetic association study of dopamine metabolism-related genes and chronic headache with drug abuse. Eur J Neurol. 2006;13(9):1009-13. [PubMed ID: 16930369]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01415.x.

  • 33.

    Kweon YS, Lee HK, Lee CT, Pae CU. Association study of catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism in Korean male alcoholics. Psychiatr Genet. 2005;15(2):151-4. [PubMed ID: 15900232].

  • 34.

    Hallikainen T, Lachman H, Saito T, Volavka J, Kauhanen J, Salonen JT, et al. Lack of association between the functional variant of the catechol-o-methyltransferase (COMT) gene and early-onset alcoholism associated with severe antisocial behavior. Am J Med Genet. 2000;96(3):348-52. [PubMed ID: 10898913].

  • 35.

    Cao L, Li T, Liu X. [Association study of heroin dependence and catechol-O-methyltransferase gene]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Yi Chuan Xue Za Zhi. 2003;20(2):127-30. Chinese. [PubMed ID: 12673581].

  • 36.

    Oosterhuis BE, LaForge KS, Proudnikov D, Ho A, Nielsen DA, Gianotti R, et al. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene variants: Possible association of the Val158Met variant with opiate addiction in Hispanic women. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2008;147B(6):793-8. [PubMed ID: 18270997]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2909109]. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.30716.

  • 37.

    Enoch MA, Waheed JF, Harris CR, Albaugh B, Goldman D. Sex differences in the influence of COMT Val158Met on alcoholism and smoking in plains American Indians. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2006;30(3):399-406. [PubMed ID: 16499480]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-0277.2006.00045.x.