The textile industries use dyes for coloring their final products, and as a result, produce large amounts of organic matter and color-containing effluents (
1,
2). The presence of these substances with complex aromatic structures can adversely affect the aqueous environment by reducing photosynthesis activity (
1-
4). Moreover, most of these aromatic compounds can cause skin irritation and respiratory problems and increase cancer and cell mutation risks in humans (
5-
7). Therefore, effluents containing dyes require efficient treatment before being discharged into the environment (
1). Various methods such as oxidation, adsorption, coagulation, photochemical degradation, and membrane separation are used for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions (
8,
9). Among the mentioned techniques, adsorption has been considered the most attractive technology due to high efficiency, simplicity, and low cost (
10-
12). It is a method that transfers contaminants from the liquid phase to a solid phase and, therefore, reduces the bioavailability of stable and aromatic species to living organisms (
13). In this method, different adsorbents such as powdered activated carbon (
14), chitosan (
15), CNTs (
1), bamboo activated carbon (
16), fly ash (
17,
18), chitin (
19), zeolite (
20), peanut hull (
21), carbon nanotubes (
12), and Fe
3O
4/chitosan (
22) have been used for the adsorption of reactive dyes in aqueous environments. Among them, carbon nanotubes have been suggested for the successful removal of different types of pollutants from aqueous solutions because CNTs have favorable physicochemical features such as stability, large specific surface area, high selectivity, hollow and layered structures, and small size (
5,
6,
23). Moreover, their functional groups and hydrophobic surfaces show strong interactions with inorganic and organic compounds (
24).
Nonetheless, adsorbents including activated carbon and CNTs are relatively expensive and readily saturated; thus, it is essential to regenerate and reuse them for the treatment of aqueous solutions. Commonly, adsorbents are regenerated by chemical, thermal, and wet air oxidation methods, with serious drawbacks including high cost, expensive equipment, decreasing adsorption capacity, and high energy consumption (
25). Recently, adsorbent regeneration by the electrochemical process has been reported as an effective method because of minimal adsorbent losses, 80-95% regeneration efficiencies, and degradation of contaminants desorbed from the adsorbent via oxidation at the anode surface (
26,
27). In the process of electrochemical regeneration, pollutants are desorbed from the adsorbent surface by the electro-desorption mechanism and then degraded by electrochemical oxidation (
25). Many active species such as hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide, and HClO contribute to direct or indirect electrochemical oxidation of pollutants (
25,
28). Wu et al. treated p-nitrophenol by the electrochemical-adsorption process and found that the electrochemical regeneration was affected by current density, airflow, and the production rate of reactive species (
28). Zhou and Lei, by studying the electrochemical regeneration of activated carbon containing p-nitrophenol, reported that the degradation of contaminant molecules on the adsorbent could occur by the attack of free radicals produced by electro-oxidation (
26).
It has been reported that the efficiency of electrochemical oxidation is mainly dependent on the electrode material, which is basically divided into active and non-active electrodes. It was also reported that non-active electrodes, such as lead dioxide (PbO
2) have better efficiency for the destruction of pollutants than have active electrodes such as platinum (Pt) (
26). Recently, this type of electrodes has shown a loss of activity due to surface fouling or limited service life (
25). To overcome these problems, electrodes with high lifetime and catalytic activity such as Ti/Sb-SnO
2 (
29), Ti/Co/SnO
2-Sb
2O
5 (
30), boron-doped diamond (
31), Ti/Pt/PbO
2, and Si/BDD (
32) electrodes have been proposed. Compared to these electrodes, Ti/RuO
2-IrO
2-TiO
2 has special characteristics such as large specific surface areas, high mass transfer, rapid production of oxidants, and long-term durability (
33-
37). However, less attention has been paid to Ti/RuO
2-IrO
2-TiO
2 as the anode electrode for the electrochemical regeneration of adsorbents.