Abstract
Background:
Personality is associated with health behaviors, such as smoking and substance abuse, yet there is little information about the relationship between optimism and tobacco smoking or substance abuse among high school students.Objectives:
The aim of the present study was to determine the association between optimism or pessimism in predicting tobacco smoking and substance abuse among high school students in southeast of Iran.Methods:
In this study, 1094 students of high schools in Zahedan city, southeast of Iran, were selected using proportionally multi-stage sampling. Cigarette and hookah smoking status, substance abuse, optimism, and other potential confounders were measured using a self-administered questionnaire. The data were analyzed using chi-square, analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests and ordinal logistic regression in Stata.14 software.Results:
According to the results of present study, the prevalence of cigarette smoking and ever hookah smoking was 32.7% and 36.1%, respectively. About 11.2% of students had used at least one illicit drug. After controlling potential confounders, optimism score was negatively related to cigarette smoking stages (OR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.97) and illicit drugs use (OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.96) yet was not associated with hookah smoking (OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.31).Conclusions:
Optimism and pessimism have an important role in tendency of students to tobacco smoking and substance abuse. On the other hand, the co-occurrence of smoking and substance abuse is high among students with low optimism scores. Therefore, educating and consulting students regarding positivism and promising could prevent from smoking and substance abuse and probably transition to higher stages.Keywords
1. Background
Behavioral decisions by human in daily life, including smoking and drug abuse, are influenced by personality traits (1, 2). On the other hand, in the transition of individuals to a new context, such as high school, particularly with new levels of behavioral freedom, personality could play a particularly important role in influencing their behavior (3). It seems that one of these personality indicators is optimism or pessimism. As a definition, optimism is the expectation of positive future events and it is related to good psychological functioning, effective coping with stress, and physical health (4, 5).
The relationship between optimism and psychological and physical well-being, have been shown in different studies (6, 7). A study by Kubzansky et al. showed that pessimism is a risk factor for coronary heart disease (8). Additionally, according to the results of the Woman’s Health Initiative (WHI) study, optimism is associated with the occurrence of coronary heart disease, postmenopausal mortality, and depression (9, 10). Moreover, unhealthy dietary, alcohol consumption, smoking, and high body mass index have also been associated with low optimism scores (5).
Based on reports of the World Health Organization (WHO), tobacco use, as the most preventable cause of death, disability, and economic pasting, is a global public health challenge around the world (11). Initiation of tobacco smoking in adolescence increases the probability of smoking in adulthood (12). According to previous studies, individuals, who have smoked during youth are five times more likely to continue to smoke and those, who started smoking in early adolescence are more likely to become heavy smokers in later life (13).
It must be mentioned that the prevalence of tobacco smoking among students and adolescents in Iran and around the world, has been reported differently in the literature, ranging from 5.9% to 56% in different studies (14-22). However, there is an increasing trend in smoking prevalence in Iranian adolescents and the rate of becoming a smoker is high among Iranian adolescents (23). Therefore, developing prevention programs to decrease smoking in high schools is necessary. On the other hand, the development of prevention programs is fundamentally needed for a better understanding of factors related to tobacco smoking and illicit drug use in adolescents. However, some earlier studies have shown psychological and social factors related to smoking onset and smoking status (24-26), yet there is a paucity of research regarding the association between optimism, tobacco smoking, and substance use in adolescents, therefore the aim of the current study was to examine the association between optimism and smoking and substance abuse in a large sample of high school male and female students in southeast of Iran. The results of this study could provide up to date data for authorities regarding the association between optimism and risky behaviors among students.
2. Objectives
The aim of the present study was to determine the association between optimism or pessimism in predicting tobacco smoking and substance abuse among high school students in Zahedan city, southeast of Iran. The results of this study, as the first study in this region, could also provide the basis for comparison in future epidemiological studies.
3. Methods
This cross-sectional study was carried out on 1094 male and female high school students in grade 2 in Zahedan city, southeast of Iran, from May 2018 to July 2018. The sample size was calculated and estimated considering to α = 0.05, d = 0.03, and P = 0.17 (based on a previous study in Iran). Firstly, the sample size was estimated as n = 602. Due to cluster sampling with design effect of 1.4 and percentage of drop out equal to 30%, the sample size increased to 1094. The participants were selected based on a multi-stage proportional cluster sampling method. First, a list of high schools in Zahedan city was provided from education organization. Then, the schools were stratified in eight stratums based on district (two education districts in Zahedan city), gender (male and female high schools), and administration (private and governmental). In the next step, one to three high schools (as cluster or clusters) were selected randomly using simple random sampling from each stratum according to proportion of students. Finally, based on the needed sample size, one or two classes of students in grade two were selected randomly from each school. In this study, those, who were unwilling to participate or were absent at the time of the study, were excluded. The data were collected using an anonymous, self-administered questionnaire by three experts in MSc degree. It should be noted that initially all students were explained completely regarding the objectives of this research. The questionnaire consisted of items on demographic and socio-economic characteristics, optimism, cigarette, and hookah smoking status, illicit drug use, and potential covariates (e.g., having smoker friend(s) and having smoker members in the family). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Zahedan University of Medical Sciences and the Research Committee of the Sistan and Baluchistan Province Education Organization.
Optimism questionnaire is a 48-item instrument designed to evaluate the causal explanation for positive and negative events. This questionnaire has three dimensions, including internality (internal-external), stability (stable-unstable), and globality (global-specific). Each dimension is assessed by an equal number of items for positive and negative situations (n = 8). In the mentioned questionnaire, the internal, stable, and global attribution of causality to the situation was granted a score of one and each external, unstable, and specific attribution was granted a score of zero. The optimism questionnaire has demonstrated good criterion-related reliability, test-retest reliability, and moderate internal consistency in the previous study (27). However, regarding the validity of optimism questionnaire and questionnaire for cigarette and hookah smoking status, illicit drug was approved with at least 0.88 content validity index (CVI) for every question by eight expert individuals. The reliability of the two mentioned questionnaires was approved by Cronbach’s alpha = 0.92 and 0.78, respectively, in 33 students.
Regarding the determination of cigarette smoking status among students, the subjects were classified as never cigarette smokers if they reported that they have never tried a cigarette, even a puff; cigarette experimenters, if they reported they have tried cigarette smoking, even a few puffs, but smoked less than 100 cigarettes in their lifetime; and regular cigarette smoker if they reported they have smoked 100 cigarettes or more in their lifetime, irrespective of current smoking status. On the other hand, never hookah smokers were those, who reported that they have never tried hookah, even a puff; hookah experimenters were those, who reported that they have tried hookah (even a puff) or have smoked hookah occasionally; and regular hookah smokers were those, who reported that they smoke hookah at least once per month. The students were classified as illicit drug users if they had used opium, cannabis, ecstasy, and methamphetamine at least one time in their lifetime. The socioeconomic status (SES) was determined through principal component analysis (PCA). Using this method, five dependent variables, including father’s educational level (FE), mother’s educational level (ME), family assets (FA), and family income (FI) were summarized in one main component presented below:
This component explained 71.0% of the variance. Using the 25th and 75th percentiles of the principal component of socio-economic status, the subjects were divided to three different SES levels: high, medium, and low.
3.1. Statistical Analysis
The chi-square test was used to assess the relationship between tobacco use or illicit drug abuse status and qualitative independent variables. The relationship between optimism and tobacco use or illicit drug abuse status was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and independent samples t-tests. Ordinal logistic regression was used for multiple analyses. Directed acyclic graph (DAG) was used to determine potential confounders. The data were analyzed by Stata.14 software with P < 0.05 significant level.
4. Results
In this study, 613 (56%) of students were male and 481 (46%) were female. The present study showed that 67.3% (n = 736), 22.6% (n = 247), and 10.1% (n = 111) of the students were never cigarette smokers, cigarette experimenters, and regular cigarette smokers, respectively. Regarding hookah use, 63.9% (n = 699) of students never smoked hookah, 27.9% (n = 305) were hookah experimenters, and 8.2% (n = 90) were regular hookah smokers (smoking hookah at least once per month). In terms of substance abuse, about 11.2% (n = 123) of the subjects had reported using some kind of illicit drug during their lifetime. The chi-square test showed that the distribution of students with regular cigarette smokers (P = 0.002), students with regular hookah smokers (P = 0.04), and students with experience of some kind of illicit drug during their lifetime (P = 0.012) among males was significantly more than females (Table 1).
The Distribution of Regular Smoker, Regular Hookah Smoker and Illicit Drug Use According to Demographic Variables and Other Characteristics of the High School Students in Zahedan, Southeast of Irana
| Characteristics | No. | Regular Smoker | P Value | Regular Hookah Smoker n (%) | P Value | Illicit Drug Use | P Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | ||||
| Male | 613 | 89 (14.5) | 70 (11.4) | 96 (15.6) | |||
| Female | 481 | 22 (4.6) | 20 (4.1) | 27 (5.6) | |||
| Socioeconomic status | 0.041 | 0.57 | 0.05 | ||||
| Low | 463 | 78 (16.8) | 37 (7.9) | 69 (14.9) | |||
| Middle | 501 | 33 (6.6) | 41 (8.1) | 39 (7.8) | |||
| High | 130 | 10 (7.6) | 12 (9.2) | 15 (11.5) | |||
| Having smoker friend(s) | 0.001 | 0.03 | 0.001 | ||||
| No | 831 | 53 (6.3) | 58 (6.9) | 54 (6.5) | |||
| Yes | 263 | 58 (22) | 32 (12.1) | 69 (26.2) | |||
| Having smoker in the family | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.001 | ||||
| No | 763 | 49 (6.4) | 50 (6.5) | 47 (6.1) | |||
| Yes | 331 | 62 (18.8) | 40 (12.1) | 76 (22.9) | |||
| Living with parents | 0.0001 | 0.001 | 0.0001 | ||||
| No | 93 | 27 (29) | 19 (20.4) | 28 (30.1) | |||
| Yes | 1001 | 84 (8.3) | 71 (7.0) | 95 (9.5) | |||
| General risk tacking behaviors | 0.001 | 0.01 | 0.049 | ||||
| No | 810 | 48 (5.9) | 55 (6.8) | 81 (10.0) | |||
| Yes | 284 | 63 (22.2) | 35 (12.3) | 42 (14.8) | |||
| Hookah smoking status | 0.0001 | 0.0003 | |||||
| Never smoker | 699 | 50 (7.1) | 60 (8.6) | ||||
| Experimenter | 305 | 31 (10.1) | 35 (11.4) | ||||
| Regular smoker | 90 | 30 (33.3) | 28 (31.1) | ||||
| Cigarette smoking status | 0.0004 | 0.0003 | |||||
| Never smoker | 736 | 34 (4.6) | 59 (8.0) | ||||
| Experimenter | 247 | 26 (10.5) | 29 (11.7) | ||||
| Regular smoker | 111 | 30 (27.0) | 35 (31.5) | ||||
| Illicit drug use status | 0.0001 | 0.001 | |||||
| No | 971 | 76 (7.8) | 62 (6.4) | ||||
| Yes | 123 | 35 (28.4) | 28 (22.7) | ||||
| Previous year average grade | 0.1 | 0.01 | 0.01 | ||||
| > 15 | 535 | 50 (9.3) | 31 (5.8) | 39 (7.3) | |||
| < 14.9 | 559 | 61 (10.9) | 59 (10.5) | 84 (15.0) |
The frequency distribution of cigarette smoking status, hookah smoking status, and illicit drug use according to characteristics and some independent variables are shown in Table 1. As the presented result indicate in Table 1, in addition to gender, the variables, including having smoker friend(s), having a smoker in the family, living with parents, general risk-taking behaviors, hookah smoking status, illicit drug use status, and SES were significantly related to regular cigarette smoking in high school students (P < 0.05). With regards to hookah smoking, male students, students with smoker friend(s) and smoker in the family, students with general risk-taking behaviors, regular cigarette smokers and students with history of illicit drug use and low average grade, have a greater chance of becoming regular hookah smokers in the southeast of Iran (P < 0.05). On the other hand, gender, socioeconomic status, having smoker friend(s), having a smoker in the family, living with parents, general risk-taking behaviors, cigarette smoking status, hookah smoking status, and previous year average grade were significantly associated with lifetime illicit drug use (Table 1).
This study indicated that subjects, who had used illicit drugs and regularly used cigarette and hookah smoking had significantly higher scores in the negative-stability and negative-globality domains as well as lower scores in the positive-stability and positive-globality domains (P < 0.05) (Table 2). The total optimism scores according to cigarette and hookah smoking and also illicit drug use status is also shown in Figure 1. According to Figure 1, a lower optimism score is related to higher likelihood of smoking and illicit drugs use among students.
The Mean and Standard Deviation of Optimism Subscale’s Score by Cigarette Smoking Status, Hookah Smoking Status and Illicit Drug Use Among High School Students in Zahedan, Southeast of Irana
| Optimism Dimensions | Cigarette Smoking Status | P Value | Hookah Smoking Status | P Value | Illicit Drug Use | P Value | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Never Smoker | Experimenter | Regular Smoker | Never Smoker | Experimenter | Regular Smoker | No | Yes | ||||
| Positive stability | 4.17 ± 1.28 | 3.71 ± 1.61 | 3.21 ± 1.47 | 0.002 | 3.81 ± 1.09 | 3.50 ± 1.12 | 3.06 ± 1.10 | 0.09 | 3.98 ± 1.22 | 3.20 ± 1.19 | 0.011 |
| Negative stability | 2.11 ± 1.53 | 4.01 ± 1.42 | 4.56 ± 1.71 | 0.002 | 2.91 ± 1.29 | 3.60 ± 1.43 | 4.11 ± 1.55 | 0.001 | 2.39 ±1.30 | 4.20 ± 1.61 | 0.001 |
| Positive globality | 4.24 ± 1.05 | 3.22 ± 1.14 | 2.21 ± 1.50 | 0.01 | 4.33 ± 1.49 | 4.13 ± 1.34 | 3.05 ± 1.66 | 0.05 | 4.51 ±1.29 | 3.17 ± 1.09 | 0.713 |
| Negative globality | 2.56 ± 1.17 | 2.61 ± 1.44 | 2.52 ±1.71 | 0.092 | 2.72 ± 1.33 | 2.90 ± 1.09 | 3.81 ±1.51 | 0.01 | 2.88 ± 1.29 | 3.03 ± 1.31 | 0.001 |
| Positive internality | 4.73 ±1.42 | 4.09 ± 1.53 | 3.29 ± 1.44 | 0.001 | 4.45 ± 1.41 | 4.13 ± 1.35 | 4.02 ± 1.22 | 0.006 | 4.32 ± 1.20 | 3.86 ± 1.22 | 0.041 |
| Negative internality | 3.77 ± 1.1 | 3.79 ± 1.42 | 3.99 ± 1.11 | 0.59 | 3.65 ± 1.43 | 3.71 ± 1.66 | 3.79 ± 1.31 | 0.401 | 3.71 ± 1.26 | 3.88 ± 1.33 | 0.121 |
| Total optimism score | 4.29 ± 2.51 | 3.01 ± 1.17 | 2.01 ± 1.01 | 0.001 | 4.26 ± 2.41 | 3.91 ± 2.05 | 1.99 ±1.03 | 0.01 | 3.84 ± 2.28 | 2.14 ± 1.75 | 0.021 |
Total optimism scores according to cigarette smoking, hookah smoking and illicit drug use status among high school students in Zahedan, southeast of Iran
In the present study, the total optimism score was significantly associated with gender, having smoker friend(s), having smoker in the family, living with parents and previous year average grade (P < 0.05) (Table 3).
The Mean and Standard Deviation of Optimism Total Score by Demographic Variables and Other Characteristics of the High School Students in Zahedan, Southeast of Irana
| Characteristics | Optimism Score | P Value |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | 0.001 | |
| Male | 2.86 ± 1.59 | |
| Female | 4.28 ± 2.33 | |
| Socioeconomic status | 0.311 | |
| Low | 3.37 ± 2.01 | |
| Middle | 3.49 ± 2.22 | |
| High | 3.59 ± 2.11 | |
| Having smoker friend(s) | 0.006 | |
| No | 4.07 ± 2.91 | |
| Yes | 2.76 ± 2.94 | |
| Having smoker in family | 0.007 | |
| No | 3.90 ± 2.44 | |
| Yes | 2.70 ± 2.09 | |
| Living with parents | 0.009 | |
| Yes | 3.79 ± 2.12 | |
| No | 2.38 ± 1.88 | |
| General risk tacking behaviors | 0.77 | |
| No | 3.72 ± 2.21 | |
| Yes | 3.63 ± 2.39 | |
| Previous year average grade | 0.004 | |
| > 15 | 4.32 ± 2.19 | |
| < 14.9 | 3.34 ± 2.51 |
In this study the ordinal logistic regression was fitted to estimate the association between optimism score as the main independent variable and cigarette smoking status, hookah smoking status, and illicit drug use as dependent variables, separately. In this regression model, the relationship between optimism score and dependent variables was adjusted for gender, SES, smoker in the family, and living with parents. According to the results of DAGitty analysis, these mentioned variables are recognized as confounding variables. As the results of the model indicate, higher scores of optimism protect students from being in advanced levels of cigarette smoking (OR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.79 - 0.97, P = 0.05) and illicit drugs use (OR = 0.91 95% CI: 0.70 - 0.96, P = 0.044) in multiple logistic regression analysis (Table 4).
Ordinal and Binary Logistic Regression Analysis of the Relationship Between “Cigarette Smoking Stages” and “Hookah Smoking Status” and “Optimism”
| Optimism Score | Cigarette Smoking Stages | Hookah Smoking Status | Illicit Drug Use | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI)a | P Value | OR (95% CI)a | P Value | OR (95% CI)b | P Value | |
| Univariate analysis | 0.73 (0.52 - 0.96) | 0.041 | 0.87 (0.67 - 0.97) | 0.043 | 0.83 (0.71 - 0.95) | 0.031 |
| Multiple logistic regression analysisc | 0.90 (0.79 - 0.97) | 0.05 | 0.98 (0.82 - 1.31) | 0.19 | 0.91 (0.70 - 0.96) | 0.044 |
5. Discussion
This study showed that the prevalence of ever cigarette smoking, ever hookah smoking, and using at least one illicit drug were 32.7%, 36.1%, and 11.2%, respectively. According to the reports of WHO, the prevalence of tobacco smoking among Iranian adolescents, American adolescents, and England adolescents is about 5.9%, 13.4%, and 7%, respectively (11). On the other hand, a previous study in Iran estimated that the prevalence of cigarette experimenter or regular smoking and hookah smoking in Iranian high school students is 18.4% and 38.2%, respectively (14). Another study from Iran has reported the prevalence of illegal drugs use and cigarette smoking among high school students was 19.2% and 24%, respectively (18). In the study conducted by Momtazi and Rawson in Iran, the lifetime rate of using alcohol was reported as 9.9% and prevalence of opiate use was reported between 1.2% and 8.6% in different parts of the country (20). According to the mentioned data, it could be concluded that the prevalence of cigarette or hookah smoking among high school students in southeast of Iran is rather more than other parts of the country and around the world. On the other hand, in addition to accessibility, the prevalence of illicit drug use in high school students of this region is relatively low.
The present data, however, indicated that most regular cigarette and hookah smokers and also illicit drug users were among male students and students having smoker friend(s) or family members. On the other hand, the non-smoker students and the students that did not use illicit drug were mostly from families with high SES. Also in this study, living with parents, lack of general risk tacking behaviors and higher average grade were related to less likelihood of tobacco smoking and illicit drug use. It should be noted that cigarette smoking, hookah use and illicit drug use were related to each other in this study, so that being in advanced level increased the likelihood of being in advanced stage of other ones. These results are in concordance with results of previous studies in Iran (14, 17, 18, 20, 21).
The main result of this study was the significant relationship between optimism score (as one of personality’s factors) and tobacco smoking or illicit drugs use, so that the never-smokers reported higher optimism score compared with experimenters and regular smokers. This result is in concordance with previous studies from Iran and around the world, and indicates this fact that the students with less optimism are more likely to smoke cigarettes and use illicit drugs (5, 17, 28-30). On the other hand, some studies accomplished that lack of optimism is associated with a collection of unhealthy habits and also positive association of pessimism and smoking (5, 24, 26). However, one study from the United States reported that there is no association between optimism or pessimism and smoking (31). However, this discrepancy may be due to different reasons. The different results could be due to different studied populations. Salgado-García studied the participants aged 22 to 45 years old, yet the present study was carried out on high school students. Moreover, cultural and social differences could also explain these dissimilarities. Another study conducted by Tyc et al. concluded that there is no association between optimism and smoking status (32). However, Tyc et al. used an optimism theory and assessment instrument, which is different from the current study. They used the youth life oriented test (LOT) to explore optimism among adolescents, which is an instrument for assessing dispositional optimism. The LOT refers to generalized outcome expectancies that positive events, rather than negative events, will happen (7). Some studies concluded that histrionic and depressive personalities could be considered as strong associates of smoking and the prevalence of histrionic and depressive personalities is low among optimistic persons (17). Therefore, these is evidence that pessimism could cause smoking or illicit drugs acquisition among adolescents.
The optimism questionnaire in this study was divided to several dimensions, including positive and negative stability, positive and negative globality, and positive and negative internality. In this study, the students, who were in higher levels of cigarette and hookah smoking and those, who had used illicit drugs, had higher scores in the negative-stability dimension and lower scores in negative-globality dimension. Stability refers to perceiving that an outcome is seen as permanent or temporary. Summarily, regular and experimenter smokers and individuals, who have used illicit drugs are more pessimistic than never smokers and students, who have never used illicit drugs. Although according to the results of this study, pessimism may be a risk factor for tobacco smoking, yet longitudinal studies are necessary to consider the risk of pessimism in transition between cigarette smoking, hookah smoking, and illicit drugs use stages among adolescents.
It is clear that personality or optimism is somewhat hereditary, yet it could be formed and learned through social life and social factors (33, 34). Therefore, having effective plans and interventions, such as comprehensive education to improve personality and optimism in adolescents is very important. The high school students and adolescents are at critical ages of smoking behavior initiations and their personality is shaping at these ages, therefore authorities should provide useful alternatives for reducing smoking and substance abuse and eventually promote general health. Generally, positive performance is related to health behaviors (2, 5). Thus, more studies are needed to investigate the effect of optimism and personality in onset and transition of cigarette or hookah smoking status and illicit drugs use, especially among high school students.
A limitation of this study was its cross-sectional design, thus it is not possible to make clear interpretations regarding the causal relationship between smoking and personality. However, further longitudinal studies are required to confirm the findings. On the other hand, a large sample size and high response rate could increase the generalization of this investigation.
5.1. Conclusions
The present large sample study showed that tobacco smoking (especially cigarette smoking) and illicit drug use were generally more frequent among pessimistic male and female students. Otherwise, optimism was found to be a protective factor for high risk behaviors among adolescents. It is evident that primary prevention should be targeted at young people, by enhancing their dispositional optimism and educational sessions and eventually promote healthy behavioral habits.
Acknowledgements
References
-
1.
Ibrahim N, Ismail R, Halim MRTA, Amit N. Personality, high-risk activities and aggressive behaviour among Illegal Street Racers. Mediterr J Soc Sci. 2015. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n5s1p527.
-
2.
Luht K, Eensoo D, Tooding LM, Harro J. The association of measures of the serotonin system, personality, alcohol use, and smoking with risk-taking traffic behavior in adolescents in a longitudinal study. Nord J Psychiatry. 2018;72(1):9-16. [PubMed ID: 28844162]. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2017.1368702.
-
3.
Cyders MA, Flory K, Rainer S, Smith GT. The role of personality dispositions to risky behavior in predicting first-year college drinking. Addiction. 2009;104(2):193-202. [PubMed ID: 19149813]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2653206]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02434.x.
-
4.
Brissette I, Scheier MF, Carver CS. The role of optimism in social network development, coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;82(1):102-11. [PubMed ID: 11811628]. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.102.
-
5.
Kelloniemi H, Ek E, Laitinen J. Optimism, dietary habits, body mass index and smoking among young Finnish adults. Appetite. 2005;45(2):169-76. [PubMed ID: 16009454]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2005.05.001.
-
6.
Conversano C, Rotondo A, Lensi E, Della Vista O, Arpone F, Reda MA. Optimism and its impact on mental and physical well-being. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2010;6:25-9. [PubMed ID: 20592964]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2894461]. https://doi.org/10.2174/1745017901006010025.
-
7.
Carver CS, Scheier MF, Segerstrom SC. Optimism. Clin Psychol Rev. 2010;30(7):879-89. [PubMed ID: 20170998]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4161121]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006.
-
8.
Kubzansky LD, Sparrow D, Vokonas P, Kawachi I. Is the glass half empty or half full? A prospective study of optimism and coronary heart disease in the normative aging study. Psychosom Med. 2001;63(6):910-6. [PubMed ID: 11719629]. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200111000-00009.
-
9.
Tindle HA, Chang YF, Kuller LH, Manson JE, Robinson JG, Rosal MC, et al. Optimism, cynical hostility, and incident coronary heart disease and mortality in the women's health initiative. Circulation. 2009;120(8):656-62. [PubMed ID: 19667234]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2901870]. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.827642.
-
10.
Vahia IV, Meeks TW, Thompson WK, Depp CA, Zisook S, Allison M, et al. Subthreshold depression and successful aging in older women. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;18(3):212-20. [PubMed ID: 20224518]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3937985]. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e3181b7f10e.
-
11.
World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic 2011: Warning about the dangers of tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
-
12.
Reidpath DD, Ling ML, Wellington E, Al-Sadat N, Yasin S. The relationship between age of smoking initiation and current smoking: An analysis of school surveys in three European countries. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(3):729-33. [PubMed ID: 22990215]. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/nts177.
-
13.
Park S. [Smoking behavior and predictors of smoking initiation in childhood and early adolescence]. J Korean Acad Nurs. 2009;39(3):376-85. Korean. [PubMed ID: 19571634]. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2009.39.3.376.
-
14.
Anbarlouei M, Sarbakhsh P, Dadashzadeh H, Ghiasi A, Ataieasl M, Dorosti A, et al. Cigarette and hookah smoking and their relationship with self-esteem and communication skills among high school students. Health Promot Perspect. 2018;8(3):230-6. [PubMed ID: 30087847]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6064751]. https://doi.org/10.15171/hpp.2018.31.
-
15.
Ansari H. Hookah use among youth and young adults: A public health challenge. Health Scope. 2014;3(3). https://doi.org/10.17795/jhealthscope-20632.
-
16.
Ansari H, Ansari-Moghaddam A, Mohammadi M. [Prevalence of substance abuse and associated factors in hookah users]. J Mazandaran Univ Med Sci. 2016;26(136):73-84. Persian.
-
17.
Fakharri A, Jahani A, Sadeghi-Bazargani H, Farahbakhsh M, Asl AM. Personality patterns and smoking behavior among students in Tabriz, Iran. Electron Physician. 2017;9(3):3950-7. [PubMed ID: 28461869]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5407227]. https://doi.org/10.19082/3950.
-
18.
Khajehdaluee M, Zavar A, Alidoust M, Pourandi R. The relation of self-esteem and illegal drug usage in high school students. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2013;15(11). e7682. [PubMed ID: 24719686]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3971778]. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.7682.
-
19.
Lam TH, Stewart SM, Ho LM. Prevalence and correlates of smoking and sexual activity among Hong Kong adolescents. J Adolescent Health. 2001;29(5):352-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1054-139x(01)00301-9.
-
20.
Momtazi S, Rawson R. Substance abuse among Iranian high school students. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010;23(3):221-6. [PubMed ID: 20308905]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4479403]. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0b013e328338630d.
-
21.
World Health Organization. WHO report on the global tobacco epidemic, 2017: Monitoring tobacco use and prevention policies. World Health Organization; 2017.
-
22.
Tarrahi MJ, Mohammadpoorasl A, Ansari H, Mohammadi Y. Substance abuse and its predictors in freshmen students of Lorestan universities: Subgrouping of college students in west of Iran. Health Scope. 2017;In Press(In Press). https://doi.org/10.5812/jhealthscope.64186.
-
23.
Mohammadpoorasl A. Increasing the trend of smoking in Iranian adolescents. Iran J Public Health. 2013;42(10):1197-8. [PubMed ID: 26060632]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4436552].
-
24.
Joffer J, Burell G, Bergstrom E, Stenlund H, Sjors L, Jerden L. Predictors of smoking among Swedish adolescents. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:1296. [PubMed ID: 25518992]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4300986]. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1296.
-
25.
Mohammadpoorasl A, Fakhari A, Rostami F, Shamsipour M, Rashidian H, Goreishizadeh MA. Predictors of transition in different stages of smoking: A longitudinal study. Addict Health. 2010;2(1-2):49-56. [PubMed ID: 24494101]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3905501].
-
26.
Wellman RJ, Dugas EN, Dutczak H, O'Loughlin EK, Datta GD, Lauzon B, et al. Predictors of the onset of cigarette smoking: A systematic review of longitudinal population-based studies in youth. Am J Prev Med. 2016;51(5):767-78. [PubMed ID: 27180028]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2016.04.003.
-
27.
Scholler G, Fliege H, Klapp BF. [Questionnaire of self-efficacy, optimism and pessimism: Reconstruction, selection of items and validation of an instrument by means of examinations of clinical samples]. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 1999;49(8):275-83. German. [PubMed ID: 10488648].
-
28.
Boehm JK, Kubzansky LD. The heart's content: The association between positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health. Psychol Bull. 2012;138(4):655-91. [PubMed ID: 22506752]. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027448.
-
29.
Giltay EJ, Geleijnse JM, Zitman FG, Buijsse B, Kromhout D. Lifestyle and dietary correlates of dispositional optimism in men: The Zutphen Elderly Study. J Psychosom Res. 2007;63(5):483-90. [PubMed ID: 17980220]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.07.014.
-
30.
Steptoe A, Dockray S, Wardle J. Positive affect and psychobiological processes relevant to health. J Pers. 2009;77(6):1747-76. [PubMed ID: 19796062]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2787693]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00599.x.
-
31.
Progovac AM, Chang YF, Chang CH, Matthews KA, Donohue JM, Scheier MF, et al. Are optimism and cynical hostility associated with smoking cessation in older women? Ann Behav Med. 2017;51(4):500-10. [PubMed ID: 28194642]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5554747]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-016-9873-x.
-
32.
Tyc VL, Hadley W, Allen D, Varnell S, Ey S, Rai SN, et al. Predictors of smoking intentions and smoking status among nonsmoking and smoking adolescents. Addict Behav. 2004;29(6):1143-7. [PubMed ID: 15236815]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.03.007.
-
33.
Liu C, Ang RP, Lwin MO. Cognitive, personality, and social factors associated with adolescents' online personal information disclosure. J Adolesc. 2013;36(4):629-38. [PubMed ID: 23849657]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.03.016.
-
34.
Meevissen YM, Peters ML, Alberts HJ. Become more optimistic by imagining a best possible self: Effects of a two week intervention. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011;42(3):371-8. [PubMed ID: 21450262]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.012.