Logo

Air Quality and Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Case Study of Ventilation and Bioaerosols in an Educational Hospital

Author(s):
Yasaman RabbaniYasaman Rabbani1, Homeira KeshavarzHomeira Keshavarz1, Arefe HosseinpourArefe Hosseinpour1, Mohammad NourmohammadiMohammad Nourmohammadi2, 3,*, Morteza MortazaviMorteza MortazaviMorteza Mortazavi ORCID4
1Student Research Committee, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
2Department of Health Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
3Department of Occupational Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
4Department of Occupational Health and Safety Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran

Health Scope:Vol. 14, issue 3; e159328
Published online:Jun 02, 2025
Article type:Research Article
Received:Jan 22, 2025
Accepted:May 14, 2025
How to Cite:Rabbani Y, Keshavarz H, Hosseinpour A, Nourmohammadi M, Mortazavi M. Air Quality and Hospital-Acquired Infections: A Case Study of Ventilation and Bioaerosols in an Educational Hospital.Health Scope.2025;14(3):e159328.https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-159328.

Abstract

Background:

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) pose a significant threat to patient health and healthcare systems. Adequate ventilation is one of the most effective methods for controlling and preventing the spread of infectious pathogens in healthcare settings.

Objectives:

This study investigates the correlation between ventilation systems, bioaerosol density, and the prevalence of HAIs.

Methods:

This descriptive-analytical study was conducted at an educational hospital in Mashhad. Data were collected from 473 patients. To measure air velocity, a TES 1340 anemometer was used to assess airflow speed. Bioaerosol sampling followed the NIOSH 0800 standard method. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26.

Results:

Data analysis revealed a strong inverse correlation between bioaerosol concentration and both relative humidity (P = 0.001) and air changes per hour (ACH) (P = 0.001), whereas a direct relation was observed between bioaerosol concentration and temperature (P = 0.001). Additionally, the type of infection significantly correlated with the department type (P = 0.005), but not with patient gender (P = 0.091). Among infection types, Acinetobacter infections were most prevalent (41, 25%), particularly in ICU3. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common infection in the emergency surgery department. Candida infections were significantly influenced by ACH, while S. aureus prevalence increased with higher humidity and affected younger patients. Bioaerosol concentrations were highest for S. aureus and lowest for Candida, with no significant impact of temperature on infection distribution.

Conclusions:

The findings emphasize the critical role of ventilation systems and environmental control measures in preventing airborne transmission of pathogens and reducing HAIs. Further research is needed to optimize ventilation strategies and minimize the risk of infection.

1. Background

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) can result in prolonged hospital stays, increased healthcare costs, and elevated mortality rates, thereby impacting both patients and healthcare workers. Airborne transmission plays a crucial role in the spread of HAIs (1, 2). The most important source of hospital infections is bioaerosols, which usually exist as colloidal suspensions in the air, consisting of suspended liquid droplets and solid particles originating from plants, such as pollen, and animals (3, 4). These particles can include living or dead microorganisms such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi (5). The growth and proliferation of bioaerosols in the internal environments of the hospital are increased by various factors such as the type of walls and floors, the location of the hospital building (high traffic or low traffic areas), air change rate, air movement, and season (6). A critical consequence of HAIs is the emergence of multidrug-resistant organisms, which further complicate treatment outcomes. Current data indicate that HAIs affect approximately 3.2% (687,000 or 1 in 31 patients) of hospitalized patients in the United States and 6.5% of patients in the European Union/European Economic Area, with global prevalence likely exceeding these estimates (7). This mode of transmission occurs when pathogens are conveyed from infected individuals to susceptible individuals through particles that remain suspended in the air (8). The transmission of these infections is considered an indirect route and is influenced by various factors, including the presence of an airborne pathogenic organism, the identification of contamination sources, detection in air samples, and specifically, the occurrence of infections in patients exposed to contaminated air (9). Infectious bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (the causative agent of tuberculosis), Acinetobacter baumannii, Aspergillus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa have the potential to spread via airborne particles (10). In hospitals, Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes are two pathogens that may cause severe invasive infections (11). Airborne dissemination of pathogens can occur through different means, such as respiratory droplets, dust particles carrying pathogens, contaminated medical equipment, ventilation system malfunctions, environmental sources, and even hospital personnel and visitors (12, 13). The transmission of airborne infectious diseases is significantly impacted by particle size and dryness. Temperature and relative humidity act as primary environmental factors, playing a critical role in altering transmission rates (14). Following the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals have been attempting to reduce the risk of airborne infectious disease transmission by increasing the air change per hour (ACH) — the number of times that the total air volume in a room or space is completely removed and replaced in an hour — and by using ventilation systems proportional to the needs of different hospital areas, such as operating rooms and patient rooms (15). In a study conducted by Mirzaei et al. to evaluate isolation rooms in Mashhad hospitals, the results showed that in 81% of cases, the number of air changes per hour and in 72% of cases, the air inlet and outlet standards were not up to standard (16). Fernström and Goldblatt examined the role of aerobiology — the study of airborne organisms — in infectious disease transmission. Their findings indicated that factors such as particle size and type, airborne duration, travel distance, and environmental conditions have significant effects on airborne disease transmission. Furthermore, high-efficiency filtration remains the most common method for reducing airborne particle transmission (17). According to studies by Li et al., achieving around 25 ACH is necessary for rapid aerosol removal, achievable through portable heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) air purifiers; however, solely relying on HVAC systems poses challenges, as it reduces the influx of fresh air into hospital spaces (3). In a study conducted by Qiu et al., results demonstrated that bacterial species distribution is influenced by ventilation conditions and humidity levels in the environment, and that ventilation played a more crucial role in controlling bacterial distribution when humidity levels were higher (18). Hassan and Zeeshan, in a study of two public hospitals with different ventilation systems, disinfection protocols, and occupancy levels, found that the most prevalent bacterial species were Staphylococcus species (53% of samples), Micrococcus spp. (30%), and Bacillus spp. (11%), while the predominant fungal species were Aspergillus spp. (67%) and Penicillium (28%) (19). Only a limited number of studies have considered the impact of infection type on other parameters, such as pathogen density and transmission, length of hospital stay, and other factors.

2. Objectives

Given the critical importance of controlling HAIs and the vital role of indoor air quality, this study aims to quantitatively and qualitatively assess the correlation between ventilation systems, bioaerosol density, and the incidence of HAIs, marking a significant step toward improved infection control in hospital environments.

3. Methods

In this descriptive-analytical study, conducted in a 325-bed educational hospital that is 70 years old and located in a high-traffic area of the metropolis of Mashhad, data from 473 inpatients were collected from the hospital's infection control department between October 2021 and June 2024. The information collected included patient age, gender, hospital ward, duration of hospitalization until infection, bioaerosol density in each ward, and infection type. A Lutron PHB318 (Taiwan) was employed to measure air velocity in ventilation inlets and outlets (Figure 1), adhering to ASHRAE standards (Figure 2). An anemometer model TES 1340 (Taiwan) was used to measure airflow speed, in accordance with ACGIH standards. Based on Equation 1, the flow rate into the room was calculated. The ACH were calculated based on Equation 2 (20).

Measuring the air flow velocity at the air inlet
Figure 1.

Measuring the air flow velocity at the air inlet

ASHRAE standard for measuring air velocity
Figure 2.

ASHRAE standard for measuring air velocity

V= Air speed (fpm); A= Area of inlet (ft2)

That Q (ft3/min) = air flow and V= volume of room (ft3)

Bioaerosol sampling was conducted based on the NIOSH 0800 standard method. Air samples were collected using a sampling pump (Air Quick Take 30) equipped with a single-stage Anderson impactor, with a flow rate of 28.3 L/min. Prior to each sampling, all equipment was thoroughly cleaned with 70% isopropyl alcohol. After sample collection, the blood agar plates were incubated at 37°C for 24 to 48 hours. Colony counts were then performed on each plate, and bioaerosol concentration was calculated as colony-forming units per cubic meter (CFU/m3) using Equation 3 (21, 22).

That N is number of bioareosol per plate al L is volume of air sampling liter.

Data analysis was performed using SPSS software version 26. Descriptive statistics for infection type based on hospital ward and patient gender were assessed. The Kruskal-Wallis test was employed to compare the mean infection type with other quantitative parameters, followed by post hoc tests for pairwise comparisons. To examine the association between infection type and gender, as well as between infection type and ward, cross-tabulation and Fisher's exact test were applied. Spearman's correlation was utilized to assess associations between bioaerosol density, ACH, and other quantitative variables.

4. Results

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between ventilation parameters and the incidence of HAIs among 473 patients with infections. Data analysis revealed that the highest number of infected patients were admitted to ICU3. Additionally, the highest bioaerosol concentration was observed in the emergency surgery department. Further data analysis indicated that ICU3 had the highest ACH rate, while the emergency surgery department had the lowest. The relative humidity was highest in ICU2, and the highest ambient temperature was recorded in the men's orthopedic ward (Table 1).

Table 1.Average Air Quality Parameters of Different Hospital Wards and the Number of Patients with Infections Admitted to Each Ward
Value and Section TypeNumber of PeopleMean
Bioaerosol DensityACHRelative Humidity (%)Temperature (℉)
ICU 1883205.5021.378
ICU 2541563.832.577.1
ICU 311916213.6223.376
ICU 41094724.721.578.5
ICU 52586527.176
Men's orthopedic department182263.525.679.9
Emergency surgery60474324.777.7
Total473300.146.745924.02977.438

Average Air Quality Parameters of Different Hospital Wards and the Number of Patients with Infections Admitted to Each Ward

Table 2 presents data on the types of HAIs and ACH among male and female patients across different hospital departments. Overall, Acinetobacter-related infections show the highest prevalence, particularly in ICU3, where 141 male and 29 female patients have been infected. Other common infections include Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, both of which also exhibit high prevalence in ICU3, with E. coli observed in 44 male and 8 female patients, and P. aeruginosa in 43 male and 5 female patients. In the emergency surgery unit, the most frequent infection is Staphylococcus aureus, affecting 37 male and 2 female patients. Conversely, certain infections, such as those caused by Proteus and Serratia, have a lower incidence, appearing only in isolated cases within departments such as ICU1, ICU4, and male orthopedics. The overall patient count indicates that a total of 473 individuals have contracted one of these infections, comprising 403 men and 70 women. Additionally, ICU3 has the highest infection count, highlighting a significant concentration of HAIs within this unit.

Table 2.Comparison of Different Types of Infections Based on Gender and Type of Ward
Value and Infection TypeNumber of Infected People by GenderThe Highest Number of Infection Species in That Section Type
MaleFemaleNo.Section Type
Acinetobacter1412941ICU3
Staphylococcus epidermidis3038ICU4
Staphylococcus aureus37212Emergency surgery
Escherichia coli44815ICU3
Enterobacter3169Emergency surgery
Enterococcus813ICU3
Proteus2-1ICU4 , Men's Orthopedic Department
Serratia1-1ICU1
Pseudomonas aeruginosa43517ICU3
Citrobacter1-1Emergency surgery
Candida17712ICU3
Klebsiella21911ICU1
Klebsiellaoxytoca27-7ICU1 , ICU3 , ICU4
Total403701385

Comparison of Different Types of Infections Based on Gender and Type of Ward

Based on the results obtained from Fisher's Exact Test in Table 3, a significant relationship was found between the type of infection and the type of department (P = 0.005). However, no significant correlation was observed between the type of infection and gender (P = 0.091). Furthermore, the results of the Spearman test indicated a significant inverse correlation between bioaerosol concentration and relative humidity (P = 0.001), followed by ACH (P = 0.001); however, a significant direct relationship was found between bioaerosol concentration and temperature. No significant correlation was found between ACH and relative humidity (P = 0.228), but a significant inverse relationship was observed between ACH and temperature (Table 4).

Table 3.Results of Fisher's Exact Test of Infection Type with Two Variables (Gender and Ward Type)
ValueMonte Carlo P-Value (2-sided)
Gender0.091
Section type0.005

Results of Fisher's Exact Test of Infection Type with Two Variables (Gender and Ward Type)

Table 4.Relationship Between Air Parameters with Bioaerosols and ACH
VariablesCorrelation CoefficientP-Value
Relative humidity
Bioaerosol concentration-0.430.000
ACH-0.0550.228
Temperature
Bioaerosol concentration0.6620.000
ACH
ACH-0.4470.000
Bioaerosol concentration-0.450.000

Relationship Between Air Parameters with Bioaerosols and ACH

Comparing the average type of infection with other quantitative parameters, most results indicated significant differences between them. According to Figure 3A, the greatest impact of ACH was observed on Candida fungi, while the least impact was on S. aureus bacteria. On the other hand, as shown in Figure 3B, Enterococcus bacteria and subsequently S. aureus exhibited higher prevalence at higher humidity levels, while Klebsiella bacteria were more prevalent at lower humidity levels. S. aureus caused infections in hospitalized individuals within a shorter period, while Klebsiella oxytoca did so over a longer duration (Figure 3C). A greater proportion of younger hospitalized individuals were infected with S. aureus, whereas older individuals were more likely to contract E. coli (Figure 3D). The bioaerosol concentration carrying S. aureus was higher than that of the other infection species, while the lowest concentration of bioaerosols was associated with Candida fungi (Figure 3E). Additionally, no significant difference was found between the type of infection and temperature.

A, The difference between the infection type with bioaerosol concentration; B, the difference between the infection type with air changes per hour (ACH); C, the difference between the infection type with relative humidity; D, the difference between the Infection type with hospitalization until infection; E, the difference between the infection <a href="#A159328REF1">1</a>.
Figure 3.

A, The difference between the infection type with bioaerosol concentration; B, the difference between the infection type with air changes per hour (ACH); C, the difference between the infection type with relative humidity; D, the difference between the Infection type with hospitalization until infection; E, the difference between the infection 1.

5. Discussion

This study examined the relationship between ventilation parameters and the prevalence of HAIs in an educational hospital in Mashhad. The findings revealed that infections caused by Acinetobacter spp. exhibited the highest prevalence among both male and female patients, likely due to the pathogen’s remarkable ability to survive and proliferate in hospital environments. These results emphasize the critical role of ventilation systems in controlling bioaerosol transmission and mitigating the risk of HAIs. Furthermore, a statistically significant association was observed between the type of infection and the hospital department, whereas no significant correlation was found between infection type and patient gender. Additionally, bioaerosol concentration demonstrated a significant inverse correlation with both relative humidity and ACH, while exhibiting a direct correlation with ambient temperature. A significant inverse relationship was also identified between ACH and temperature.

A key observation was the inverse correlation between bioaerosol concentration and both relative humidity (P = 0.001) and ACH (P = 0.001), suggesting that enhanced ventilation and optimized humidity levels can effectively reduce airborne microbial loads. Conversely, the direct correlation between bioaerosol concentration and temperature (P = 0.000) suggests that higher ambient temperatures may facilitate microbial proliferation. These findings align with previous research, which underscores the efficacy of increased ACH in mitigating airborne pathogen transmission by diluting contaminated air. Notably, the lowest ACH rate was recorded in the emergency surgery department (3 ACH), which corresponded to the highest bioaerosol concentration, further underscoring the necessity for adequate ventilation in high-risk areas.

The distribution of infection types among different hospital wards revealed that ICU3 exhibited the highest burden of HAIs, particularly infections caused by Acinetobacter spp., Escherichia coli, and P. aeruginosa. This observation is consistent with existing literature highlighting intensive care units as epicenters of multidrug-resistant infections due to prolonged patient stays, the extensive use of invasive procedures, and high exposure to antibiotics. In the study by Choobdar et al., 13.5% of 645 newborns in NICU were identified with HAI (23). Additionally, the emergency surgery department demonstrated a notably high prevalence of S. aureus infections, likely attributable to frequent surgical interventions, high patient turnover, and increased exposure to contaminated surfaces. In alignment with previous studies, this research underscores the role of environmental factors in HAI prevalence (2).

Studies by Rajab (24) have demonstrated that ventilation and filtration systems significantly improve indoor air quality, while research by Shimoda et al. (25) has highlighted the influence of temperature fluctuations on pathogen growth, distribution, and infection control. Furthermore, Qiu et al. (18) emphasized that decreasing relative humidity can adversely affect microbial metabolism, ultimately creating unfavorable conditions for pathogen survival. The results of this study reinforce these findings by demonstrating that Enterococcus spp. and S. aureus thrive in higher humidity conditions, whereas Klebsiella spp. exhibit greater activity under lower humidity levels.

Although recent infection control measures have largely targeted Gram-negative bacteria, particularly those transmitted via direct contact, there has been a notable increase in infections caused by gram-positive bacteria, which display greater resilience in low-humidity environments (26). Centeleghe et al.’s research demonstrated that Klebsiella pneumoniae can persist on dry surfaces for at least four weeks at 55% relative humidity and 21°C, potentially remaining viable in a non-culturable state and contributing to pathogen transmission. This underscores the importance of environmental disinfection and surface decontamination as complementary strategies to ventilation-based infection control measures (27, 28).

The present study also identified a higher bacterial species diversity in ICU wards compared to other hospital departments. This finding may be attributed to the infrequent replacement of air filters, which can serve as microbial reservoirs. If not adequately maintained, air filtration systems may facilitate pathogen proliferation and subsequent reintroduction into hospital environments, exacerbating the risk of airborne transmission. The relatively minimal impact of ACH on S. aureus infections observed in this study can be explained by its primary mode of transmission, which occurs through direct contact and large respiratory droplets rather than airborne dissemination. Thus, while increasing ACH can mitigate airborne infections, effective infection control for S. aureus necessitates a multifaceted approach that integrates stringent surface disinfection and adherence to hygiene protocols. Blanco also found that a 10% increase in relative humidity could increase the prevalence of Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) by 9 ± 8%.

The relationship between infection type and hospital department can be attributed to various factors, including differences in patients' immune systems, the number of hospitalized patients, traffic of individuals, and the design and organization of departments (29). Demographic analyses indicated no statistically significant association between gender and infection type (P = 0.091), suggesting that environmental and clinical factors play a more influential role in HAI prevalence than patient demographics. However, age-related variations in infection susceptibility were observed. Consistent with previous research, S. aureus infections were more frequently reported among younger patients, while E. coli infections were more prevalent among elderly individuals. The latter finding aligns with established evidence linking E. coli to urinary tract infections (UTIs), which are increasingly common among older adults due to physiological changes and the frequent use of urinary catheters in this population. Escherichia coli is the most common cause of urinary tract infections, with incidence rates between 30 and 100 cases per 1,000 person-years in individuals aged 60 to 90 years (30).

The findings of this study emphasize the necessity of optimizing hospital ventilation conditions to reduce HAIs and enhance healthcare quality. Implementation of improved ventilation strategies, along with the use of high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters and real-time air quality monitoring, could significantly mitigate the airborne transmission of pathogens. Furthermore, future research should explore additional factors influencing HAI prevalence, including air filtration efficiency, disinfection technologies, and the impact of healthcare personnel behaviors on infection control. Addressing these factors not only has the potential to lower healthcare costs and reduce patient hospitalization duration but also to improve overall patient outcomes and enhance the efficiency of healthcare systems.

5.1. Conclusions

This study aimed to determine the relationship between ventilation parameters and the types of infections. The analysis demonstrated statistically significant relationships between bioaerosol concentrations and environmental parameters. Specifically, a strong inverse correlation was observed between bioaerosol concentrations and both relative humidity (P = 0.001) and ACH (P = 0.001), indicating that higher relative humidity and ACH are associated with lower bioaerosol concentrations. On the other hand, a direct correlation was found between bioaerosol concentrations and temperature (P = 0.001), suggesting that warmer conditions contribute to higher bioaerosol levels.

In terms of infection distribution, the type of infection was significantly correlated with the department type (P = 0.005), with Acinetobacter infections being most prevalent (41, 25%), particularly in ICU3. S. aureus was the predominant infection in the emergency surgery department, while Candida infections were significantly influenced by ACH. Notably, S. aureus prevalence increased with higher humidity and was more common in younger patients (P = 0.091 for gender, not significant). The data also revealed that bioaerosol concentrations were highest for S. aureus and lowest for Candida, with temperature not significantly influencing infection distribution.

These findings emphasize the need for controlling environmental factors, such as humidity and ACH, to potentially mitigate bioaerosol-related infection risks in hospital settings. These findings underscore the importance of understanding the types of infections for infection control management in hospitals, which could aid in designing better ventilation systems to prevent HAIs. However, the study had limitations, such as reliance on limited statistical data from a single hospital. Future research is recommended to examine the impact of other environmental factors on bioaerosol density and infection types. Overall, regulating air change rates, controlling temperature and humidity, and understanding infection types appear to be effective strategies for reducing bioaerosol density and minimizing the risk of bacterial and fungal infection transmission in hospital environments.

Acknowledgments

Footnotes

References

  • 1.
    Lemiech-Mirowska E, Kiersnowska ZM, Michalkiewicz M, Depta A, Marczak M. Nosocomial infections as one of the most important problems of healthcare system. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2021;28(3):361-6. [PubMed ID: 34558254]. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/122629.
  • 2.
    Hamidi F, Rahmani A, Yousefzadeh S, Eslami M, Nassehinia H. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Two Disinfection Processes on Bacteria Causing Nosocomial Infections in the Intensive Care Units of an Educational, Research, and Treatment Hospital in Semnan, Iran. Health Scope. 2024;13(3). https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-142411.
  • 3.
    Li X, Huang S, Sun Z. Technology and equipment development in laser-induced fluorescence-based remote and field detection of biological aerosols. Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity. 2019;1(2):113-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobb.2019.08.005.
  • 4.
    Jabeen R, Kizhisseri MI, Mayanaik SN, Mohamed MM. Bioaerosol assessment in indoor and outdoor environments: a case study from India. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):18066. [PubMed ID: 37872255]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC10593752]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44315-z.
  • 5.
    Kim KH, Kabir E, Jahan SA. Airborne bioaerosols and their impact on human health. J Environ Sci (China). 2018;67:23-35. [PubMed ID: 29778157]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7128579]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2017.08.027.
  • 6.
    Ghosh B, Lal H, Srivastava A. Review of bioaerosols in indoor environment with special reference to sampling, analysis and control mechanisms. Environ Int. 2015;85:254-72. [PubMed ID: 26436919]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7132379]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.018.
  • 7.
    Sikora A], Zahra F. Nosocomial Infections. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls [Internet]; 2023.
  • 8.
    Raoofi S, Pashazadeh Kan F, Rafiei S, Hosseinipalangi Z, Noorani Mejareh Z, Khani S, et al. Global prevalence of nosocomial infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2023;18(1). e0274248. [PubMed ID: 36706112]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9882897]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274248.
  • 9.
    Bonadonna L, Briancesco R, Coccia AM, Meloni P, Rosa G, Moscato U. Microbial Air Quality in Healthcare Facilities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(12). [PubMed ID: 34207509]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC8296088]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126226.
  • 10.
    Zheng Y, Chen H, Yao M, Li X. Bacterial pathogens were detected from human exhaled breath using a novel protocol. J Aerosol Sci. 2018;117:224-34. [PubMed ID: 32226119]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7094568]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.12.009.
  • 11.
    Stoneham S, Peters J, Price J. Staphylococcal and streptococcal infections. Medicine. 2021;49(12):731-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpmed.2021.09.001.
  • 12.
    Carrazana E, Ruiz-Gil T, Fujiyoshi S, Tanaka D, Noda J, Maruyama F, et al. Potential airborne human pathogens: A relevant inhabitant in built environments but not considered in indoor air quality standards. Sci Total Environ. 2023;901:165879. [PubMed ID: 37517716]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165879.
  • 13.
    Sajjadi SA, Ketabi D, Joulaei F. Fungal Assessment of Indoor Air Quality in Wards and Operating Theatres in an Organ Transplantation Hospital. Health Scope. 2018;7(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.60208.
  • 14.
    Ahlawat A, Wiedensohler A, Mishra SK. An Overview on the Role of Relative Humidity in Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Indoor Environments. Aerosol and Air Quality Research. 2020;20(9):1856-61. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2020.06.0302.
  • 15.
    Nourmohammadi M, Mirzaei R, Taban E, Yari S. Effect of Ventilation System on Spread and Control of Infections (COVID-19) in Indoor Environments: Based on Current Studies. Asian Pacific Journal of Environment and Cancer. 2020;3(1):55-8. https://doi.org/10.31557/apjec.2020.3.1.55-58.
  • 16.
    Mirzaei R, Nourmohammadi M, Sezavar M, Naseri M, Razavipour MK, Khademi G. Inspection of Isolation Rooms Based on Standards, a Cross-Sectional Study in the COVID-19 Crisis. Health Scope. 2025;14(1). https://doi.org/10.5812/healthscope-144245.
  • 17.
    Fernstrom A, Goldblatt M. Aerobiology and its role in the transmission of infectious diseases. J Pathog. 2013;2013:493960. [PubMed ID: 23365758]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3556854]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/493960.
  • 18.
    Qiu Y, Zhou Y, Chang Y, Liang X, Zhang H, Lin X, et al. The Effects of Ventilation, Humidity, and Temperature on Bacterial Growth and Bacterial Genera Distribution. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(22). [PubMed ID: 36430064]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC9691097]. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192215345.
  • 19.
    Hassan A, Zeeshan M. Microbiological indoor air quality of hospital buildings with different ventilation systems, cleaning frequencies and occupancy levels. Atmospheric Pollution Research. 2022;13(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2022.101382.
  • 20.
    Milne AD, d'Entremont MI, Adam Law J. Calculation of air change rates and post-aerosol pause times for a COVID-19 airway management enclosure. Can J Anaesth. 2020;67(11):1670-2. [PubMed ID: 32588271]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC7316429]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01748-8.
  • 21.
    Andrews R, O’Connor PF. NIOSH manual of analytical methods (NMAM). Washington, D.C: NIOSH; 2020.
  • 22.
    The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. NIOSH Manual of Analytical Methods (NMAM). 4th ed. Washington, D.C: NIOSH; 1994.
  • 23.
    Choobdar F, Vahedi Z, Khosravi N, Khalesi N, Javid A, Shojaee S. Nosocomial Infection in an Iranian Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Hospital Epidemiology and Risk Factors. Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2020;8(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/pedinfect.96850.
  • 24.
    Rajab F. Air Quality in Infection Prevention: Innovations, Efficacy, and Limitations. Infection Control Today. 2023:NA.
  • 25.
    Shimoda T, Okubo T, Enoeda Y, Yano R, Nakamura S, Thapa J, et al. Effect of thermal control of dry fomites on regulating the survival of human pathogenic bacteria responsible for nosocomial infections. PLoS One. 2019;14(12). e0226952. [PubMed ID: 31881059]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6934310]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0226952.
  • 26.
    Tacconelli E, Cataldo MA, Dancer SJ, De Angelis G, Falcone M, Frank U, et al. ESCMID guidelines for the management of the infection control measures to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in hospitalized patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20 Suppl 1:1-55. [PubMed ID: 24329732]. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-0691.12427.
  • 27.
    Centeleghe I, Norville P, Hughes L, Maillard JY. Klebsiella pneumoniae survives on surfaces as a dry biofilm. Am J Infect Control. 2023;51(10):1157-62. [PubMed ID: 36907360]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2023.02.009.
  • 28.
    Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VJ. Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(3):603-61. [PubMed ID: 26016486]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4451395]. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.00134-14.
  • 29.
    Blanco N, Perencevich E, Li SS, Morgan DJ, Pineles L, Johnson JK, et al. Effect of meteorological factors and geographic location on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci colonization in the US. PLoS One. 2017;12(5). e0178254. [PubMed ID: 28558010]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5448764]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178254.
  • 30.
    Bonten M, Johnson JR, van den Biggelaar AHJ, Georgalis L, Geurtsen J, de Palacios PI, et al. Epidemiology of Escherichia coli Bacteremia: A Systematic Literature Review. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(7):1211-9. [PubMed ID: 32406495]. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa210.
comments

Leave a comment here


Crossmark
Crossmark
Checking
Share on
Cited by
Metrics

Purchasing Reprints

  • Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) handles bulk orders for article reprints for Brieflands. To place an order for reprints, please click here (   https://www.copyright.com/landing/reprintsinquiryform/ ). Clicking this link will bring you to a CCC request form where you can provide the details of your order. Once complete, please click the ‘Submit Request’ button and CCC’s Reprints Services team will generate a quote for your review.
Search Relations

Author(s):

Related Articles