Logo

The Relation of Gluten-Free Diet and Quality of Life in Children with Celiac Disease: A Cross-sectional Study

Author(s):
Fariba Shahraki-SanaviFariba Shahraki-SanaviFariba Shahraki-Sanavi ORCID1, 2, Manijeh KhaliliManijeh KhaliliManijeh Khalili ORCID3,*, Sara RezaeiSara RezaeiSara Rezaei ORCID4, Alireza KhorramAlireza KhorramAlireza Khorram ORCID5,**
1Health Promotion Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
2Academy of Medical Sciences of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran
3Children and Adolescents Health Research Center, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
4Public Health School, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
5Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Corresponding Authors:

Health Scope:Vol. 14, issue 3; e156761
Published online:Jul 01, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Oct 03, 2024
Accepted:Jun 04, 2025
How to Cite:Shahraki-Sanavi F, Khalili M, Rezaei S, Khorram A. The Relation of Gluten-Free Diet and Quality of Life in Children with Celiac Disease: A Cross-sectional Study.Health Scope.2025;14(3):e156761.https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-156761.

Abstract

Background:

The present study aimed to determine the relationship between a gluten-free diet (GFD) and quality of life (QoL) in children with celiac disease (CD) and to evaluate the impact of additional factors that may affect both.

Methods:

This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2021 using a census sampling method. A total of 409 children aged ≤ 10 years with CD were recruited from referral clinics in Zahedan. Data were collected through a structured questionnaire. Statistical analyses were performed using independent t-tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), chi-square tests, and Pearson’s correlation coefficient in SPSS version 23.0.

Results:

The gender distribution revealed a predominance of females (61.4%). The children had a mean age of 6.81 ± 2.46 years and a median disease duration of 3 years. The most common symptoms included abdominal pain (75.6%), weight loss (64.1%), and diarrhea (44.7%), while aggression (17.1%) and depression (11.5%) were the most frequently reported comorbidities. Poorer QoL was significantly associated with older age, longer disease duration, more comorbidities, and lower adherence to a GFD (all P < 0.01). Financial difficulties were also linked to reduced dietary adherence and worse QoL (P < 0.01).

Conclusions:

This study highlights that, while many children with CD maintain a relatively good QoL, several factors — particularly older age, longer disease duration, comorbid conditions, and financial hardship — negatively impact both dietary adherence and QoL.

1. Background

Celiac disease (CD) is a chronic autoimmune disorder characterized by a lifelong intolerance to gluten, a protein found in wheat, rye, and barley. In recent decades, the global incidence of CD has increased notably (1, 2), now affecting approximately 1 - 2% of the population worldwide (2-4). In Iran, the prevalence is estimated at around 2% (4). The disease is more common in children than adults and occurs 1.5 to 2 times more frequently in females than males (5, 6). Patients with CD commonly exhibit a variety of gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms, including vomiting, anorexia, failure to thrive, diarrhea, abdominal bloating, pain, constipation, and weight loss (1, 2, 7).

Currently, the only effective treatment for CD is strict, lifelong adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD) (4, 8). In addition to improving gastrointestinal and systemic symptoms, GFD may lower the increased cardiovascular risk observed in untreated CD patients (9, 10). However, its effect on cardiometabolic risk remains debated. Some studies show benefits on systolic blood pressure, HDL cholesterol, and inflammation (11), while others raise concerns about the high fat, sugar, and salt content in many gluten-free products, which may lead to poor lipid profiles, insulin resistance, and higher rates of overweight and obesity (12, 13). While GFD adherence is associated with improved clinical outcomes, it may also impact the quality of life (QoL) of patients and their families (1, 4).

Quality of life in individuals with CD is influenced by various factors, including education level, employment status, disease severity, age at diagnosis, disease duration, presence of comorbidities, and duration of GFD adherence (4, 14). Several studies have consistently shown that QoL is significantly diminished prior to diagnosis (8, 15). However, after diagnosis and the initiation of a GFD, QoL improves significantly, often reaching levels comparable to those of the general population (4). Adherence to a GFD has also been associated with reductions in depressive symptoms (16), and symptom severity is strongly correlated with QoL (4). Yet, maintaining a strict GFD can be challenging — especially in low-income populations — due to the limited availability and higher costs of gluten-free products (17).

Some surveys have explored the impact of GFD on QoL among children, consistently reporting improvements in physical, psychological, and social dimensions, significantly enhancing QoL (16, 18). Despite these findings, limited research has specifically focused on children, particularly the interplay between GFD adherence and QoL (19).

2. Objectives

Understanding the factors that influence QoL in this population is crucial for providing comprehensive, patient-centered care. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate the relationship between GFD adherence and QoL among children with CD and to explore associations with demographic variables, disease-related characteristics, and perceived financial burdens.

3. Methods

3.1. Type of Study, Sample Size, and Sampling

This cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2021 and involved 409 children aged ≤ 10 years with CD. Using a census sampling method, all children meeting the inclusion criteria from the CD clinics at Boali and Ali-Ibn-Abitalib hospitals in Zahedan, southeastern Iran, were recruited. This approach minimized selection bias and enhanced the representativeness of the findings. Participation was voluntary, and informed consent was obtained from all parents or legal guardians.

3.2. Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The inclusion criterion was a confirmed diagnosis of CD and the exclusion criterion was lack of consent to participate in the study.

3.3. Research Tools

In this study, a researcher-designed questionnaire including demographic information, symptoms, comorbidities, GFD costs perception, GFD adherence (24 items), and QoL (35 items) was used. The content validity of the final questionnaire was confirmed through expert review by six specialists and evaluated using statistical indices, including the Kendall’s coefficient of concordance. The content validity ratio (CVR) was 0.9, and the Content Validity Index (CVI) ranged from 0.83 to 0.94. Reliability was assessed via a pilot study involving 20 participants, and internal consistency was determined using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. To minimize the rate of missing data, efforts were made to ensure data completeness by supervising questionnaire completion and encouraging responses to all items.

Responses were recorded on a 5-point Likert scale. The total QoL score was categorized into five levels, with a range from 35 to 175. All QoL and dimension items were negatively oriented, meaning that lower scores indicated better QoL. Adherence to the GFD was also categorized into five levels based on the total score (range: 24 - 120).

3.4. Statistical Analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Categorical variables were presented as frequency (percentage), while continuous variables were reported as mean ± standard deviation (SD). To assess differences in QoL and GFD adherence across subgroups, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used and chi-square test was used to analyze the relationship between categorical variables. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was employed to examine correlations between numeric variables. A significance level of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

In the present study, 409 children aged ≤ 10 years with CD were included. The mean ± SD of age and disease duration were 6.81 ± 2.46 years and 2.94 ± 2.19 years, respectively. The results comparing QoL and GFD adherence across demographic subgroups are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.Comparison of Quality of Life and Gluten-Free Diet Adherence Across Demographic Subgroups
VariablesNo. (%)QoL (Mean ± SD)P-ValueGFD Adherence (Mean ± SD)P-Value
Gender0.260.78
Male158 (38.6)79.3 ± 24.869.0 ± 6.9
Female251 (61.4)82.0 ± 23.968.9 ± 6.5
Ethnicity0.580.003
Baloch319 (78.0)81.1 ± 24.068.3 ± 6.2
Sistani86 (21.0)79.6 ± 25.171.1 ± 7.7
Others4 (1.0)91.7 ± 29.271.75 ± 5.85
Father’s age 0.510.85
≤ 3069 (16.9)78.7 ± 27.868.9 ± 6.5
31 - 40215 (52.6)81.1 ± 23.269.2 ± 6.6
41 - 5089 (21.8)83.9 ± 24.768.5 ± 6.8
> 5036 (8.8)78.1 ± 25.669.2 ± 7.6
Mother’s age 0.440.624
≤ 30147 (35.9)79.4 ± 25.468.9 ± 5.6
31 - 40204 (49.9)81.2 ± 23.868.9 ± 7.2
41 - 5052 (12.7)85.1 ± 23.369.5 ± 7.4
> 506 (1.5)72.0 ± 25.665.0 ± 4.7
Father’s education0.480.003
Illiterate51 (12.5)82.7 ± 25.267.9 ± 5.6
Below diploma279 (68.2)81.5 ± 24.668.5 ± 6.4
Diploma/university 79 (19.3)78.0 ± 22.871.4 ± 7.6
Mother’s education0.950.01
Illiterate75 (18.3)80.3 ± 26.568.4 ± 6.9
Below diploma283 (69.3)81.2 ± 23.968.7 ± 6.1
Diploma/university degree51 (12.4)81.3 ± 23.771.6 ± 8.9
Father’s job0.220.09
Unemployed68 (16.6)87.1 ± 31.469.4 ± 6.7
Employee58 (14.2)81.4 ± 24.270.4 ± 8.6
Retired6 (1.5)70.0 ± 10.472.6 ± 4.2
Self-employed277 (66.7)80.0 ± 22.868.3 ± 6.2
Mother’s job0.390.01
Housewife381 (93.2)80.6 ± 24.568.8 ± 6.2
Others28 (6.8)84.4 ± 22.872.1 ± 1.8
Years since diagnosis (y)0.0070.93
< 196 (23.5)74.7 ± 23.669.1 ± 7.1
1 - 3165 (40.3)81.1 ± 25.569.0 ± 6.5
> 3148 (36.2)84.7 ± 22.668.8 ± 6.6

Comparison of Quality of Life and Gluten-Free Diet Adherence Across Demographic Subgroups

The gender distribution showed that females (61.4%) outnumbered males (38.6%). The majority of participants were from the Baloch ethnic group (78.0%). Most parents were in the 31 - 40 age range, with an education level below a diploma. A higher proportion of mothers were homemakers (93.2%), while most fathers were self-employed (66.7%). A significant trend was observed based on the number of years since diagnosis (P = 0.007): Patients diagnosed within the past year had better QoL scores. It’s important to note that the QoL score was inversely scaled, meaning that lower scores indicate better QoL. Regarding GFD adherence, significant associations were found with ethnicity (P = 0.003), father’s education (P = 0.003), mother’s education (P = 0.01), and mother’s occupation (P = 0.01). Specifically, patients whose parents had higher educational attainment and those whose mothers were employed outside the home showed better adherence to the GFD.

As shown in Table 2, the most prevalent symptom among celiac patients was abdominal pain (75.6%), followed by weight loss (64.1%) and diarrhea (44.7%). No significant gender differences were observed for most of the presenting symptoms (all P > 0.05). However, hair loss was significantly more common among female patients compared to males (P = 0.004). The most commonly reported comorbidities were aggression (17.1%), followed by depression (11.5%) and dermatitis (5.1%). No significant gender differences were found in the diagnostic procedures.

Table 2.Distribution of Symptoms, Comorbidities, and Diagnostic Tests Utilization by Gender in Patients with Celiac Disease
Symptoms aMale (N = 158)Female (N = 251)Total (N = 409)P-Value
Abdominal pain122 (39.6)187 (60.4)309 (75.6)0.63
Weight loss99 (37.9)163 (62.1)262 (64.1)0.67
Diarrhea66 (36.3)117 (63.7)183 (44.7)0.35
Nausea and vomiting50 (35)93 (65)143 (35.0)0.28
Anorexia43 (38.1)70 (61.9)113 (27.6)0.9
Flatulence34 (32.1)72 (67.9)106 (25.9)0.10
Constipation25 (31.3)55 (68.7)80 (19.6)0.12
Short stature29 (40.3)43 (59.7)72 (17.6)0.79
Chronic fatigue11 (32.4)23 (67.6)34 (8.3)0.46
Irritability9 (40.9)13 (59.1)22 (5.4)0.82
Headache6 (33.3)12 (66.7)18 (4.4)0.80
Hair loss1 (5.9)16 (94.1)17 (4.2)0.004
Skin rashes5 (41.7)7 (58.3)12 (2.9)0.52
Depression4 (36.4)7 (63.6)11 (2.7)0.56
Concentration disorder0 (0.0)2 (100)2 (0.5)0.52
Comorbidities
Aggression30 (42.9)40 (57.1)70 (17.1)0.50
Depression16 (34.0)31 (66.0)47 (11.5)0.52
Dermatitis 9 (42.9)12 (57.1)21 (5.1)0.81
Hypothyroidism5 (38.5)8 (61.5)13 (3.2)0.97
Liver disease4 (36.4)7 (63.6)11 (2.7)0.95
Epilepsy2 (40)3 (60)5 (1.2)0.98
Type 1 diabetes 3 (75)1 (25)4 (1.0)0.30
Autoimmune disease0 (0)2 (100)2 (0.5)0.52
Type 2 diabetes 1 (100)0 (0)1 (0.2)0.38
Diagnostic tests
Blood test 144 (38.7)229 (61.3)373 (91.2)0.85
Endoscopy153 (39.4)236 (60.6)389 (95.1)0.33
Bone density 30 (39.0)47 (61.0)77 (18.8)0.99
Genetic 20 (36.4)35 (63.6)55 (13.4)0.76

Distribution of Symptoms, Comorbidities, and Diagnostic Tests Utilization by Gender in Patients with Celiac Disease

The results in Table 3 show that, overall, nearly three-quarters of the participants had a favorable perception of their QoL. Additionally, the majority of patients (72.6%) demonstrated a moderate level of GFD adherence.

Table 3.Levels of Quality of Life and Adherence to the Gluten-Free Diet in Celiac Disease Patients
QoL DimensionsVery LowLowModerateHighVery High
Physical health7 (1.7)47 (11.5)105 (25.7)190 (46.5)60 (14.7)
Emotional health12 (2.9)34 (8.3)96 (23.5)104 (25.4)163 (39.9)
Activity4 (1.0)21 (5.1)63 (15.4)149 (36.4)172 (42.1)
Relationship9 (2.2)36 (8.8)99 (24.2)213 (52.1)52 (12.7)
Total QoL2 (0.5)35 (8.6)77 (18.8)190 (46.5)105 (25.7)
Adherence to the GFD1 (0.2)92 (22.5)297 (72.6)19 (4.6)0 (0.0)

Levels of Quality of Life and Adherence to the Gluten-Free Diet in Celiac Disease Patients

The results in Table 4 reveal a significant positive correlation between advancing age (r = 0.240, P < 0.01), longer disease duration (r = 0.148, P < 0.01), lower GFD adherence (r = 0.244, P < 0.01), and the presence of additional comorbidities (r = 0.159, P < 0.01) with reduced QoL. Importantly, the QoL score is inversely scaled — higher scores indicate poorer QoL.

Table 4.Correlation Coefficients Between Age, Gluten-Free Diet Adherence, Disease Duration, Number of Medical Problems, and Total Quality of Life
Variables12345
Age (y)1
GFD adherence (score)0.109 a1
Disease duration (y)0.468 b0.0241
Numbers of comorbidities (N)0.170 b0.132 b0.139 b1
Total QoL (score)0.240 b0.244 b0.148 b0.159 b1

Correlation Coefficients Between Age, Gluten-Free Diet Adherence, Disease Duration, Number of Medical Problems, and Total Quality of Life

These findings, as shown in Table 5, suggest that patients who use a shopping cart for payment (P = 0.001), along with those experiencing fewer financial difficulties (P = 0.001), less distress (P = 0.001), and fewer financial struggles (P = 0.001) related to the cost of gluten-free products, tend to exhibit better adherence to the GFD. Furthermore, patients who reported paying for recommended gluten-free foods themselves or using a shopping cart (P = 0.001), as well as those who never experienced distress or frustration (P = 0.003) and never struggled financially to afford the GFD (P = 0.001), demonstrated significantly better QoL compared to other groups.

Table 5.Patients’ Views on the Cost of Gluten-Free Products and Their Impact on Gluten-Free Diet Adherence and Quality of Life
Patients’ ViewsGFD AdherenceQoL
No. (%)Mean ± SDP-ValueMean ± SDP-Value
Methods of payment for gluten-free foods0.0010.001
I pay myself142 (34.7)69.2 ± 6.4189.16 ± 23.27
I have a shopping cart39 (9.5)73.0 ± 8.090.9 ± 35.4
Both cases228 (55.7)68.1 ± 6.474.0 ± 20.1
Patients’ views on the financial burden of CD treatment0.0010.45
It is fair10 (2.4)76.0 ± 5.373.1 ± 28.8
It is relatively high26 (6.4)77.2 ± 9.686.9 ± 20.1
Very high but I can afford77 (18.8)69.2 ± 6.381.0 ± 22.0
Very high and I cannot afford296 (72.4)67.9 ± 5.880.7 ± 25.0
Feelings of distress or frustration related to the cost of gluten-free food alternatives0.0010.003
Never12 (2.9)75.9 ± 7.056.1 ± 21.6
Sometimes35 (8.5)76.5 ± 7.778.6 ± 16.6
mostly107 (26.2)70.4 ± 5.080.8 ± 21.1
Always255 (62.3)67.0 ± 6.082.5 ± 25.9
Struggling financially to afford a GFD0.0010.001
Never12 (2.9)76.5 ± 7.955.9 ± 22.0
Sometimes29 (7.1)77.0 ± 7.975.1 ± 12.2
mostly100 (24.4)70.7 ± 5.379.5 ± 19.2
Always268 (65.6)67.1 ± 5.983.2 ± 26.2
Total409 (100)69.0 ± 6.780.9 ± 24.3

Patients’ Views on the Cost of Gluten-Free Products and Their Impact on Gluten-Free Diet Adherence and Quality of Life

5. Discussion

This study included 409 children aged ≤ 10 years with CD, with a mean age of 6.81 ± 2.46 years and a median disease duration of 3 years. The majority of participants were female, and most were of the Baloch ethnic group. Parents were predominantly aged 31 - 40 years. Parental education emerged as a significant factor in CD management, potentially improving understanding, enhancing GFD adherence, and providing greater family support. The most common symptoms among children with CD were abdominal pain, weight loss, and diarrhea, with aggression, depression, and dermatitis reported as the most frequent comorbidities. Blood tests and endoscopy with biopsy were the primary diagnostic tools used. The average QoL score was high, while GFD adherence was moderate. Older age, longer disease duration, and more comorbidities were associated with poorer QoL, which was inversely linked to GFD adherence. Overall, these findings highlight the substantial influence of financial factors on both GFD adherence and QoL in individuals with CD.

In the current study, the majority of CD patients were female, which aligns with previous findings. For instance, Singh et al. reported a female-to-male ratio of 2.5 (P < .001) (6), Saeed et al. observed a higher prevalence among Saudi girls (55.5% vs. 44.5%) (20), Van Kalleveen et al. reported 67% female participants with a 2: 1 ratio (21), and Stahl et al. found a 1.4 times higher prevalence in females (22). This consistency across studies underscores the higher prevalence of CD among females, which is well-documented in the literature.

The prevalence of symptoms can vary across individuals. Stahl et al. found common symptoms in children with CD to include stomach aches, constipation, vomiting, diarrhea, and weight loss (22). Similarly, Van Kalleveen et al. identified recurrent abdominal pain and distension as predominant symptoms, with about one-third of children presenting the classical triad of failure to thrive, abdominal distension, and chronic diarrhea (21). Saeed et al. also noted that failure to thrive was the most common presentation in Saudi children, followed by short stature, abdominal distension, and chronic diarrhea (20). These findings are consistent with the results of the present study, where abdominal pain was the most commonly reported symptom, followed by weight loss, diarrhea, and vomiting.

Interestingly, the most commonly reported comorbidities in this study were aggression and depression, which contrasts with Saeed et al.’s findings, where type 1 diabetes was reported as a common comorbidity in Saudi children (20). The high frequency of aggression and depression highlights the need to consider the broader systemic impact of CD, which necessitates comprehensive management strategies addressing both gastrointestinal and extraintestinal manifestations.

Regarding diagnostic methods, blood tests were used in 91.2% of cases, slightly lower than the 100% reported by Van Kalleveen et al. (21). Endoscopy with biopsy, the diagnostic gold standard, was performed in 95.1% of participants, which is higher than the rates reported by Singh et al. (70%) (6) and Van Kalleveen et al. (60%) (21). Combining serological testing with biopsy remains the most reliable method for confirming CD.

The data showed high overall QoL scores across physical health, emotional well-being, activity, and relationships. However, this contrasts with studies by Burger et al., who reported slightly lower QoL in CD patients compared to healthy controls (18), and Simsek et al., who observed significantly lower emotional well-being scores in children with CD (16). These discrepancies may be attributed to the challenges of maintaining a strict GFD, which can significantly affect daily life and overall QoL (23).

The present study found moderate adherence to the GFD, which is consistent with the findings by Gladys et al., who reported that 24% to 52% of participants did not adhere to the diet adequately (24). Poor adherence remains a major challenge due to factors such as limited availability, high cost, and suboptimal quality of certified gluten-free products (24-26). Interestingly, several studies have indicated that strict adherence to a GFD can negatively impact QoL, particularly in the social and emotional domains (27, 28). Research has shown that individuals following a GFD often face increased stress when dining out, due to fears of gluten cross-contact, discomfort in repeatedly questioning food preparation, and frustration over the GFD being perceived as a trend rather than a medical requirement (28).

A key finding of the present study was the link between financial strain and both lower GFD adherence and reduced QoL among CD patients. Previous studies in the UK by Fry et al. and Burden et al. reported that gluten-free foods were, on average, 159% to 400% more expensive than regular products (17, 29). These costs adversely affect adherence to the GFD and the QoL of patients. Similarly, Posterick and Ayars found that individuals with lower incomes had the poorest adherence, which increased their risk for disease progression and complications (30). These findings emphasize the significant impact of economic barriers on CD management. The high costs of gluten-free foods and hospitalizations call for policy interventions (31), such as subsidies, to improve adherence and overall well-being for individuals with CD.

5.1. Conclusions

In summary, this study highlights the complex challenges faced by children with CD and their parents, particularly in relation to QoL and GFD adherence. Despite relatively high QoL scores, GFD adherence was only moderate, with significant variations observed based on demographic and socioeconomic factors. Parental education, maternal employment, disease duration, age, comorbidities, and especially financial burden were strongly associated with both adherence and QoL. These findings underscore the crucial role of parental support and socioeconomic stability in managing CD effectively. Notably, the high cost of gluten-free foods and the associated financial stress emerged as critical barriers to optimal adherence and QoL. This reinforces the urgent need for policy-level interventions aimed at improving the affordability and accessibility of gluten-free products. Integrating these insights into family-centered care (FCC) approaches (32) and public health strategies could enhance disease management and promote better long-term outcomes for pediatric patients with CD.

5.2. Research Limitations

A key limitation of this study is that children aged ≤ 10 years were unable to complete the questionnaires themselves, so parents were required to respond on their behalf. To reduce bias and enhance validity, census sampling, standardized questionnaires, and confidentiality assurances were implemented.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Martín-Masot R, Labella A, Baena-García L, Flor-Alemany M, López-Frías M, de la Higuera M, et al. Time Following a Gluten-Free Diet, Ultra-Processed Food Consumption and Quality of Life in Children with Celiac Disease. Appl Sci. 2022;12(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app122211680.
  • 2.
    Sahin Y. Celiac disease in children: A review of the literature. World J Clin Pediatr. 2021;10(4):53-71. [PubMed ID: 34316439]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8290992]. https://doi.org/10.5409/wjcp.v10.i4.53.
  • 3.
    Al-Sunaid FF, Al-Homidi MM, Al-Qahtani RM, Al-Ashwal RA, Mudhish GA, Hanbazaza MA, et al. The influence of a gluten-free diet on health-related quality of life in individuals with celiac disease. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021;21(1):330. [PubMed ID: 34433427]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8390240]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01908-0.
  • 4.
    Nikniaz Z, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Abbasalizad Farhangi M, Shirmohammadi M, Nikniaz L. Determinants of health-related quality of life in patients with celiac disease: a structural equation modeling. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):204. [PubMed ID: 34429115]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8386028]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01842-5.
  • 5.
    Ashtari S, Najafimehr H, Pourhoseingholi MA, Rostami K, Asadzadeh-Aghdaei H, Rostami-Nejad M, et al. Prevalence of celiac disease in low and high risk population in Asia-Pacific region: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):2383. [PubMed ID: 33504878]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7841177]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82023-8.
  • 6.
    Singh P, Arora A, Strand TA, Leffler DA, Catassi C, Green PH, et al. Global Prevalence of Celiac Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(6):823-836 e2. [PubMed ID: 29551598]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2017.06.037.
  • 7.
    Guandalini S. The approach to Celiac Disease in children. Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2017;4(3):124-7. [PubMed ID: 30805515]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6372481]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpam.2017.08.002.
  • 8.
    Violato M, Gray A. The impact of diagnosis on health-related quality of life in people with coeliac disease: a UK population-based longitudinal perspective. BMC Gastroenterol. 2019;19(1):68. [PubMed ID: 31046685]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6498641]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-019-0980-6.
  • 9.
    Ludvigsson JF, Yao J, Lebwohl B, Green PHR, Yuan S, Leffler DA. Coeliac disease: complications and comorbidities. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025;22(4):252-64. [PubMed ID: 39875649]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41575-024-01032-w.
  • 10.
    Lebwohl B, Cao Y, Zong G, Hu FB, Green PHR, Neugut AI, et al. Long term gluten consumption in adults without celiac disease and risk of coronary heart disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2017;357:j1892. [PubMed ID: 28465308]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5421459]. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1892.
  • 11.
    Rohani P, Izze da Silva Magalhaes E, Imanifard R, Jarahzadeh M, Ziamanesh F, Fatahi S, et al. Impact of gluten-free diet (GFD) on some of cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr Sci. 2024;13. e37. [PubMed ID: 39345238]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11428062]. https://doi.org/10.1017/jns.2024.39.
  • 12.
    Angi A, Polidori N, Cerruto M, Chiarelli F, Mohn AA. Effects of Gluten-free Diet on Lipid Profile Risk Factors in Celiac Children. JPGN Rep. 2021;2(3). e083. [PubMed ID: 37205957]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10191504]. https://doi.org/10.1097/PG9.0000000000000083.
  • 13.
    Norsa L, Shamir R, Zevit N, Verduci E, Hartman C, Ghisleni D, et al. Cardiovascular disease risk factor profiles in children with celiac disease on gluten-free diets. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(34):5658-64. [PubMed ID: 24039358]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3769902]. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i34.5658.
  • 14.
    Bystrom IM, Hollen E, Falth-Magnusson K, Johansson A. Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with celiac disease: from the perspectives of children and parents. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:986475. [PubMed ID: 22548054]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3324145]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/986475.
  • 15.
    Momtazbakhsh M, Fakour Y, Zarei A, Daneshpazhooh M, Aghapour E. Leisure-Time Physical Activity Impact on Quality of Life, Anxiety, Depression, and Clinical Intensity of Pemphigus Vulgaris. Health Scope. 2024;13(1). https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-138659.
  • 16.
    Simsek S, Baysoy G, Gencoglan S, Uluca U. Effects of Gluten-Free Diet on Quality of Life and Depression in Children With Celiac Disease. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61(3):303-6. [PubMed ID: 26322559]. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0000000000000799.
  • 17.
    Burden M, Mooney PD, Blanshard RJ, White WL, Cambray-Deakin DR, Sanders DS. Cost and availability of gluten-free food in the UK: in store and online. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91(1081):622-6. [PubMed ID: 26310267]. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133395.
  • 18.
    Burger JPW, de Brouwer B, IntHout J, Wahab PJ, Tummers M, Drenth JPH. Systematic review with meta-analysis: Dietary adherence influences normalization of health-related quality of life in coeliac disease. Clin Nutr. 2017;36(2):399-406. [PubMed ID: 27179800]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2016.04.021.
  • 19.
    White LE, Bannerman E, Gillett PM. Coeliac disease and the gluten-free diet: a review of the burdens; factors associated with adherence and impact on health-related quality of life, with specific focus on adolescence. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016;29(5):593-606. [PubMed ID: 27214084]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12375.
  • 20.
    Saeed A, Assiri A, Assiri H, Ullah A, Rashid M. Celiac disease in Saudi children. Evaluation of clinical features and diagnosis. Saudi Med J. 2017;38(9):895-9. [PubMed ID: 28889146]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5654022]. https://doi.org/10.15537/smj.2017.9.20808.
  • 21.
    Van Kalleveen MW, de Meij T, Plotz FB. Clinical spectrum of paediatric coeliac disease: a 10-year single-centre experience. Eur J Pediatr. 2018;177(4):593-602. [PubMed ID: 29392394]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-018-3103-4.
  • 22.
    Stahl MG, Geno Rasmussen C, Dong F, Waugh K, Norris JM, Baxter J, et al. Mass Screening for Celiac Disease: The Autoimmunity Screening for Kids Study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(1):180-7. [PubMed ID: 32701732]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7775339]. https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000751.
  • 23.
    Rodriguez Almagro J, Rodriguez Almagro D, Solano Ruiz C, Siles Gonzalez J, Hernandez Martinez A. The Experience of Living With a Gluten-Free Diet: An Integrative Review. Gastroenterol Nurs. 2018;41(3):189-200. [PubMed ID: 29847393]. https://doi.org/10.1097/SGA.0000000000000328.
  • 24.
    Gladys K, Dardzinska J, Guzek M, Adrych K, Malgorzewicz S. Celiac Dietary Adherence Test and Standardized Dietician Evaluation in Assessment of Adherence to a Gluten-Free Diet in Patients with Celiac Disease. Nutrients. 2020;12(8). [PubMed ID: 32751809]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7468751]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12082300.
  • 25.
    Wieser H, Ruiz-Carnicer A, Segura V, Comino I, Sousa C. Challenges of Monitoring the Gluten-Free Diet Adherence in the Management and Follow-Up of Patients with Celiac Disease. Nutrients. 2021;13(7). [PubMed ID: 34209138]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8308436]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13072274.
  • 26.
    Bathrellou E, Bountziouka V, Lamprou D, Fragedaki E, Papachristou E, Vriesekoop F, et al. Higher cost of gluten-free products compared to gluten-containing equivalents is mainly attributed to staple foods. Nutr Bull. 2025;50(1):44-51. [PubMed ID: 39460519]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC11815601]. https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.12716.
  • 27.
    Marsilio I, Canova C, D'Odorico A, Ghisa M, Zingone L, Lorenzon G, et al. Quality-of-Life Evaluation in Coeliac Patients on a Gluten-Free Diet. Nutrients. 2020;12(10). [PubMed ID: 33003417]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7601879]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12102981.
  • 28.
    Wolf RL, Lebwohl B, Lee AR, Zybert P, Reilly NR, Cadenhead J, et al. Hypervigilance to a Gluten-Free Diet and Decreased Quality of Life in Teenagers and Adults with Celiac Disease. Dig Dis Sci. 2018;63(6):1438-48. [PubMed ID: 29387990]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-4936-4.
  • 29.
    Fry L, Madden AM, Fallaize R. An investigation into the nutritional composition and cost of gluten-free versus regular food products in the UK. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2018;31(1):108-20. [PubMed ID: 28851025]. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12502.
  • 30.
    Posterick A, Ayars CL. Celiac Disease Dietary Adherence on the Rural-Urban Continuum. Nutrients. 2023;15(21). [PubMed ID: 37960188]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10649991]. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu15214535.
  • 31.
    Seyedin H, Moghimi M, Goharinezhad S, Azmal M, Kalhor R. The Hospital Cost Reduction Strategies from the Managers’ Point of View: A Qualitative Study in Iran. Health Scope. 2024;13(1). https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-137620.
  • 32.
    Al-Oran H, Al-Sagarat A, Obeidat H. Family-Centered Care from the Point of View of Undergraduate Nursing Students Studying in Selected Public Universities: A Cross-Sectional Study. Health Scope. 2024;13(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-145655.

Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles