Abstract
Background:
Hypertension is one of the key risk factors for several diseases.Objectives:
The aim of this study was to determine the determinants of hypertension self-management behaviors (HSBs) based on intervention mapping approach.Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 800 hypertensive patients in southwestern Iran in 2018. A structured questionnaire was applied for data collection. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.Results:
The mean age of respondents was 58.25 years (SD: 12.10; age range: 30 - 74 years). The best predictors for HSBs were perceived barriers, outcome expectations, and self-efficacy.Conclusions:
Our findings have implications for the evidence-based design of HSBs promotion interventions.Keywords
Hypertension Perceived Barriers Outcome Expectations Self-Efficacy
1. Background
Hypertension is one of the key risk factors of atherosclerosis, stroke, and heart and kidney failure (1, 2). In the last four decades, the prevalence of hypertension has reduced in high-income countries but increased in low-income countries, and is anticipated to increase by 60% to reach 1.56 billion worldwide by 2025 (3). Hypertension can be prevented or controlled by changes in lifestyle, including medication adherence, weight loss, increased physical activity, refraining from smoking, complying with a healthy diet rich in fruits and vegetables, and reduced sodium intake (4). Identifying determinants of self-management behaviors in patients helps health promotion experts to develop health-promoting programs. In this regard, the intervention mapping (IM) approach is one of the most popular frameworks for planning health promotion programs (5). IM has been used in several studies of the self-management behaviors promotion of chronic diseases (6, 7).
2. Objectives
The aim of the study was to determine the determinants of hypertension self-management behaviors (HSBs) based on the IM approach.
3. Methods
3.1. Participants and Procedure
This cross-sectional study was conducted on the rural population of Shadegan in Khuzestan Province, Iran in 2018. The data collection was performed in the following steps. First, the villages of Shadegan were considered as a cluster. Then, based on the probability proportional to the size of each cluster, participants were randomly selected. The sample size was calculated at the 95% significant level, and the standard deviation (SD) of HSBs according to the result of a pilot study was 4.47. Considering an error rate (d) of 0.1, the sample was estimated as 800, of whom 730 signed the consent form and voluntarily agreed to participate in the study (response rate: 91.2%). A confirmed diagnosis of hypertension for over six months, age > 30 years, and the use of at least one antihypertensive medication were considered as the inclusion criteria.
3.2. Measures
Data were collected through face-to-face interviews with the participants using written questionnaires (Appendix in supplementary file). Four health care providers working in the health centers of the region were trained on how to collect the data. The data collection tool had three parts. The first part contained six items on demographic information, including age, gender, marital status, education level, household size, and economic status.
The second part of the questionnaire included five items on HSBs, including smoking, physical activity, proper food regimen, weight control, and medication adherence. Each item was scored from 0 to 4, making the total score between 0 and 20 points. Higher scores were indicative of better HSBs. Cronbach’s alpha was calculated as 0.81.
The third part assessed the attitude (Att), outcome expectations (OE), perceived barriers (PB), subjective norms (SNs), and self-efficacy (SE). The research team developed the questionnaire using the results of previous studies (8-10), as well as the first and second steps of the IM approach (5). The participants answered the constructs’ items on a Likert scale from 1 to 5. The reliability coefficients for the abovementioned constructs were as follows: (1) Att (α = 0.72), (2) OE (α = 0.78), (3) PB (α = 0.88), (4) SNs (α = 0.79), and (5) SE (α = 0.70), attesting to the internal consistency of the measures.
3.3. Data Management and Analysis
The SPSS-16 was used for the data analysis. Multiple linear regressions was performed to explain the variance and predictability in the HSBs according to the variables of (1) Att, (2) OE, (3) PB, (4) SNs, and (5) SE. The validity of the questionnaires was confirmed using an expert panel. Cronbach’s alpha was used to estimate the internal consistency of different measures.
3.4. Ethical Approval
The Research Ethics Committee of Abadan School of Medical Sciences, Iran (IR.ABADANUMS.REC.1395.038) approved the study protocol. All participants signed an informed consent.
4. Results
The mean age of participants was 58.25 years (SD = 12.10), and age range was 30 - 74 years. More details of demographic characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1.
Distribution of the Demographic Characteristics Among the Participants
| Variables | No. (%) |
|---|---|
| Age | |
| Middle-aged | 340 (46.6) |
| Elderly | 390 (53.4) |
| Gender | |
| Female | 421 (57.7) |
| Male | 309 (42.3) |
| Marital Status | |
| Single | 38 (5.2) |
| Married | 510 (69.9) |
| Widow | 182 (24.9) |
| Education | |
| Illiterate | 179 (24.5) |
| Primary school (5 grades) | 293 (40.1) |
| Secondary school (8 grades) | 128 (17.5) |
| High school (12 grades) | 92 (12.6) |
| Academic (16 grades) | 38 (5.2) |
| Household Size | |
| 1 - 2 | 92 (12.6) |
| 3 - 5 | 582 (79.7) |
| More than 5 | 56 (7.7) |
| Economic Status | |
| Poor | 154 (21.1) |
| Middle | 450 (61.6) |
| Good | 126 (17.3) |
Our results suggested that the assessed constructs explained 51% of the variance in HSBs (Table 2).
The Determinants of HSBs
| Model | Unstandardized Coefficients | Standardized Coefficients | t | P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B | SE | Beta | |||
| Step 1 | |||||
| Att | 0.049 | 0.037 | 0.038 | 1.330 | 0.184 |
| OE | 0.377 | 0.038 | 0.292 | 9.858 | < 0.001 |
| PB | -0.225 | 0.028 | -0.314 | -8.006 | < 0.001 |
| SNs | 0.014 | 0.024 | 0.019 | 0.597 | 0.551 |
| SE | 0.315 | 0.047 | 0.248 | 6.742 | < 0.001 |
| Step 2 | |||||
| Att | 0.050 | 0.037 | 0.038 | 1.357 | 0.175 |
| OE | 0.382 | 0.037 | 0.296 | 10.244 | < 0.001 |
| PB | -0.232 | 0.025 | -0.324 | -9.192 | < 0.001 |
| SE | 0.313 | 0.047 | 0.247 | 6.721 | < 0.001 |
| Step 3 | |||||
| OE | 0.389 | 0.037 | 0.301 | 10.490 | < 0.001 |
| PB | -0.233 | 0.025 | -0.325 | -9.222 | < 0.001 |
| SE | 0.328 | 0.045 | 0.259 | 7.254 | < 0.001 |
The mean, standard deviation, score range, and correlation between the studied constructs are shown in Table 3.
The Mean, Standard Deviation, Score Range, and Correlation Between the Determinants of HSBs
| Variables | Mean (SD) | Range | Att | OE | SNs | SE | HSBs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Att | 14.60 (3.37) | 5 - 25 | 1 | ||||
| OE | 14.32 (3.39) | 5 - 25 | 0.267** | 1 | |||
| PB | 21.04 (6.13) | 7 - 35 | -0.288** | -0.382** | 1 | ||
| SNs | 23.63 (5.92) | 8 - 40 | 0.217** | 0.386** | -0.572** | 1 | |
| SE | 14.81 (3.46) | 5 - 25 | 0.384** | 0.408** | -0.671** | 0.384** | 1 |
| HSBs | 8.29 (4.39) | 0 - 20 | 0.306** | 0.531** | -0.614** | 0.415** | 0.600** |
5. Discussion
According to our findings, socio-cognitive constructs explained 51% of the variance in HSBs. The present findings also showed that PB, OE, and SE were the strongest determinants of HSBs. This result is not similar to the results reported by other studies (8-10). In this regard, Bane et al. reported a significant relationship between self-efficacy and medication adherence in hypertensive patients (8). Furthermore, Lewis et al. indicated the important role of behavioral outcome in hypertensive medication adherence (9). Moreover, Fongwa et al. reported financial resources and stressful settings as barriers to adherence to treatment in women with hypertension (10).
5.1. Conclusion
This research provides a foundation for planning health promotion programs to increase HSBs. Planning a health promotion program to increase OE and SE and reduce PB may be useful to increase HSBs.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Jalali SF, Javanian M, Ghadimi R, Bijani A, Mouodi S. Blood Pressure Screening Campaign in the Adult Population. Health Scope. 2021;10(1). e110707. https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.110707.
-
2.
Abedini S, Pourjalil F, Mohseni S. The Impact of an Educational Program Based on the BASNEF Model on Knowledge and Self-Care Behaviors of Patients with Hypertension. Health Scope. 2020;9(4). e95588. https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.95588.
-
3.
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in blood pressure from 1975 to 2015: A pooled analysis of 1479 population-based measurement studies with 19.1 million participants. Lancet. 2017;389(10064):37-55. [PubMed ID: 27863813]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5220163]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31919-5.
-
4.
Kotseva K, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Ryden L, Hoes A, Grobbee D, et al. Lifestyle and impact on cardiovascular risk factor control in coronary patients across 27 countries: Results from the European Society of Cardiology ESC-EORP EUROASPIRE V registry. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019;26(8):824-35. [PubMed ID: 30739508]. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487318825350.
-
5.
Kok G, Schaalma H, Ruiter RA, van Empelen P, Brug J. Intervention mapping: protocol for applying health psychology theory to prevention programmes. J Health Psychol. 2004;9(1):85-98. [PubMed ID: 14683571]. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105304038379.
-
6.
Detaille SI, van der Gulden JW, Engels JA, Heerkens YF, van Dijk FJ. Using intervention mapping (IM) to develop a self-management programme for employees with a chronic disease in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:353. [PubMed ID: 20565925]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2908090]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-10-353.
-
7.
Hadjiconstantinou M, Schreder S, Brough C, Northern A, Stribling B, Khunti K, et al. Using Intervention Mapping to Develop a Digital Self-Management Program for People With Type 2 Diabetes: Tutorial on MyDESMOND. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(5). e17316. [PubMed ID: 32391797]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7248797]. https://doi.org/10.2196/17316.
-
8.
Bane C, Hughe CM, McElnay JC. Determinants of medication adherence in hypertensive patients: an application of self-efficacy and the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Int J Pharm Pract. 2006;14(3):197-204. https://doi.org/10.1211/ijpp.14.3.0006.
-
9.
Lewis LM, Askie P, Randleman S, Shelton-Dunston B. Medication adherence beliefs of community-dwelling hypertensive African Americans. J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2010;25(3):199-206. [PubMed ID: 20386242]. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e3181c7ccde.
-
10.
Fongwa MN, Evangelista LS, Hays RD, Martins DS, Elashoff D, Cowan MJ, et al. Adherence treatment factors in hypertensive African American women. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2008;4(1):157-66. [PubMed ID: 18629350]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2464745]. https://doi.org/10.2147/vhrm.2008.04.01.157.