Suicidal Behaviour Among Nigerian Undergraduates: Associations with Gambling Disorder and Emotional Dysregulation

authors:

avatar Bede Chinonye Akpunne ORCID 1 , * , avatar Ebenezer Olutope Akinnawo 2 , avatar Stephen Ikechukwu Akpunne 3 , avatar Daniel Oluwasanmi Kumuyi ORCID 1

Department of Behavioural Studies, Faculty of Social Sciences, Redeemer's University, Ede, Osun State, Nigeria
Department of Pure and Applied Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Adekunle Ajasin University, Akungba –Akoko, Ondo State, Nigeria
Harriett A. Woolford Health Center, Morgan State University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

how to cite: Akpunne B C, Akinnawo E O, Akpunne S I, Kumuyi D O. Suicidal Behaviour Among Nigerian Undergraduates: Associations with Gambling Disorder and Emotional Dysregulation. Health Scope. 2022;11(2):e121797. doi: 10.5812/jhealthscope-121797.

Abstract

Background:

There is a high prevalence of suicidal behavior among Nigerian youths. However, the connections between suicidal behavior and precipitating factors, such as gambling disorder and emotional dysregulation (ED) in this population, are not well researched.

Objectives:

The present study examined the associations between gambling disorder, ED, and suicidal behavior in Nigerian university undergraduate students.

Methods:

This study was carried out during October 2020 - April 2021 on 1338 undergraduates with a mean ± SD age of 19.84 ± 3.22 years selected using random and purposive sampling for the universities and participants respectively. Participants responded to the Attitudes Towards Gambling Scale, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and Redeemer's University Suicidality Scale. Descriptive statistics (simple percentages) and inferential statistics (Pearson’s correlation and regression analysis) were used for data analysis.

Results:

The Pearson's correlation revealed that suicidal behaviour had significant positive correlations with the nonacceptance of emotional responses or distress (r = 0.22, P = 0), difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviours (r = 0.21, P = 0), difficulties in impulse control (r = 0.27, P = 0), the lack of emotional awareness (r = 0.14, P = 0), limited access to emotional regulation strategies (r = 0.33, P = 0), the lack of emotional clarity (r = 0.32, P = 0), and difficulties in emotional regulation (r = 0.4, P = 0). Problematic gambling (PG) independently predicted suicidal behavior, while PG and ED dimensions jointly predicted suicidal behavior. The ED dimensions contributed 15% incrementally to the prediction of suicidal behavior and beyond the 2% variance accounted for PG in undergraduates.

Conclusions:

Our results showed positive links between PG, ED, and suicidal behavior among Nigerian undergraduates. It suggests that the combination of PG and ED increases the severity of suicidal behavior among students.

1. Background

Suicide is one of the top ten causes of mortality in the overall population (1) and the second or third most common cause of death among people aged 15 - 34 years globally (2, 3). More than 800,000 people die annually by suicide worldwide, with estimates that for every suicide death, more than 20 others attempt suicide (4, 5). Statistics show that one person commits suicide every 40 seconds (4), and reports vary by country and location (6). Suicide connotes any self-initiated or committed action with the aim or expectation of dying, including active or passive self-inflicted acts (7). Three main suicidal behaviors are ideation, planning, and attempt (4). Suicidal behavior among adolescents has become a significant public health concern in many parts of the world due to its increased incidence (8, 9). Suicide deaths in Nigeria, as in many other countries, are augmenting at an alarming rate (10-12). In 2019, 3.5 suicide deaths were reported per 100,000 Nigerian population (13). Most deaths by suicide occur in the rural communities (14) of developing countries, such as Nigeria (10), and are primarily unreported (5). According to the World Health Organization (4) ranking, Nigeria tops African countries and ranks fifth in the countries with acute suicide cases worldwide. With 24,000,000 cases, South Korea leads the pack, followed by Russia (18,000,000), India (16,000,000), and Japan (15,400,000) (15).

Suicidal behavior and gambling disorders have been linked in studies (16, 17). Gambling is a complicated phenomenon (18), influenced by genetic disposition (19), a family history of gambling or substance-use disorder (20), personality traits (21), socio-demographic and exposure variables (22), and hostile childhood events (23). Gambling is a common way for Nigerian undergraduates to make ends meet (12). This circumstance frequently predisposes gamblers to become pathological/compulsive gamblers (24), who exhibit symptoms such as an overwhelming drive to keep gambling despite its toll on their lives (25, 26).

Emotional dysregulation (ED) is a key aspect of the gambling problem (27, 28). ED is a multidimensional term that includes maladaptive responses to unpleasant emotional states and impulsivity (29). In addition, PG has been associated with impulsivity, particularly its emotional components (21). According to the evidence, emotion-driven impulsivity and ED are intimately linked (30). Compulsive gambling might be motivated by an impulsive need to avoid undesirable mood states (31). As a result, people with PG may use gambling to regulate their emotions (32). Success in lowering bad feelings through gambling involvement becomes a source of negative reinforcement, which keeps gambling going (33). Therefore, gambling to cope with negative emotions is associated with greater severity and poorer gambling outcomes (28, 32). Individuals with gambling disorder (IGD) are more likely to use maladaptive emotional control approaches, such as emotional suppression (34).

Suicidal behavior is pathological and is influenced by various biological, psychological, social, cultural, and spiritual variables. However, the association and pattern of the interaction between gambling problems, ED, and suicidal behavior remain unclear (35). They have not been studied sufficiently in Nigeria despite the high frequency of suicide (12), particularly among young people.

2. Objectives

This study evaluates the relationships between Nigerian students' gambling disorder, ED, and suicidal behavior. We hypothesized that the suicide behavior of participants would be significantly and jointly predicted by gambling disorder and ED. We also hypothesized that ED, in addition to gambling disorder, would have a significant incremental predictive influence on the severity of suicide behavior in the Nigerian university undergraduate students population.

3. Methods

3.1. Participants

The target of the study was selected university undergraduates in Osun state, southwestern Nigeria. The data were collected during October 2020 - April 2021, and a multi-stage sampling procedure was adopted in this study. Four universities were selected through simple random sampling in the first stage (using the ballot method). The clustered sampling method was employed at the second stage to ensure representativeness in selecting respondents from different already existing clusters. To this aim, various existing sub-groups to which the population already belonged in the chosen institutions were used. The subgroups used as clusters were gender, faculty, and levels of study. To ensure that the identified clusters were adequately sampled, the purposive sampling technique was used at the last stage in selecting 1338 respondents (mean ± SD age of 19.84 ± 3.22 years) for the study.

3.2. Measures

Attitudes Towards Gambling Scale (ATGS-8), proposed by Orford et al. (36), is an 8-item variation of the original 14-item version of the British Gambling Prevalence Survey instrument developed in 2007 to measure attitudes towards gambling (36). The ATGS-8 items were assessed based on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Four items (1, 4, 6, 7) were scored backward, and the total ATGS-8 score with a range of 8 - 40 was obtained as the sum of eight components. A score of 24 reflects a neutral attitude toward gambling and represents the middle. Scores above 24 suggest an average favorable attitude toward gambling, while scores below 24 indicate an unfavorable attitude toward gambling. In the British sample, the derived Cronbach's alpha value was 0.76, while item-total correlations ranged from 0.39 to 0.58 (36, 37).

Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) by Gratz and Roemer (38) is a 36-item measure of ED. Each item is scored based on a 5-point Likert scale (almost never to almost always). DERS has six dimensions: nonacceptance of emotional responses, difficulties engaging in goal‐directed behaviors, difficulties in impulse control, the lack of emotional awareness, limited emotional regulation strategies, and the lack of emotional clarity. Our pilot study yielded a validity coefficient of 0.62 between the DERS and SIDES Affect Dysregulation Scale (39). The DERS has adequate psychometric properties in adults and adolescents (40).

Redeemer's University Suicidality Scale (RUSS) is a 19-item single-factor measure of suicidal behavior developed by the authors. An earlier study of the development and validation of RUSS involved initial item generation, expert appraisal (content validity) of the initial pool of items, and exploratory factor analysis for item purification. The internal consistency of Cronbach's alpha of 0.93 was reported for the RUSS. A satisfactory validity coefficient (r = 0.881, P = 0) was observed between RUSS and The Suicide Ideation Scale by Rudd (41) and (r = 0.605, P = 0) between RUSS and General Health Questionnaire (42). This finding of the pilot study showed that RUSS was valid as a diagnostic tool for measuring suicidality among the general Nigerian population.

3.4. Statistical Analysis

The Statistical Package of Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 was used to evaluate the data collected. The demographic characteristics of respondents were organized, summarised, and described using descriptive statistics (frequency and percentage), whereas the hypotheses were tested using inferential statistics (regression analysis).

3.5. Informed Consent

The respondents signed informed consent before administering the instruments. The study's goal was communicated to all participants, and only those who were willing to participate were invited to join. The respondents could leave at any point throughout the survey because participation was optional, and confidentiality was guaranteed.

4. Results

The socio-demographic characteristics of the participants in this study are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1. Socio-demographic Characteristics of Participants a
VariablesValues
Gender
Male512 (38.3)
Female826 (61.7)
Total1338 (100)
Age (mean ± SD)19.84 ± 3.22
University
Public Owned University 505 (37.7)
Privately Owned University374 (28)
Total1338 (100)
Level of education
level 100 409 (30.6)
level 200 241 (18)
level 300 363 (27.1)
level 400 276 (20.6)
level 500 49 (3.7)
Marital status
Single1302 (97.3)
Married33 (2.5)
Engaged3 (0.2)
Total1338 (100)

The relationships between gambling, ED, and suicidal behavior are summarized in Table 2. A significant positive correlation was observed between gambling and suicidal behavior [r (1336) = 0.14, P < 0.01]. Moreover, suicidal behavior had significant positive correlations with nonacceptance of emotional responses or distress [r(1336) = 0.22, P = 0], difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviours [r(1336) = 0.21, P < 0.01], difficulties in impulse control [r(1336) = 0.27, P < 0.01], the lack of emotional awareness [r(1336) = 0.14, P < 0.01], limited access to emotional regulation strategies [r(1336) = 0.33, P < 0.01], the lack of emotional clarity [r(1336) = 0.32) < 0.01], and difficulties in emotional regulation total [r(1336) = 0.4, P < 0.01]. Furthermore, a significant positive correlation was observed between age and suicidal behavior [r(1336) = 0.13, P < 0.01]. The implication of this finding is that suicidal behavior severities among participants increase with a rise in problematic gambling (PG) and difficulties in emotional regulation. Table 2 shows that the more the chronological age, the greater the likelihood of suicidal behavior.

Table 2. Pearson’s Correlation Matrix Shows the Relationships Between Gambling, Emotional Dysregulation, and Suicidal Behavior (N = 1338) a
Variables12345678910
1. Gambling 1
2. Nonacceptance of emotional responses0.09 **1
3. Difficulties in Goal-directed behavior-0.040.55 **1
4. Difficulties in impulse control0.1 **0.57 **0.61 **1
5. Lack of emotional awareness0.19 **-0.28 **-0.23 **-0.15 **1
6. Limited emotional regulation strategies0.17 **0.64 **0.61 **0.68 **-0.14 **1
7. Lack of emotional clarity 0.17 **0.38 **0.36 **0.38 **0.24 **0.41 **1
8. Difficulties in emotional regulation0.18 **0.75 **0.72 **0.8 **0.1 **0.85 **0.67 **1
9. Age 0.24 **0.05-0.000.040.09 **0.08 **0.050.09 **1
10. Suicidal behavior0.14 **0.22 **0.21 **0.27 **0.14 **0.33 **0.32 **0.4 **0.13 **1
Mean21.0415.1513.5715.0616.4219.7513.1293.0819.8633.83
SD5.045.824.315.095.326.733.9620.512.9515.85

A regression analysis, summarised in Table 3, was carried out to test the first hypothesis. The results demonstrated that PG independently predicted suicidal behavior severity by 14.8%. Further analysis revealed that PG and the dimensions of ED had a joint significant predictive influence on suicidal behavior severity in participants [F(7, 1337) = 39.12, P = 0]. The analysis suggested that PG and ED explained a 17.1% variance of suicidal behavior severity among the undergraduates. Further analysis of the joint regression showed that PG had no significant independent influence on suicidal behavior (β = 0.04, P = 0.129). The dimensions of ED that had a significant independent predictive influence on suicidal behavior were awareness (β = 0.155, P = 0), strategies (β = 0.218, P = 0), and clarity (β = 0.161, P = 0).

Table 3. Multiple Regression Analysis of the Joint Prediction of Problematic Gambling (PG) and Emotional Dysregulation (ED) on Suicidal Behavior in University Undergraduates (N = 1337)
VariablesPG and ED TotalPG and Dimensions of ED
BβtP-ValueBβtP-Value
(Constant)2.7911.2130.2251.4490.5740.566
PG 0.2340.0742.8920.0040.1260.041.520.129
ED composite score 0.2810.36314.1130.000
Nonacceptance of emotional responses0.0870.0320.890.373
Difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors-0.008-0.002-0.0580.954
Difficulty in Impulse control0.1590.0511.3250.185
Lack of emotional awareness0.4610.1555.2890.000
Limited emotional regulation strategies0.5130.2185.4860.000
Lack of emotional clarity0.6420.1615.2070.000
R0.3840.413
R214.80.171
F-ratio115.639.12
P-value0.0000.000

Hierarchical multiple regression was conducted to determine whether the factors of ED (nonacceptance of emotional responses or distress, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors, difficulties in impulse control, the lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotional regulation strategies, and the lack of emotional clarity) contributed incrementally to the prediction of suicidal behavior above PG alone.

As summarised in Table 4, the composite score of PG was entered in step 1. Nonacceptance of emotional responses or distress, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors, and difficulties in impulse control were entered in step 2. The lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotional regulation strategies, and the lack of emotional clarity were entered in step 3. Results indicated that PG explained 2% of the variance in suicidal behavior (R2 = 0.02, P < 0.01), nonacceptance of emotional responses or distress, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors, and difficulties in impulse control explained an incremental 7% of the variance in suicidal behavior, (ΔR2 = 0.07, P < 0.01) above PG. Furthermore, the lack of emotional awareness, limited access to emotional regulation strategies, and lack of emotional clarity explained an incremental 8% of the variance in suicidal behavior scores (ΔR2 = 0.08, P < 0.01) above the variance accounted for by PG, nonacceptance of emotional responses or distress, difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors, and difficulties in impulse control.

This result suggests that undergraduates with some factors of ED are more likely to manifest a higher level of suicidal behavior than those with PG alone. Finally, undergraduates who display all the factors of ED (the lack of emotional awareness, strategies, and the lack of emotional clarity) will report a higher level of suicidal behavior than those who present with PG and a few of the factors of ED. In other words, additional factors of ED contribute incrementally to the prediction of the levels of suicidal behavior above the prediction score explained by PG alone among the undergraduates. According to the mentioned finding, it could be concluded that ED has significant incremental predictive influence over and above that of PG on the severity of suicidal behavior among university undergraduates in Osun state, Nigeria.

Table 4. Hierarchical Regression of Gambling and the Factors of Emotional Dysregulation on the Severity of Suicidal Behavior (N = 1337) a
VariablesModel 1Model 2Model 3
BSE.BβBSE.BβBSE.Bβ
Gambling0.450.0850.143
Nonacceptance of emotional responses0.2340.0920.086
Difficulties engaging in goal-directed behaviors0.1680.1310.046
Difficulty impulse control0.5360.1140.172
Lack of emotional awareness0.4610.0870.155
Limited emotional regulation strategies0.5130.0930.218
Lack of emotional clarity0.6420.1230.161
F27.88**33.13**39.125**
R0.1430.3010.413
R20.020.090.171
Adjusted R20.02
ΔR20.070.08

5. Discussion

This study revealed the significant predictive role of PG and ED for suicidal behavior among Nigerian undergraduate students. Moreover, we found significant positive correlations between gambling, ED, and suicidal behavior. The reported positive links between gambling disorder and suicidal behavior are consistent with the literature. Problematic gambling has been marked by a loss of control over gambling behavior (43) and is associated with numerous sequelae, including psychiatric problems (44). Precise prevalence estimates of the relationships between PG and suicidal behavior are unclear due to variances in sample makeup, the measurement of suicide factors, and nosological changes connected to PG (17). Suicidal ideation and attempts related to gambling were reported by 25.6% of callers to gambling helplines (17). Suicidal thoughts and attempt rates ranged from 49% to more than 80% (45, 46). Studies have shown that people with PG had greater rates of suicidal thoughts, planned suicide, and attempted suicide than the general population (16, 17).

Our findings on the link between ED and suicidal behavior are congruent with the literature. Suicide has been theorized by Baumeister (47) and Shneidman (48) as the ultimate escape from acute emotional agony. Researchers who confirm the association between a tendency to avoid or escape uncomfortable feelings (experiential avoidance) and suicidal ideation support the views of Baumeister and Shneidman (49-51). Similarly, research suggests that if other more adaptable answers to recurring stressful life occurrences are not examined, suicide may be viewed as a way out of emotional anguish (52). Furthermore, the literature supports hypotheses that link problem-solving deficiencies to suicidal thoughts (53). ED diagnosis and symptoms are linked to an increased risk of future suicide attempts (54-58).

Lack of emotional awareness, limited emotional regulation strategies, and the lack of emotional clarity were revealed to have a substantial independent influence on suicidal behavior among the six DERS characteristics studied. This conclusion does not invalidate the positive correlation discovered between other ED characteristics and suicidal behavior. However, it highlights that the linkage and pattern of the relationship between ED and suicidal behavior are complex and confusing (35). Anestis et al. (59) reported that elevated levels of ED were associated with suicidal desire while were inversely correlated with the acquired capability for suicide. As a result, the significant prediction of suicide behavior by the dimension of ED could be due to sample locations and sociocultural situations.

Moreover, theories of the suicide phenomenon and underlying emotional processes are consistent with the multidimensional approach to ED (47, 60). These theories suggest that several aspects of ED are involved in suicidal ideation and behavior (38, 56). Suicide is viewed as a technique of recognizing and validating negative impacts and avoiding self-awareness deficits (47). Likewise, the cry of pain hypothesis (61) proposed that suicidal behavior is a response function under stress. Both models argue that suicide behavior occurs when an extremely negative effect is regarded as intolerable (nonacceptance), and there is a lack of perceived strategies for good emotional control to alleviate the pain (strategies) (62). Therefore, our findings corroborate studies that note suicidal tendencies due to limited access to emotion regulation strategies (63, 64) and nonacceptance of emotional reactions (64).

Miranda et al. (63) previously revealed that the DERS tactics subscale had the strongest relationship with suicidal ideation compared to other DERS domains. There has also been evidence of the link between a low perceived ability to participate in effective coping strategies and a suicide attempt (65). Pisani et al. (66) and Rajappa et al. (67) found that the strategies domain of DERS highly predicted suicide attempts in teenagers. Some empirical investigations have linked the inability to control one's behavior when experiencing extreme effects (impulse subscale of DERS) to a higher risk of suicide. A relationship between impulsivity/impulsive behavioral reaction to distress and suicide attempts has been established (68). In conclusion, the strategies, nonacceptance, and impulse dimensions of ED are supported by empirical evidence as significant characteristics associated with suicide ideation and attempts in teenagers (69).

In our study, ED was found to significantly predict suicidal behavior severity by 15% over and above that of problematic gambling alone. In other words, the combination of problematic gambling and ED results in higher suicidal behavior possibilities than each alone. This finding suggests a positive relationship between PG and ED among Nigerian undergraduates. The relationship between pathological gambling and ED has gained some scholarly attention, even though the same cannot be stated in Nigerian studies. In an attempt to explain the psychological aspects behind gambling disease, several authors have suggested that deficits in emotional regulation play a significant role in PG (18, 70).

Some hypotheses indicated that specific components of ED were involved in the psychological functioning deficits of pathological gamblers. According to the somatic marker of addiction (70), poor decision-making in problematic gambling is explained by impairments in emotion processing. The ED component, which includes the incapacity to reflect on one's own and others' interior mental states, sentiments, attitudes, aspirations, beliefs, and emotions, is implicated in some psychopathologies (71). These have also been associated with addictive behaviors, such as gambling (72).

According to research findings, there are inconsistent correlations between PG and ED. Some research failed to show significant correlations between ED and PG (73, 74), while others did (75, 76). Estevez et al. (77) discovered that most DERS subscales were connected to the severity of PG. However, investigations have shown that PG and problems with emotion regulation both predict suicide behavior independently. When the two variables were combined, we observed an increase in the risk of suicide behavior. Although our study did not assess the mechanisms by which PG and ED impact each other, it does support previous research that found an independent positive connection between PG, ED, and suicidal behavior. In addition, Lorains et al. (78) proposed that ED could have a role in linking PG and mental illnesses, such as mood and anxiety disorders.

5.1. Conclusion and Recommendations

The current study focused on the relationships and predictive influences of pathological gambling (PG) and ED on suicidal behavior among Nigerian undergraduates. Our results established positive links between PG, ED, and suicidal behavior. It could be concluded that PG and ED are significant joint and independent predictors of suicidal behavior. Moreover, we concluded that a combination of PG and ED augments the severity of suicidal behavior among undergraduates more than each one alone. These findings underscore the need to assess gambling involvement, problematic gambling, and ED when treating undergraduates presenting with suicidal behavior. More importantly, suicide reduction in university undergraduates should be targeted by relevant authorities with every sense of urgency. To this aim, mental healthcare facilities should, by the act of government, be established and equipped adequately in all tertiary institutions where assessment for psychopathologies, especially depression and suicidal behavior, can be carried out. Appropriate psychological interventions (psychotherapies) should be performed on undergraduates diagnosed with pathological gambling, elevated ED, and suicidal behavior. Finally, for better and more influential treatments, referrals to psychiatric hospitals should also be made for those at high risk for suicide.

5.2. Limitations

The present research was carried out on undergraduate students in some selected universities in southwestern Nigeria. Considering sociocultural differences in settings outside Nigeria, the findings should be generalized with caution. Furthermore, the mean age of our participants showed that the majority were young adults. Therefore, the relationships found between the variables of interest in this study might be different from other age categories.

References

  • 1.

    World Health Organization. Suicide in the world: global health estimates. World Health Organization; 2019. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326948.

  • 2.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS). Atlanta, Georgia: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/injury/wisqars/index.html.

  • 3.

    World Health Organisation. Preventing Suicide: A Global Imperative. World Health Organisation; 2014. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/suicide-prevention/world_report_2014/en/.

  • 4.

    World Health Organization. World health statistics 2018. World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/255336/9789241565486-eng.pdf;jsessionid=7A6C46D234B30AA610C4C3D250677E64?sequence=1.

  • 5.

    Fleischmann A, De Leo D. The World Health Organization's report on suicide: a fundamental step in worldwide suicide prevention. Crisis. 2014;35(5):289-91. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000293. [PubMed: 25297514].

  • 6.

    Shuchman M. Suicide report indicates shift at WHO. CMAJ. 2014;186(14). E532. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-4897. [PubMed: 25225220]. [PubMed Central: PMC4188682].

  • 7.

    World Health Organization. Practice manual for establishing and maintaining surveillance systems for suicide attempts and self-harm. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016.

  • 8.

    Im Y, Oh WO, Suk M. Risk Factors for Suicide Ideation Among Adolescents: Five-Year National Data Analysis. Arch Psychiatr Nurs. 2017;31(3):282-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2017.01.001. [PubMed: 28499568].

  • 9.

    Guedria-Tekari A, Missaoui S, Kalai W, Gaddour N, Gaha L. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts among Tunisian adolescents: prevalence and associated factors. Pan Afr Med J. 2019;34:105. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.105.19920. [PubMed: 31998428]. [PubMed Central: PMC6961937].

  • 10.

    Azoma C. Suicide: Doctors at risk. The Sun: Voice of the Nation; 2017.

  • 11.

    Ukwu J. 7 Nigerian states with high suicide cases. Legit; 2016. Available from: https://www.legit.ng/971791-recession-7-nigerian-states-unbelievably-high-suicide-cases.html.

  • 12.

    Oyetunji TP, Arafat SMY, Famori SO, Akinboyewa TB, Afolami M, Ajayi MF, et al. Suicide in Nigeria: observations from the content analysis of newspapers. Gen Psychiatr. 2021;34(1). e100347. doi: 10.1136/gpsych-2020-100347. [PubMed: 33521558]. [PubMed Central: PMC7812081].

  • 13.

    The World Bank. Suicide mortality rate (per 100,000 population). Nigeria: World Health Organisation; 2019. Available from: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.SUIC.P5.

  • 14.

    Goldberg E. Rural areas have the highest suicide rates and fewest mental health workers. Business; 2018.

  • 15.

    This Day. Floating a New Crusade against Suicide. This Day; 2018.

  • 16.

    Ronzitti S, Kraus SW, Decker SE, Ashrafioun L. Clinical characteristics of veterans with gambling disorders seeking pain treatment. Addict Behav. 2019;95:160-5. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.03.014. [PubMed: 30925440].

  • 17.

    Moghaddam JF, Yoon G, Dickerson DL, Kim SW, Westermeyer J. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in five groups with different severities of gambling: Findings from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Am J Addict. 2015;24(4):292-8. doi: 10.1111/ajad.12197. [PubMed: 25808267].

  • 18.

    Latvala T, Lintonen T, Konu A. Public health effects of gambling - debate on a conceptual model. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1077. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7391-z. [PubMed: 31399026]. [PubMed Central: PMC6688345].

  • 19.

    Xuan YH, Li S, Tao R, Chen J, Rao LL, Wang XT, et al. Genetic and Environmental Influences on Gambling: A Meta-Analysis of Twin Studies. Front Psychol. 2017;8:2121. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02121. [PubMed: 29259572]. [PubMed Central: PMC5723410].

  • 20.

    Blanco C, Myers J, Kendler KS. Gambling, disordered gambling and their association with major depression and substance use: A web-based cohort and twin-sibling study. Psychol Med. 2012;42(3):497-508. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711001401. [PubMed: 21835089]. [PubMed Central: PMC4431979].

  • 21.

    Maclaren VV, Fugelsang JA, Harrigan KA, Dixon MJ. The personality of pathological gamblers: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2011;31(6):1057-67. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.02.002. [PubMed: 21802620].

  • 22.

    Volberg RA, Abbott MW, Rönnberg S, Munck Ingrid ME. Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2008;104(4):250-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2001.00336.x.

  • 23.

    Petry NM, Steinberg KL, Women's Problem Gambling Research C. Childhood maltreatment in male and female treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. Psychol Addict Behav. 2005;19(2):226-9. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.19.2.226. [PubMed: 16011396].

  • 24.

    Oyebisi EO, Alao KA, Popoola BI. Gambling behaviour of university students in South-Western Nigeria. IFE Psychol. 2012;20(1):252-62.

  • 25.

    American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders. Arlington, Virginia: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.

  • 26.

    Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Suicide and suicidal thoughts. Mayo Clinic; 2021. Available from: https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/suicide/symptoms-causes/syc-20378048.

  • 27.

    Rogier G, Colombi F, Velotti P. A brief report on dysregulation of positive emotions and impulsivity: Their roles in gambling disorder. Curr Psychol. 2020;41(4):1835-41. doi: 10.1007/s12144-020-00638-y.

  • 28.

    Navas JF, Verdejo-Garcia A, L. Opez-GOmez M, Maldonado A, Perales JC. Gambling with Rose-Tinted Glasses on: Use of Emotion-Regulation Strategies Correlates with Dysfunctional Cognitions in Gambling Disorder Patients. J Behav Addict. 2016;5(2):271-81. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.040. [PubMed: 27363462]. [PubMed Central: PMC5387778].

  • 29.

    Glenn CR, Klonsky ED. A multimethod analysis of impulsivity in nonsuicidal self-injury. Personal Disord. 2010;1(1):67-75. doi: 10.1037/a0017427. [PubMed: 22448604].

  • 30.

    Canale N, Vieno A, Bowden-Jones H, Billieux J. The benefits of using the UPPS model of impulsivity rather than the Big Five when assessing the relationship between personality and problem gambling. Addiction. 2017;112(2):372-3. doi: 10.1111/add.13641. [PubMed: 27873374].

  • 31.

    Blain B, Richard Gill P, Teese R. Predicting Problem Gambling in Australian Adults Using a Multifaceted Model of Impulsivity. Int Gambl Stud. 2015;15(2):239-55. doi: 10.1080/14459795.2015.1029960.

  • 32.

    Barrada JR, Navas JF, Ruiz de Lara CM, Billieux J, Devos G, Perales JC. Reconsidering the roots, structure, and implications of gambling motives: An integrative approach. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):1–22. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212695. [PubMed: 30794642]. [PubMed Central: PMC6386301].

  • 33.

    Stewart SH, Zack M, Collins P, Klein RM. Subtyping pathological gamblers on the basis of affective motivations for gambling: Relations to gambling problems, drinking problems, and affective motivations for drinking. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008;22(2):257-68. doi: 10.1037/0893-164X.22.2.257. [PubMed: 18540723].

  • 34.

    Navas JF, Contreras-Rodriguez O, Verdejo-Roman J, Perandres-Gomez A, Albein-Urios N, Verdejo-Garcia A, et al. Trait and neurobiological underpinnings of negative emotion regulation in gambling disorder. Addiction. 2017;112(6):1086-94. doi: 10.1111/add.13751. [PubMed: 28060454].

  • 35.

    Anestis MD, Kleiman EM, Lavender JM, Tull MT, Gratz KL. The pursuit of death versus escape from negative affect: An examination of the nature of the relationship between emotion dysregulation and both suicidal behavior and non-suicidal self-injury. Compr Psychiatry. 2014;55(8):1820-30. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.07.007. [PubMed: 25104613].

  • 36.

    Orford J, Griffiths M, Wardle H, Sproston K, Erens B. Negative public attitudes towards gambling: findings from the 2007 British Gambling Prevalence Survey using a new attitude scale. Int Gambl Stud. 2009;9(1):39-54. doi: 10.1080/14459790802652217.

  • 37.

    Wardle H, Moody A, Spence S, Orford J, Volberg R, Jotangia D, et al. British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010. National Centre for Social Research; 2011.

  • 38.

    Gratz KL, Roemer L. Multidimensional Assessment of Emotion Regulation and Dysregulation: Development, Factor Structure, and Initial Validation of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2004;26(1):41-54. doi: 10.1023/b:joba.0000007455.08539.94.

  • 39.

    Brown LK, Houck C, Lescano C, Donenberg G, Tolou-Shams M, Mello J. Affect regulation and HIV risk among youth in therapeutic schools. AIDS Behav. 2012;16(8):2272-8. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0220-3. [PubMed: 22669595]. [PubMed Central: PMC3496428].

  • 40.

    Nordgren L, Monell E, Birgegård A, Bjureberg J, Hesser H. Factor Structure of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale in Treatment Seeking Adults with Eating Disorders. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2019;42(1):111-26. doi: 10.1007/s10862-019-09765-8.

  • 41.

    Rudd MD. The prevalence of suicidal ideation among college students. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 1989;19(2):173-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1943-278x.1989.tb01031.x. [PubMed: 2749860].

  • 42.

    Goldberg DP, Williams P. A user's guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Great Britain: NFER-NELSON; 1991.

  • 43.

    Raylu N, Oei TP. Pathological gambling: A comprehensive review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2002;22(7):1009-61. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(02)00101-0.

  • 44.

    Potenza MN. Review. The neurobiology of pathological gambling and drug addiction: an overview and new findings. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363(1507):3181-9. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0100. [PubMed: 18640909]. [PubMed Central: PMC2607329].

  • 45.

    Petry NM, Kiluk BD. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002;190(7):462-9. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200207000-00007. [PubMed: 12142848]. [PubMed Central: PMC3397475].

  • 46.

    Ledgerwood DM, Petry NM. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in treatment-seeking pathological gamblers. J Trauma Stress. 2006;19(3):411-6. doi: 10.1002/jts.20123. [PubMed: 16789003].

  • 47.

    Baumeister RF. Suicide as escape from self. Psychol Rev. 1990;97(1):90-113. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.1.90. [PubMed: 2408091].

  • 48.

    Shneidman ES. Suicide as psychache. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1993;181(3):145-7. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199303000-00001. [PubMed: 8445372].

  • 49.

    Ellis TE, Rufino KA. Change in Experiential Avoidance is Associated with Reduced Suicidal Ideation over the Course of Psychiatric Hospitalization. Arch Suicide Res. 2016;20(3):426-37. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2015.1093983. [PubMed: 27046328].

  • 50.

    Skinner KD, Rojas SM, Veilleux JC. Connecting Eating Pathology with Risk for Engaging in Suicidal Behavior: The Mediating Role of Experiential Avoidance. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2017;47(1):3-13. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12249. [PubMed: 27038144].

  • 51.

    Zvolensky MJ, Bakhshaie J, Garza M, Valdivieso J, Ortiz M, Bogiaizian D, et al. The Role of Anxiety Sensitivity in the Relation Between Experiential Avoidance and Anxious Arousal, Depressive, and Suicidal Symptoms Among Latinos in Primary Care. Cognit Ther Res. 2015;39(5):688-96. doi: 10.1007/s10608-015-9696-2.

  • 52.

    Schotte DE, Clum GA. Problem-solving skills in suicidal psychiatric patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55(1):49-54. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.55.1.49. [PubMed: 3571658].

  • 53.

    Dieserud G, Røysamb E, Braverman MT, Dalgard OS, Ekeberg Ø. Predicting Repetition of Suicide Attempt: A Prospective Study of 50 Suicide Attempters. Arch Suicide Res. 2003;7(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/13811110301571.

  • 54.

    Gomez-Exposito A, Wolz I, Fagundo AB, Granero R, Steward T, Jimenez-Murcia S, et al. Correlates of Non-suicidal Self-Injury and Suicide Attempts in Bulimic Spectrum Disorders. Front Psychol. 2016;7:1244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01244. [PubMed: 27597836]. [PubMed Central: PMC4992685].

  • 55.

    Pisetsky EM, Haynos AF, Lavender JM, Crow SJ, Peterson CB. Associations between emotion regulation difficulties, eating disorder symptoms, non-suicidal self-injury, and suicide attempts in a heterogeneous eating disorder sample. Compr Psychiatry. 2017;73:143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.11.012. [PubMed: 27978502]. [PubMed Central: PMC5263187].

  • 56.

    Al-Dajani N, Uliaszek AA, Hamdullahpur K. It's the thought that counts: belief in suicide as an escape moderates the relationship between emotion dysregulation and suicidal ideation cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2019;6:16. doi: 10.1186/s40479-019-0112-5. [PubMed: 31719989]. [PubMed Central: PMC6833273].

  • 57.

    Smith AR, Velkoff EA, Ribeiro JD, Franklin J. Are Eating Disorders and Related Symptoms Risk Factors for Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors? A Meta-analysis. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019;49(1):221-39. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12427. [PubMed: 29444332].

  • 58.

    Rania M, Monell E, Sjolander A, Bulik CM. Emotion dysregulation and suicidality in eating disorders. Int J Eat Disord. 2020;54(3):313-25. doi: 10.1002/eat.23410. [PubMed: 33205495]. [PubMed Central: PMC7984062].

  • 59.

    Anestis MD, Bagge CL, Tull MT, Joiner TE. Clarifying the role of emotion dysregulation in the interpersonal-psychological theory of suicidal behavior in an undergraduate sample. J Psychiatr Res. 2011;45(5):603-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.013. [PubMed: 21092986].

  • 60.

    Selby EA, Anestis MD, Bender TW, Joiner TJ. An exploration of the emotional cascade model in borderline personality disorder. J Abnorm Psychol. 2009;118(2):375-87. doi: 10.1037/a0015711. [PubMed: 19413411]. [PubMed Central: PMC2842601].

  • 61.

    Williams JMG, Pollock LR. Psychological aspects of the suicidal process. Understanding suicidal behaviour: The suicidal process approach to research, treatment and prevention. Chichester, UK: Wiley; 2001. p. 76-93.

  • 62.

    Rasmussen SA, Fraser L, Gotz M, MacHale S, Mackie R, Masterton G, et al. Elaborating the cry of pain model of suicidality: Testing a psychological model in a sample of first-time and repeat self-harm patients. Br J Clin Psychol. 2010;49(Pt 1):15-30. doi: 10.1348/014466509X415735. [PubMed: 19302734].

  • 63.

    Miranda R, Tsypes A, Gallagher M, Rajappa K. Rumination and Hopelessness as Mediators of the Relation Between Perceived Emotion Dysregulation and Suicidal Ideation. Cognit Ther Res. 2013;37(4):786-95. doi: 10.1007/s10608-013-9524-5.

  • 64.

    Wolff JC, Davis S, Liu RT, Cha CB, Cheek SM, Nestor BA, et al. Trajectories of Suicidal Ideation among Adolescents Following Psychiatric Hospitalization. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2018;46(2):355-63. doi: 10.1007/s10802-017-0293-6. [PubMed: 28349306]. [PubMed Central: PMC5617752].

  • 65.

    Valois RF, Zullig KJ, Hunter AA. Association Between Adolescent Suicide Ideation, Suicide Attempts and Emotional Self-Efficacy. J Child Fam Stud. 2015;24(2):237-48. doi: 10.1007/s10826-013-9829-8.

  • 66.

    Pisani AR, Wyman PA, Petrova M, Schmeelk-Cone K, Goldston DB, Xia Y, et al. Emotion regulation difficulties, youth-adult relationships, and suicide attempts among high school students in underserved communities. J Youth Adolesc. 2013;42(6):807-20. doi: 10.1007/s10964-012-9884-2. [PubMed: 23666604]. [PubMed Central: PMC3654393].

  • 67.

    Rajappa K, Gallagher M, Miranda R. Emotion Dysregulation and Vulnerability to Suicidal Ideation and Attempts. Cognit Ther Res. 2012;36(6):833-9. doi: 10.1007/s10608-011-9419-2.

  • 68.

    Auerbach RP, Stewart JG, Johnson SL. Impulsivity and Suicidality in Adolescent Inpatients. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2017;45(1):91-103. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0146-8. [PubMed: 27025937]. [PubMed Central: PMC5045310].

  • 69.

    Hatkevich C, Penner F, Sharp C. Difficulties in emotion regulation and suicide ideation and attempt in adolescent inpatients. Psychiatry Res. 2019;271:230-8. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.038. [PubMed: 30502560].

  • 70.

    Olsen VV, Lugo RG, Sutterlin S. The somatic marker theory in the context of addiction: contributions to understanding development and maintenance. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2015;8:187-200. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S68695. [PubMed: 26185474]. [PubMed Central: PMC4501162].

  • 71.

    Fonagy P, Luyten P, Moulton-Perkins A, Lee YW, Warren F, Howard S, et al. Development and Validation of a Self-Report Measure of Mentalizing: The Reflective Functioning Questionnaire. PLoS One. 2016;11(7). e0158678. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158678. [PubMed: 27392018]. [PubMed Central: PMC4938585].

  • 72.

    Spada MM, Roarty A. The relative contribution of metacognitions and attentional control to the severity of gambling in problem gamblers. Addict Behav Rep. 2015;1:7-11. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2015.02.001. [PubMed: 29531974]. [PubMed Central: PMC5845956].

  • 73.

    Ciccarelli M, Nigro G, Griffiths MD, Cosenza M, D'Olimpio F. Attentional biases in problem and non-problem gamblers. J Affect Disord. 2016;198:135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.03.009. [PubMed: 27016656].

  • 74.

    Schreiber LR, Grant JE, Odlaug BL. Emotion regulation and impulsivity in young adults. J Psychiatr Res. 2012;46(5):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2012.02.005. [PubMed: 22385661]. [PubMed Central: PMC3334448].

  • 75.

    Elmas HG, Cesur G, Oral E. Alexithymia and Pathological Gambling: The Mediating Role of Difficulties in Emotion Regulation. Turk J Psychiatr. 2016:1–7. doi: 10.5080/u13779.

  • 76.

    Rogier G, Velotti P. Narcissistic Implications in Gambling Disorder: The Mediating Role of Emotion Dysregulation. J Gambl Stud. 2018;34(4):1241-60. doi: 10.1007/s10899-018-9759-x. [PubMed: 29455443].

  • 77.

    Estevez Gutierrez A, Herrero Fernandez D, Sarabia Gonzalvo I, Jauregui Bilbao P. [Mediating role of emotional regulation between impulsive behavior in gambling, Internet and videogame abuse, and dysfunctional symptomatology in young adults and adolescents]. Adicciones. 2014;26(4):282-90. Spanish. [PubMed: 25577999].

  • 78.

    Lorains FK, Cowlishaw S, Thomas SA. Prevalence of comorbid disorders in problem and pathological gambling: Systematic review and meta-analysis of population surveys. Addiction. 2011;106(3):490-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03300.x. [PubMed: 21210880].

Copyright © 2022, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.